So would dave. I feel vaguely better about you after you pushed there, in fact. Which, again: I think if you/me/Egix is town, this game is pretty much in the bag.
This game is BNL's that was supposed to be modded by Stefanb, right?
idk what BNL is but StefB was going to run this and I guess he site flaked.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 792, NotAnAxehole wrote:I honestly have no reason to build a case, I'm dead. I don't see you guys moving to day 2 with me in the game, but whatever, here is my read on themilkcartonkid
I'm not sure anyone has a weaker game start than themilkcartonkid. He actually says absolutely nothing of value, does 0 scum hunting. It's not even like he's memeing, he's just saying a bunch of nothing like "I don't like this, but it's NAI" or "null scum", "not great", "much better". These don't seem like comments coming from town early in the game.
Spoiler:
In post 42, themilkcartonkid wrote:This honestly doesn't seem like a real claim? It seems completely NAI, but I dont think inferno was just going through the motions of doubting a Miller claim, which us plus town for me
In post 64, Inferno390 wrote:However much this sounds like parroting Tchill, refusing to speak your mind when we’re all trying to sort and analyze just looks like you’re trying to look active without doing anything. Which does not earn you town-points. It’d be one thing if you were trying to get a reaction out of people. But right now you’re just calling attention to yourself and then not following up on it. Not great.
In post 57, Tchill13 wrote:It's page 3 and I think you're full of it RC. Being cryptic helps nobody and it becomes a personal solve vs trying to work with others. You do you though. I'm not a fan of the style.
This looks much better
The uncertainty expressed in these posts is both useless and simultaneously trying to look like you're doing something.
In post 31, Inferno390 wrote:I’m confused by this question. How does people talking about ANYTHING early help figure out alignments other than by looking at how they respond? Isn’t that literally how you play this game?
And I actually analyze voting patterns and talking patterns. The miller claim itself is not what I would look at, but how people interacted with each other regarding it and what voting patterns emerged.
I was being specific about the whole miller situation. You saw the miller claim, and how people reacted to it already - either agreement or disagreement with the claim. Did you expect people to say other things than agreement/disagreement or the whole "miller claims at Day 1" theory?
In post 45, Vorkuta wrote:(we lost a town game where this very thing happened)
I guess this explains Vorkuta's behavior.
At this point, NotAnAxeHole is close from being lynched, and if I understood correctly, for being a Canadian. Must be a rough life being a Canadian.
In post 64, Inferno390 wrote:However much this sounds like parroting Tchill, refusing to speak your mind when we’re all trying to sort and analyze just looks like you’re trying to look active without doing anything. Which does not earn you town-points. It’d be one thing if you were trying to get a reaction out of people. But right now you’re just calling attention to yourself and then not following up on it. Not great.
I don't like this post, especially the "However much this sounds like parroting Tchill" part. It sounds like he is worried about his actions looking bad. I think town wouldn't care as much about what they say as long as they get their points accross?
In post 80, Inferno390 wrote:Ok I see how it is
I called you out on your BS confscum claim and so you try to apply pressure to me
Lovely
When people have real reasons for calling me scum, let me know. I’ll be here waiting when they do.
Ah, the great "I'm not guilty; you have no proof."
This usually comes from guilty people.
VOTE: Inferno390
Lol
This interaction pinged me, although I dont know what it pinged or who pinged it
In post 146, themilkcartonkid wrote:This interaction pinged me, although I dont know what it pinged or who pinged it
Maybe it pinged for you because you viewed the whole post as an interaction when it really wasn't one?
Except for the first quote, they were just comments.
When someone quotes a post, that is an interaction. Axe interacted with you and either their interaction or your original response pinged me. Not sure yet why
Looking back, this distancing from RC puts themilkcartonkid in a really bad situation.
In post 160, themilkcartonkid wrote:I think some people are just falling prey to the charisma. Also, I'm telling with your opinions, which means we definitely need to lynch you. I have a bad track record
In this post, he says 1/4 are scum when that is the default odds of the game... He then proceeds to throw around reads while also stating his uncertainty on each one, which seems absolutely unnecessary as town and is not typical town language at this stage of the day... Especially with the rate at which it evolved. Like, the attempt to play these reads off as remotely genuine seems so forced and with so many conditionals, ifs and buts...
. So that's great. If I had to vote one of them right now it would be axe,
but I dont trust my read there because
its influenced by tone
and theres a few things that dont match up with my internal logic
.
I dont think inferno has absolutely screamed scum
since their first few posts
but they havent pkayed well as town either
. I do think they over reacted to their push,
but that's nai atm
. Will probably influence my read later post someone flipping. Honestly, I dont get the push on tchill. Seems more actually annoyed town than inferno did and RC tred inferno for that.
Jp I dunno
.. again mostly tone plus have they actually brought anything other than parroting? If they were lurking that would be one thing,
but they post a good bit
. Vork, what have they said scummy, someone whose tring them, what do you find good about them?
This post is really weird considering #160, I feel like they are almost directly contradictory... Like, in one he's telling people not to follow RC, the other he's patting RC on the back and sucking him off.
In post 320, RadiantCowbells wrote:Basically I was sick of games where there wasn't any strong momentum things to catch scum from and I decided to force one here.
I'm sad it led to multiple replace outs.
Honestly, I liked it. I did think stating your original case more clearly would have been a little better, but the replace out I dont think was your fault. Inferno butted heads with a few people
Seems like distancing, the connection between themilkcartonkid and RC is really weird... Refusal to pick the same target. Seems like scum theater
I feel once again, this post is a bunch of nothing, which about summarizes themilkcartonkid's play this game, empty reads, pointless posts... Conditional statements, looking to be perceived as useful without being useful.
In post 397, RadiantCowbells wrote:And she was universally townread in the last scum game where I had locked her scum on the first couple of pages so I'm really about everyone townreading her.
My big concern with Tchill13 / Axehole was that they were masons deliberately playing scummy and that is luckily confirmed as not happening.
Rc, I am the king of triple guessing a townread, so I'm serious when I say if I keep agreeing her, she may need to be lynched. But I think shes actually contributing well rn
Lynch this guy, he's scum. I think RC deserves to be looked at as well.
This literally means that tmck is the only person who it makes sense to NK axehole.
"Nobody's ever mentioned Axe's case on Milk" - RuiRui
No, you used an entirely different context for your read there - you're saying that themilkcartonkid would have nightkilled Axe because he made a case against him, you never pointed to Axe's points as reasons to scumread themilkcartonkid and never talked about his individual points
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
about everyone townreading her.