I kinda would like a bit more discussion before anyone who could plausibly be in the top 6 pairs first of all, which is probably the only reason I haven't offered yetIn post 864, Slaxx wrote:Does anyone have issues with Slaxx/Dunn?
I never said that thoughIn post 873, the worst wrote:About the same place as your suggestion that this entire phase is worthlessIn post 869, Dunnstral wrote:And I don't feel as comfortable about you as I do about fire. Where's my veto power?In post 866, the worst wrote:I don't feel nearly as comfortable about Dunn as I do about you famIn post 864, Slaxx wrote:Nancy, you can be the one that got away <3
Does anyone have issues with Slaxx/Dunn?
In the dumpster
I actually think it makes sense historically for it to be the ladies with the coins. Dowries and all that.In post 34, Firebringer wrote:I DIDNT EXPECT FAKEGOD TO CHANGE THE SETUP!In post 28, Ankamius wrote:Read the setup fire
ALSO WOULDNT IT MAKE MORE SENSE FOR THE GENTLEMEN TO HAVE THE COIN!?
Fam u calling my scum game weakIn post 875, Krazy wrote:I kinda would like a bit more discussion before anyone who could plausibly be in the top 6 pairs first of all, which is probably the only reason I haven't offered yetIn post 864, Slaxx wrote:Does anyone have issues with Slaxx/Dunn?
Beyond that, Dunn's BoP as scum is significantly higher than yours which would mean it would be much riskier to put you in the top 6
I believe this is inaccurate. 1 scum in the coalition does not lose, the game carries on as a mountainous.In post 62, Slaxx wrote:Because 1 scum in the townblock loses the game.In post 54, the worst wrote:Why does it only take 1?In post 51, Slaxx wrote:Yeah but in that scenario it doesn't take three, it just takes one. It also gives people an excuse to chain lynches together. I don't really like it.In post 49, the worst wrote:Only key difference here vs. the coalition setup is it's distinctly +ev for scum to powerwolf like crazy during predance and infiltrate the power couples vs. coalition where max ev is one off/one on
the little voices in my head are telling me to be careful of finding 6 people to basically prep for the finale when half of them could be scum
I recognise the probability of it is absolutely tiny but still
That's how I'm feeling right now with Krazy too, I don't actually think I've played that often with me. I think he backup mods a lot of games or somethingIn post 880, Slaxx wrote:You’re starting to sound like an expert on my meta and I can’t even remember being in games with you?
May we refrain from making quote stacks of the caliber seen here? It’s unneeded clutter.In post 84, Jibril wrote: A noble cause. I have no doubts that you are.
I do not like how this post feels. It feels like a construct rather than a true belief. I am saying this feels fake.In post 99, Adelbert Steiner wrote:I have not played this before, but I believe that we should probably come together and decide who is the scummiest gentleman first, that gentleman will be eliminated by not having a dance partner. After that, I am going to be learning whilst doing.
So far, my only read is Slaxx as a townlean.
The difference is the the worst stopped shitposting. You just kept going.In post 870, Firebringer wrote:Can you go into this more? I am highly skeptical of a lot of what you are saying here because I can find cases of both me and the worst shit posting and us both solving the game and for you to just say this is very one dimensional.In post 867, Allomancer wrote:Early on, I already was kinda sus of you and tw. Then later, the worst focused on solving the game, while you kept shitposting. You guys were some of my first reads, and nothing has changed that since. More to follow, got to go now.
So do we have history or are you just a prolific observer?In post 885, Krazy wrote:I am the ghost of christmas past boogaboogabooga
Oh.In post 887, Reinhardt wrote:I do not like how this post feels. It feels like a construct rather than a true belief. I am saying this feels fake.In post 99, Adelbert Steiner wrote:I have not played this before, but I believe that we should probably come together and decide who is the scummiest gentleman first, that gentleman will be eliminated by not having a dance partner. After that, I am going to be learning whilst doing.
So far, my only read is Slaxx as a townlean.
I do not really see what Firebringer sees either. I see the playfulness and such, yes, but not what makes the a scum-oriented appearance.In post 132, the worst wrote:FirstlyIn post 117, Firebringer wrote:okay but my accusation of tw pocketing me was mostly a joke (even though it was at u), I am scum reading tw for his general disposition and way he is interacting with me and others. My general vibe is a lack of authenticity backed with a lot of playfulness. Which is where my read is.
all of this is bullshit
This game started with 3 pages of shitposting and I didn't register how important the whole dancing thing was. how am I being even close to as playful as I normally am? if anything I feel abnormally serious in this game.
and when do you ever scumread playfulness?
the only time I've seen you be this lolconfident about a read was an s/s so you're heavily pinging me with this shit
I spec a lotIn post 889, Slaxx wrote:So do we have history or are you just a prolific observer?
To me, it feels like you are the gentleman mentioned.In post 887, Reinhardt wrote:I do not like how this post feels. It feels like a construct rather than a true belief. I am saying this feels fake.In post 99, Adelbert Steiner wrote:I have not played this before, but I believe that we should probably come together and decide who is the scummiest gentleman first, that gentleman will be eliminated by not having a dance partner. After that, I am going to be learning whilst doing.
So far, my only read is Slaxx as a townlean.
I like this thought a little more from Adelbert, but not by much. It’s a very by-the-numbers questioning.In post 139, Adelbert Steiner wrote:I believe that would be playing against your win condition. However, you are also saying that he's lolconfident in a scum/scum situation, so, this would not be analogous unless you are both scum, I believe.In post 135, the worst wrote:what do you think?In post 134, Adelbert Steiner wrote:How would this be s/s, though?In post 132, the worst wrote:the only time I've seen you be this lolconfident about a read was an s/s so you're heavily pinging me with this shit
Are you claiming scum right now Sir Goose?
Ummm no....we are both still shitposting. And I have done both content post and shit post. What distinction are you making here because this is still one dimmensional?In post 888, Allomancer wrote:The difference is the the worst stopped shitposting. You just kept going.In post 870, Firebringer wrote:Can you go into this more? I am highly skeptical of a lot of what you are saying here because I can find cases of both me and the worst shit posting and us both solving the game and for you to just say this is very one dimensional.In post 867, Allomancer wrote:Early on, I already was kinda sus of you and tw. Then later, the worst focused on solving the game, while you kept shitposting. You guys were some of my first reads, and nothing has changed that since. More to follow, got to go now.
Okay.In post 893, Krazy wrote:I spec a lotIn post 889, Slaxx wrote:So do we have history or are you just a prolific observer?