Open 79 - Nightless Vanilla (Town Win!) before 611

yellowbounder · Post Post #18 (isolation #0) » Sat Jun 14, 2008 9:08 pm

Vote: ChannelDelibird

for watching too much football, and writing a freaking blog about it.

yellowbounder · Post Post #20 (isolation #1) » Sun Jun 15, 2008 9:21 am

Unvote, Vote: Blackberry

That's L-3. Blackberry, claim!

yellowbounder · Post Post #31 (isolation #2) » Sun Jun 15, 2008 11:05 pm

unvote, vote Aegor

Let's see if through the entire game, I only make votes that put people on L-3.

yellowbounder · Post Post #35 (isolation #3) » Mon Jun 16, 2008 6:04 am

farside22 wrote:
Aegor wrote:I voted you because one of the people I was talking to last night by PM told me to jump on the first bandwagon I saw. Did I miss something?
Townies don't talk to anyone. Scum do. Are you joking?

Well, it wouldn't be very good to your long term survival to claim scum in a mafia game. So, I'll assume he's joking.

yellowbounder · Post Post #39 (isolation #4) » Mon Jun 16, 2008 8:52 am

populartajo wrote:
yellowbounder wrote:
farside22 wrote:
Aegor wrote:I voted you because one of the people I was talking to last night by PM told me to jump on the first bandwagon I saw. Did I miss something?
Townies don't talk to anyone. Scum do. Are you joking?
Well, it wouldn't be very good to your long term survival to claim scum in a mafia game. So, I'll assume he's joking.
Yet you are voting for him? I hope this is a joke a too.
Here lie my hopes of a serious game. /tear
Lets get this shit serious, kaythxkeepridin.

Love of bandwagons

Bandwagons are interesting ways to find out information but I seriously dislike them. It shows zero reasoning and scum will usually use them to speedlynch someone. @IH, @yellowbounder, (both present in both Berry and Aegor wagons), @Aegor and @Lquiz any conclusions of your love of bandwagons? Why are you bandwagoning him?

Aegor

Aegor might be joking but thats the point, why would he joke so blatantly about being scum? First time doing this, Aegor?

Both bandwagons, and Aegor's "claim" are not serious. Or at least, as serious as Page 1 and 2 bandwagons can get. No one's barely done anything even remotely pro or anti town yet. Calm down.

yellowbounder · Post Post #74 (isolation #5) » Thu Jun 19, 2008 7:05 pm

I'm pretty sure that it was an extended joke/trick, to provoke reactions.

Aegor wrote:Okay, here we go.

I did it somewhat jokingly, and somewhat not. My response: "Joking? No." was actually in response to the question: "First time doing this, Aegor?" The explanation about my theoretical scumbuddies was not to be taken too seriously. However, there was still some "serious" component, as I could have joked about something more innocuous. In this way, the explanation was both for my own amusement and just breaking the ice. Considering the facts that I am amused and we are still talking about it, I would say that it was a success.

You know, like what he said.

yellowbounder · Post Post #80 (isolation #6) » Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:52 am

Lquiz wrote:I'm starting to become wary of Aegor, claiming scum is just such a strange tactic, is his "just for reactions" to cover a mistake up, i don't know, but i don't really want to lynch a townie d1, so i'm going to unvote, and see what he says.

Unvote Aegor

Lowell wrote:
unvote, vote Aegor
. Kill all annoyances.

This bandwagon is growing far too quickly, for something completely trivial. I want no part in it.

Unvote: Aegor

yellowbounder · Post Post #84 (isolation #7) » Sat Jun 21, 2008 8:26 am

Lowell wrote:You mean the 2-vote wagon? Yeah, way too fast. Very prudent.

It was three until I unvoted. Sorry, I didn't see Lquiz's unvote there.

My point still stands. I don't think it's a tell at all.

yellowbounder · Post Post #105 (isolation #8) » Wed Jun 25, 2008 9:10 pm

Will do reread, and post very very soon.

yellowbounder · Post Post #114 (isolation #9) » Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:53 pm

Lowell wrote:No fear. Lowell is here.

Lowell wrote:
vote popular

Lowell wrote:
populartajo wrote:
Lowell wrote:
vote popular
?
Just random. Unless it's not.

\

Lowell wrote:
unvote, vote Aegor
. Kill all annoyances.

Lowell wrote:You mean the 2-vote wagon? Yeah, way too fast. Very prudent.

Lowell wrote:"I did (scummy thing X) to get reactions. (Player Y) reacted by calling it scummy. Ergo, (player Y) is scum."

Man, you could right the book on scumhunting.

Lowell wrote:To right the book. Like, to right that which is askew. To right the wrongs. To correct it.

There, see? Perfect.

Lowell wrote:I think Lquiz just doesn't know what he's doing.

I'd rather see more votes on Aegor.

You say very little Lowell. Very little indeed. I mean, you could at least try and put some meat in your post, you're mostly just echoing the consensus, and don't push anything new. Be bold, you know?

unvote, vote Lowell

yellowbounder · Post Post #151 (isolation #10) » Wed Jul 02, 2008 7:45 am

FaerieLord wrote:84: Yellowbounder (-) LAL, he quoted the post
...
114: Yellowbounder (-) Hello kettle

1) It was a mistake. A silly and easily avoidable mistake, but nethertheless, a mistake.

2) I suppose I should post more, but I haven't seen anything that makes me suspicious in the extreme towards anyone. I'll go with Lowell for now.

Vote: Lowell

yellowbounder · Post Post #180 (isolation #11) » Sat Jul 05, 2008 10:01 pm

Sun Tzu, you voted for one person, then another, and then said nothing at all for the next six or so posts.

You're worse the Lowell, and me.

unvote, vote: Sun Tzu