In post 2644, Nero Cain wrote:I mean ultimately it doesn't really matter if there's a traitor or not but I think the numbers could support a 4th scum. Mini normals are usually 10/3 setups so we are basically in a mini normal with two extra roles. I also vaguely remember reading something saying that town had alot of power so I could see a 4th scum/traitor being viable. + the rolecop/traitor thing is a nice neat little package. But ultimately...
IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER
What do you mean by town derp? Who is the town derping? And what does this have to do with anything I said?In post 2643, Nero Cain wrote:you aren't town are you?
In 2621 I made the statement that I thought that "informed vanilla" sounded like it could a result from a rolecop b/c I didn't know that traitors investigate as traitors.
in 2629 you asked me or someone if I was scum reading Fire. I said no but thinking about it I guess that its not impossible that he's an informed goon. But anyways...
In 2638 you asked me who I thought was the traitor and then light pushed Fire as the traitor despite there being a not a traitor result on him and you believing that Wisdom is town.
I responded by telling you that Fire only makes sense as a traitor if Wisdom is also scum so I asked if this is what you believed
and then...
AND THEN
I got this garbage.
Yes, Elsa claimed traitor and it could be WIFOM (more or this in a minute) Mod already informed us that a traitor investigates as a traitor. You are just talking in circles and I don't think its the town derp that you are trying to claim it is.Nancy Drew 39 wrote: No but Elsa said there was a traitor before Wisdom claimed Fire was an informed townie, so maybe it’s a town role? \_0_/
Why shouldn’t it matter and why isn’t it something town should care about? Don’t you think it’s important that we figure that out? Why not? *confused*In post 2644, Nero Cain wrote:I mean ultimately it doesn't really matter if there's a traitor or not but I think the numbers could support a 4th scum. Mini normals are usually 10/3 setups so we are basically in a mini normal with two extra roles. I also vaguely remember reading something saying that town had alot of power so I could see a 4th scum/traitor being viable. + the rolecop/traitor thing is a nice neat little package. But ultimately...
IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER
And Nancy asking who I thought the traitor was is not something town asks and/or should care about.
Okay.In post 2657, Nero Cain wrote:I mean, its self resolving. We know there are going to be at least 2 scum left regardless of if there's a traitor or not. If we go down our POE list and the game isn't over after we lynch 2 more scum then we know there's a traitor or a 4th scum member.
Oh, so Fire is probably town then.
Yeah, I didn’t see that but if traitor results as traitor and Fire results as informed vanilla, then I clearly misinterpreted that. I’m understanding now, why what I was asking got misconstrued. I was just trying to resolve Fire slot.In post 2662, Nero Cain wrote:I mean I guess its not impossible that he's some kind of informed goon but with the lack of flipped/claimed prs I'm leaning town on him for right now.
Chara has pretty decent reads. I feel good that he agrees with me on sheep and Creature being town. I also dislike Kaito’s FA push.In post 219, Chara wrote:sheep and FA are town, Alch is probably town that posts things that ping me for scum. Creature's start is good.
Elsa/Kaito can go.
Maki is ???
VOTE: Kaito
not aligned with Maki, i think.
Okay, molla/FA, sheep are obvtown here. I really should try to read the beginning of this game.In post 204, Frozen Angel wrote:my list would be:In post 182, sheepsaysmeep wrote:miller claims in order first to last
~% villa with 50% as null basically independent of posting and off of how they claimed/timing
fa 70%
alchemist 95%
dave 98%
lady angel 75%
chara 80% and i sort of like charas posting
but 5 strong towns from that
lolthesetup
fa 100%
alch 95%
dave 95%
lady angel 70%
chara 60%
In post 2666, Kaito Momota wrote:I have no choice but to assume that Maki targeted Clemency because that's where I told her to target. Either way her play here was disgusting.
VOTE: Clemency
If you guys want to lose the game due to not listening to me (we're halfway there) then be my guest, I don't care enough about you guys to try to save the game if you won't do it on your own
See you next prod
In post 2425, Kaito Momota wrote:I suggest Sheepsaysmeep.
In post 2489, Kaito Momota wrote:As promised, we will be lynching Maki today. That's certainly wher Chara would have been voting
VOTE: Maki Harukawa
After that, we can sweep around and clean up Clemency as well
Where are you getting this all from @Kaito? It seems to me, that you’re making a helluva lot of assumptions?In post 2559, Gamma Emerald wrote:Maki Harukawa has been lynched!
Spoiler: The Reveal
It is now Night 3, you have (expired on 2019-02-05 18:25:00) to submit night actions.
