VOTE: RedFlavorIn post 16, RedFlavor wrote:It's a song I'm listening to.
Scum
VOTE: NeroIn post 26, Nero Cain wrote:but you were scum so you are claiming scum?In post 18, HeWhoSwims wrote:VOTE: Nero Cain this has won me a game before so it's worth a shot
Oh wait...In post 18, HeWhoSwims wrote:Good to be back! Familiar faces here, even RedFlavor from my first ever game (iirc)!
VOTE: Nero Cain this has won me a game before so it's worth a shot
That's definitely not allowed lol.
Trying too hard. This is scum. Luckily I'm already voting here.In post 78, Nero Cain wrote:rosterfosterIn post 74, RedFlavor wrote:Jesus show us the mafia please.
ofrhz
BodhiSmith13
Creature
GET. OFF. OF. ME. *pushes*In post 77, Alchemist21 wrote:I have a Townlean on Nero
I am entirely semi-serious.Nero Cain wrote:Are we like ending RVS now? Or is this a joke post of yours?
if not, why do you believe my 78 was serious?
https://imgur.com/gallery/bCqRpIn post 96, Jesus Louisus wrote:He is American Jesus.In post 86, RedFlavor wrote:Who apparently I think is Nero Cain.
Things that are not town-tells:In post 98, Alchemist21 wrote:His enthusiasm is what I find Towny about him. Maybe you’re just scum.In post 90, Montosh wrote:Trying too hard. This is scum. Luckily I'm already voting here.In post 78, Nero Cain wrote:rosterfosterIn post 74, RedFlavor wrote:Jesus show us the mafia please.
ofrhz
BodhiSmith13
Creature
GET. OFF. OF. ME. *pushes*In post 77, Alchemist21 wrote:I have a Townlean on Nero
Also all these people are town except Creature. He hasn't posted and is therefore confscum.
VOTE: Montosh
Yes but which one? American Jesus clearly supports the small towns. But the other one? I don't know...In post 102, Nero Cain wrote:This is wrong b/c he is the ultimate pro-town being.In post 99, Montosh wrote:Being Jesus
This is me freaking out:In post 105, Nero Cain wrote:you freaked out
In post 90, Montosh wrote: Trying too hard. This is scum. Luckily I'm already voting here.
Also all these people are town except Creature. He hasn't posted and is therefore confscum.
I ended RVS when you reacted in an odd way to my joke post. In the post I'm referring I called Creature scum for not posting by page 4. I don't feel I need a "THIS IS NOT SERIOUS" disclaimer on every RVS post. I think you know better.In post 111, Nero Cain wrote:if you were being semi-serious it doesn't really seem like RVS though, no?In post 95, Montosh wrote:I am entirely semi-serious.
I mean if you read the post and still come to the conclusion that I'm being serious then I guess that's on me but I felt it was obviously not serious.In post 112, Alchemist21 wrote:You called him scum for trying too hard. How else am I supposed to take that comment?
Why? There is one.In post 117, Kublai Khan wrote:The idea that there is a "random voting stage" is mafia is the dumbest most enduring myth on this site.
Sure I get that. I still think it exists because town does it. Not saying you can't scumhunt in it, but I felt some of the reaction from Nero was excessive. 101 in particularIn post 121, Kublai Khan wrote:Aw, there's a town attitude.In post 118, Montosh wrote:Why? There is one.In post 117, Kublai Khan wrote:The idea that there is a "random voting stage" is mafia is the dumbest most enduring myth on this site.
At least I do it. I don't know about you.
Scum's opening votes aren't random because they already know who is friend and who is foe. So they have to fake it.
Always scumhunt from post 1 onward.
In post 123, Nero Cain wrote:that's just a bunch of marathon games but let not engage KK on fluff.In post 120, Montosh wrote:The 12 days of shitposting?
I was being mostly non-serious but that post from Nero did give me a gut reaction of scummy.In post 138, LuckyOtter wrote:But were you not being serious when you said you were being semi-serious? I'm seriously confused.
That's fair I guess.In post 145, LuckyOtter wrote:Slight correction you were already voting him but felt compelled to point that out, which reads like a re-vote.
Is that so? Why not?In post 146, Alchemist21 wrote:Montosh isn’t making me feel better about him.
Are people making a big deal out of NC's list? I don't see anyone actually doing that. Also RVS is fine and occasionally makes me chuckle. Thus is should stay a thing. In fact, I propose this entire game be RVS.In post 147, RedFlavor wrote:I don't understand why people are making a big issue with NC's list tbh, it seems random to me.
I also think RVS is bad and it should be stop very soon. And it does not stop and end like a normal thing does.
You mean just asking how he picked it? That's all he did. It's page 8 and I think Nero saying he picked from people who hadn't posted and KK showing that that wasn't the case was interesting.
I would like to make it past Day 1 this game actually.In post 160, Creature wrote:Go MontoshIn post 11, Kirari Momobami wrote:Since there's no way to crumb this I'm just going to say I'm a multitasking one shot motion detector and babysitter. I'm using both shots tonight, don't care about the motion detect, and want to invite the scum to shoot me so they can play roulette with my babysit. Come on guys, sure I could hit scum... But you could also get two townies for the price of one. The gamble... Is yours to make
VOTE: saudade
Oh grant me your secret wisdom senpai.In post 169, rosterfoster wrote:VOTE: Creature
I have some super top secret ways to catch scum creature
Well I admit I still don't quite understand your view of it (or are you referencing Nero's reaction?). What post of mine are you talking about specifically? The one where I quoted Nero's list?In post 186, Alchemist21 wrote:You kinda stumbled while trying to justify your post that got you scumread.In post 182, Montosh wrote:Is that so? Why not?
I think we'll have to just agree to disagree on this point because I really don't see where you're coming from. It still seems relatively simple to me. I had a slight gut reaction to it but mostly I think it was nothing and NAI. The fact that Nero made a big deal about it is a lot more AI imo.In post 189, Alchemist21 wrote:Yes, your post that said Nero was trying too hard. Your attempts to explain it were really awkward.In post 187, Montosh wrote:Well I admit I still don't quite understand your view of it (or are you referencing Nero's reaction?). What post of mine are you talking about specifically? The one where I quoted Nero's list?In post 186, Alchemist21 wrote:You kinda stumbled while trying to justify your post that got you scumread.In post 182, Montosh wrote:Is that so? Why not?
I agree on this. Misrepresenting the whole situation.In post 207, Nero Cain wrote:If it wasn't clear, I'd also vote Red b/c 147 is some terrible reading or a legit attempt at revisionism
Thank goodness thought I was losing my marblesIn post 214, rosterfoster wrote:I am entirely semi-serious is such a nonesensical sentence that of course it’s not serious
It's more than Alch's but mainly I was just busy most of the day so I haven't read through the rest of the game yet.In post 239, ofrhz wrote:Since more people have said they thought you were serious, why are you still voting for Nero? Is 101 still that oddIn post 131, Montosh wrote:Fine if three people see it then maybe it's me. I will endeavour to be more clear. Commencing now all posts will have serious disclaimers.
I mean mine is a lifeless rock and hers is the Earth so yeah thank you.In post 247, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:In post 91, RedFlavor wrote:I was almost gonna say "Hi Skitter" to youIn post 92, Montosh wrote:I've had this avatar longer than skitter has had hers dammit.Am I the only one who doesn’t think they’re similar?In post 93, Montosh wrote:I think
It was phrased as question without a vote... so I don't see why you'd see it as anything other than a question.In post 257, RedFlavor wrote:I didn't know it wasnt a push and just a question.
No why should they yet?In post 258, Nero Cain wrote:claim red
Will do. Thanks for your contribution.In post 279, Kublai Khan wrote:Add me to the group of people that sense strong scum-vibes coming off Montosh.
See I don't disagree about Red but I personally wasn't a fan of the way the wagon happened. Not so much how quick, but rather who was on it and how some tried to get a weird early claim out. The process felt scummy and so that's why I hesitate.In post 285, LuckyOtter wrote:e]
- I honestly didn't love red's initial vote on pisskop. Just pings me as the scum thing to do to jump on the self vote right away like that. (Side note: Vork voted here as well, but showed some self-awareness about it that seemed more towny to me)
- Some fluffy posts, even when things start to move along a little (with the exception of saying he doesn't see why NC's random list is getting negative attention, which I can agree with)
- Early wagons are good and didn't/don't see a need to drop this one yet until I can do some more sorting
I usually ignore RVS claims which are clearly not serious but sure whatever floats your boat
I too enjoy this vague use of wordsIn post 321, Kublai Khan wrote: - Anti town-tells
I expressed concerns about the way the wagon built up. I do, in general, care about how a wagon was built and not just against whom it is targetted.In post 321, Kublai Khan wrote: - Anti RedFlavor-wagon for the sake of being against a wagon.
I see nothing wrong with this post and kinda agree with it. I generally think lurking is scummy and to me not posting is scummy too so meh.
If roster is scum trying to pocket me it's working and under most circumstances I might agree but I've recently finished a game with town!roster and this feels similar so far.In post 340, Alchemist21 wrote:I think Roster’s scum trying to pocket a range of people. Their only scumread is HeWhoSwims which they’ve voted 3 separate times so far. Meanwhile there’s a handful of Townreads that were given in quick succession. I don’t see the sincerity behind most of their reads. The defense of Montosh feels like they’re white-knighting a Townie.
VOTE: RosterFoster
+1 to this as well.In post 347, Alchemist21 wrote:@Mod, can we get vote counts sorted by who has the most votes please?
It could be that I'm lying. Or it could be that since then you've reacted in a scummy way to a joke post and tried to get a premature claim on someone after joining a pretty shitty wagon.In post 373, Nero Cain wrote: I'm with piss here. If this is a scum list and he's legit scum reading me doesn't that prove 90 was serious and that he's lying when he says it wasn't?
Why them over HWS?
So does his posting so far seem very similar to that game?In post 395, LuckyOtter wrote:I would say the same thing about HWS' posting style. I played with him as town and he has a very edited posting style that can read fake.In post 391, rosterfoster wrote:Vork kind of has an unconventional posting style, so people tend to scumread that.In post 389, LuckyOtter wrote:I'm not seeing what is particularly weird about Vorkuta's posts. I don't see Red's and Vork's joining the pisskop wagon as the same.
ED is indeed a possible, but the case on swims is more than just lurking, while I don’t really see one of ED?
Sure. Should we let people with bad posts go scot free if they haven't made enough. HWS can post more if he has a problem with it.
I mean for anyone else I'd be SRing that slot but knowing the way Creature posts it's kinda hard to do that. What specific posts in his ISO set him apart from town!Creature in your mind?In post 406, Vorkuta wrote: My Creature vote is because
-Creature is due to roll scum against me some time soon
-I rely quite a bit on others telling me that "this is a scum!creature post" because apparently he's obvious as either alignment. Hopefully with pressure he obv!somethings and we can move on.
-Look at his ISO and tell me you don't want to roll your eyes at him
Agreed. This post sucks bad. But....In post 435, pisskop wrote:what a weaksauce thing to sayIn post 434, Jesus Louisus wrote:I wouldn't mind switching my vote over to you. It's your call. I just can't decide if you are defending your partner or white knighting.
In post 436, pisskop wrote:lemme help you since youre so incapable of making your own choices
Code: Select all
[v]pisskop[/v][/quote] This post sucks worse.
Not every one. But I didn't like his posts. And go after things other than content? I mean the content of their posts is pretty important for me to read people I gotta say.In post 472, pisskop wrote:Go after every Low Content Poster on site and see how long it takes to pull your hair out.In post 469, Montosh wrote:Sure. Should we let people with bad posts go scot free if they haven't made enough. HWS can post more if he has a problem with it.
gotta read people on things other than content. Im not TRing him, Im saying this wagon is going to waste our time and kill our momentum.
Ok, I'm down with that then. If it's at all possible I'd be interested in getting a link to the game you're referring to.In post 478, LuckyOtter wrote:@Montosh I haven't seen enough from HWS to say for sure, but from the couple of posts so far, yes. Similar enough that I don't want to vote him.
ED on the other hand just pops in with literally no substance. So, easy vote.
Agreed on this.In post 499, RedFlavor wrote:scum!ofrhz would gain more if he just stayed silent and waited for me to claim. Townish.
So, at the time my main town reads were on him and his posts felt very much like "I'm posting just for the sake of posting but not really adding any real content to the game". Kinda like active lurking without the active part.
So was Red's. Why does the speed of HWS's bother you more? Is there something about the way that wagon built up that bothered you at the time.In post 529, Nero Cain wrote: I'm fence sitting on HWS. He's lurking which is kinda scummy but is prob ultimately null. The one thing I don't really like is that he's sitting on his RVS and if he legit thinks I'm scum he needs to explain it.Also, his wagon was kinda fast.
Just going to x2 what ofrhz said. What you're describing sounds like active lurking, which to me is definitely scummy. What ED is doing is simple lurking, since they didn't seem to be making any effort to actually appear active and contributing to the game state. I think that's also scummy but less so.In post 532, HeWhoSwims wrote:I think "empty posting" is telling for scum personally - making posts that seem relevant but arent really saying anything. Of course meta plays a role here too - for example I think Creature usually posts short posts? But I didn't know ED before and as Otter said, it's just no contribution at all. If that akes sense.In post 506, RedFlavor wrote:You do? Why?In post 468, HeWhoSwims wrote:I think that's a good catch and I think it really is something scum could do.
In post 561, Vorkuta wrote:Wait hold up guys
Why are we scumreading the guy with only 4 posts
when we could be scumreading creature instead?
Being too cautious with votes can be scummy. As if you're trying to avoid taking firm positions that can get you in trouble. I agree that I'm not liking Vortuka, particularly on that Creature wagon.In post 574, HeWhoSwims wrote:You have a good point, and what I said holds less value now that he's completely inactive / being replaced. On a re-read I think Vorkuta has a bit of the same, but I'm usually "cautious" with votes so to speak so I don't necessarily want to vote there yet? I'm gonna try to re read more this afternoon/evening.In post 571, Montosh wrote:Just going to x2 what ofrhz said. What you're describing sounds like active lurking, which to me is definitely scummy. What ED is doing is simple lurking, since they didn't seem to be making any effort to actually appear active and contributing to the game state. I think that's also scummy but less so.In post 532, HeWhoSwims wrote:I think "empty posting" is telling for scum personally - making posts that seem relevant but arent really saying anything. Of course meta plays a role here too - for example I think Creature usually posts short posts? But I didn't know ED before and as Otter said, it's just no contribution at all. If that akes sense.In post 506, RedFlavor wrote:You do? Why?In post 468, HeWhoSwims wrote:I think that's a good catch and I think it really is something scum could do.
Is there anyone you want to vote?
Oh yay. Scum self-meta. Scum never do this!In post 585, Vorkuta wrote:This is going to be fun
Also scum!vork doesn't go foreasy and low hanging fruit on D1.
It's too easy and compromises the rest of the game.
Like please- you're claiming that I'm scum yet you fail to see how suboptimal any of this is for scum!vork
Why? He seems kind of similar to recent games I played with him where he was town. Do you think he's able to fake that effectively as scum? Why?In post 600, Creature wrote:Pretty sure rosterfoster is one scum
Kind of a good point, though how much resistance was there? There was a decent wagon on HWS and some of the people who were on them are now on you. Like I see where you could be coming from but I'm not sure that's as strong as all that.In post 601, Creature wrote:I wonder what's the resistance to HWS seeing everybody softed a scumread on them but never pulled a train on him like they did to me
Glad someone liked itIn post 608, DeasVail wrote:This made me giggleIn post 99, Montosh wrote:Things that are not town-tells:
- Frustration
- Enthusiasm
- Saying "I'm Scum!"
- Saying "I'm Town!"
- Being Jesus