Merchant's Daughter [Game Restart!]

Dunnstral · Post Post #350 (ISO) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:04 pm

In post 345, Slaxx wrote:
In post 341, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 338, Slaxx wrote:She even said "want to find out" trying to goad him in to it.
So... she was trying to get him to dance? So what's the issue
...

seriously?

The issue is the only effort up until then was securing a partner when there was stuff of substance happening elsewhere. That's the issue.

And as I've said i think twice now, scum would be more interested in being left out than town would.

There are 9 gents and 8 ladies, barring shenanigans Jibril wouldn't need to worry about being left out

I don't think Jibril's posts are very indicative

Slaxx wrote:
In post 343, Dunnstral wrote:All of Jibril's posts are roleplaying
Does she always roleplay as someone doing something that would benefit scum while also not giving reads?

Never seen her before

Slaxx · Post Post #351 (ISO) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:06 pm

In post 350, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 345, Slaxx wrote:
In post 341, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 338, Slaxx wrote:She even said "want to find out" trying to goad him in to it.
So... she was trying to get him to dance? So what's the issue
...

seriously?

The issue is the only effort up until then was securing a partner when there was stuff of substance happening elsewhere. That's the issue.

And as I've said i think twice now, scum would be more interested in being left out than town would.
There are 9 gents and 8 ladies, barring shenanigans Jibril wouldn't need to worry about being left out

I don't think Jibril's posts are very indicative

Slaxx wrote:
In post 343, Dunnstral wrote:All of Jibril's posts are roleplaying
Does she always roleplay as someone doing something that would benefit scum while also not giving reads?
Never seen her before

That's valid for Jibril, now, onto Adel?

mcqueen · Post Post #352 (ISO) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:06 pm

@Mod: V/LA until Friday, please

I'll be periodically reading the thread tonight

Slaxx · Post Post #353 (ISO) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:07 pm

You're dismissing valid concerns way too quickly to be town, IMO.

Dunnstral · Post Post #354 (ISO) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:08 pm

I don't have anything to say about your push on Adel, it's not incorrect like I think it is for Jibril, I still gut townread them and think town can be hesitant to want to form a pair, especially a hydra who may want to consult their other head

Dunnstral · Post Post #355 (ISO) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:08 pm

In post 353, Slaxx wrote:You're dismissing valid concerns way too quickly to be town, IMO.

I don't think your push on Jibril was a valid concern

Slaxx · Post Post #356 (ISO) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:10 pm

In post 355, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 353, Slaxx wrote:You're dismissing valid concerns way too quickly to be town, IMO.
I don't think your push on Jibril was a valid concern

You're right, I derped and forgot Jibril wouldn't be left out.

That doesn't change how you came in and immediately waived off FB as lynchbait then have I think twice now misunderstood my point about Adel.

Slaxx · Post Post #357 (ISO) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:11 pm

In post 354, Dunnstral wrote:I don't have anything to say about your push on Adel, it's not incorrect like I think it is for Jibril, I still gut townread them and think town can be hesitant to want to form a pair, especially a hydra who may want to consult their other head

Its not the hesitancy to form the pair, its the focus or the effort on it in proportion to the level of other useful activity

What the everloving hell is opaque about that point

Dunnstral · Post Post #358 (ISO) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:11 pm

What I'm doing isn't "dismissing concerns"

I explained why I don't think it is correct, is there a problem with my analysis on Jibril?

Their account name is an anime character, matching their picture, and they don't seem 100% serious

Slaxx · Post Post #359 (ISO) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:12 pm

In post 358, Dunnstral wrote:What I'm doing isn't "dismissing concerns"

I explained why I don't think it is correct, is there a problem with my analysis on Jibril?

Their account name is an anime character, matching their picture, and they don't seem 100% serious

I literally just conceded the Jibril point.

Slaxx · Post Post #360 (ISO) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:13 pm

And it LITERALLY does not change a damn thing about the Adel point. Jib-town just makes that point stronger. I mean christ.

Didn't you open with a snarky tiny mind comment?

Dunnstral · Post Post #361 (ISO) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:13 pm

In post 359, Slaxx wrote:I literally just conceded the Jibril point.

And then you said:

In post 353, Slaxx wrote:You're dismissing valid concerns way too quickly to be town, IMO.

Slaxx · Post Post #362 (ISO) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:14 pm

THEN I SAID:

In post 356, Slaxx wrote:
In post 355, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 353, Slaxx wrote:You're dismissing valid concerns way too quickly to be town, IMO.
I don't think your push on Jibril was a valid concern

You're right, I derped and forgot Jibril wouldn't be left out.

That doesn't change how you came in and immediately waived off FB as lynchbait then have I think twice now misunderstood my point about Adel.

Firebringer · Post Post #363 (ISO) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:16 pm

when you see people argue over nothing

Dunnstral · Post Post #364 (ISO) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:16 pm

OK. So what's the problem? That I don't agree with your read on Adel?

Your analysis is fine, maybe he can come in and defend himself, It's just not enough to convince me. It's something that he

may

be doing, circumstantial evidence at best

Ankamius · Post Post #365 (ISO) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:17 pm

this feels very tvt

Slaxx · Post Post #366 (ISO) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:19 pm

In post 364, Dunnstral wrote:OK. So what's the problem? That I don't agree with your read on Adel?

Your analysis is fine, maybe he can come in and defend himself, It's just not enough to convince me. It's something that he
may
be doing, circumstantial evidence at best

Its your overall entrance and oddly confident posting, I sometimes get you confused with dannflor but I just checked and I'm not, I just expected you to be a lot different and for us to agree more. But yeah, part of it is just the lack of any specific rebuttal to Adel, and also townreading easily.

Dunnstral · Post Post #367 (ISO) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:21 pm

I don't disagree with your analysis on Adel, it may or may not be scum motivated, I wouldn't bet my coin(s) on it

Slaxx · Post Post #368 (ISO) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:22 pm

okay

I was going to go on about how two people dismissing this argument made me even more paranoid but I have a TR on Ank and a middling read on FB so I probably just need to step away and come back tomorrow, I may be tunnelling.

Firebringer · Post Post #369 (ISO) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:25 pm

In post 368, Slaxx wrote:okay

I was going to go on about how two people dismissing this argument made me even more paranoid but I have a TR on Ank and a middling read on FB so I probably just need to step away and come back tomorrow, I may be tunnelling.

have a good night buddy

Ankamius · Post Post #370 (ISO) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:31 pm

In post 368, Slaxx wrote:okay

I was going to go on about how two people dismissing this argument made me even more paranoid but I have a TR on Ank and a middling read on FB so I probably just need to step away and come back tomorrow, I may be tunnelling.

I think you are honestly

I have the impression that you sincerely believe what you're saying but that it's not something that needs to be pushed

and I'm also getting the impression that Dunnstral sees it the same way and is responding appropriately

mcqueen · Post Post #371 (ISO) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:37 pm

In post 352, mcqueen wrote:
@Mod: V/LA until Friday, please

I'll be periodically reading the thread tonight

Scratch this; I'll catch up Thursday afternoon

Celica · Post Post #372 (ISO) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:39 pm

I'm a bit late to the party, (or should I say dance.) I will not be claiming how many coins I have, as I think that's the wrong way to play this.

Celica · Post Post #373 (ISO) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:46 pm

In post 5, Ankamius wrote:Are we planning on strategizing coin amount at all, because I'm going to be very picky with who I accept as a partner thanks to that mechanic

Exactly why we shouldn't claim our coins. I don't think coin count should go into who we partner. I've spectated a few of these and I think a lot of the most telling interactions are pre-dance. I can see some gents/ladies wanting to put a pair together based on coin count. That can easily be said by town or scum, but I feel it takes away a bit of reasoning and scumhunting. So I would rather we just not do it at all

In post 22, Ankamius wrote:Okay

I'm mainly asking because I'm the 8 coin lady, so whoever my partner is gets some pretty spicy voting power this game

And tbh regardless of what people think, I'd rather just not accept a partner than specifically partner with someone I find scummy

So keep that in mind

. Well um, I understand why you were worried, but I don't think you should've claimed that so fast even if your intent was to claim sometime. I FOS this a bit mostly because being it can set Ankamius with her ideal partner as scum. Even if town wanted to claim the high coin count (and I can understand why.) Doing it this early just doesn't seem correct, along with the timing of the 2 posts. It's meh.

Celica · Post Post #374 (ISO) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:51 pm

In post 41, the worst wrote:Ohhh find 3 t/t pairings we're communally confident on then we can just nuke the others and either win or find the deepwolf/ves?

While it

is

that simple on paper, it's likely the 3 pairings we choose won't be the ones at end game. Due to a ton of factors.

In post 46, Firebringer wrote:
In post 37, the worst wrote:
In post 34, Firebringer wrote:
In post 28, Ankamius wrote:Read the setup fire
I DIDNT EXPECT FAKEGOD TO CHANGE THE SETUP!

ALSO WOULDNT IT MAKE MORE SENSE FOR THE GENTLEMEN TO HAVE THE COIN!?
SEXIST
I'll walk out to rid these good people of your bigotry

NOT IF I LEAVE YOU FIRST YOU CLASSY LADY!

I can't wait for fire and the worst to be one of the last pairings alive.