Open 761: Grey Flag Nightless - [It's over!]

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #475 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:21 pm

In post 471, Bitmap wrote:I don't townread players with 100% scum wins as town ever.

I'm referring to this. Why not just treat me as town then?

Bitmap · Post Post #476 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:23 pm

In post 475, RadiantCowbells wrote:
In post 471, Bitmap wrote:I don't townread players with 100% scum wins as town ever.
I'm referring to this. Why not just treat me as town then?

Ok maybe that was a bit bad. What I mean is that I have a really healthy dose of suspicion especially when no one outside of me and Shoshin has pressured you.

Shoshin · Post Post #477 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:24 pm

I pushed RC?

Bitmap · Post Post #478 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:26 pm

Healthy dose of suspicion

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #479 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:27 pm

how do you define healthy? in terms of how it affects your winrate?

if your chances of winning vs scum me are going to be ~0 no matter what set of actions you undertake, shouldn't you just take the set of actions that gives you the highest win chance if I'm town, ie townreading me?

Bitmap · Post Post #480 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:30 pm

Enough to see if you slip/feed information.

Are you scum?

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #481 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:33 pm

shit he's onto me

Chemist1422 · Post Post #482 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:33 pm

see this is the kind of thing that gives me trouble reading RC

NotAJumbleOfNumbers · Post Post #483 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:34 pm

Prodding AbuHumaid.

(expired on 2019-07-06 21:36:27)

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #484 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:34 pm

In post 479, RadiantCowbells wrote:how do you define healthy? in terms of how it affects your winrate?

if your chances of winning vs scum me are going to be ~0 no matter what set of actions you undertake, shouldn't you just take the set of actions that gives you the highest win chance if I'm town, ie townreading me?

this? i dunno i think if it really meant a lot to you to read me and you were willing to put in a solid fraction of the time that I put in mastering my scum game learning to beat it, you could do it.
the question is if it's worth that time to you and no one has made the choice that that time is worth it to them.

Chemist1422 · Post Post #485 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:35 pm

ok wait big brain thought

if RC is scum we don’t need to lynch him if we get both of his buddies

so therefore I’m using my “not necessary to read” pass on him

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #486 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:36 pm

that's the first thing I said at the start of this game, btw.

Bitmap · Post Post #487 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:36 pm

Shoshin · Post Post #488 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:37 pm

If we get 4 lynches, does that mean we win as long as we find 5 town?

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #489 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:37 pm

no

that means we win as long as we find 4 town.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #490 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:37 pm

out of 5 players.

Chemist1422 · Post Post #491 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:38 pm

In post 311, Bitmap wrote:At this point, I'm annoyed that it's only me, RC, and Shoshin chiming in.

this pings villagery to me, and probably never wolf if RC/Shoshin flips wolf

Chemist1422 · Post Post #492 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:39 pm

In post 486, RadiantCowbells wrote:that's the first thing I said at the start of this game, btw.

okay so when I say something is big brain that means it’s obvious and I didn’t get it until now

Shoshin · Post Post #493 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:40 pm

We win as long as we find 4 town? Can you help me understand how this works out?

Bitmap · Post Post #494 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:40 pm

In post 492, Chemist1422 wrote:
In post 486, RadiantCowbells wrote:that's the first thing I said at the start of this game, btw.
okay so when I say something is big brain that means it’s obvious and I didn’t get it until now

This means you have to hit the other two scum with wagons led by scum!RC.

Do you see the fallacy in this logic?

Chemist1422 · Post Post #495 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:40 pm

Bitmap ISO is good, they’re questioning the stuff that needs to be questioned and solving while having a solid radar for stuff

I’m not making any sense I don’t think but that’s fine

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #496 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:41 pm

In post 493, Shoshin wrote:We win as long as we find 4 town? Can you help me understand how this works out?

we win

if we can pick 5 players and have 4 of them be town

Chemist1422 · Post Post #497 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:41 pm

In post 494, Bitmap wrote:
In post 492, Chemist1422 wrote:
In post 486, RadiantCowbells wrote:that's the first thing I said at the start of this game, btw.
okay so when I say something is big brain that means it’s obvious and I didn’t get it until now
This means you have to hit the other two scum with wagons led by scum!RC.

Do you see the fallacy in this logic?

Who said RC would be leading the wagons

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #498 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:41 pm

i mean

i always lead the wagons

Bitmap · Post Post #499 (ISO) » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:41 pm

In post 497, Chemist1422 wrote:
In post 494, Bitmap wrote:
In post 492, Chemist1422 wrote:
In post 486, RadiantCowbells wrote:that's the first thing I said at the start of this game, btw.
okay so when I say something is big brain that means it’s obvious and I didn’t get it until now
This means you have to hit the other two scum with wagons led by scum!RC.

Do you see the fallacy in this logic?
Who said RC would be leading the wagons

Have you seen the last 20 pages?