An automatic votecounter is in use. This might not register.
VOTE: Donald
This should.
I agree.In post 16, Porkens wrote:Partner
Overreaction to the votes on Trump->ejjinami and Trump are partners.
In post 9, Not Known 15 wrote:An automatic votecounter is in use. This might not register.
VOTE: Donald
This should.
In post 24, ejjinami wrote:Let me repeat the question, why aren't you voting where your reads are?
You shouldn't have any reasons to vote for DT rn
Well, it isn't scum indicative if you didn't understand what I meant. And then it doesn't fall under "looking for something to call scummy" either.In post 27, ejjinami wrote:Oh, ok then. I thought you were talking about me and pork
How exactly is me not undersanding that scum indicative?
And why am I not town, who's looking for sth to call scummy?
Although I should have noticed it here...In post 17, ejjinami wrote:sorry, I don't eat meat, you can't be my buddy ):
Well, your opening posts still look a bit construed. But now I actually get the situation myself.... yeah I understood what Porkens meant.In post 65, ejjinami wrote:Wait, oh…
People’s reactions actually make so much more sense rn :/
It still shouldn’t have counted though, it’s literally impossible for anyone who doesn’t live in US to understand the vote
That’s not fair
No, not the posts you mentioned.In post 66, ejjinami wrote:If I understand it correctly, you’re SRing me and DT because of those posts:
In post 11, ejjinami wrote:And hey, hey, hey! D:< u no vote other people while asking innocent questions
Principle of fair trade, VOTE PORK NEXT
He doesn't even look appetizing
We really misunderstood each other there. Still, I find the posts together still a bit construed, but you are not in the same scum probability as before. And DT is off the hook.
Well, it's possible to find the whole scumteam by page 3. Unfortunately this is not what happened.In post 73, Psyche wrote:even nk15 himself admits now that his 57 was too much
the guy was claiming to have found the whole scumteam by page 3
You are straight out wrong. I remember that this happened when I re-checked the scum posts of a game quite often(that people made posts when their partner or they themselves were voted early that looked panicked...).In post 79, Psyche wrote:doubtful he'd genuinely believe such bullshit
inference then is that he's being disingenuous
She didn't talk about djt at all - she thought you were voting Invisibility:In post 108, Porkens wrote:She entered and defended the rvs target and went up and down about it. Then she got super defensive and ran her mouth all over when I called her on it. There was no good reason to defend djt
The "u no vote other people while asking innocent questions" refers to the only poster before you who did actually ask a question. Invisibility.In post 11, ejjinami wrote:And hey, hey, hey! D:< u no vote other people while asking innocent questions
Principle of fair trade, VOTE PORK NEXT
He doesn't even look appetizing
It would have been a sign that ejj is scum if they actually understood who Porkens wanted to vote. However, they thought Porkens(and, accordingly, I) talked about yourself as the person who was intended to be voted. That's just a sign of a misunderstanding, then, and not a sign of scum who is disconnected from townish thoughts(here: If statement Z by person X about person Y makes me think that they are partners then that statement is not only scum-indicative for X but also for Y; and voting Y is voting a scumread) and only cares about their partner and themselves not being lynched.In post 126, Invisibility wrote:this however, doesn't make senseIn post 26, Not Known 15 wrote:In post 24, ejjinami wrote:Let me repeat the question, why aren't you voting where your reads are?
You shouldn't have any reasons to vote for DT rn
That you don't understand this is another sign that you are scum. The post you posted tells me that you are partners with DT. Which means you arescum. I called you partners - what that means is obvious. This means that you are scum trying to find something you can name scummy.both
why would it be a sign that ejj is scum?
In post 26, Not Known 15 wrote:
That you don't understand this is another sign that you are scum. The post you posted tells me that you are partners with DT.Which means you are both scum.I called you partners - what that means is obvious. This means that you are scum trying to find something you can name scummy.
I bolded the parts that conflict with each other.In post 135, MaryJoLisa wrote:BTW, I could very clearly see how Ejjinami was giving off some big-time scum vibes with the entrance along with DT. I'm more inclined to think that the explanation of not understanding American politics is both true, and also a convenient tool to explain away the scumminess. But what bothers me here is thatyou weren't scum reading Ejjand then it seemed to take very little to change your mind and cast your vote on Ejj.
Another misunderstanding. Your question was reasonable, because it was not addressed to me... but to Invisibility.In post 138, MaryJoLisa wrote:Post 62 Invisiblity is TRing ejjinami at this point.
Post 66 ejjinami makes what looks to me to be a compelling defense to the scum case on her.
Post 77 Invisibility says that he’s buying ejjinami’s authenticity.
Post 125 Invisibility starts SRing ejjinami.
I just want to understand better what changed here.
Clarify this, please.In post 142, Porkens wrote:Mary and edge sure
Wait- that was not a rhetorical question?In post 147, Porkens wrote:You first?In post 129, Porkens wrote:In post 94, Not Known 15 wrote:You are straight out wrong. I remember that this happened when I re-checked the scum posts of a game quite often(that people made posts when their partner or they themselves were voted early that looked panicked...).In post 79, Psyche wrote:doubtful he'd genuinely believe such bullshit
inference then is that he's being disingenuous
Unfortunately, I sometimes excitedly rush to conclusions that make someone look scummy without taking something into account I should have seen.
I looked at other entrances of ejjinami in completed games.UNVOTE: ejjinami
How has this evolved?
Reason?In post 167, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Porkens I think you might be scum this game.
Same question.In post 169, Baezu wrote:Liking where my vote isIn post 138, MaryJoLisa wrote:Post 62 Invisiblity is TRing ejjinami at this point.
Post 66 ejjinami makes what looks to me to be a compelling defense to the scum case on her.
Post 77 Invisibility says that he’s buying ejjinami’s authenticity.
Post 125 Invisibility starts SRing ejjinami.
I just want to understand better what changed here.
In post 146, Not Known 15 wrote:Clarify this, please.In post 142, Porkens wrote:Mary and edge sure
In post 174, MaryJoLisa wrote:I think the proper thing to do is to let the replace-in have some time to read the thread and think things over.In post 173, Porkens wrote:Mary is defending ej. Ej is pretty clearly scum. Your unvote makes no sense.
Vote this please.In post 183, Invisibility wrote:aaand we have two days so im gonna have to compromise wagon
Well... maybe because of this below?In post 219, Invisibility wrote:why are there people that aren’t voting porkens
In post 119, Not Known 15 wrote: if you look at the ISO of invisibility their posts contain:
-rvs/useless posts
-unexplained townread on ejj early on<---also possible nightkill target crumb?
-Vote NK, without any reasons(not even "I agree with X")
... and one question to MaryJo("Who is scum") that anyone could ask anywhere and that - at that point - is a bit strange(why would town ask this that early - normally people say their reads without being asked, and as town you normally ask only if people keep silent - and I see no real reason for this question but to appear as a "useful player".
Their behaviour looks to me like mainly non-committal play trying to avoid attention while still trying to look like an actuallyuseful contributor.
We don't have any power roles. That means that this is scum indicative.
VOTE: Invisibility
In post 185, Not Known 15 wrote:Vote this please.In post 183, Invisibility wrote:aaand we have two days so im gonna have to compromise wagon
In other words, we need 5 votes on someone before deadline or there is no lynch.
These are the things that stick out very much.In post 231, Porkens wrote:Ok Jesus look I’m town my intro was not forced luv is either misrepping me on purpose or can’t read me.
Ej had an extremely scummy entrance which both NK and I picked up on. nK has abandoned that read But I think the replace out was scummy and luv pushing me feels like shooting for opportunity.
Mary joe was my lock for ej partner because of all the defending.
But I think nk is town, and I respect their reads, so That swayed me away from ej hence my mj read goes away and luv just cant read me.
I followed nk onto invis,and then nk fucking left me there like a real piece of crap, so now I feel like I’m holding a bag of shit.
But i don’t want to appear weak so I can’t back off my invis voteeven though it’s actually meh.
Also confirmation bias.
In post 194, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Psyche can be town.In post 149, Psyche wrote:looks like this is all the info im gonna get this d1
suppose i'll have to reach a little to decide who should die
In post 151, Baezu wrote:I don’t like either of these wagons
VOTE: psycheIn post 158, President Donald Trump wrote:Useless vote. Sad! Everybody knows the best vote right now is not known.
In post 134, President Donald Trump wrote:Mediocre Psyche wouldn't know how to license his name to a mob-tied Atlantic City casino project if his life depended on it. Sad!
We are at 4/2.In post 280, Invisibility wrote:wait
we're at 6/2
goes to 4/2
i dont think that we lose the game at 4/2 assuming the mafia get this nightkill as well
(Quote changed to include the missing /; added bold parts)In post 201, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Invisibility
President Donald Trump
MaryJoLisa
Baezu
Porkens
Psyche
Not Known 15
Trumpcan live for nowsince his gimmick amuses me. I heard good things aboutMary Joso shecan be reevaluated tomorrow.
(also added bold parts here)
The other collusion looks TOO obvious.In post 299, President Donald Trump wrote:CNN doesn't want to talk about Baezu's "individual" "typo" where he signaled to his partner that they should vote for the NK target. Still SCUMMY!
The problem is the material from LUV - it could be connected to Baezu(but also to Invisibility btw). And in that case, we have a problem.In post 301, MaryJoLisa wrote:I’m hearing about collusion between Trump and Invisibility and between Invisibility and Baezu. I’d thought I’d take a look at both sets of interactions and try to make a case for either pairing. I also noticed after writing this that NK15 suggested LUV and Baezu, so I'll look at that one too to see what I can glean from there.
Here’s what I think an Invisibility/Trump partnership might look like:
Spoiler:
Now let’s see what an Invisibility/Baezu partnership might look like:
Spoiler:
If there are errors in the work above, please correct them. I tried to double check everything but mistakes do happen. I'm not ready to place my vote, but I'm leaning toward Invisibility because he's the common denominator. Things seems to be revolving around him.
That could hammer Porkens. Instead, it sends Invisibility to L-2; and because I voted Invisibility before this risks me voting for Invisibility and suddenly Porkens is L-2 and Invisibility at L-1.
In your analysis you say that it would still empower Trump to re- vote Porkens and hammer. No.In post 305, MaryJoLisa wrote:Yeah, but I addressed that in my spoiler above. Take a look at posts 253 - 257. I think it could have been a power move for DT and Invisibility's panic looked genuine. He was speaking directly to Trump. He wasn't saying, "you should vote for Porkens because..." He was more or less saying, "What are you doing?? This was not the plan!"
Nobody else looked at this, right? Otherwise the reactions make no sense.In post 298, Not Known 15 wrote:(Quote changed to include the missing /; added bold parts)In post 201, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Invisibility
President Donald Trump
MaryJoLisa
Baezu
Porkens
Psyche
Not Known 15
Trumpcan live for nowsince his gimmick amuses me. I heard good things aboutMary Joso shecan be reevaluated tomorrow.(also added bold parts here)
Now, THAT looks like a Psyche kill crumb.
First, they made a list, with possible lynches; 4 people were not possible lynches:Psyche, Donald, you, me.In post 331, MaryJoLisa wrote:What do you mean? I did see that you made that post and it resonated with me, but it didn't feel like the silver bullet. Maybe walk me through it?In post 327, Not Known 15 wrote: Nobody else looked at this, right? Otherwise the reactions make no sense.
No, you are scum, and your reaction looks like one from someone who has given up.In post 346, Invisibility wrote:like actually someone unvote I am town and I don’t want to lose
This sudden simulated change of emotions should fool no one.In post 349, Invisibility wrote:CAN WE PLEASE IUST LYNCCH BAEZU FIRST????????
LIKE ACTUALLY
THE CRUMHS ARE THERE FOR BOTH IF US
BAEZU IS SCUMMIRR ON HER OWN
In post 359, President Donald Trump wrote:Different opinions are expressed and I make a decisive and final decision - it is a very simple process.
Obviously town - didn't select a nightkill target.
VOTE: Invisibility
Obviously town - didn't select a nightkill target.In post 360, Baezu wrote:About to get on a plane, will comb thread thoroughly tonight
In post 298, Not Known 15 wrote:(Quote changed to include the missing /; added bold parts)In post 201, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Invisibility
President Donald Trump
MaryJoLisa
Baezu
Porkens
Psyche
Not Known 15
Trumpcan live for nowsince his gimmick amuses me. I heard good things aboutMary Joso shecan be reevaluated tomorrow.(also added bold parts here)
Now, THAT looks like a Psyche kill crumb.
It isn't MYLO. It is LYLO.In post 369, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Town does not vote so quickly in MYLO here.