That's not quite my idea. I think it's a more psychological thing. Deflecting by way of a joke. Like I said, it's minor. (I also think that your responses seem town here.)In post 103, CheekyTeeky wrote:You see me say maybe I'm town and you take it literally. Like what do I achieve as scum there? It's more likely I'm attempting to troll the troll which is NAI.
Is this a meta thing?
Yeah. The last game I played, I made a naked vote and someone asked me why, and I went into my reasons, and then they started scumreading me for not giving the reasons immediately. I think that logic is terrible but I thought I'd ask you the question and see how you answered it anyway. Now that I did, I don't think it really helped me at all.In post 109, LuckyOtter wrote:Because in my mind it was fairly obvious given the preceding posts. I'm curious, is there a reason for this question?
I could also see it coming from a more "reactive" kind of town player but we'll see.In post 67, GeminiTwin12 wrote:True enough, you have a point.
Avoid attention from what? I'm not joining a wagon just to join one. Someone has to be giving me scummy vibes for me to.
Why are you still voting me?In post 110, LuckyOtter wrote:And damnit if I don't like this reads list (not just because I'm in the townlean ).
It's reaching because one was me simply trying to gain perspective on the reads list, I read iso's and I said how/why I could see LuckyOtter + Tris could be there and I said how I don't understand Porkens/Parachute so it's not like I said I disagree and left it at that. Then that would have been me saying stuff just to say it. That I could see how someone would take issue. You disagree, ok fine, why do you disagree with my opinion?In post 133, CheekyTeeky wrote:Gemini can you talk about how it's reaching? Like I think I get it but I'd like your perspective.
huh?In post 137, LuckyOtter wrote:Still trying to figure out where to move it/hoping LG would come back before I did
Why? Is it making you nervous?... Should I just leave it there maybe?...
..
.
Seems like scum caught for the wrong reason syndrome.In post 136, GeminiTwin12 wrote:It's reaching because one was me simply trying to gain perspective on the reads list, I read iso's and I said how/why I could see LuckyOtter + Tris could be there and I said how I don't understand Porkens/Parachute so it's not like I said I disagree and left it at that. Then that would have been me saying stuff just to say it. That I could see how someone would take issue. You disagree, ok fine, why do you disagree with my opinion?In post 133, CheekyTeeky wrote:Gemini can you talk about how it's reaching? Like I think I get it but I'd like your perspective.
Also I don't understand how my response to a question pertaining to me not starting a wagon and alleged attention aversion is pretty bad, given the question in and of itself. This whole thing just feels empty to me.
I don't see that. In fact I'm leaning a bit town on her. I like 116.In post 140, Porkens wrote:Seems like scum caught for the wrong reason syndrome.In post 136, GeminiTwin12 wrote:It's reaching because one was me simply trying to gain perspective on the reads list, I read iso's and I said how/why I could see LuckyOtter + Tris could be there and I said how I don't understand Porkens/Parachute so it's not like I said I disagree and left it at that. Then that would have been me saying stuff just to say it. That I could see how someone would take issue. You disagree, ok fine, why do you disagree with my opinion?In post 133, CheekyTeeky wrote:Gemini can you talk about how it's reaching? Like I think I get it but I'd like your perspective.
Also I don't understand how my response to a question pertaining to me not starting a wagon and alleged attention aversion is pretty bad, given the question in and of itself. This whole thing just feels empty to me.
I feel this over aphet.
VOTE: gemini
Why did you vote for Parachutes in particular?In post 23, apthet wrote:I mainly just didn't want to vote Porkens anymore.
What's disagreeable about that?In post 126, apthet wrote: I also went back and looked at Gemini's posts because I thought that townreading LuckyOtter and tris and disagreeing with a townread on Porkens on her part was a particularly disagreeable opinion.
Yeah uhIn post 108, Chito and Nuko wrote:In post 82, tris wrote:I was less challenging it and more interrogating it.In post 79, Porkens wrote:You are challenging his read, correct?In post 73, tris wrote:How is she trying to hard to be town rather than just doing town stuff?In post 68, LuckyOtter wrote:Just looks like you're trying too hard to look like town. Your last question/comment to Gemini is really not accomplishing anything.In post 60, CheekyTeeky wrote:Do I get raisons?Porkens had reasons however small for their reads.LuckyOtter wrote:In post 14? Highly unlikely.In post 78, tris wrote:Was it though? It became clear after my responses, but I could have had some actual reason for believing that Porkens is mafia.Tris making even more good responses here.In post 86, tris wrote:Conversely, I want to townread you, but that might just be because you have a playstyle that I like so far.In post 84, CheekyTeeky wrote: I like how you assume we should all play the same way. If your brain can't see the use, then dammit maude, it's not useful!
Yeah, tris is probably town.
-Nuko