Merchant's Daughter [Game Restart!]

Adelbert Steiner · Post Post #10 (isolation #0) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 2:11 pm

In post 4, Jibril wrote:Innocent Flugel seeks Master.

I do not know what a flugel is!

Adelbert Steiner · Post Post #25 (isolation #1) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 2:20 pm

In post 21, Jibril wrote:
In post 10, Adelbert Steiner wrote:
In post 4, Jibril wrote:Innocent Flugel seeks Master.
I do not know what a flugel is!
Oh, Want to learn?

Indeed, I would!

Adelbert Steiner · Post Post #40 (isolation #2) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 2:27 pm

In post 34, Firebringer wrote:
In post 28, Ankamius wrote:Read the setup fire
I DIDNT EXPECT FAKEGOD TO CHANGE THE SETUP!

ALSO WOULDNT IT MAKE MORE SENSE FOR THE GENTLEMEN TO HAVE THE COIN!?

No, it follows the marriage system of the older days where the father of the bride gives some property with his daughter. It was a business transaction more than anything else in the past!

Adelbert Steiner · Post Post #47 (isolation #3) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 2:29 pm

In post 43, Firebringer wrote:ohh I thought the transaction was you gave money to get the bride. It was the other way around?

Indeed it was!

The groom took the daughter off the father's hands to care for, the father then, in return, threw a lavish party. That's also why tradition is that the bride's family pays for the wedding.

Adelbert Steiner · Post Post #59 (isolation #4) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 2:34 pm

In post 52, Jibril wrote:
In post 25, Adelbert Steiner wrote:
In post 21, Jibril wrote:
In post 10, Adelbert Steiner wrote:
In post 4, Jibril wrote:Innocent Flugel seeks Master.
I do not know what a flugel is!
Oh, Want to learn?
Indeed, I would!
We are the sixth ranked race of the exceed, far superior to you. You may think of me as an angel, or a demon, per your preference. If you betray me, I will smite you.

Are humans the seventh ranked?

Adelbert Steiner · Post Post #68 (isolation #5) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 2:37 pm

In post 63, Jibril wrote:
In post 59, Adelbert Steiner wrote:
In post 52, Jibril wrote:
In post 25, Adelbert Steiner wrote:
In post 21, Jibril wrote:
In post 10, Adelbert Steiner wrote:
In post 4, Jibril wrote:Innocent Flugel seeks Master.
I do not know what a flugel is!
Oh, Want to learn?
Indeed, I would!
We are the sixth ranked race of the exceed, far superior to you. You may think of me as an angel, or a demon, per your preference. If you betray me, I will smite you.
Are humans the seventh ranked?
16th, the lowest rank. Are you one?

Yes, but if it helps, I am the Captain of the Knights of Pluto!

Adelbert Steiner · Post Post #72 (isolation #6) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 2:42 pm

In post 69, Jibril wrote:
In post 68, Adelbert Steiner wrote:
In post 63, Jibril wrote:
In post 59, Adelbert Steiner wrote:
In post 52, Jibril wrote:
In post 25, Adelbert Steiner wrote:
In post 21, Jibril wrote:
In post 10, Adelbert Steiner wrote:
In post 4, Jibril wrote:Innocent Flugel seeks Master.
I do not know what a flugel is!
Oh, Want to learn?
Indeed, I would!
We are the sixth ranked race of the exceed, far superior to you. You may think of me as an angel, or a demon, per your preference. If you betray me, I will smite you.
Are humans the seventh ranked?
16th, the lowest rank. Are you one?
Yes, but if it helps, I am the Captain of the Knights of Pluto!
I'm sorry to hear that. Please tell me more about your knights.

We are sworn to protect the Princess!

We are definitely more competent than General Beatrix's soldiers!

Adelbert Steiner · Post Post #87 (isolation #7) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 2:50 pm

In post 81, Slaxx wrote:
In post 80, Firebringer wrote:
In post 32, Firebringer wrote:
In post 30, Slaxx wrote:I think FB is town for asking that question compulsively. I feel like Mafia checks first here just in case they feel like not knowing would AI them somehow.
I got townread before as scum because of posts like this mr duckie. U ain't going to pocket me this way.
Ohhh shit. This was from Slaxx.

My mind just played tricks on me
I was seriously wondering why you called ME duckie but I thought maybe you called everyone duckie *shrug*

Also, the worst is a goose right now.

Adelbert Steiner · Post Post #99 (isolation #8) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 2:56 pm

I have not played this before, but I believe that we should probably come together and decide who is the scummiest gentleman first, that gentleman will be eliminated by not having a dance partner. After that, I am going to be learning whilst doing.

So far, my only read is Slaxx as a townlean.

Adelbert Steiner · Post Post #105 (isolation #9) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 2:59 pm

In post 102, Krazy wrote:But the real question is, are you having fun Adelbert?

Indeed!

Adelbert Steiner · Post Post #134 (isolation #10) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 3:27 pm

In post 132, the worst wrote:the only time I've seen you be this lolconfident about a read was an s/s so you're heavily pinging me with this shit

How would this be s/s, though?

Are you claiming scum right now Sir Goose?

Adelbert Steiner · Post Post #139 (isolation #11) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 3:32 pm

In post 135, the worst wrote:
In post 134, Adelbert Steiner wrote:
In post 132, the worst wrote:the only time I've seen you be this lolconfident about a read was an s/s so you're heavily pinging me with this shit
How would this be s/s, though?

Are you claiming scum right now Sir Goose?
what do you think?

I believe that would be playing against your win condition. However, you are also saying that he's lolconfident in a scum/scum situation, so, this would not be analogous unless you are both scum, I believe.

Adelbert Steiner · Post Post #153 (isolation #12) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 3:42 pm

I am fairly confident that the worst has attempted to throw off a read by firebringer using what is referred to as a chainsaw method. Instead of defending his play, he has attacked his accuser's play. I still do not believe that a scum v. scum can be analogous where a 1v1 is involved with you.

Adelbert Steiner · Post Post #154 (isolation #13) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 3:43 pm

Firebringer is likely town in this exchange.

Adelbert Steiner · Post Post #165 (isolation #14) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 3:47 pm

In post 163, Slaxx wrote:
In post 161, the worst wrote:
In post 157, Slaxx wrote:
In post 156, the worst wrote:
In post 152, Slaxx wrote:
In post 149, the worst wrote:
In post 148, Firebringer wrote:the read is genuine

In post 11, Firebringer wrote:This is a Trust Tell. A bannable offense and needs to be removed from the game.
Was this in reference to our mindmeld or separate?
separate
it was a shitpost
lol

do u see what i see
I'm suddenly starting to think maybe not
Wait you're not on Adel SR?

It is funny to me that once again you have scum read me, and it matters not what account I am on.

Adelbert Steiner · Post Post #170 (isolation #15) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 3:50 pm

In post 168, the worst wrote:@Albert are you an outed alt?

No. And I will not be outed.

A man is allowed his secrets.

Adelbert Steiner · Post Post #174 (isolation #16) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 3:52 pm

In post 172, the worst wrote:
In post 170, Adelbert Steiner wrote:
In post 168, the worst wrote:@Albert are you an outed alt?
No. And I will not be outed.

A man is allowed his secrets.
Yeah that's fine

Throwaway comments like the one you made to slaxx just then kinda murky out ability to read you without actually adding any benefit. It's kinda like those arguments like "I haven't done anything AI so far, how dare you scumread me" if that makes sense

If you're a hidden alt please don't tease with meta

If you insist. I will simply laugh at the jokes on my own.

Adelbert Steiner · Post Post #181 (isolation #17) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 3:55 pm

In post 175, the worst wrote:
In post 153, Adelbert Steiner wrote:I am fairly confident that the worst has attempted to throw off a read by firebringer using what is referred to as a chainsaw method. Instead of defending his play, he has attacked his accuser's play. I still do not believe that a scum v. scum can be analogous where a 1v1 is involved with you.
Elements of this are probably fairly reasonable but literally the last time I saw him as scum he came out the gates swinging at a scumbuddy to manipulate the gamestate into a massive annoying 1v1

It was a scum motivated behaviour

he's actually pretending to have reasoning here but I don't think his reasoning is consistent with reality which is not directly analogous but I think it's very worth mentioning

Do you think it's fair to suggest that I've been posting the way he claimed and I'm scum because of it?

If my memory serves correctly, you are fairly prone to fluff posting early on.

However, I would like to see this prior game to pass judgment for myself. Could you direct me to it?

Adelbert Steiner · Post Post #193 (isolation #18) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 3:59 pm

In post 188, the worst wrote:
In post 181, Adelbert Steiner wrote:
In post 175, the worst wrote:
In post 153, Adelbert Steiner wrote:I am fairly confident that the worst has attempted to throw off a read by firebringer using what is referred to as a chainsaw method. Instead of defending his play, he has attacked his accuser's play. I still do not believe that a scum v. scum can be analogous where a 1v1 is involved with you.
Elements of this are probably fairly reasonable but literally the last time I saw him as scum he came out the gates swinging at a scumbuddy to manipulate the gamestate into a massive annoying 1v1

It was a scum motivated behaviour

he's actually pretending to have reasoning here but I don't think his reasoning is consistent with reality which is not directly analogous but I think it's very worth mentioning

Do you think it's fair to suggest that I've been posting the way he claimed and I'm scum because of it?
If my memory serves correctly, you are fairly prone to fluff posting early on.

However, I would like to see this prior game to pass judgment for myself. Could you direct me to it?
How much experience do you have with me?

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=76441
This is the one.

Extensive.

Adelbert Steiner · Post Post #222 (isolation #19) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 4:10 pm

In post 197, the worst wrote:Can you talk me through why you felt FireB's points against me as town were valid then? don't feel the need to wallpost just elaborate a little.

Let me begin by saying that I do not understand, when one gentleman could be ejected by not having a partner, why you would accept without information.

Furthermore, I am not positive I had the same feelings of genuine attempts to suss out who is and is not scum based upon your previous posts between the fluff. Whilst I have seen both your scum and town games, your town games have a different tone where you are relaxed but pretty early on show some thought into gamesolving, when you are scum, you have tended to go for many fluff posts with no explained analysis, simply providing reads. Therefore, while you are fairly fluff post heavy as both scum and town, someone else needed to engage you other than firebringer for me to see whether this was town or scum levels of fluff posting. Seeing as how I can only control my own actions, I decided to interject any way I could to see if you would engage so I could develop my personal day 1 read of you.

Adelbert Steiner · Post Post #862 (isolation #20) » Wed Jan 30, 2019 10:45 am

@FakeGod I just got assigned to a trial at work, V/LA until Monday, please

Adelbert Steiner · Post Post #868 (isolation #21) » Wed Jan 30, 2019 10:59 am

In post 863, Slaxx wrote:Oh... I might know who Adel is, and if so, not cool Re: referencing an ongoing game. If not, ignore I guess.

Game I was specifically thinking of was about a year ago and was abandoned by the mod. Were you not dog person in that game, if you are so sure who I am?

Adelbert Steiner · Post Post #874 (isolation #22) » Wed Jan 30, 2019 11:03 am

In post 872, Slaxx wrote:
In post 868, Adelbert Steiner wrote:
In post 863, Slaxx wrote:Oh... I might know who Adel is, and if so, not cool Re: referencing an ongoing game. If not, ignore I guess.
Game I was specifically thinking of was about a year ago and was abandoned by the mod. Were you not dog person in that game, if you are so sure who I am?
Nah fam. I’ve only been back three months or so.

My last game before that was like... 2013 or 2012 or something.

Then I must withdraw my previous joking reference. I remember a dog in 2018. I am bad with names, not so much with images.

Now I must get back to deposition reading!