open 759: house party (compleded)

ISO · Post Post #2000 (ISO) » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:46 pm

sadly so and I hate not being alive.

Fuscosco · Post Post #2001 (ISO) » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:47 pm

somebody has to die.

ISO · Post Post #2002 (ISO) » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:47 pm

but tw is good @ this game and v town

Titus · Post Post #2003 (ISO) » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:47 pm

In post 1998, Skygazer wrote:that move is very likely killing tw

Again, assumes facts not in evidence. I don't even TR him and the push is anti-town. We made these suboptimal pools, now it's optimal to keep and maybe reassess when we lynch scum.

Fuscosco · Post Post #2004 (ISO) » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:48 pm

We dont have a scumflip; nobody is anything approaching obvtown.

Inbred Lannisters · Post Post #2005 (ISO) » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:48 pm

In post 1969, Inbred Lannisters wrote:The only universe where adding tw to the party is detrimental to town, is the one where party is all town and tw is scum. In every other case it's +EV

@Titus, Fusco

Titus wrote:We shouldn't add anyone. Force scum to make a move.

What kind of move are you imagining, possible only in the world where tw isn't added?

-Jeff

RedPanda · Post Post #2006 (ISO) » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:49 pm

You should read tw iso. If you don't see him as obv town, you can vote nooone. Fmpov the only move scum will make tonight is kill tw.

Fuscosco · Post Post #2007 (ISO) » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:49 pm

I just had to remove a very rude response. Im frustrated at your hydra as a whole, not any one poster within it.

ISO · Post Post #2008 (ISO) » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:50 pm

i think if tw is added to the party then scum will be forced to nk me for my obvtowniness and good reads (tm)

ISO · Post Post #2009 (ISO) » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:51 pm

In post 2002, Skygazer wrote:but tw is good @ this game and v town

pocket me pls

ISO · Post Post #2010 (ISO) » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:51 pm

and frankly thats a sacrifice im willing to make

Fuscosco · Post Post #2011 (ISO) » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:51 pm

In post 2006, RedPanda wrote: Fmpov the only move scum will make tonight is kill tw.

We dont have a scum flip. We dont even have a good consensus on who even is scum

Is it Yumeko or Sky, piss or PP? What about Uncle Bob?

RedPanda · Post Post #2012 (ISO) » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:51 pm

IbL You shouldn't add anymore unless I'm here to quality control it

or if there's only 1 scum left in the game.

Fuscosco · Post Post #2013 (ISO) » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:51 pm

In post 2008, Skygazer wrote:i think if tw is added to the party then scum will be forced to nk me for my obvtowniness and good reads (tm)

ugh

ISO · Post Post #2014 (ISO) » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:51 pm

In post 2009, the worst wrote:
In post 2002, Skygazer wrote:but tw is good @ this game and v town
pocket me pls

ive pocketed u irl

Titus · Post Post #2015 (ISO) » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:52 pm

In post 2005, Inbred Lannisters wrote:
In post 1969, Inbred Lannisters wrote:The only universe where adding tw to the party is detrimental to town, is the one where party is all town and tw is scum. In every other case it's +EV
@Titus, Fusco

Titus wrote:We shouldn't add anyone. Force scum to make a move.
What kind of move are you imagining, possible only in the world where tw isn't added?

-Jeff

Disagree. We lose the guarantee of where scum are. We have no reason objectively to think anyone is better than anyone else. Scum want to add players to the party. It creates wifom.

By adding someone, they can forever doubt cast tw for every failed lynch. They can say he's the infection causing the problem.

If there's a possibility the party is all town, we refuse. Scum flail getting more and more desperate to add.

Adding technically denies the knowledge that scum must be in the non party as well, but there's likely two.

Fuscosco · Post Post #2016 (ISO) » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:52 pm

Thats three people who have claimed to be the obvious choice for NKing now. Such arrogance.

Inbred Lannisters · Post Post #2017 (ISO) » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:52 pm

In post 2007, Fuscosco wrote:I just had to remove a very rude response. Im frustrated at your hydra as a whole, not any one poster within it.

Idk man, your posts seem to be almost all "posts of frustration" and zero real arguments / reads

If you're that frustrated and we're terribly wrong you should be able to convince the rest of town, if not us, that we're wrong. Do that.

-Joff

ISO · Post Post #2018 (ISO) » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:52 pm

fusc you uhhh know i was shitposting right

Titus · Post Post #2019 (ISO) » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:53 pm

In post 2011, Fuscosco wrote:
In post 2006, RedPanda wrote: Fmpov the only move scum will make tonight is kill tw.
We dont have a scum flip. We dont even have a good consensus on who even is scum

Is it Yumeko or Sky, piss or PP? What about Uncle Bob?

+1

Apparently you are as smart as our last game suggested

Fuscosco · Post Post #2020 (ISO) » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:53 pm

yea sky.

RedPanda · Post Post #2021 (ISO) » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:54 pm

In post 2011, Fuscosco wrote:
In post 2006, RedPanda wrote: Fmpov the only move scum will make tonight is kill tw.
We dont have a scum flip. We dont even have a good consensus on who even is scum

Is it Yumeko or Sky, piss or PP? What about Uncle Bob?

It's yumeko and pp. gun to my head I would vote duppin as third scum.

Titus · Post Post #2022 (ISO) » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:55 pm

In post 2021, RedPanda wrote:
In post 2011, Fuscosco wrote:
In post 2006, RedPanda wrote: Fmpov the only move scum will make tonight is kill tw.
We dont have a scum flip. We dont even have a good consensus on who even is scum

Is it Yumeko or Sky, piss or PP? What about Uncle Bob?
It's yumeko and pp. gun to my head I would vote duppin as third scum.

So why add tw and give dupin cover

ISO · Post Post #2023 (ISO) » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:55 pm

In post 2014, Skygazer wrote:
In post 2009, the worst wrote:
In post 2002, Skygazer wrote:but tw is good @ this game and v town
pocket me pls
ive pocketed u irl

That's established.
Need to do some not-this-game stuff. BBS.

ISO · Post Post #2024 (ISO) » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:55 pm

RP why are you SRing duppin again