[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 10958229 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null micro 871: mystery box of silver 4 (G O) - Mafiascum.net
In post 39, GeminiTwin12 wrote:Yeah, I'm not putting much stock into anything considering the game is still fresh
Actually, why bother saying this at all?
because assuming 'certain things' could be alignment indicative is a bit...pointless considering the reason I stated above.
OK, sure, but you could have just named the 'certain things' and say that they're not alignment indicative, for the sake of discussion or clarity. Just felt like an unnecessary and somewhat dodgy statement.
Like this: Hey Porkens, those RVS votes are not alignment indicative. Are you trying to pocket me?
p-edit: Cheeky and Porkens, why are you both focusing on the wrong thing?
Why is what they are focusing on wrong? I find what you're focusing on to actually be less relevant.
In post 52, LuckyOtter wrote:Internet went down the second I was going to post with quotes and tags. Grr. Responding quickly on my phone.
Gemini's vote was post 13. There was no wagon on Porkens as Cheeky implies, just one vote. It was RVS and clearly a joke vote. So that business should be the non-issue. Gemini's 'I'm here but have nothing to say' post was the first thing I've seen that merited real follow-up
What do you mean? I'm just trying to understand Otter's thoughts so I can sort him. Why is it strange I would ask that question? It seems like a normal kind of question to ask in a game of mafia.
In post 84, CheekyTeeky wrote:
I like how you assume we should all play the same way. If your brain can't see the use, then dammit maude, it's not useful!
Conversely, I want to townread you, but that might just be because you have a playstyle that I like so far.
In post 133, CheekyTeeky wrote:Gemini can you talk about how it's reaching? Like I think I get it but I'd like your perspective.
It's reaching because one was me simply trying to gain perspective on the reads list, I read iso's and I said how/why I could see LuckyOtter + Tris could be there and I said how I don't understand Porkens/Parachute so it's not like I said I disagree and left it at that. Then that would have been me saying stuff just to say it. That I could see how someone would take issue. You disagree, ok fine, why do you disagree with my opinion?
Also I don't understand how my response to a question pertaining to me not starting a wagon and alleged attention aversion is pretty bad, given the question in and of itself. This whole thing just feels empty to me.
Seems like scum caught for the wrong reason syndrome.
I feel this over aphet.
VOTE: gemini
I don't see that. In fact I'm leaning a bit town on her. I like 116.
In post 126, apthet wrote:
I also went back and looked at Gemini's posts because I thought that townreading LuckyOtter and tris and disagreeing with a townread on Porkens on her part was a particularly disagreeable opinion.
I can't be arsed to meta-dive everyone and ongoing games rules prohibit me from talking more about tris's playstyle but
That'sthree (vague, general, surface-level) questions in a row, none of which they actually followed up on. Like idk if I'm just used to newbscum in games I'm usually in throwing around questions to make it seem like they're trying to find answers but their questions have no substantive value behind them at all, but their ISO is basically filled with exactly that. If you interrogate someone I'd assume that you actually want to use the information you get out of it, unless you're scum who doesn't need that info.
VOTE: tris
Two of those questions where literally right before you had posted. Of course I haven't followed up on them. For the first one there's been no need to follow up on. Cheeky's answer is a piece of my understanding of her, but there was nothing specific in her answer that I felt the need to say something about.
Also, why are those links to quoting the posts?
In post 148, CheekyTeeky wrote:
Ngl I don't knows what's up with porkens/Tris voting each other for so long.
Just a leftover vote from RVS. I haven't yet found who I want to vote for reals. I'm in the midst of sorting through my thoughts on various players. UNVOTE:
I can't be arsed to meta-dive everyone and ongoing games rules prohibit me from talking more about tris's playstyle but
That'sthree (vague, general, surface-level) questions in a row, none of which they actually followed up on. Like idk if I'm just used to newbscum in games I'm usually in throwing around questions to make it seem like they're trying to find answers but their questions have no substantive value behind them at all, but their ISO is basically filled with exactly that. If you interrogate someone I'd assume that you actually want to use the information you get out of it, unless you're scum who doesn't need that info.
VOTE: tris
I'm finding it odd that this is the impression you're getting from my ISO. It seems to me that the rest of my ISO (well, after RVS) demonstrates more thoughtful stuff.
In post 137, LuckyOtter wrote:Still trying to figure out where to move it/hoping LG would come back before I did
Why? Is it making you nervous?... Should I just leave it there maybe?...
..
.
VOTE: apthet Thank you for the scumday wishes, really, but I'm also not liking your Gemini vote. You say that Gemini's post was "pretty bad," (why?) but then immediately hedge this by saying it could be a reactive town. Then you pretty well admit you're reaching in 129. This doesn't sit well--shows a lack of conviction.
I'll agree that a certain amount of reaching is necessary early on, but we're moving beyond that point now. It's not a great excuse.
Agree that the Gemini vote was based on weak reasoning and the hedging was scummy, but while I easily see scum making such a post, I can also see it coming from town who is unsure of their own reads and are trying to strike a point. To be fair, I did see Gemini's post as textbook scummy, while having seen many town with such an attitude leaves me unsure on my Gemini read, and I actually think it's more likely from town.
I can't be arsed to meta-dive everyone and ongoing games rules prohibit me from talking more about tris's playstyle but
That'sthree (vague, general, surface-level) questions in a row, none of which they actually followed up on. Like idk if I'm just used to newbscum in games I'm usually in throwing around questions to make it seem like they're trying to find answers but their questions have no substantive value behind them at all, but their ISO is basically filled with exactly that. If you interrogate someone I'd assume that you actually want to use the information you get out of it, unless you're scum who doesn't need that info.
VOTE: tris
I'm finding it odd that this is the impression you're getting from my ISO. It seems to me that the rest of my ISO (well, after RVS) demonstrates more thoughtful stuff.
Oh, forgot about your earlier post where you address other parts of my ISO.