Sorry but how is this “abusive”? I didn’t insult YOU at all, I think your solve makes no sense.In post 2477, Titus wrote:Playing with comments like this is really unenjoyable. Tell me whichever head this is and I will limit playing any mechanically intense setups where logic is involved. I get groups can decide on suboptimal options and I can lose a debate. Yet this is just abusive.In post 2475, Inbred Lannisters wrote:Sure but let me get my lobotomy first, kthanx.In post 2472, Titus wrote:You want me to elaborate why the two random party setup was best? Or how changing the party is proscum?In post 2470, Inbred Lannisters wrote:In post 2459, Titus wrote:Yes, because changing the party was 100% proscum. I stand by what I said. Just like I stand by day 1 that two random even parties was best.In post 2453, Golden RASpberry wrote:2451 is literally how to be good at town.
Also pls note Titus has gone from mechtalk and intent to lynch outside the party to shading everyone in the party....
Spoiler:
~T
~T
I said,
~seriously confused T