In post 1888, Skygazer wrote:but also like EOF is also in the party and i dont feel like scum would push for two members into a four person party tbh
In post 1892, Skygazer wrote:well like, town seemed set that they wanted a 4 person party of strong town so the game can potentially be in auto
and if two scum are in the party and no one is added to the party and the two non party scum die then the game would be autowin for town
at most i think there'd only be one scum in the party??
I don’t believe Titus actually believes this because it is 100% against scum’s wincon to have more than one scum in the party.In post 2015, Titus wrote:Disagree. We lose the guarantee of where scum are. We have no reason objectively to think anyone is better than anyone else. Scum want to add players to the party. It creates wifom.In post 2005, Inbred Lannisters wrote:@Titus, FuscoIn post 1969, Inbred Lannisters wrote:The only universe where adding tw to the party is detrimental to town, is the one where party is all town and tw is scum. In every other case it's +EV
What kind of move are you imagining, possible only in the world where tw isn't added?Titus wrote:We shouldn't add anyone. Force scum to make a move.
-Jeff
By adding someone, they can forever doubt cast tw for every failed lynch. They can say he's the infection causing the problem.
If there's a possibility the party is all town, we refuse. Scum flail getting more and more desperate to add.
Adding technically denies the knowledge that scum must be in the non party as well, butthere's likely two.
~T