already too defensive on the first page
this feels to me like scum's way of discrediting. calling it a "logic leap" to paint Bambi negatively and asking a question that's meant to shade the push, instead of simply intuiting that Bambi might have seen the way you reacted as scummy. again, overdefensiveIn post 56, ajfefijsleifjsa wrote:first the argument was "if they are scum they're too dangerous"In post 47, Bambi Jay wrote:AJ is scum. Get em outta here.
now it's suddenly "they are definitely scum"
how did that logic leap happen?
it's pretty obviously 50/50 from their hypothetical town!POV, this question serves no purpose other than to again discredit. Yes to a townie Bambi is not confirmed town, but obviously she's going to present as town regardless of her alignment. that's not something AI or worth posting about.In post 75, ajfefijsleifjsa wrote:bambi let's discuss your not policy lynch
why are you saying its 50/50 when its not?
"Olympic gold in mental gymnastics" really? I find all their reasoning pretty straightforward. Hyperbole again with intent to discreditIn post 76, ajfefijsleifjsa wrote:I'm sorry, I didn't realize you could quicklynch all on your own now? So far only you and GuiltyLion have expressed any interest whatsoever in lynching us. I highly doubt we get lynched, especially since our logic is flawless while you are over there getting an Olympic gold in mental gymnastics.
Again, this is simply combative shade meant to muddy up the thread and protect themselves.In post 86, ajfefijsleifjsa wrote:we literally RVS'd you and now you're saying we chose the wrong slot to fuck with? overreact much?
@hydra - Why do you think Bambi is scum, or if you don't think Bambi is scum, why are you arguing with them in this manner?