Alright fuck it I've had a couple drinks so why not
I have a role
That role, I thought, was in the upper half of a hierarchy. When I googled the hierarchy, I found ten tiers in that hierarchy. I figured maybe one was left out and we all got a different role in that hierarchy.
I know that there is a role above me and below me in that hierarchy but I do not know their alignment nor who they are. It was just heavily implied they existed. There's also a fictional man who both fits the theme of this hierarchy AND the overall setup, AND of solving a mystery in general. So I feel like I might have a grasp on the setup.
And because of that, I am now doubting Ank's wheat-related claim. Yesterday I was under the impression that everyone was a part of this hierarchy. I now know that to be false. SO. The question is: is there room in a micro for this clustering of three roles AND the wheat mechanic?
In post 606, Slaxx wrote:Alright fuck it I've had a couple drinks so why not
I have a role
That role, I thought, was in the upper half of a hierarchy. When I googled the hierarchy, I found ten tiers in that hierarchy. I figured maybe one was left out and we all got a different role in that hierarchy.
I know that there is a role above me and below me in that hierarchy but I do not know their alignment nor who they are. It was just heavily implied they existed. There's also a fictional man who both fits the theme of this hierarchy AND the overall setup, AND of solving a mystery in general. So I feel like I might have a grasp on the setup.
And because of that, I am now doubting Ank's wheat-related claim. Yesterday I was under the impression that everyone was a part of this hierarchy. I now know that to be false. SO. The question is: is there room in a micro for this clustering of three roles AND the wheat mechanic?
could the wheat mechanic be part of this hierarchy?
In post 606, Slaxx wrote:Alright fuck it I've had a couple drinks so why not
I have a role
That role, I thought, was in the upper half of a hierarchy. When I googled the hierarchy, I found ten tiers in that hierarchy. I figured maybe one was left out and we all got a different role in that hierarchy.
I know that there is a role above me and below me in that hierarchy but I do not know their alignment nor who they are. It was just heavily implied they existed. There's also a fictional man who both fits the theme of this hierarchy AND the overall setup, AND of solving a mystery in general. So I feel like I might have a grasp on the setup.
And because of that, I am now doubting Ank's wheat-related claim. Yesterday I was under the impression that everyone was a part of this hierarchy. I now know that to be false. SO. The question is: is there room in a micro for this clustering of three roles AND the wheat mechanic?
could the wheat mechanic be part of this hierarchy?
Plausibly. But there's at least three roles of an unknown alignment, mine being one, that are non-vanilla. The role left it open for there possibly to be more above the one above me or more below the one below me.
In post 609, Eragon wrote:so why couldnt ank be part of the hierarchy and a farmer?
or even both.
also, do you know if its directly above or below or just a general "above" , "below"
It is specifically said that I am in the middle of two others, and they all have named roles.
I tried to signal Ank with a hint that I
feel
like she would pick up on if her wheat role was integrated into her role in the hierarchy and unless I missed something it whiffed by her. It was hard finding something just subtle enough to get people who got a role similar to mine to recognize it and not let everyone else know.
Also I hate setup spec but I got wrapped up in it in Schadd's last game and it (barely) won us the game as town.
So.
Take that as you wish.
There's something about his games where I get more caught up in trying to figure out what the hell he was trying to do to fuck with me than I get in the game itself.
By the way, if I were just told there was someone above me or below me, I probably wouldn't have said anything.
But fmpov there are 7 players left, and so 2/6 remaining people, at least, know what I am talking about. Unless Schadd is completely fucking with me and didn't put the roles in the setup.
In post 611, Slaxx wrote:Also I hate setup spec but I got wrapped up in it in Schadd's last game and it (barely) won us the game as town.
So.
Take that as you wish.
There's something about his games where I get more caught up in trying to figure out what the hell he was trying to do to fuck with me than I get in the game itself.
ive had games like this before
its oddly comforting sitting back and being VT that just laughs at everyone being really confused
thinking
"we wont know all the results because who knows what scum did, and they sure as hell wont help us out"
In post 602, Eragon wrote:@ank is there anything else you can tell us about the wheat crops or just "high levels of wheat = bad for town"
Not really, no
My role just doesn't make any sense out of the gate, so my assumption was that wheat count would cause the game to function in a way it doesn't otherwise in order to make it a usable role.
I assume this is enough for you to understand what I mean and what my role is roughly?
In post 602, Eragon wrote:@ank is there anything else you can tell us about the wheat crops or just "high levels of wheat = bad for town"
Not really, no
My role just doesn't make any sense out of the gate, so my assumption was that wheat count would cause the game to function in a way it doesn't otherwise in order to make it a usable role.
I assume this is enough for you to understand what I mean and what my role is roughly?
but then why is it bad for town?
and now i dont understand it at all but i wont ask you to further explain the role itself, but if it makes it usable, why is that bad for town?
Because of how universal it was that people hopped on it, while the only two people that didn't were immediately jumped on. It reeked like either a red herring or something that scum was more than happy to help feed.