--------------------------------------------------
Deadline is in (expired on 2019-04-09 12:00:00)
This is hilarious coming from the guy who soft guiltied me to get out of being soft guiltied by URAP.In post 1589, Flavor Leaf wrote:L8 is literally just painting a picture so he can get out of his soft guilty tomorrow.
Then why haven't you voted me? Lacks conviction.He brings up the killing me to see more of the setup potential, but killing him does the EXACT same thing.
Proves nothing. The second game that I played I drew scum and crumbed Cop in my first post.I literally claimed my role in advanced. I was asking what technical breadcrumbing and what was different about that compared to normal crumbing. You can go back and see, because this is how I crumb.
Nope, you can explain both URAP and your claims with the single, simple assumption that you're scum. It may be more complex than that but this is the simplest explanation.URA targeted me, got roleblocked or I was rolestopped. If you don’t believe there’s a combination of that, then L8 is scum.
Completely false and blatant misrep.In post 1594, L84Dnr wrote:No.In post 1590, Flavor Leaf wrote:The only way L8 is town here is if scum were able to stop both my shot and URA’s, which is possible lately with the roles, but if the case is going to be pushed against me, when occam’s Razor is just L8 is scum pushing it on me when the SAME argument can be made for him.
Which is hypocritical.
The explanation that you're scum (and I'm not) requires only one assumption that we already know is in play. We know that there are scum and this scenario assumes that you're one of them. If you're scum then URAP's soft guilty on you is entirely accurate and your soft guilty on me is a fabrication.
The explanation that I'm scum (and you're not) requires the added assumption of the existence of some sort of scum PR for which we don't have evidence. You need that to explain away URAP's soft guilty on you.
I think that you just nicked yourself with Occam's Razor.
How? You say that two things are equal. I say that they aren't.In post 1602, Flavor Leaf wrote:Completely false and blatant misrep.In post 1594, L84Dnr wrote:No.In post 1590, Flavor Leaf wrote:The only way L8 is town here is if scum were able to stop both my shot and URA’s, which is possible lately with the roles, but if the case is going to be pushed against me, when occam’s Razor is just L8 is scum pushing it on me when the SAME argument can be made for him.
Which is hypocritical.
The explanation that you're scum (and I'm not) requires only one assumption that we already know is in play. We know that there are scum and this scenario assumes that you're one of them. If you're scum then URAP's soft guilty on you is entirely accurate and your soft guilty on me is a fabrication.
The explanation that I'm scum (and you're not) requires the added assumption of the existence of some sort of scum PR for which we don't have evidence. You need that to explain away URAP's soft guilty on you.
I think that you just nicked yourself with Occam's Razor.
And we know this how?I claimed soft guilty on you prior to even reading there was a soft guilty on me.
Seriously? Pointing the guilt at somebody else isn't a scum play?!?There’s zero reason as scum for me to claim a soft guilty on you after a soft guilty on me.
Like, that’s just not a scum play.
No, I didn't bring them up because you already had. I also didn't shoot them down. We might be dealing with a JOAT, ascetic, ninja, or any combination thereof. What we don't have is evidence of any of that. What we have is a simple explanation that sees Leaf eat hemp.In post 1604, Flavor Leaf wrote:L8 didn’t even bring up Ascetic possibilities or anything, he just wanted to hop on and push the notion of “crazuto believe there’s 2 roles”
That looks like insider knowledge who knows there isn’t, and there’s just an Ascetic.
And after your death, there will be.In post 1610, L84Dnr wrote:No, I didn't bring them up because you already had. I also didn't shoot them down. We might be dealing with a JOAT, ascetic, ninja, or any combination thereof. What we don't have is evidence of any of that. What we have is a simple explanation that sees Leaf eat hemp.In post 1604, Flavor Leaf wrote:L8 didn’t even bring up Ascetic possibilities or anything, he just wanted to hop on and push the notion of “crazuto believe there’s 2 roles”
That looks like insider knowledge who knows there isn’t, and there’s just an Ascetic.
You’re claiming ungated full no modifier watcher? Lol.In post 1595, L84Dnr wrote:No, I don't have any modifiers. It doesn't fit my PR.In post 1578, Flavor Leaf wrote:I’m also Loyal/Disloyal, and L8 has no claimed modifiers. Look at setup, guys...-.-
He knew he was guiltied and he’s taking advantage of URA’s posts
- Disloyal Vig makes perfect sense given that you don't want your Vig killing townies.
- Loyal Neighborizer similarly makes sense given that you don't want scum in the neighborhood.
- Loyal Watcher just makes my PR into a clumsy and confusing Cop.
Yup. Plain old boring town watcher is what I got. No modifiers, conditions or exceptions.In post 1614, Flavor Leaf wrote:You’re claiming ungated full no modifier watcher? Lol.In post 1595, L84Dnr wrote:No, I don't have any modifiers. It doesn't fit my PR.In post 1578, Flavor Leaf wrote:I’m also Loyal/Disloyal, and L8 has no claimed modifiers. Look at setup, guys...-.-
He knew he was guiltied and he’s taking advantage of URA’s posts
- Disloyal Vig makes perfect sense given that you don't want your Vig killing townies.
- Loyal Neighborizer similarly makes sense given that you don't want scum in the neighborhood.
- Loyal Watcher just makes my PR into a clumsy and confusing Cop.
In post 1617, L84Dnr wrote:Yup. Plain old boring town watcher is what I got. No modifiers, conditions or exceptions.In post 1614, Flavor Leaf wrote:You’re claiming ungated full no modifier watcher? Lol.In post 1595, L84Dnr wrote:No, I don't have any modifiers. It doesn't fit my PR.In post 1578, Flavor Leaf wrote:I’m also Loyal/Disloyal, and L8 has no claimed modifiers. Look at setup, guys...-.-
He knew he was guiltied and he’s taking advantage of URA’s posts
- Disloyal Vig makes perfect sense given that you don't want your Vig killing townies.
- Loyal Neighborizer similarly makes sense given that you don't want scum in the neighborhood.
- Loyal Watcher just makes my PR into a clumsy and confusing Cop.
Vedith and I as the scum team just makes no sense. I mean assume that I'm scum...In post 1611, Flavor Leaf wrote:The fact you are even still considering TownVedith means you’re likely just scum.
Yeah, I must be a complete eejit not to have made up a more convincing lie.In post 1618, Flavor Leaf wrote:In post 1617, L84Dnr wrote:Yup. Plain old boring town watcher is what I got. No modifiers, conditions or exceptions.In post 1614, Flavor Leaf wrote:You’re claiming ungated full no modifier watcher? Lol.In post 1595, L84Dnr wrote:No, I don't have any modifiers. It doesn't fit my PR.In post 1578, Flavor Leaf wrote:I’m also Loyal/Disloyal, and L8 has no claimed modifiers. Look at setup, guys...-.-
He knew he was guiltied and he’s taking advantage of URA’s posts
- Disloyal Vig makes perfect sense given that you don't want your Vig killing townies.
- Loyal Neighborizer similarly makes sense given that you don't want scum in the neighborhood.
- Loyal Watcher just makes my PR into a clumsy and confusing Cop.
You forgot Ascetic.
Untrue.In post 1613, Flavor Leaf wrote:Your flip gives everything that my flip would, except your scum flip benefits town more and your town flip benefits town more.
Assuming you flip green.What you are pushing essentially makes you the for sure lynch tomorrow in 5p lylo, and that’s why I don’t see you as town.
I'm trying to see how getting myself lynched tomorow would be convenient for me as either alignment. Spell it out for me. Use small words.My flip directly will incriminate you, and you are pushing like you have to see me flip before you can fathom the roles like that, which is incredibly convenient for ScumYou.