Individual-1 (Donald Trump)

This forum is for discussion about anything else.
shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #17929  (isolation #200)  » Tue Jun 12, 2018 3:55 pm

W was also a below average person
Ford is the closest to average I can think of in modern history

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #17930  (isolation #201)  » Tue Jun 12, 2018 4:32 pm

i think i like this caption better
Image

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #17942  (isolation #202)  » Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:16 am

In post 17935, Aristophanes wrote:If TrumpEnds the Korean War he will get a second term. JS.

he's just as likely to find a cure for ALS

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #17946  (isolation #203)  » Wed Jun 13, 2018 8:39 am

In post 17946, T-Bone wrote:No other President has ever meet with a NK leader.

because the Republicans and very serious people in the media were constantly shouting that you "DONT NEGOTIATE WITH TERRORISTS!!!!"

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #17964  (isolation #204)  » Thu Jun 14, 2018 2:04 pm


shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #17977  (isolation #205)  » Fri Jun 15, 2018 2:23 pm

its almost like he doesn't want the FBI to exist
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/bi ... ig-picture

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #17989  (isolation #206)  » Mon Jun 18, 2018 2:08 pm


shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #17997  (isolation #207)  » Tue Jun 19, 2018 11:27 am

and apparently how much their own country being broken is due to American actions

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18007  (isolation #208)  » Thu Jun 21, 2018 11:29 am

In post 18007, T-Bone wrote:You fool, you're not supposed to reveal to the sheep that YOU are actually the out of touch elite!
nothing matters anymore
nothing

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18011  (isolation #209)  » Fri Jun 22, 2018 8:12 am

In post 18009, Kublai Khan wrote:The First Lady wearing this.... what the hell?

I'd guess it's the usual "fuck you, I've got mine"
but who knows

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18067  (isolation #210)  » Thu Jul 19, 2018 5:35 pm

In post 18064, Prof Fridays wrote:Is it blasphemous to say I'm a Trump convert after not voting for him in 2016? I mean, my company gave me a raise from $14.85/hr to $20.25/hr because of the tax cuts, and it seems like the economy's as good as it's ever been. Granted, I have my disagreements (tariffs/Helsinki summit), but it feels like people don't wanna give credit where credit is due.

Man, what should we do with all of this money now that we've gotten massive tax cuts?
I know! Let's give all the workers a big raise.

said no company ever

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18093  (isolation #211)  » Fri Jul 20, 2018 8:19 am

In post 18081, Prof Fridays wrote:
Man, what should we do with all of this money now that we've gotten massive tax cuts?
I know! Let's give all the workers a big raise.


said no company ever

That is patently false.

http://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/ ... -heres-why

most corporate tax cuts fuel income inequality
very little wage growth is found for the common worker

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18114  (isolation #212)  » Mon Jul 23, 2018 11:27 am

In post 18094, shaft.ed wrote:
In post 18081, Prof Fridays wrote:
Man, what should we do with all of this money now that we've gotten massive tax cuts?
I know! Let's give all the workers a big raise.


said no company ever

That is patently false.

http://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/ ... -heres-why

most corporate tax cuts fuel income inequality
very little wage growth is found for the common worker

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles ... r-business

Image

look at all that tax cut induced wage growth

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18135  (isolation #213)  » Tue Jul 24, 2018 8:46 am

In post 18121, Firebringer wrote:how far has republicans been moved to the right?

all the way

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18136  (isolation #214)  » Tue Jul 24, 2018 8:48 am

In post 18127, Ginngie wrote:I hate that I was in middle school during Obama and had no idea wtf was going on

at least you missed Bush

I'm glad I wasn't sentient for most of Reagan
Last edited by shaft.ed on Tue Jul 24, 2018 8:49 am, edited 1 time in total.

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18144  (isolation #215)  » Tue Jul 24, 2018 10:25 am

"They"

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18183  (isolation #216)  » Fri Jul 27, 2018 9:36 am

In post 18176, Oso wrote:people going off their nut

really
no one did anything with this in a post about asexual dominance?

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18204  (isolation #217)  » Wed Aug 01, 2018 8:28 am

In post 18203, Kublai Khan wrote:"Which is why the time has come for voter ID, like everything else. You know, if you go out and you want to buy groceries, you need a picture on a card. You need ID.” - Donald Trump, 2018

groceries yes
guns not so much

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18264  (isolation #218)  » Thu Aug 16, 2018 10:45 am

In post 18263, chamber wrote:
In post 18260, Kublai Khan wrote:There's a solid chance that she would fabricate evidence and the "Trump n-word tape" is going to be as vaporware as the "Michelle Obama whitey video".


So, not saying you can't take things out of context, but she has had tapes to back up everything so far that anyone has tried to contradict.

also odds of there not being an N-word tape in some form are close to zero

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18272  (isolation #219)  » Fri Aug 17, 2018 8:01 am

thats been known since prior to the election

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18312  (isolation #220)  » Wed Aug 22, 2018 8:42 am

In post 18278, Haschel Cedricson wrote:Petition to name this thread Individual-1.

I prefer unindicted co-conspirator

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18313  (isolation #221)  » Wed Aug 22, 2018 8:48 am

In post 18292, Kublai Khan wrote:
In post 18288, rb wrote:i mean i think hilary belongs in jail with trump

Wait, why? She's one of the most thoroughly vetting politicians this country has had and they couldn't pin a single crime on her. Stop the Republican lie that she's "crooked" or "corrupt".

killed Vince Foster for one


These kinds of comments just demonstrate how effectively the 30 year smear machine has been

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18317  (isolation #222)  » Wed Aug 22, 2018 12:10 pm

my understandin is that it was not classified at the time the emails were made became classified at a later date

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18326  (isolation #223)  » Wed Aug 22, 2018 4:05 pm

I'll go with "No" for $200, Alex

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18345  (isolation #224)  » Thu Aug 23, 2018 10:26 am

It seems having a fair jury, they'd easily get the other 10 counts if they so chose to
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/one- ... -18-counts

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18349  (isolation #225)  » Thu Aug 23, 2018 11:07 am

Meh, with Ellis in charge of sentencing, I wouldn't be surprised by a very short term

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18351  (isolation #226)  » Thu Aug 23, 2018 11:23 am

he broke
how's he gonna pay a fine?

and yeah, I wouldn't be shocked by that sentence
The prosecution has a week to decide on a retrial right? Does sentencing come before or after?

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18363  (isolation #227)  » Thu Aug 23, 2018 2:27 pm

In post 18359, Majiffy wrote:though other factors including malicious intent

and hue

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18366  (isolation #228)  » Thu Aug 23, 2018 3:40 pm

how do you get a guilty on bank fraud but not the conspiracy to commit charge?

like he accidentally defrauded the bank?

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18373  (isolation #229)  » Thu Aug 23, 2018 4:30 pm

but didnt Gates testify that he helped Manafort commit bank fraud
why would Gates lie about that?

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18395  (isolation #230)  » Fri Aug 24, 2018 12:34 pm

non-violent crimes can have very violent repercussions

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18499  (isolation #231)  » Fri Sep 07, 2018 11:21 am


shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18501  (isolation #232)  » Fri Sep 07, 2018 1:25 pm

she's not a random women
she's a staffer
it's in the twitter thread

the two people next to him also got removed for not clapping vigorously enough

but the girl wiping her nose with the flag was OK apparently

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18518  (isolation #233)  » Tue Sep 25, 2018 1:35 pm

yes

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18521  (isolation #234)  » Tue Sep 25, 2018 4:11 pm


shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18522  (isolation #235)  » Tue Sep 25, 2018 4:15 pm

In post 18521, Maruchan wrote:
In post 18519, shaft.ed wrote:yes

that was me asking to see them.


Can someone please link said pictures/videos?


shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18536  (isolation #236)  » Tue Oct 02, 2018 8:42 am

will be
hah

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18537  (isolation #237)  » Tue Oct 02, 2018 6:04 pm

so this shit would have been useful in the before times
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/201 ... trump.html

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18554  (isolation #238)  » Wed Oct 03, 2018 5:51 pm

Image

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18571  (isolation #239)  » Wed Oct 17, 2018 8:42 am

could have just pointed out he's the most bought president ever
by a large margin

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18582  (isolation #240)  » Fri Oct 19, 2018 11:29 am

i read Ayn Rand for the plot
I think i was the only one

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18603  (isolation #241)  » Mon Oct 29, 2018 9:50 am

I did the same essay competition and lost because I didnt realize i was supposed to just copy the Jon Galt screed from Atlas Shrugged to properly demonstrate my appreciation of the free markets. I was able to recycle components of that essay for my AP English exam, so that was at least helpful.

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18606  (isolation #242)  » Mon Oct 29, 2018 3:59 pm

In post 18606, SleepyKrew wrote:I was confused because I thought scholarships were very un-Rand.

yeah but endless supplies of money for libertarian propoganda are the most Randian thing ever

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18609  (isolation #243)  » Wed Oct 31, 2018 8:53 am

its a ploy to get their base to the polls

you'd have to amend the constitution to change it

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18636  (isolation #244)  » Tue Nov 27, 2018 10:56 am

In post 18636, Flubbernugget wrote:Don't we already have npr?

but that's sooo liberal

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18752  (isolation #245)  » Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:09 pm

oh god

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18783  (isolation #246)  » Tue Dec 11, 2018 10:15 am

In post 18779, Ginngie wrote:but also legally allows people to hold those views and not be accountable.
i'd say thats a problem with the law

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18790  (isolation #247)  » Tue Dec 11, 2018 11:51 am

In post 18787, Creature wrote:as long their practice doesn't break the constituional laws.

the religious loophole laws specifically allow people to 'practice' their bigotry while violating actual laws

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18792  (isolation #248)  » Tue Dec 11, 2018 11:57 am

In post 18792, Creature wrote:Do their practices directly harm non-participants? They should be punished.

this one

denying goods or services to others based on their religious views

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18797  (isolation #249)  » Tue Dec 11, 2018 12:23 pm

In post 18794, Creature wrote:
In post 18793, shaft.ed wrote:
In post 18792, Creature wrote:Do their practices directly harm non-participants? They should be punished.

this one

denying goods or services to others based on their religious views

So we agree here.

no we dont, because the law doesn't punish them for this behavior, it specifically allows it

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18802  (isolation #250)  » Tue Dec 11, 2018 1:36 pm

In post 18799, Creature wrote:doesn't allow you to do X in their name, then you can't force them to.

no one is forcing them to run a certain business or take on a certain job

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18830  (isolation #251)  » Tue Dec 18, 2018 9:21 am

wha?

I don't think that phrase means what you think it means

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18834  (isolation #252)  » Tue Dec 18, 2018 10:30 am


shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18858  (isolation #253)  » Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:43 am


shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18859  (isolation #254)  » Thu Jan 10, 2019 2:07 pm

how did we get on the worst timeline?

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18994  (isolation #255)  » Sat Jan 12, 2019 5:30 pm

In post 18993, Creature wrote:I don't think intersex non-human animals get to pick their sex.

what does this even mean

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #18998  (isolation #256)  » Sat Jan 12, 2019 5:59 pm

In post 18996, Creature wrote:Intersex non-human animals don't.

when did you learn to communicate with non-human animals?

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19001  (isolation #257)  » Sat Jan 12, 2019 6:07 pm

In post 19000, Psyche wrote:i think we just call intersex non-human animals "intersex" and for some reason don't really obsess much about our ability to assign them a label based on their sex

as long as they use the right bathroom

as god intended

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19013  (isolation #258)  » Wed Jan 16, 2019 9:23 am

have you ever had cold french fries?

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19015  (isolation #259)  » Wed Jan 16, 2019 11:35 am

candelabra is not a heat lamp

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19027  (isolation #260)  » Thu Jan 17, 2019 11:54 am

not all Cohen's doing
but it definitely shows he was grifting the grift
I seriously doubt anyone with the capacity to skim money from the campaign wasn't doing it

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19050  (isolation #261)  » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:45 am

its pretty difficult to divine intent
someone could have misspoken, misremembered, made and honest mistake when talking to you, forgotten some sort of verbal agreement, or lied to you with clear intent to gain a monetary advantage

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19056  (isolation #262)  » Wed Jan 23, 2019 12:17 pm

can light also mean less dense?

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19069  (isolation #263)  » Fri Jan 25, 2019 12:28 pm

Do you think if Trump now realizes people can still get arrested during a government shutdown, he gives up on the wall bullshit?

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19070  (isolation #264)  » Fri Jan 25, 2019 12:32 pm

apparently Chad Ochocinco is Stone's neighbor

why are we living in the most absurd timeline?

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19079  (isolation #265)  » Fri Feb 01, 2019 1:47 pm

In post 19078, YellowSnow wrote:I don't know that I can attribute that to Trump

you can't
solved your problem

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19083  (isolation #266)  » Fri Feb 01, 2019 3:26 pm

In post 19081, YellowSnow wrote:Yeah but progressive economic policies didn't really help during Obama and I don't think you can just arbitrarily assign all good outcomes to democrats and all bad outcomes to republicans.

Obama never enacted progressive economic policies

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19084  (isolation #267)  » Fri Feb 01, 2019 3:27 pm

In post 19083, tosser wrote:also to argue that trump has been good for the economy you have to make the case that his policies and trade wars benefited the economy more than if he hadn't undertaken them at all. not just point to the economy growing - which is largely out of his control

dont forget the shutdown that evaporated billions into thin air

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19087  (isolation #268)  » Fri Feb 01, 2019 7:26 pm

In post 19086, YellowSnow wrote:This falls under the "government is a good thing" theory I suppose.

Obamacare was not progressive I assume.

centrist

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19088  (isolation #269)  » Fri Feb 01, 2019 7:26 pm

and the government is obviously a good thing

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19092  (isolation #270)  » Fri Feb 01, 2019 7:45 pm

In post 19092, YellowSnow wrote:Don't agree on robin hood economics.

currently you have the rich robbing the poor
glad thats ok with you though *thumbsup*

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19136  (isolation #271)  » Fri Feb 01, 2019 8:51 pm

In post 19100, Creature wrote:
In post 19093, shaft.ed wrote:currently you have the rich robbing the poor

???

the wealthy in the US pay less % on their earning than the middle class
Warren Buffet estimated he pays 17% taxes on what he earns
his secratary was paying high 20s to low 30s

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19141  (isolation #272)  » Fri Feb 01, 2019 8:56 pm

In post 19132, YellowSnow wrote:Historically communist nations have a history of falling on itself while capitalist nations grow exponentially.

and who is asking for communism?

such boring discussions anymore

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19150  (isolation #273)  » Fri Feb 01, 2019 9:14 pm

In post 19148, Slaxx wrote:
In post 19146, Psyche wrote:creature is worse


I’d argue he’s just worse because he’s better

do you have any idea how many times marginal tax rates have been described to Creature?

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19190  (isolation #274)  » Sat Feb 02, 2019 4:26 pm

In post 19187, Creature wrote:
In post 19177, T-Bone wrote:I don't mean to be insulting...but I've yet to see a self-described "fiscal conservative" have a real grasp on how taxes and government work. It makes it really difficult to discuss economic policy with someone who describes themselves that way when they don't know how these things work.

And like, I'm not trying to make you feel bad Creature, or anyone else who wants to hold a conservative ideal. But if you want to debate policy, you really need to understand what we're talking about. Otherwise it just makes you A) look stupid and B) feel like you are getting ganged up on for being a conservative. You're not stupid, and you're not getting ganged up on for being a conservative. You're getting ganged up on because you don't understand how taxes and government work AND you are unwilling to learn!

And I, nor anyone else, want you to feel that way!

I mean, I don't need to know the exact tax system to argue why whatever the % on the rich is shouldn't be exaggerated.

sure but you do need to understand the tax system to know whether or not it is exaggerated

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19199  (isolation #275)  » Sat Feb 02, 2019 5:05 pm

In post 19192, Creature wrote:
In post 19191, shaft.ed wrote:
In post 19187, Creature wrote:
In post 19177, T-Bone wrote:I don't mean to be insulting...but I've yet to see a self-described "fiscal conservative" have a real grasp on how taxes and government work. It makes it really difficult to discuss economic policy with someone who describes themselves that way when they don't know how these things work.

And like, I'm not trying to make you feel bad Creature, or anyone else who wants to hold a conservative ideal. But if you want to debate policy, you really need to understand what we're talking about. Otherwise it just makes you A) look stupid and B) feel like you are getting ganged up on for being a conservative. You're not stupid, and you're not getting ganged up on for being a conservative. You're getting ganged up on because you don't understand how taxes and government work AND you are unwilling to learn!

And I, nor anyone else, want you to feel that way!

I mean, I don't need to know the exact tax system to argue why whatever the % on the rich is shouldn't be exaggerated.

sure but you do need to understand the tax system to know whether or not it is exaggerated

Were we arguing the current tax system is exaggerated or were we arguing about the 20% (or infinity and beyond) increase change?

to know if an increase would be exaggerated you need to understand where you are starting from

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19202  (isolation #276)  » Sat Feb 02, 2019 5:15 pm

theyre actually quite good at public relations given how incredibly unpopular most of their positions are

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19204  (isolation #277)  » Sat Feb 02, 2019 5:24 pm

so youre saying Republicans dont perform above the popularity of their platform?

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19210  (isolation #278)  » Sat Feb 02, 2019 8:02 pm

In post 19208, YellowSnow wrote:Unpopular with liberal websites...

nice to see people admit that conservative idealogy is pissing off the liberals

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19223  (isolation #279)  » Sun Feb 03, 2019 12:05 am

In post 19218, Creature wrote:Just surprising we have a huge ammount of white nationalists.

not so surprising when you look at the actual history of this country

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19224  (isolation #280)  » Sun Feb 03, 2019 12:06 am

In post 19223, T-Bone wrote:I'd also like to hear about more of those unpopular leftists policies. So that we can drop them from our platform. What are they, exactly?

i hear taxing the rich is really unpopular with the rich
and people that don't understand taxation almost as though they had been repeatedly misinformed to hold opinions that run directly against their self-interests

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19277  (isolation #281)  » Mon Feb 04, 2019 2:59 pm

In post 19246, YellowSnow wrote:I don't know that there is any easy solution either though.

a good first step would be to stop stripping the voting rights of side minority group

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19281  (isolation #282)  » Mon Feb 04, 2019 3:03 pm

In post 19262, YellowSnow wrote:I think most people approve of their boss if he signs your paycheck.

welp that doesnt explain it then
i mean this could be the least accurate description of Trump I've ever seen
Last edited by shaft.ed on Mon Feb 04, 2019 3:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19285  (isolation #283)  » Mon Feb 04, 2019 3:06 pm

In post 19270, Creature wrote:Also yeah, I sorta expect someone to overreact over a policy that would make them pay for something that likely won't even benefit them.

yeah that never happens to liberals

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19289  (isolation #284)  » Mon Feb 04, 2019 3:09 pm

In post 19285, YellowSnow wrote:
In post 19283, u r a person 2 wrote:
In post 19277, YellowSnow wrote:Well, there are a multitude of issues for voters to consider and I think most republicans(and liberals for that matter) consider social justice just one issue out of many.


Right, and they are stomaching the bigotry because they consider other issues more important. We're in agreement.


I don't think there's anything wrong with suggesting that social justice isn't the overriding issue of our generation. Important, yes, but there ARE other things. And that doesn't make you racist to think so.

yes they did deliver those massive tax cuts for billionares and hard up corporations
definitely worth kicking a few minority groups

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19296  (isolation #285)  » Mon Feb 04, 2019 3:17 pm

In post 19291, YellowSnow wrote:
In post 19290, shaft.ed wrote:
In post 19285, YellowSnow wrote:
In post 19283, u r a person 2 wrote:
In post 19277, YellowSnow wrote:Well, there are a multitude of issues for voters to consider and I think most republicans(and liberals for that matter) consider social justice just one issue out of many.


Right, and they are stomaching the bigotry because they consider other issues more important. We're in agreement.


I don't think there's anything wrong with suggesting that social justice isn't the overriding issue of our generation. Important, yes, but there ARE other things. And that doesn't make you racist to think so.

yes they did deliver those massive tax cuts for billionares and hard up corporations
definitely worth kicking a few minority groups


yay class warfare!
it is
and one class is clearly winning
keep cheering them on if it makes you feel better
i guess

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19305  (isolation #286)  » Mon Feb 04, 2019 3:32 pm

In post 19305, YellowSnow wrote:to make their leftist policies more mainstream than they really are.


In post 19303, T-Bone wrote:
In post 19260, YellowSnow wrote:I don't think socialist economic policies are as popular as many people seem to think.


The economic policies that you are citing as 'socialist' poll at an average of 70%.

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19379  (isolation #287)  » Mon Feb 04, 2019 5:40 pm

In post 19357, YellowSnow wrote:and possibly the economy on the whole

possibly is doing a lot of work there

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19471  (isolation #288)  » Mon Feb 04, 2019 10:23 pm

Direct stakeholder funds.
First-time homebuyer programs.
Tuition-free higher education.
Endowments for historical and cultural institutions.
National history education programs.
Historical monuments and markers.
Roots journeys to Africa.

so basically if the GI bill had actually just been applied to them as well

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19516  (isolation #289)  » Wed Feb 06, 2019 9:15 am

you are talking past eachother

isn't inflation usually is in reference to lending rates, which peaked pre-Reagan and was the main reason he was elected
I think my parents' mortgage was like 14% interest. Of course a standard savings account could pay out something like 8-10% then as well

The Fed is quite aggressive at controlling inflation now because it is another way that dynastic wealth can be lost as the value of their money piles naturally falls over time if inflation remains high

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19530  (isolation #290)  » Wed Feb 06, 2019 6:23 pm

In post 19529, Panzerjager wrote:Bay area, Seattle, San Diego, LA...even places near those places are impossibly high. The real bitch of it is that raising minimum wage really hasn't helped.

Dont forget Boston
selling my house right now and feel kinda shitty for contributing to the problem

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19564  (isolation #291)  » Thu Feb 07, 2019 10:44 am

its more about keeping 'those people' out of the affluent neighborhoods
white liberals like to talk about helping poors and POC, but NIMBYism is strong

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19571  (isolation #292)  » Thu Feb 07, 2019 2:06 pm

In post 19571, Psyche wrote:https://thehill.com/hilltv/what-americas-thinking/428747-new-poll-americans-overwhelmingly-support-taxing-the-wealth-of

another unpopular democratic policy

they only said that so people cant call them racists

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19599  (isolation #293)  » Fri Feb 08, 2019 4:44 pm

In post 19587, YellowSnow wrote:I'm saying 1 Trillion in reperation payments would not solve thie problem in all likelyhood.

maybe
just maybe
this is about something that cant be monetized

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19600  (isolation #294)  » Fri Feb 08, 2019 4:46 pm

In post 19598, YellowSnow wrote:pointing fingers at businesses like the NFL

the people pointing fingers at the NFL are the ones getting their feefees hurt because handegg players reminded them that everything is hunkydory in the best nation on earth

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19670  (isolation #295)  » Fri Feb 15, 2019 1:07 pm

In post 19665, Slaxx wrote:And I’m cool with that brand of republicanism. It’s more of a progressive libertarianism.

nothing in Collins voting record says progressive libertarianism

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19671  (isolation #296)  » Fri Feb 15, 2019 1:07 pm

In post 19668, YellowSnow wrote:I could see Rand Paul announcing a bid, and maybe Paul Ryan.

no way

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19672  (isolation #297)  » Fri Feb 15, 2019 1:08 pm

Weld is running in case Trump gets indicted before the next election cycle making him the default nom

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19681  (isolation #298)  » Fri Feb 15, 2019 2:47 pm

Pence won't win

he couldnt even get reelected in Indiana

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19692  (isolation #299)  » Sun Feb 17, 2019 8:34 am

theres a difference between stupid and completely incoherent

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19719  (isolation #300)  » Wed Mar 06, 2019 10:31 am

MAGA

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19731  (isolation #301)  » Fri Mar 08, 2019 10:00 am

it would be irresponsible not to speculate
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politi ... 86429.html

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19733  (isolation #302)  » Sat Mar 09, 2019 8:11 pm

In post 19732, shaft.ed wrote:it would be irresponsible not to speculate
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politi ... 86429.html

so the sex spa founder apparently started a consulting firm selling access to the president
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/repo ... cess-trump

no biggie though I spose

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19736  (isolation #303)  » Mon Mar 11, 2019 4:16 pm

i mean even without the sex trafficking it aught to be a deal
usually when sex is added the press at least pays attention

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19881  (isolation #304)  » Thu Apr 04, 2019 8:51 am

isn't Warren the only one that has done this

Still waiting on Bernie's taxes
from the 2016 campaign

don't know why people think he's a populist

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19885  (isolation #305)  » Thu Apr 04, 2019 7:57 pm

old white man

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19889  (isolation #306)  » Thu Apr 04, 2019 9:26 pm

In post 19888, Slaxx wrote:So, Muellers team doesn’t seem happy with Barr?

because he's a lying bastard
no one could have predicted

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19898  (isolation #307)  » Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:33 pm

isnt he that asshole that owns the Washington Post?

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19904  (isolation #308)  » Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:34 am

In post 19904, Papa Zito wrote:VOTE:
In post 19902, T-Bone wrote:
In post 19897, Kublai Khan wrote:"If he was smart, he would’ve put his name on it. You’ve got to put your name on stuff or no one remembers you.”
- Donald J Trump, 2019 on George Washington buying the Mount Vernon property and not naming it after himself.


And after Washington refused to have Mount Vernon named after himself, he returned to the nation's capital......

Philadelphia?

Dr. Phil knew how to market himself

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19906  (isolation #309)  » Mon Apr 15, 2019 9:24 am

The papers are reporting he ginned this up to distract from Mueller Report shenanigans
not that he didn't want to do it already

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19926  (isolation #310)  » Tue Apr 16, 2019 9:54 am

In post 19926, theplague42 wrote:It really demonstrates that he hasn't developed a theory of mind yet.

man
glad we finally established that one

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19931  (isolation #311)  » Tue Apr 16, 2019 11:01 am

In post 19931, AniX wrote:The President has a duty to not tweet every random thought that pops into his head BECAUSE those things are given extra weight and are seen as spoken with authority.

so so low on the list of things that are going on right now

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19933  (isolation #312)  » Tue Apr 16, 2019 11:32 am

In post 19933, Kublai Khan wrote:
In post 19932, shaft.ed wrote:
In post 19931, AniX wrote:The President has a duty to not tweet every random thought that pops into his head BECAUSE those things are given extra weight and are seen as spoken with authority.

so so low on the list of things that are going on right now

Sadly, Trump's twitter history has been the best thing to get Trump supporters to admit that Trump is an idiot. Though they'll then defensively argue that "criminal Hillary" would have been much worse.

you could get them to admit he is Satan incarnate
it won't matter

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19964  (isolation #313)  » Fri Apr 19, 2019 9:45 am

so the Mueller report has gone from complete exoneration to total bullshit in less than a day
the cognitive dissonance is endless

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19968  (isolation #314)  » Fri Apr 19, 2019 1:12 pm

it didn't

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19973  (isolation #315)  » Fri Apr 19, 2019 2:56 pm

In post 19969, Fluminator wrote:I'm just so confused because there's so many things to nail and be angry at trump on. Why do the media keep focusing on unproven things (and recently revealed to almost certainly be fake news). How are they messing up on what should be one of the easiest politicians to bury.

because this is colluding with a hostile foreign government
people have been hung for less
the main reason it can't be proven is because of endless obstruction of justice

and whats this 'fake news' of which you speak?

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19974  (isolation #316)  » Fri Apr 19, 2019 2:57 pm

In post 19970, Fluminator wrote:To people only half paying attention, it seems like Trump isn't actually doing that bad and the economy of the country is doing extremely well right now.
I still wouldn't vote for him, but I think the media is definitely overly biased against him.

the economy isn't working for the commoners
the media, owned by the 1%, wants people to keep thinking everything is fine
you've got everything upside down

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #19986  (isolation #317)  » Sun Apr 21, 2019 3:58 pm

Mother Jones?

ninjad

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20014  (isolation #318)  » Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:31 am

i dont even

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20021  (isolation #319)  » Sun Apr 28, 2019 10:56 am

why cant this stop already

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20026  (isolation #320)  » Sun Apr 28, 2019 2:21 pm

In post 20025, Lycanfire wrote:Are states continually pushing the definition back so formerly standard abortions are now considered "late term" to cause ire like this?

yes

heartbeat bill just passed in Ohio
that shows up at 6 weeks gestation

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20030  (isolation #321)  » Sun Apr 28, 2019 2:40 pm

In post 20028, u r a person 2 wrote:did you guys even watch chambers' youtube link?

I don't know the details but some Democrat pushed a bill that would ease restrictions on late term abortions and it led to a discussion (i think?) of what happens to severely deformed babies. My understanding is that parents are responsible for making decisions about life support, etc for their children, and I think republicans have twisted that into an argument that Democrats want to allow for abortion even after birth, which would obviously just be murder.

I'm pretty sure its about non-viable fetuses and the mother's ability to decide whether or not to take them to birth or have an abortion


shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20032  (isolation #322)  » Sun Apr 28, 2019 3:32 pm

there's a pretty big difference between severely deformed and non-viable

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20043  (isolation #323)  » Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:32 pm

In post 20034, Lycanfire wrote:Do they die on their own, or do hospitals offer minimal intervention?

they die even if hospitals do everything they can
generally born with absent or completely dysfunctional major organs like brain, heart or lungs

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20050  (isolation #324)  » Sun Apr 28, 2019 8:48 pm

In post 20045, Fluminator wrote:complete unrestricted abortion was always the main progressive issue i struggled to fully get behind.
*flees*

its really not
complete unrestricted abortion is essentially not different from infanticide

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20052  (isolation #325)  » Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:51 am

wouldn't unrestricted abortion mean that if its not out yet you can abort it?
correct me if I'm wrong, I'd rather not be

and sorry let me correct the phrasing, it would include infanticide

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20054  (isolation #326)  » Mon Apr 29, 2019 10:26 am

In post 20053, Porkens wrote:How would restriction of elective abortion procedures change whether abortion were infantcide?

because a fetus is quite viable outside the womb in the time close to birth
and it is common to induce birth ahead of natural delivery
I don't see how whether or not it is still contained within the womb is a defining feature

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20056  (isolation #327)  » Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:11 pm

In post 20052, shaft.ed wrote:and sorry let me correct the phrasing, it would include infanticide

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20059  (isolation #328)  » Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:33 pm

In post 20057, Zulfy wrote:
In post 20054, shaft.ed wrote:I don't see how whether or not it is still contained within the womb is a defining feature


There'll come a day when a 1 month old fetus could develop outside of the womb, that doesn't make it infanticide.

Without intervention

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20060  (isolation #329)  » Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:37 pm

In post 20058, Porkens wrote:
In post 20056, shaft.ed wrote:
In post 20052, shaft.ed wrote:and sorry let me correct the phrasing, it would include infanticide


Again, what is the relation of this definition of infantcide to regulation of abortion?

I'm saying there is a point where what is inside the womb is indistinguishable from an infant

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20062  (isolation #330)  » Mon Apr 29, 2019 5:04 pm

I'm saying if abortion is completely unregulated, some abortions would be infanticide

I believe this because lack of any regulations on timing would allow for abortions of fully gestated 'babies' that could, in other circumstances, have already been born without any medical intervention outside of the delivery
That said, I really don't like the blurring of lines between a baby vs. a fetus and hope I'm not contributing with this viewpoint

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20073  (isolation #331)  » Fri May 03, 2019 11:33 am

In post 20071, Fluminator wrote:and try to make it seem like the opposing side is only in it to enslave women (when it's so obvious that most are just concerned about the unborn baby/fetus)

we might believe this if a majority of the same people didn't rally against birth control and sex education

and ffs "unborn baby"
Last edited by shaft.ed on Fri May 03, 2019 11:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20074  (isolation #332)  » Fri May 03, 2019 11:34 am

In post 20072, Flubbernugget wrote:In my experience you can get people to accept sentience is a gray area in pretty much any manner until abortion is brought up.

sentience doesn't occur until after birth
pretty long after

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20076  (isolation #333)  » Fri May 03, 2019 11:46 am

pain responses are not the low bar for sentience

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20083  (isolation #334)  » Fri May 03, 2019 12:18 pm

In post 20080, Inferno390 wrote:They have the same rights as every other human being in America

different adult humans dont even have the same rights in America

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20084  (isolation #335)  » Fri May 03, 2019 12:19 pm

In post 20077, Inferno390 wrote:I draw the line as the coming together of 1 sperm and 1 egg = 1 human being.
Also, who argues that miscarriage is murder? Unless it’s due to abuse or something.

a number of activities increase the odds of miscarriage
would they then be considered abuse

and do you have any clue how frequent egg fertilization is vs. birth?

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20088  (isolation #336)  » Fri May 03, 2019 1:17 pm

In post 20086, Fluminator wrote:
In post 20073, shaft.ed wrote:
In post 20071, Fluminator wrote:and try to make it seem like the opposing side is only in it to enslave women (when it's so obvious that most are just concerned about the unborn baby/fetus)

we might believe this if a majority of the same people didn't rally against birth control and sex education

and ffs "unborn baby"

They really don't. That's just propaganda spread by liberal bubbles.


care to support that claim
I can find these all day
https://www.quora.com/Does-the-pro-life ... of-fetuses
https://arktimes.com/arkansas-blog/2019 ... on-approve

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20090  (isolation #337)  » Fri May 03, 2019 2:45 pm

In post 20089, Fluminator wrote:nitpicked quotes.

they aren't nitpicked quotes, they are the stances of pretty much every major anti-abortion organization

I'll give you that the general populace is not a monolith behind the activist groups. But the activists are the one pushing legislation in this country. And they are all squarely anti-contraception.

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20098  (isolation #338)  » Fri May 03, 2019 3:17 pm

In post 20091, Inferno390 wrote:
In post 20085, Kublai Khan wrote:
In post 20084, shaft.ed wrote:
In post 20077, Inferno390 wrote:I draw the line as the coming together of 1 sperm and 1 egg = 1 human being.
Also, who argues that miscarriage is murder? Unless it’s due to abuse or something.

a number of activities increase the odds of miscarriage
would they then be considered abuse

and do you have any clue how frequent egg fertilization is vs. birth?

Shaft.ed is beating me to the punch, but yeah. If you think fertilization = person, then you have to investigate any and every failure to bring a fetus to term as a possible murder.


If I die of pneumonia, is that murder?
Come on guys, this is ridiculous. Death =\= murder and we all know that.

And if you do something that knowingly puts the life of the embryo at risk, if the embryo is a child, then that would be negligence on your part.
if someone force feeds you alcohol until you die is it murder?
what if they didn't know they were doing it to you?

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20100  (isolation #339)  » Fri May 03, 2019 3:19 pm

In post 20096, Fluminator wrote:I might look into each american activist group later, but if these groups would push for more free condoms or whatever, would you stop saying pro-lifers are only in it to enslave women?

"free condoms or whatever"
clearly someone who has thought about family planning and reproductive rights

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20106  (isolation #340)  » Fri May 03, 2019 3:50 pm

In post 20102, Fluminator wrote:There's a large population of dudes that are super pro choice because they want to sleep around and not have to deal with any of the emotional stress with kids, because the females can do the psychologically stressful abortion procedure and the guys are off free.
so you call me out for making up demographics

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20107  (isolation #341)  » Fri May 03, 2019 3:52 pm

In post 20101, Fluminator wrote:I think it's just safer to just give the right to life to all "humans" instead of debating how much abstract and logical processes it has to have before being human enough.
I do my part by not putting women in a situation where there's a fetus inside them.

again all "humans" needs to be defined. If life starts at conception, there are huge issues in regards to negligence as has already been pointed out, and complete lack of female autonomy


and I'm married to an asexual, so I'm even less fetus making than you
who gives a shit?

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20137  (isolation #342)  » Fri May 03, 2019 8:32 pm

In post 20123, Aurathebirb wrote:who are just christian parents who pretty much silently oppose abortion

this isn't inherent to christianity though
this is a decades long campaign to create a wedge issue
prior to the 60s only the Catholics cared

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20138  (isolation #343)  » Fri May 03, 2019 9:26 pm

In post 20134, Lycanfire wrote:I don't think either of those posts hold any worthwhile rhetorical value. Fluminator's post is interesting: I think people don't care about reproduction as much as they should. At the same time, sex isn't reproduction. I think that's really the extent of motive-questioning of pro-choice men and that's where my interest ends.

There's a few "lanes" I think you can go here:
Embryos are human, killing embryos is morally wrong
Embryos are human, killing embryos is not morally wrong
Embryos are not human, killing embryos is morally wrong
Embryos are not human, killing embryos is not morally wrong

(for arguments sake, I'm going with the simplest definition of an embryo of less than nine weeks of development.)

i cant even tell if this is parody or not

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20143  (isolation #344)  » Fri May 03, 2019 10:31 pm

ftr
youre talking about a zygote, morula, blastocyst etc. being a human,
embryo isn't the correct terminology

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20145  (isolation #345)  » Fri May 03, 2019 10:34 pm

its not at all compelling

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20170  (isolation #346)  » Sat May 04, 2019 1:13 pm

In post 20152, Inferno390 wrote:And yes, I’m pro birth because I think it’s morally wrong.

pro forced birth
just to be clear

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20171  (isolation #347)  » Sat May 04, 2019 1:14 pm

In post 20152, Inferno390 wrote:What I’m saying is LOGICALLY, if an embryo is a human being

again, your definition goes all the way back to zygote

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20172  (isolation #348)  » Sat May 04, 2019 1:17 pm

In post 20157, Inferno390 wrote:
In post 20143, shaft.ed wrote:ftr
youre talking about a zygote, morula, blastocyst etc. being a human,
embryo isn't the correct terminology


I’m using embryo to cover conception to birth because a) this debate is already too complicated and b) people don’t know about all those terms and c) those terms are a distraction to the point of the argument.

Fine I'm going to start calling fetuses bananas because it supports my argument

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20198  (isolation #349)  » Mon May 06, 2019 9:32 am

the counterpoint is the numerous examples of prominent anti-choicers that have pushed their mistresses to get abortions

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20206  (isolation #350)  » Mon May 06, 2019 3:57 pm

In post 20192, Kublai Khan wrote:Trump also re-tweeted a Jerry Falwell Jr. tweet suggesting that Trump should have two extra years to compensate for his first two years being bogged down by investigations.

I guess he'll have to wait in line behind Bill if this is gonna be a thing

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20207  (isolation #351)  » Mon May 06, 2019 3:58 pm

In post 20204, Psyche wrote:
In post 20202, Fluminator wrote:I find it amusing so many people took offense to hearing "a large amount of pro choice men don't actually care about women." when the pro choice side's entire stick is that pro lifers hate women.
Not the intended point when j said that, but maybe you know how pro lifers feel when hearing that now.

also, this shouldn't matter; it should matter whether saying so is accurate or not

don't let facts get in the way of a poorly constructed gotcha

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20211  (isolation #352)  » Mon May 06, 2019 4:20 pm

we can go with the even more accurate pro-forced birth

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20231  (isolation #353)  » Mon May 06, 2019 9:41 pm

In post 20228, Kublai Khan wrote:

Actual law:

Upon written request from the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, the chairman of the Committee on Finance of the Senate, or the chairman of the Joint Committee on Taxation, the Secretary shall furnish such committee with any return or return information specified in such request, except that any return or return information which can be associated with, or otherwise identify, directly or indirectly, a particular taxpayer shall be furnished to such committee only when sitting in closed executive session unless such taxpayer otherwise consents in writing to such disclosure.

My bolding. This is an illegitimate decision by Mnuchin.

wow two constitutional crises in one week
they getting really efficient

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20258  (isolation #354)  » Wed May 08, 2019 8:51 am

In post 20252, u r a person 2 wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/05/07/us/politics/donald-trump-taxes.html


1.1 billion in mid 80s-90s dollars... so about 1.9 billion in todays dollars

that's quite a loss, Mr. Trump.

and they're already spinning it as "he's such a genius!"

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/fox- ... tax-losses

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20296  (isolation #355)  » Wed May 15, 2019 3:52 pm

“The egg in the lab doesn’t apply,” Chambliss said. “It’s not in a woman. She’s not pregnant.”


all about saving babies

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20329  (isolation #356)  » Wed May 15, 2019 6:10 pm

In post 20318, Garmr wrote:Well when you get media saying the Ok symbol is racist, A cartoon frog is evil,

the media didn't do this
it was the white supremacists co-opting the imagery
the 'media' just told you that white supremacists co-opted the imagery

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20393  (isolation #357)  » Wed May 15, 2019 10:13 pm

In post 20385, Fluminator wrote:
In post 20360, Psyche wrote:I've asked you dozens of questions since you popped into this thread with your retarded antiwhite media claim and you barely answered one. But because I'm not bothering to explain what a symbol is to you I'm stupid.

The media definitely has a bias towards progressivism though, doesn't it?

lol

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20414  (isolation #358)  » Thu May 16, 2019 5:22 pm

In post 20407, Fluminator wrote:
In post 20399, u r a person 2 wrote:
In post 20385, Fluminator wrote:
In post 20360, Psyche wrote:I've asked you dozens of questions since you popped into this thread with your retarded antiwhite media claim and you barely answered one. But because I'm not bothering to explain what a symbol is to you I'm stupid.

The media definitely has a bias towards progressivism though, doesn't it?

No. It's the opposite. Media has a conservative bias. They let conservatives blatantly lie and argue in bad faith in the name of "fairness" because they're afraid of being labeled biased for the left. See: Clinton emails vs grabbed her by the pussy and every other Trump scandal in the campaign. These were not equal scandals but they were treated that way.

Which dominant channels outside of Fox have conservative bias? Would you consider a channel like CNN conservatively biased? Or something like the WSJ?

all of them Katie

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20415  (isolation #359)  » Thu May 16, 2019 5:23 pm

In post 20409, u r a person 2 wrote:The thing about conservative bias - they don't have to be conservative papers. The NYTimes is certainly a liberal newspaper, but even they were at fault for equating Clinton's emails with all the many scandals about DJT in the election. When the goal is to make reporting appear fair, but one side has scandals up the wazoo and policies based on fake news, and the other has.. the email scandal, giving equal time to each side IS conservative bias.

yes the paper instrumental in lying us into the Iraq war is soooo liberal

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20425  (isolation #360)  » Thu May 16, 2019 9:20 pm

In post 20420, u r a person 2 wrote:
In post 20415, shaft.ed wrote:yes the paper instrumental in lying us into the Iraq war is soooo liberal

i mean, a lack of competence does not equate to a political leaning.


okay, as I typed that out I realized how silly it sounds in the trump era, but it was more true then ;P

yeah just an honest mistake surely

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20432  (isolation #361)  » Fri May 17, 2019 9:50 am

In post 20430, u r a person 2 wrote:Left media presents this is a problem in so far as it may help reelect trump, and when it leads to violence, right? But if there were libs going around talking about how to "own the cons" it would be headline news as evidence of how conceited the left is and how people need to vote to put them back into their place.

maybe because
it isn't left media

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20444  (isolation #362)  » Fri May 17, 2019 5:53 pm

In post 20433, Fluminator wrote:The media was definitely anti-trump, but I guess that doesn't mean much with regards to conservative because there are loads of conservatives against Trump.

reality is anti-Trump

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20452  (isolation #363)  » Sat May 18, 2019 2:43 pm

their masculinity is simply keeping others down
essentially defined by misogyny and attacking the SJWs

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20466  (isolation #364)  » Wed May 22, 2019 11:44 am

do they not realize how widely photoshopped this is going to be?

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20467  (isolation #365)  » Wed May 22, 2019 11:46 am

the internets are fast

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20472  (isolation #366)  » Wed May 22, 2019 2:13 pm

In post 20469, Flubbernugget wrote:Lowkey hoping the roads fall apart to the point where trains become politically viable as the primary means of transportation

lol if you think the train tracks are in any better shape than the roads

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20477  (isolation #367)  » Wed May 22, 2019 2:46 pm

In post 20474, Flubbernugget wrote:
In post 20472, shaft.ed wrote:
In post 20469, Flubbernugget wrote:Lowkey hoping the roads fall apart to the point where trains become politically viable as the primary means of transportation

lol if you think the train tracks are in any better shape than the roads

Let that fall apart too and then pitch for bullet trains

lol

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20480  (isolation #368)  » Wed May 22, 2019 6:41 pm

In post 20479, u r a person 2 wrote:i want the hyper speed loops!

IF they could get built, they are fast, cheap, and could provide a connection between cities and rural areas that might just bridge the growing cultural and economic divide in this country.

hyperloops are a scam

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20482  (isolation #369)  » Wed May 22, 2019 6:47 pm

Looks like 5 days until court ordered documents

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20485  (isolation #370)  » Wed May 22, 2019 6:55 pm

In post 20481, chamber wrote:Musk isn't a good idea guy, he repackages other ideas well. Hyperloops just bad science.

its not even that
i think tech journos just fall for anything

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20486  (isolation #371)  » Wed May 22, 2019 7:02 pm

In post 20484, Kublai Khan wrote:Trump had a "Mission Accomplished" moment?

nah
temper tantrum about infrastructure week and two failed court rulings

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20489  (isolation #372)  » Wed May 22, 2019 7:13 pm

In post 20488, u r a person 2 wrote:I think there's at least one company building a test track. Why is it a scam exactly? The theory seems pretty sound to me

even if stuffing people in tubes in a vacuum works
it has low rider capacity

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20493  (isolation #373)  » Wed May 22, 2019 8:21 pm

low capacity high speed travel already went out of business

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20496  (isolation #374)  » Wed May 22, 2019 8:58 pm

In post 20494, u r a person 2 wrote:
In post 20493, shaft.ed wrote:low capacity high speed travel already went out of business

are we talking small planes (which are used for all sorts of rural transport)
or cars (which were the original low capacity, high speed transport)
or what?

Looking at it from the perspective of a problem in need of a solution. Republicans win elections primarily, or in part, because of the economic and cultural divide between metropolitan areas and rural areas. A technology that could bridge that gap by allowing people to commute from far greater distances in a reasonable amount of time would
a) decrease housing costs in cities
b) increase real estate value in rural areas
c) bring economic benefit to rural areas by providing access to metropolitan job markets
d) bridge the culture gap by forcing increased daily interactions

Some technology capable of achieving this is the road hyperloop to an enduring liberal federal government.
yeah those features are great
but they are magical

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20513  (isolation #375)  » Thu May 23, 2019 9:30 am

I love infrastructure week


Hoping they are only doing the one indictment to get the others to start talking

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20517  (isolation #376)  » Thu May 23, 2019 2:53 pm

In post 20513, shaft.ed wrote:I love infrastructure week


Hoping they are only doing the one indictment to get the others to start talking

huh, this seems like it may have some implications

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20521  (isolation #377)  » Fri May 24, 2019 9:25 am

oh shit
I hadn't thought of the AG Barr as Russian mole angle of this whole shitshow
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/th ... e-dropping
Last edited by shaft.ed on Fri May 24, 2019 10:02 am, edited 1 time in total.

shaft.ed
dem.agogue
 
User avatar
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis
Pronoun: He

Post Post #20529  (isolation #378)  » Fri May 24, 2019 4:29 pm

In post 20528, Ginngie wrote:
In post 20525, Papa Zito wrote:Ok, space elevator then catapult trebuchet all the waste into the Sun.

Thanks everyone, we had a productive day, I'll be in my trailer.


I think a bullet train into space would be a better alternative

hyperloop
if its under a vacuum it wont catch fire

Previous
[ + ]

Return to General Discussion