Who are your partners and would you like to concede on behalf of the scum team?In post 1943, Alonzo wrote:Taking a break there, if anyone has question about pages 1-40 plz ask
-ws
Who are your partners and would you like to concede on behalf of the scum team?In post 1943, Alonzo wrote:Taking a break there, if anyone has question about pages 1-40 plz ask
Mesthinks this was a copy-paste from a hydra PT which forgot to remove a name of a suspected account owner.In post 1860, Team RWBY wrote:I think Sho hasn't read my DVa games tho)
Self-evidently obviously so, but what makes you think it's the latter rather than the former?In post 1870, Team RWBY wrote:The thing I'm suspecting is happening is that scum are prepared to let skygazer go if skygazer is scum, and are not in any particular danger of being wagonned if skygazer is town and the wagon ends up falling apart.
Sure did, but it was after 1715.In post 1871, Shining Dreamers wrote:But I did post in the PT.......
It actually wasn't from the PT, this is just what happens when I try to kinda just give a snap reads list on the fly... sighIn post 1952, Shining Dreamers wrote:Mesthinks this was a copy-paste from a hydra PT which forgot to remove a name of a suspected account owner.In post 1860, Team RWBY wrote:I think Sho hasn't read my DVa games tho)
The problem's with the evaluation though--the process of evaluating it is fluff when the miller claim's a nonentity, not important, not something to focus on...and yet Sky was focusing on it.In post 1875, Team RWBY wrote:This isn't a post that tries to create doubt inside a claim, but one that's evaluating it.
She was also busy. Sure, her actions there aren't scum but that sure wasn't town of her either.In post 1875, Team RWBY wrote:They acknowledge a wagon and while there is a good bit of discourse in the thread at the moment, they're not focusing on diverting attention to anything else.
I don't see solving.In post 1875, Team RWBY wrote:The bolded emphasizes the last commentary I had on previous post - they're looking at the game by solving it rather than honing in on what reasons they can find to indicate someone is scum.
As a matter of fact?In post 1875, Team RWBY wrote:Does this read forced? I want to know because I'm not seeing it.
What if I told you I've seen Sky make almost that exact same post as scum before?In post 1875, Team RWBY wrote:I don't think this post comes from scum... in most any situation. There's no specific agenda or means to helpSky'sposition in the game other than they're trying to parse reads because theirs are currently blurred.
Uh, because it'd be a scumclaim not to?
If it were six years, sure.In post 1875, Team RWBY wrote:Meta reads from this long ago don't feel too justified?
You're literally calling something which is blatantly a scum action, a town action.In post 1875, Team RWBY wrote:I don't see why scum would point out something they feel looked off about another player, only to take their response out of curiosity rather than pushing it or discrediting it.
Skyhad a good opportunity to dig into my posts because I don't follow the type of player she's been accustomed to in my game, and while the meta is both old and almost useless, they don't pry further than the response they originally asked for.
Wouldn't that be everyone especially me?In post 1883, Team RWBY wrote:who do you think has a lot of words but isn't saying much of anything?
Oh.
okay, let me rephrase.
Is it bad taste to, in response to this, comment,In post 1909, RadiantCowbells wrote:Neeniekit requested replacement. Have several people lined up.
"Oh shit I'm being pressured, better replace out"In post 1909, RadiantCowbells wrote:Neeniekit requested replacement. Have several people lined up.
Odds sit at a solid 60%!
...Uhh...because about 70% of the time I've seen a post like that, it's come from scum?
Don't worry you're the only slot in the game (aside from the Cerb half of that hydra) who reads my posts, the rest of the playerlist will safely ignore it on the grounds of it being more mastina shitposting.In post 1953, Team RWBY wrote:well
we decided to completely ignore it and hope it gets lost and forgotten but now that's looking really unlikely
-Blake
Who knows, up to her.In post 1957, Team RWBY wrote:BTW is Yume going to sign? Or are we supposed to figure out which head is posting purely through contextual inference every time
-ws
Not highest, but fairly high. You're someone who's right between the two zones--someone whoIn post 1959, Reasonably Clever wrote: @SD: Mastina. What level of mastina reader am I? Or at least, should I be? Because right now I haven't seen anything that makes me outright townread you, but you're also not acting out of character in the context of your intent was just to troll publicly(which is what I expected).
-Cerb
uh it's more I feel like she's making one post every 50 or so, so I kinda feel like as the backseat head she should be signing?In post 1968, Shining Dreamers wrote:Who knows, up to her.In post 1957, Team RWBY wrote:BTW is Yume going to sign? Or are we supposed to figure out which head is posting purely through contextual inference every time
-ws
But like I said before.
If you can't tell the difference between us.
Youreallydon't deserve to.
Skygazer, aIn post 1963, Team RWBY wrote:which slots are active lurking?
One post in 50 given my postcount is just about right--but keep in mind the intention's the opposite, that she should be at the forefront and me the background.In post 1970, Team RWBY wrote:uh it's more I feel like she's making one post every 50 or so, so I kinda feel like as the backseat head she should be signing?