Open 69 - Two of Four Mafia (a9) - Game Over before 592

[pojedinac]

Vote Natirasha

Because I agree with you completely.

[pojedinac]

I always start games with a self-vote.

Why? For the love of Flying Spaghetti Monster, Why?

unvote, vote: Lowell

Putting a player at L-2, a) this early in the game and b) just for selfvoting in random stage is very suspect.

We're still in the frivolous voting stage. And L-2 is a far cry from getting lynched. Do you honestly think that two scum would really pounce on this L-2 opportunity?

[pojedinac]

I always start games with a self-vote.

Why? For the love of Flying Spaghetti Monster, Why?

Because it usually gets the game moving qucker, I like to, and why not?

Ok, I can live with that. I guess...

unvote

[pojedinac]

glad you guys could kiss and make up but are you gonna do anything useful with that vote now poj?

I'll wait for a while before placing it on the biggest lurker.

[pojedinac]

We're still in the frivolous voting stage. And L-2 is a far cry from getting lynched. Do you honestly think that two scum would really pounce on this L-2 opportunity?

I don't know whether two scum would pounce on this or not, but it's reckless to assume that, ah, they wouldn't and then proceed to put someone at L-2 on the second page.

There are only two scum in this game. If they were both to jump to hammer a D1/page 2 lynch, this game would be over by D3.

Besides, L-2 is safe territory, especially early in the game. Personally, I tend to shrug off anything below L-1. Just ask rofl.

[pojedinac]

Low, if you're going to invoke meta-reasoning by claiming to keep yourself to a certain set of standards, you can't then deny others the right to meta-reason also, and demand proof of your claims.

While I also think that self-voting is dubious at best, there are other, more reliable ways to single out scum.