Micro 846: Any Rapper U-Pick (Mic Dropped)

Micro Games (9 players or fewer). Archived during the 2023 queue overhaul.
Locked
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #681 (isolation #0) » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:41 pm

Post by Succinct »

In post 679, TTTT wrote:also he didn't neighborize anybody
or was blocked
Don't have access yet, but mod said N2 target was Clemency and Clemency wasn't added to hood.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #732 (isolation #1) » Wed Jan 30, 2019 9:04 pm

Post by Succinct »

In post 730, Purrcocet wrote:UNVOTE:
wen u want to lynch tel me
My thoughts're similar.
Mechanically, at least one of these is false:
  • Clemency's a VT
  • Doughboy's neighborize failed (I know this happened)
  • Pink Ball's investigative failed
Overwhelmingly, Pink Ball's play suggests he's the faker.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #759 (isolation #2) » Thu Jan 31, 2019 9:44 pm

Post by Succinct »

Since we're claiming:
Notorious B.I.G., Town 2x Neighborizer;
Performance: Everyday Struggle
Encore: Story To Tell
Ability: Tell Story (any 2 nights, target player, neighborize them)
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #762 (isolation #3) » Fri Feb 01, 2019 10:51 am

Post by Succinct »

In post 760, TTTT wrote:why is pink more likely lying than Clem?
  1. Pink Ball's claimed role fits as a scum role in this setup, especially knowing mod meta.
  2. Clemency as scum has no reason to fakeclaim VT.
  3. Pink Ball's claimed failure's convenient for not giving a clear in lylo and explaining why Pink Ball didn't die last night.
  4. Pink Ball's reaction to my result, if Pink Ball were town, should've been immediately voteparking on me, as to Pink Ball, if Pink Ball were town and knew they were roleblocked, my claim would immediately be suspect.
  5. Pink Ball's play doesn't match prior game behavior.
As an incomplete list.

The only reason I'm not voting Pink Ball is you asked everyone to hold back on voting + I didn't want to end the day too early (since I don't know who second scum is for sure).

Second problem's not looking like it'll be fixed soon; first is your call.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #764 (isolation #4) » Fri Feb 01, 2019 10:57 am

Post by Succinct »

In post 761, Pink Ball wrote:From his perspective, he would be absolutely sure I'm lying because how the fuck did his action and mine fail in the same night? That wording is scummy
I started today thinking my action failed because Clemency's role was Hider/Commuter. Clemency's VT claim changed that. Objectively, Clemency could still be a Hider/Commuter, if the VT claim was a lie. You're quite correct that's doubtful. Objectively, my slot could be scum lying; I obviously know otherwise. Thus, my suspicion primarily lies on you, whose play matches scum fakeclaiming.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #765 (isolation #5) » Fri Feb 01, 2019 11:09 am

Post by Succinct »

In post 696, Purrcocet wrote:VOTE: Pink
In post 706, Clemency wrote:i'm a vt
In post 702, TTTT wrote:unless you shouldn't
if you are a commuter or something claim tho
These posts were close enough that a Clemency-TTTT scumteam could hammer Pink Ball.
In post 710, Purrcocet wrote:TTT/Clem could have blitzed just now
I didn't pick anyone last night
Double vote wouldn't work in lylo probably
In post 709, TTTT wrote:
In post 706, Clemency wrote:i'm a vt
interdasting
These posts were close enough that a Purrcocet-TTTT scumteam could hammer Clemency.

The only TTTT teams not eliminated are TTTT-PB and TTTT-Succinct.

I know one's not true and doubt the other.
My main objective is to sort who's Pink Ball's partner. I started today thinking it was Purrcocet, but I'm less sure now.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #779 (isolation #6) » Sun Feb 03, 2019 7:41 am

Post by Succinct »

In post 766, TTTT wrote:I'm trying to figure out why scum would roleblock the Doughboy-Succint slot.
If the scumteam is Pink/Purc -- why not block one of the unclaimed players (TTTT or Clem)?
If the scumteam is Clem/{Pink/Purrc] -- why not block {Pink/Purrc}?

Succint could be scum JOAT who has a 1-shot neighborizer
this kinda makes sense with schadd being town JOAT with a friendly neighbor shot
but I still don't see Doughboy replacing out like that as scum
You just solved the game for me; thank you.

It's PB-Clemency. One moment, will explain.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #780 (isolation #7) » Sun Feb 03, 2019 7:49 am

Post by Succinct »

Assume scum have a JOAT. Assume a shot's RB...and the second shot's a rolecop. Assume Purr's role is real; Purr can't be the JOAT. Assume the JOAT rolecopped N1. Assume they rolecopped a living player.

Logically it then follows, they likely rolecopped a VT, and knew to roleblock and nightkill elsewhere.

If Purr was scum with PB, then there's no way they'd have identified both VT claims.

Whereas if a VT claim was scum with PB, then the conclusion is obvious: the other VT claim was rolecopped, leaving scum free to block DB. They wouldn't block Purr, because they knew Purrcocet's role; they wouldn't block the VT because they knew it'd be a waste.

VOTE: Pink Ball
Clemency tomorrow.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #781 (isolation #8) » Sun Feb 03, 2019 7:53 am

Post by Succinct »

Do I need to unpack this further?
I can also point out how PB's narrative has changed no less than twice, and how the Clemency vote reeks of doomed scum distancing their partner.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #783 (isolation #9) » Sun Feb 03, 2019 8:44 am

Post by Succinct »

And now an hour later the lack of quickhammer proves there was no such thing.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #834 (isolation #10) » Fri Feb 08, 2019 7:28 am

Post by Succinct »

First win!
Locked

Return to “Mayfair Club [Micro Games]”