In post 717, Exilon wrote:Garmr states something demonstrably false. Look above! He even uses the word sheeping in 145, and "I'll follow". It's not incoherent at all!In post 290, Sashaddin wrote:Is this still about me in 90?In post 288, Garmr wrote:Person is under pressure to come up with a excuse makes the "I was sheeping town reads." Since their actions show no signs of sheeping town reads in fact you look for them saying they were going to do it you can't find it. You find evidence of the opposite.So by adding all those points you can conclude they were lying about it and it was a rushed excused.
He did!In post 718, Garmr wrote: Wrong he didn't sheep a town read post refers to skitter being a town read on the wagon and sheeping infernos reasoning.
Post #90 is Sash saying "I'm not right about Skitter and it was mostly RVS". Then he follows Inferno's vote on urap2.
He refers to this in 145:
In post 145, Sashaddin wrote:The game started hard and fast. My vote on Skitter was pure RVS but I sensed town in her, so I wanted to unvote and settle elsewhere.In post 119, Ausuka wrote:Can you explain this further please? Like, what about Inferno's analysis is great? I'm not seeing your pov here.
Of all the posts I found that far, this was the post that was telling me the most.I was feeling what was being said real good: the yikes 40 , the convenient 76, the free shade on 42... since we are early I decided not to be inactive and sheep a bit. I know taking someone else's reasoning is not the best move, but it's a start.People tell me I'm inactive Day 1 so I try to get away from that image now.
In 146, Sash has the following reads:In post 718, Garmr wrote:I don't know if I am their greatest scum read but if I was why vote bob before me and switch to me when I'm starting to get into a debate with inferno??The greatest scumread of Sash is Garmr.
These are his scumreads then. In 151, he votes Bob, gets wagoned, and 30 posts later posts this one:In post 146, Sashaddin wrote:(...)
- Garmr and I were scum partners once, he hasn't done much but I'm getting the same vibe. I'm watching this slot.
- Bob seems nervous scum, like post 97 below
(...)
He comes back in #260, which is relevant:In post 185, Sashaddin wrote:I think I'm going to quit playing Mafia, I always end up being lynched in the first days and that doesn't help town at all.
My main gripe here is that I can see this both ways. I can see Sash having been coached by maf to get back in the game and try to follow up on this one read. In 284 he went over ISOS and asides from Bob, his reads are much unchanged - skitter goes back to null and URAP2, even though the initial vote on him had been sheeped, is "less trustworthy". But he keeps the vote on Garmr.In post 260, Sashaddin wrote:Um, hello. Sorry for the absence, I thought of quitting then I thought how I hate when someone quits on games I like, so here i am.
Having caught up, the very first thing that comes to my mind is that Garmr is very opportunistic and shrewd. He's the same that when were red together, he's playing within his scum range imo. He's my prime suspect.
Others are less obvious, I'll have to read a second or third time this evening to get a feel of the other players, probably when the kids and wife are sleeping.
But in the meantime:
VOTE: Garmr
Is latching behaviour "scummy by nature" (wink)? Or is it motivated by a townie mindset who has been a bit shaken?
Sash came back with some renewed energy to the game. But his reads and votes didn't change much. After his vote on URAP2, in 573, he's scumread. Later, without any more interaction, he unvotes URAP2, in 661. He later explains this is due to finding some of the posts URAP makes townie. But now isn't voting anyone else.
Who's scumread right now? Only Garmr, I guess?
