In post 922, BuJaber wrote:Anyway I just noticed something and I want to lynch overkill. After the vedith kill, claiming to be pr unprompted like that has to be unbelievably dumb from a PR pov, so I'm pretty sure he's lying.
VOTE: overkill
im WIFOMing at scum lol im actually a mason.
Dont take any of my claims seriously ill tell you when im actually hardclaiming
you're right, town shouldn't but they still do it. :/
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 957, rosterfoster wrote:Buj, it was some opportunism from Stanley. I think I explained it a little anyway.
V/LA until Monday
Okay yeah.
He conveniently left himself out of the wagon analysis by townreading all late voters.
Which is such a weird statement to make. Scum would have seen it get closer to the hammer and are likely to join it. It's much harder to predict which wagon will get hammered and vote on it before it gets going.
That's really not the direction of the conversation and it feels pretty misreppy on your part. He said he was WIFOMing mafia by claiming mason. He then said that he was waiting on someone to invoke LAL b/c town should try to be all WIFOMy and confusing. I'm agreeing that they shouldn't. Like I get that gambits and the like have sometimes paid off but more times than not they've failed or had no impact or you know, actually confuse and harm the town. But all that is just game theory and doesn't have that much bearing on the game. He then puffed up his chest and got all ready to defend himself when I guess he thought I was calling him scum and I clarified that I wasn't so...
Are you scum reading him for that? If you aren't then why is it not ok with you that I wasn't?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
oh, you're voting him so of course, you think he's scum.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
I think these posts and Buj scum reading me just enough that I leapfrog over RC makes me think Buj and RC are buddies. It's your classic "lynch town/bus buddy."
So my solve right now is maybe like a
Buj
RCE
Proffi
stan1ey
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
I didnt say scum predicted jibril was going to be lynched (although they easily could have now that i think about it, anyone could predict that based on how she was playing) i said it was a safe person to throw a vote on early on and not be questioned about it, which is what i think happened and then the wagon took off based on that plus how scummy jibril was
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
r-thinks one of me and RCE is scum, but doesn't want to lynch either of us.
[*]
Nero Cain
-thinks RCE is scum
[*]
0verki11
-thinks RCE is scum
[*]
Enigma
-null, doesn't tr him but doesn't think he'd tunnel Jibril as scum.
[*]
stan1ey
-"suspicious" of RCE
[*]
Amor
-hasn't really talked about him but did say that he disliked 931
[*]
Creature
-town
[*]
Sashaddin
-leaning town
[*]
Emperor flippyNips
-says he'll read later
[*]
joges
-hasn't talked about him
[*]
Eyes without a face
-hasn't talked about him but doesn't think I'm scum with him. Like duh?
[*]
rosterfoster
-hasn't talked about him
[*]
Lycanfire
-hasn't talked about him
[*]
profii
-hasn't talked about him
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In the meantime I am voting someone who is claiming to be something he's not. The mason claim was a followup. He started by claiming "town will lose if I get lynched". Which is horribly LAMIST, but more importantly has got to be a lie because no way a PR will actually expose themselves like that. Especially when he saw that vedith got killed.
And you're reading into my question to you. I wasn't accusing you of anything. I think I have more respect for your skill to seriously expect you to expose yourself with an obvious tell like that. All I was asking you is why you're sure he's town with a claim like that? Like what makes you think it's a town!overkill gambit, not a scum!overkill gambit. I'm tired of you interpretting everything I say as a shade.
In post 971, BuJaber wrote:
I'm tired of you interpretting everything I say as a shade.
What are you talking about man this is the first time ive done this, look through my iso, ive consistently said i think you are town. You can't blame me when you said this:
In post 960, BuJaber wrote:
He conveniently left himself out of the wagon analysis by townreading all late voters.
Could you explain how it's objectively scummy?
I understand you think it was a safe wagon to sit on, what is not clear is why you've decided that scum would not join the wagon later. There is an obvious motivation for you to do that as scum because then you wouldn't be included in your scum pool.
