Okay let's try again.
Ya know who's not an interesting animal?
VOTE: rosterfoster
Take that you normal animal.
Okay let's try again.
no way!!!!!!In post 74, Nero Cain wrote:Why the fuck are ppl claiming.
Unfortunately Kid there will be no dick sucking. Yes, I am the hated straight white male. Sorry to disappoint you.
tl;dr what i say has no meaningIn post 88, Fumuki wrote:I`ll make this more self-evident if someone didn`t understandSince there`s a confirmed 12:3, as long as the nightkill happens, that means we can afford 3 mislynches. Then in that case, I think the real optimal play here is:
Day 1: Infolynch (mislynch)
Day 2: Infolynch again (mislynching twice)
Day 3: maybe lynching scum but...mehhhh, third time is the charm. Info is better than lynching mafia so Infolynch for sure. (final mislynch).
I think when the ratio gets to 3:3, we finally might haveenough to lynch scum.info
Yeah, probably the optimal play here. I`m pretty confident in this.
But since I`m bad at mafia I always try to lynch the scummiest slot instead of gaining. I know, I`m dumb but I can`t help it.info
I recommend everyone to infolynch though.
That's a lot of joke posts in a row.In post 91, Fumuki wrote:I was joking until a moment ago
but nomnom, are you really scum?
that`s sad
When you are self-aware of your own meta it becomes a meaningless axis of discussion because you can use it to deflect discussion and get away with things you wouldn't be able to get away with in the first place.In post 96, Fumuki wrote:In other words you want to ignore my 1-year solid meta?In post 95, nomnomnom wrote:I don't consider "I don't play like this as scum" a meaningful discussion, for all that's worth.
Well, that`s fine to me but wrong.
It's almost like I was trying to get reactions, and it worked since you suddenly switched on me when you had a good case on sickofit. So couple that with the fact you post a lot of stuff that doesn't actually mean anything/jokes, and that gives us a very scummy looking player.In post 99, Fumuki wrote:You:
1. said "I don`t know who to for vote for" when we were in page 3 or 4 and it definitely wasn`t hard to read the game
2. took my joke post seriously even though you later recognize that I was joking around and never had a problem with my joke votes on SickofIt
It`s like, weird.
The way you did it.In post 102, Fumuki wrote:I mean, I can get somewhat someone trying to get reactions but...I can also see scum saying "I was trying to get reactions" everytime they do something scummy?In post 100, nomnomnom wrote:It's almost like I was trying to get reactions, and it worked since you suddenly switched on me when you had a good case on sickofit. So couple that with the fact you post a lot of stuff that doesn't actually mean anything/jokes, and that gives us a very scummy looking player.
and what do you mean by "good case" on sickofit?
What case?
Sickofit had the most scummy looking entrance but that was minor. I had actually a half-case in Eeevee, but I thought your post/behavior was a bit scummier than his (since you did not only the same thing as him, but in a worse way).
What is there of scummy in switching votes to you?
I love you too.In post 105, rosterfoster wrote:They’re very sheepable.
We're never lynching axe today.In post 297, Skygazer wrote:is this like a "i would never lynch there" level of town?In post 294, nomnomnom wrote:Axe is town btw
so cold...In post 312, Skygazer wrote:i like dont know you could u please not call me thatIn post 310, nomnomnom wrote:It's a shitshow and i'll proudly be part of it you bitch
you're firedIn post 328, Saudade wrote:I taught him all he knows
What other suggestions do you have, then?In post 331, Sickofit1138 wrote:I don't really like any of the Axe, Nero, or sky wagons today actually.
Huuuuh no.In post 360, bob3141 wrote:The only real town fleeing I have is I feel that nom is town just due to how she went about defending axe when he was being pressured. It wasn’t like a scum trying to defend there scum partner but an absolute insistence that axe was town and that she would never consider voting for axe. So she must know something.
Participates in the game fairly often and the posts are genuine. Can't imagine a scum making this kind of post.
I can't. It's just a gut feeling, but a strong one at that.In post 418, Nero Cain wrote:sell me on sky
So what happened to your "I get it" post where you suddenly unvoted? That's a big 180 right there.In post 470, Skygazer wrote: im TRing axe/nom for reasons.
I'd rather choose sky over these two.In post 485, Nero Cain wrote:not evee? not wizard?In post 483, nomnomnom wrote:Tbh I feel to see a better lynch than Sky today
Not "At least 3 scums". 3 scums.In post 528, Nero Cain wrote:you know there are at least 3 scum in this game right? A singular scum read feels pretty fake and as scum gives you plenty of leverage to push w/e.In post 488, NotAnAxehole wrote:I scum read Skygazer.
I'd be fine with axe or evee.
Informed role? I didn't see such a thing?In post 715, Nero Cain wrote:What if this is a bus? The whole guy claimes RB in his first post and then we just happen to have an informed role seems like such a 1 in a million coincidence that it seems almost staged.
Probably not much tbh
In post 809, Wagonomics wrote:This was sarcasm btw, I mostly just think axe should be lynched because his reasoning is surfacelevel garbage and he's probably going to make town lose. I'm indifferent about wiz's alignment but the 1v1 is almost certainly some sort of asinine gambit even if wiz is scum. Axe spewing surfacelevel garbage can be scum even if this is a slightly more convoluted gambit than I'd expect from scumIn post 806, Wagonomics wrote:This is scumIn post 805, NotAnAxehole wrote:So yeah, can we just lynch TheWizard and quick lynch his scum buddy tomorrow, this game is awful... One scum left to find.
VOTE: nomnom
"That was an omgus" post was also awful and I'm feeling kneejerky
That's because from a gamesolving perspective it makes the most sense.In post 822, bob3141 wrote: I am however, slightly unnerved at the speed of wizards bandwagon. From none to 4 so quickly. Especially that those voting for wizard moved from sky prety much as a block.
Who are you referring to?In post 832, Nero Cain wrote:from my POV you could just possibly be scum, idk.
You were already voting me lol
Well, yes, when you say someone could be scum I kinda wanna know who you're referring to, if only for posterity.In post 839, Nero Cain wrote:Does it really matter? also BoonIn post 833, nomnomnom wrote:Who are you referring to?
You sound desperate for a lynch.
Huuuuh I'm mostly new to the site, only player I played with here is roster.In post 890, Wagonomics wrote:I guess general questions are ignored at this point in the fiesta
Nom you ever play with sick? What you think of that slot?
Why are you so quick to defend someone when you're not even sure why they did a certain thing?In post 928, Flavor Leaf wrote:I can’t mention why, but I see Wizard as the type who messes around as town an will claim randomly early games.
why did I laughIn post 1040, Wagonomics wrote:You can only ketchup if you relish the time you have
Only completed one game on site so if anyone tells you they have meta on me (except roster and even then I'd be surprised) they'd be lying.In post 1062, NerfedBuJ wrote:Oh and if anyone has meta on nom to share that might be helpful.
I'd be questioning that but I know how you function and that's your town game in general, so heh.In post 1109, rosterfoster wrote:What’s the point in doing nothing?In post 1107, Nero Cain wrote:but what was the point of posting a fake read?In post 1103, rosterfoster wrote:Because I didn’t have real reads.