You.In post 116, YellowSnow wrote:@COA you're scumreadinge me for being concerned with OMGUSing or your're scumreading the person OMGUSing?
...Tryharding? Really? Are you trying to tell me that itIn post 122, Slaxx wrote:Yeah no. It looks more like tryharding.In post 119, CultOfAthena wrote:He's obviously joking – even I can pick up on that. I think the fact that he feels comfortable enough to do... all of that... is town-indicative.
I was just wanting to talk to you, too – I feel like you've made two pretty bad votes so far. Not sure how you're seeing Ironman scum. Pushing him for the "Dunn scum if YS scum" comment I just can't understand. Feels more like you're just pushing a newbie rather than pushing something actually scummy.
Also, I literally made the distinction of the difference between pushing him as a noob and pushing him as scummy. I think you need to reread and address my points individually instead of parroting his narrative.
Let's review your points:
74
- "I have a hard time believing you actually believed what you said about Dunn." Okay, I don't.
- "Also instead of prying at motivation you’re just playing the victim, which is solidifying my read on you." I think it's reasonable for a newbie to have the thought in 67. I'll be straight up and say that I agree that 72 is pretty bad, but individually I don't necessarily think it's incredibly scum-indicative.
- "Ironman you’re not even trying to discern the alignment of people on your wagon. You’re either calling them scum or asking loaded questions you already have the answer to." I think that a feeling of being attacked by scum when voting is reasonable for a newbie.
I don't want everything I'm doing here to overstate the degree of a townread that I have on Ironman – I simply don't believe that your arguments for Ironman!scum are very reliable.