In post 975, Nero Cain wrote: In post 971, BuJaber wrote:Like what makes you think it's a town!overkill gambit, not a scum!overkill gambit.
Why is it a scum gambit and not a town one? Going "oh he lied about his role, so he must be scum!" seems incredibly shallow. If both alignments gambit isn't it just null behavior? I do agree with you on the "horribly LAMIST" but eh, sometimes ppl are just full of themselves.
What would help you sort me and RCE?
Because the gambit helps scum more than town I'm inclined to believe it comes from scum.
I think if he were PR you'd agree with me that he committed suicide, so let's say he's either VT or scum.
If VT, the obvious advantage is to bait the NK. No other advantage. You could say him trying to take himself out of the lynch pool helps increase the odds of lynching scum, but at the same time it increases the odds of lynching or exposing an actual TPR.
If scum, he is trying to avoid getting lynched, distracts the game thread by making the players discuss his claim, could potentially expose PRs who are less likely to believe him, or even try to lynch players who call him out on it.
As for the sorting, this engagement between us 3 is a good start, and also seeing your reactions to other wagons etc. I am less sure of my original assumption that one of you has to be scum. Without a joges flip that was a premature assumption to make.