VOTE: Baezu[l/vote]In post 27, GuiltyLion wrote:actually sorry, on second thought
VOTE: Baezu
tris your vote is still bad though
The Lion is onto something.
VOTE: Baezu[l/vote]In post 27, GuiltyLion wrote:actually sorry, on second thought
VOTE: Baezu
tris your vote is still bad though
Ya. I thought the same when I read it so I was happy when you had the same reasonsIn post 40, GuiltyLion wrote:several people had already posted, you didn't engage with any of them or any of the page 1 content, instead voting somebody who hadn't gotten to the thread yet with an explanation that pinged me as awkward
So what would happen in your world where everyone rolls a dice to start with?In post 64, insomnia wrote:RVS = random voting stage ???
Ummm yeah? This is why I don’t scum hunt in RVS. This is why I vote people who stack up in rvs, especially without stating a reason for it
There's literally no point in wagoning Insomnia, and tbh I also don't want to cause him more stress at this moment.In post 93, insomnia wrote:I have a family emergency and I won’t be able to post as much as I have for the next few days. I’ll just say please don’t wagon me to death carelessly, or cap my wagon at L-2 at least. I’ll try to give as much input as possible..although I doubt i’ll be able to
Says llikely one scum from random group of 4 players where > 1/4 of players are scum (taking him as town means exactly 1/3 are scum fhpov).In post 205, Elbirn wrote:What did you mean by this?In post 186, rosterfoster wrote: Really sticking your neck out there aren’t you YM?
And what prompted this vote, aside from what you were replying to?
Like what's actually wrong with jumping on a wagon?In post 210, MariaR wrote:Ok yeah tris is prob scum. Yes mafia feels like the easy wagon for scum to push for a ml
Eh. I kind of wished that early wagon on you had stayed, but whatever. Imma just pretend the whole family emergency business didn't happen.In post 220, insomnia wrote:It is town’s job to get rid of the scummiest town and it is scum’s job to get rid of the towniest.
Hey I can read this as scum!In post 306, insomnia wrote:Logic : Get rid of one of the most active players, easily readable, can point out to scum buddies (Fuck yeah)
Get rid of one of the, if not THE one who has the lowest activity, has a lynch pool of 6 people, has 5 posts, votes for a no lynch then hops on suspicious people without giving content (Fuck no fam what are you, crazy?)
But he's kind of trying to do it on the sly? Also recently fake-hammers have sounded townie, but he's doing a fake intent, which to me feels scumIn post 333, Elbirn wrote:Do you think scum-somnia would be so transparent about wanting to force role claims?
I always had this idea that scum are quite likely to say 'This should be lynched whethers it's town or scum, becuase they are bad.' That's where it comes from.In post 337, skitter30 wrote:@ roster i think that these two lines from insomnia probably dont' come from scum tbh
they're too 'i'm going to push what i think is right and i don't give a flyign fuck about the consequences'-y to be scummy imo
What made him really townie? Because I'm only seeing shade on people attacking him.In post 349, skitter30 wrote:b) insomnia's like .... really really townie and his push on ym is entirely consistent with how he views mafia and mislynches and lynchbait in a general sense
Sorry but that family emergency business screwed up the wagon on Insomnia which would have got good reads. I am not comfortable voting someone who has RL issues D1.In post 381, Baezu wrote:I really don’t like this post from roster- he’s been tunneling insomnia the whole game if you look at his iso, it’s scummy
Shucks.In post 450, Invisibility wrote:also yeahIn post 447, Enigma wrote:this is badIn post 445, rosterfoster wrote:Btw one of the people who was really pushing the theory discussion (so Insomnia/Enigma/Elbirn) is scum. Scum wants that sort of thing to clutter the thread.
no more tr for you
I have this feeling that this stance is always genuine, but scum are more likely toIn post 467, tris wrote:So, you think insomnia is faking this stance? I've gotten the sense that it's genuine. But, do you have meta contradicting that? If there is a scum attempting to clog the thread with theory discussion, I would think it would be Enigma.
I mean trying to do innocently by intenting rather than just looking for a claim. IDK probably wrong word.In post 470, skitter30 wrote:???? how is he doing it on the sly? he literally demanded that someone claim within the next 24 horus because he wanted to hammer them; that's like brazen/blunt/upfront/idk the right word but like the exact opposite of slyIn post 440, rosterfoster wrote:But he's kind of trying to do it on the sly? Also recently fake-hammers have sounded townie, but he's doing a fake intent, which to me feels scumIn post 333, Elbirn wrote:Do you think scum-somnia would be so transparent about wanting to force role claims?
like where do you see 'on the sly' from; that's so completely different from how i read his tone that i'm just ??? confused where you got this read from
461 was the most recent example.his posts just ... have a ridiculously townie tone - push and transparent and 'i don't give a fuck about how i'm viewed for pushing this' - and everything he's doing tracks with the mafia philosphy he's espousing; his actions follow his thoughts; what he's doing makes sense as a holistic, real thought process.In post 442, rosterfoster wrote:What made him really townie? Because I'm only seeing shade on people attacking him.In post 349, skitter30 wrote:b) insomnia's like .... really really townie and his push on ym is entirely consistent with how he views mafia and mislynches and lynchbait in a general sense
show me an example of 'throwing shade on people attacking him?'
a - kind of, ongoing stuff and also his alts make it confusing.a) have you played in many games with insomnia beforeIn post 445, rosterfoster wrote:Btw Skitter I do not ever recall having seen this type of convo with Insomnia before (Insomnia/Alts if you can point me to a time town you said the same I'll think), so I think it's beyond a disagreement over theory.
Btw one of the people who was really pushing the theory discussion (so Insomnia/Enigma/Elbirn) is scum. Scum wants that sort of thing to clutter the thread.
So I want to lynch in those three today. I've been kind of town-reading Elbirn so Insomnia or Engima.
b) bolded: no
c) why are yo townreading elbirn?
d) enigma and insomina have been on opposing sides of an argument so ending with 'i want to lynch one of those two' is meh; it feels kidna like you're leaving yourself room to vote enigma if that picks up steam
In post 446, rosterfoster wrote:Also Skitter thanks for breaking up your posts. It brings warmth to my heart <3
I think I say this stuff as scum. Need to see if Tris says this as town.In post 476, tris wrote:Skitter has been saying a lot of stuff I agree with. She might be town.
Oh I didn’t read that properly.In post 542, insomnia wrote:That was me saying the YM wagon is good because townies are on it. How do you take it as throwing shade on the people attacking me???
Why are you pushing a scumteam when we don't even know one flip? Makes me feel this for scum again. Ughh.In post 617, insomnia wrote:K, reading more I can see a Baezu - MariaR scum team
which makes me feel more comfortable about my town read on tris
and the one on GL
and the one on Enigma
In post 517, rosterfoster wrote:I think I say this stuff as scum. Need to see if Tris says this as town.In post 476, tris wrote:Skitter has been saying a lot of stuff I agree with. She might be town.
I don’t do big posts.In post 518, rosterfoster wrote:I'm also getting bad feels from how vigorously Skitter is defending Insomnia. Possible pocketing of Insomnia actually.
Oh yeah there was also this. I think scum wants to see what Tris saw.In post 520, tris wrote:You're probably right.In post 517, rosterfoster wrote:I think I say this stuff as scum.In post 476, tris wrote:Skitter has been saying a lot of stuff I agree with. She might be town.
Pedit: Oh, interesting
This is a mark against GL IMO. I think Skitter usually provides reasons.In post 152, skitter30 wrote:i think gl is town
I'm not sure Skitter tries so hard to diffuse an early wagon on her buddy which is probably going to dissipate naturally.In post 337, skitter30 wrote:In post 220, insomnia wrote:It is town’s job to get rid of the scummiest town and it is scum’s job to get rid of the towniest.
I’ll wait 24 hrs for a claim from Ym and then I’m voting.@ roster i think that these two lines from insomnia probably dont' come from scum tbh
they're too 'i'm going to push what i think is right and i don't give a flyign fuck about the consequences'-y to be scummy imo
I don't think this can be bussing.In post 546, skitter30 wrote:In post 476, tris wrote:Skitter has been saying a lot of stuff I agree with. She might be town.In post 520, tris wrote:You're probably right.In post 517, rosterfoster wrote:I think I say this stuff as scum.In post 476, tris wrote:Skitter has been saying a lot of stuff I agree with. She might be town.
Pedit: Oh, interestingno offense, but this progression on me is atrociousIn post 524, tris wrote:I completely read that wrong. I somehow read that as "I think skitter says this stuff as scum." As in skitter is capable of saying that as scum. Which I think is true.
This is giving me paranoia as a last distancing push, but I see the anti-associatives more from Tris' side so maybe it's a genuine push attempt from Skitter seeing as I had voted Tris before so that wagon might have gotten some traction.In post 599, skitter30 wrote:i don't think this is gaining traction like at all today but i still think this is scum so
VOTE: tris
"Oh Skitter please help me force through this myslynch so you don't get lynched'In post 642, volxen wrote:Why do you have your vote on Tris rather than Baezu? Tris is a widely townread player and you are clearly in the minority with your scumread of her. It's very unlikely that you could push a successful wagon on her, and you must realize this is the case based on the current state of the game. Baezu, on the other hand, is not a widely townread player and is coming under scrutiny due to some questionable things that she has done. You are currently the leading wagon at L-1 (6) votes, and Baezu is the closest thing to a competing counter-wagon at L-4 (3 votes). So wouldn't it make more sense for you to be voting for Baezu rather than Tris, given that you scumread both slots? Because your vote for Tris is really a vanity wagon at this point.
Skitter did that with everyone no? (except GL and Volxen who she never properly interacted with). It's one of the things which contributed to her lynch.In post 714, Enigma wrote:from skitter's angle, skitter interacts with baezu as if trying to scumhunt and asks questions - but never really follows up on it, nor scumreads baezu when there was plenty of questionable behaviour from baezu d1
I'm not sure the second paragraph comes from town GL. Too self conscious. I think I've only played with him when he was scum but I do vaguely remember something about being self-conscious.In post 148, GuiltyLion wrote:sorry yeah I see what you're saying, "scum incentive" is probably more clear than "scum!incentive", not sure why I did the latter tbh
anyway I feel I've been kinda dominating the past few pages so I'm out to play some Rocket League, catch you all later and hope to see some Elbirn votes on my return
Also I feel like this may be an associative between GL and Volxen.In post 284, GuiltyLion wrote:volxen I wanna think is town but his townreading me was almost a little too on the nose and I wanna see some scumreads. could maybe swap with skitter but skitter has been at least unwinding some other threads in addition to hardcore townreading/defending me as well