So can we not we stop with the obstructionism and get a wagon that MOST of us can agree on?In post 1222, Vorkuta wrote:By jumping off you guys implicitly accept responsibility for a no-lynch AND for providing another wagon to prevent said no lynch.
Your entire argument hinges on the point that "scum want role claims", and scum!Ausuka is not possible because scum!Ausuka didn't act in the manner in which to get the most claims out. I've seen scum play.... differentlyIn post 1276, volxen wrote:If Ausuka is scum and her goal is to force multiple townies to claim
I don't know if you are just completely incapable of reading me or you are scum, but you are taking a pretty one-dimensional view of my slot. Then again, considering I am the most widely scumread person in this game, and people are even talking about scum!Ausuka... I would say most people are completely in the dark as to who is actually scum.In post 1277, Vedith wrote:Scum post
I’m still really floored you think that you happen to have better reads than most of the other people here despite giving little reason for any of them. I’m still not even entirely sure what your case is against me besides you think I’m misrepping your meta? I addressed the other issues already, and some are just patently false, like me not trying to engage with you.In post 1280, volxen wrote:I don't know if you are just completely incapable of reading me or you are scum, but you are taking a pretty one-dimensional view of my slot. Then again, considering I am the most widely scumread person in this game, and people are even talking about scum!Ausuka... I would say most people are completely in the dark as to who is actually scum.In post 1277, Vedith wrote:Scum post
That's why I am trying to help direct the night actions for our town power role(s), because I don't think this game is ever going to be won strictly the "old fashioned way" (i.e., by actually reading people correctly).If Slaxx is scum like I strongly suspect that he is, then he's already done a very good job at deepwolfing and fooling everyone into thinking that he is town.
please stop this.In post 877, Vorkuta wrote:Relevant
Sooo, why is this here?In post 986, Ausuka wrote:i think that flipflopping is a very different thing from fencesitting or being uncommitted. i also think that flipflopping requires going back and forth a lot of times on a lot of reads in a way that indicates that you're switching your read towards what is more beneficial for a scum agenda. i think that fencesitting is refusing to take stances on players. being uncommitted is not a term i've really seen having much use in mafia, so I'm not sure what it means exactly, but not being committed to one vote isn't a scummy trait to me. i don't think RCE's posts would fit any of those criteria.
pedit: sure!
theyre all poor/junkies/gay/oldassin/takeyourpick but manage to come together to improve each others lives despite having affliction or drama or money issues. Its about how imperfections and difference can be overcome and we dont throw out the baby with the bathwater.In post 992, Alchemist21 wrote:I had a friend who tried to get me to watch Rent one time (it was an actual movie version). I couldn’t really follow what was going on and couldn’t tell what was important about each character.
Im voting it and trying my best to get him lynched. Our wagon is just not happening.In post 1289, Vorkuta wrote:our fus wagon
Your scumhunting off your wagon?In post 1015, volxen wrote:He starts out by calling me underwhelming. I then point out some of his predecessors posts which pinged me. He says I am "dancing around" a scumread on him, and then when I actually try to engage him he doubles down on scumreading me and votes me for me. He has made next to no effort at engaging with me, but he is fully content with me being lynched today. It feels like he was going to "arrive" at a scumread on me regardless of how I reacted towards his slot. I don't get the sense that he is someone who is really trying to determine my alignment, because I think he already knows my alignment.
In post 1017, Flavor Leaf wrote:Yeah, but is it quality town posting, or quality scum projecting a solid case onto a townie for reasons to “mislynch” them rather than scum read them.
le lul.In post 1021, Vorkuta wrote:-should've tried itIn post 1019, Fuscosco wrote:couldnt I have just sank you and moved on as scum?
-even an almighty and powerful scum!fus might need a vork ally no?
-that's not a defense of the points MADE against you, it's an appeal to..... self-meta?
I'm not going to speculate on what scum!everysingleplayer might do or not do.
There have been way too many cases where town players don't play to what I perceive to be their optimal win conditions, and scum plays that just baffle me, so "scum!fus wouldn't do that" isn't really an argument that holds up.
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
