Only on occasions where I'm with people I might need to impress. (?)In post 196, Flavor Leaf wrote:SIV, are you the type of guy who wears cologne?
We haven't played mafia together. I don't think you know me.
Only on occasions where I'm with people I might need to impress. (?)In post 196, Flavor Leaf wrote:SIV, are you the type of guy who wears cologne?
I might have been on Boonskiies or Morality. Or I might’ve just seen a game of yours. The name looks familiar, but I wouldn’t say i know you either.In post 201, SIV36 wrote:Only on occasions where I'm with people I might need to impress. (?)In post 196, Flavor Leaf wrote:SIV, are you the type of guy who wears cologne?
We haven't played mafia together. I don't think you know me.
I don’t see how you get the LAMIST thing from what they said. Low-confidence reads also exist. The only part of this post that could make sense to me is the last part about answering someone else’s question, but I don’t understand where you see scum intent there. How would that have been an attempt for hitalt to clear his name? Also who are they buddying in this case, me or RCE?In post 193, SIV36 wrote:Below is what I had noted at the time. For some reason, I thought I had more.In post 102, Ausuka wrote:What are these red flags?In post 100, SIV36 wrote:I've noted a number of red flags coming from hitalt more than other players.
I would have probably looked over this easily, but then HitAlt tacks on at the end "It might help me understand you better", which struck a LAMIST chord with me. A normal town seeking to understand someone's previous identity wouldn't try steering the town's perception that it's a scum-hunting intent.In post 39, HitAlt wrote:@Fuscosco - are you an alt, or new on site?Might help me understand you better.
I haven't played this game very often, but from what I've observed so far, town-players tend to fall prey to a dunning-kruger effect. I'm suspecting that if a town player has a lot of information on someone, their confidence in their read would be really high. Having a low confidence read like above really doesn't make sense to me.In post 49, HitAlt wrote:Btw, I have seen Something_Smart both as scum and as town before, and I have to admit that I can not read their tone correctly. Ever.
(maybe i'm reading too far into this one.)
This is a personal quirky read, so I apologize if this read seems really weak.In post 42, HitAlt wrote:If I understood him correctly, he means that S_S selfvoted as scum in aIn post 37, Alchemist21 wrote:I’m confused here. He self-voted in response to someone making what was really an NAI play?
Alchemist was drilling RCE that question. HitAlt wooshes in offering a helpful answer of his own. In my experience, I keep confirming scum wooshing in to other people's Q+A's.
It's hard for me to empathize with this because as town, I see the importance of people sticking up for themselves above anything. Because answers to these questions provide a lot of information. When mafia wooshes in, it seems like they want more spotlight on them so they can clear their name. Maybe there's a slight buddying bent in there also.
Got it. So ultimately, this equates to a S_smart scumlean for you, yeah?In post 188, Vorkuta wrote:I don't like appeals like this (and he's actually trying to sell it)In post 172, cbynumber wrote:What about S_Smarts posts ping you?In post 55, Something_Smart wrote:I'm very easy to read if you know what you're looking for.I really don't like people trying to get points by downplaying their abilities- it comes off as "insurancey" for the future as in "oh tehee, sorry my reads were bad- it's just not my day today".In post 55, Something_Smart wrote:I have a hard time faking that as scum.In post 71, Something_Smart wrote:I am definitely not on top of my game todayplus past trauma from the previous game
To be fair, he claimed traitor.In post 205, Vorkuta wrote:By itself- it would.
However I just came from a game with him where I vig-shot him for basically the same thing (and more) which lost us the game, so that's kind of fresh.....
In post 210, HitAlt wrote:I'm not sure if scum!SIV would do that post.
I might have raised an eyebrow when reading it, but I still think the intention behind the post was propably good.
In short: I think the level of "tryhard" makes me lean town.
This was the only scummy thing in their post. After calling my phrasing LAMIST.In post 193, SIV36 wrote:It's hard for me to empathize with thisbecause as town, Isee the importance of people sticking up for themselves above anything.
He said explain it when I feel like it.In post 216, Vorkuta wrote:I don't see the word cologne in that reply
I only have a single bottle of brut cologne. I've had it for years. I have zero knowledge of fragrances.In post 202, Flavor Leaf wrote:
What kind of cologne would you wear in that scenario? Would you say you’re at least casually knowledgeable about different fragrances?
My idea was that it's convenient for mafia to answer other people's questions. It helps them produce content and makes players think they are game-solving. I know it's a stretch, but I was suggesting he may have been buddying RCE. I was getting gut feelings when noting these things of hit-alt and getting a wolfy impression of him. These gut feelings weren't strong but Ausuka wanted more of an explanation for my suspicions.In post 203, Alchemist21 wrote:
I don’t see how you get the LAMIST thing from what they said. Low-confidence reads also exist. The only part of this post that could make sense to me is the last part about answering someone else’s question, but I don’t understand where you see scum intent there. How would that have been an attempt for hitalt to clear his name? Also who are they buddying in this case, me or RCE?
But other than this, there really hasn’t been super meaningful content from him...In post 61, Alchemist21 wrote:I like this post.In post 50, Umlaut wrote:I assume scum pay some attention to what their buddies are doing. Fuscosco isn't going to duplicate your self-vote, and HitAlt isn't going to fail to notice that you made one. I guess in the latter case he could just be lying, but I don't think that's what's happening.In post 46, Something_Smart wrote:That's a bold move, Cotton.In post 45, Umlaut wrote:S_S and Fuscosco are obviously not scum together. Likewise S_S and HitAlt.
Can you show your work?
In post 108, Ausuka wrote:UNVOTE:
yeah I'm not really comfortable with my vote right now - it's not that i've suddenly lost all faith in my train of thought but i feel like rce is being way too legitimately gamesolvy outside of that to continue focusing on him.
VOTE: Siv36
i'd rather do this instead and the more i think about it there's not really any point waiting for siv to respond to vote him.
This specifically just feels fake. Sure, what he mentions is certainly a possibility, but I don't see any evidence that this actually happened rather than Hitalt legitimately just forgetting about S_S's vote. The last sentence just feels slimy tbh.In post 100, SIV36 wrote:I have a slight suspicion on S_S however. Contrary to Umlaut's thinking that S_S and hitalt couldn't be together, I think it's plausible that they are. Mafia could also be putting in extra effort to make it seem that they are not on the same team, and would probably work on that right from the beginning of the game. But, I'm also a newbie compared to you guys, you know each other a lot better than I.
He also says he's voting Hitalt because there's a number of red flags but for whatever reason doesn't specify what those red flags are.
I'm definitely not townreading Baezu either tbh.
This post from RCE really rubs me the wrong way...a lot of his posts don’t have much content and again, he goes from voting me to voting Siv, whom I feel is the other easy mark.....not feeling crazy town vibes from RCEIn post 59, HitAlt wrote:Fine enough.In post 56, Fuscosco wrote:I selfvoted because i could, because it sparks discussion, and because, aside from conspicuously not voting at all, its my mo
VOTE: ausuka - time to activate.
I understand why Siv made this vote- he himself had said before that hitalt was pinging him with red flags, but reading over it again, it seems like he might be buddying up to me because hitalt’s posts aren’t particularly scummy when you look at the entire thread...In post 103, RCEnigma wrote:On what grounds?In post 98, Fuscosco wrote:Its eay too early to scum read siv?
that baezu vote, though, had just enough meat to be real. what happened?
Baezu hiding behind Umlauts questioning was initially +scum for me but 91 is pretty much where I'm at. Maybe less sure on Ausuka just because I know she can town tell pretty easily as scum.
SomethingSmart has literally no meaningful content. Seriously dude, can you make a meaningful contribution to this game?
Patience, young Padawan.In post 222, Baezu wrote:SomethingSmart has literally no meaningful content. Seriously dude, can you make a meaningful contribution to this game?