In post 768, Allomancer wrote:Well if you don't read, how is any conversation supposed to have a basis? "Go read" is not a basis, but actually reading is.
Dude like you just don't seem to get it.
At all. Anything. I don't fundamentally know how your mind works at all and you frustrate me because you like see shit in such a twisted way that in my eyes distorts the very nature of what it is. And I try to pear through the glasses and see anything and I can't. What are you responding to? What do you think I was saying?
Like I am not saying reading isn't necessary but for some reason you add in that as though you dispute me while not disputing me and I don't think you even realize what you are responding to?
This is how things played out:
I asked the worst why he was reading you as town.
The worst says "well go read his ISO"
I respond by saying "Well I am not going to go read that" with what I should have should have added "why won't you tell me why you are reading him as town because i asked you"
He then tells me I am breaking the flow of conversation basically and destroying good faith.
I then point out, he broke the conversation by not answering me directly and pushing me to go do something without actually addressing what he said. You could say he did so because he actually thought me reading your ISO would give me the answer, but i wanted his answer. Not just reading posts.
So fucking communication breaks down. At what point? Well FMPOV it was when the worst told me to read an ISO and from his when i said i am not going to go read an ISO like that is a substitue for his answer.
It would be like if we were in a courtroom and we asked a witness a question and they responded "Well go read X. Its there". No, I want your fucking answer to the question.
