Math and Logic Puzzles: Redux

This forum is for playing games other than Mafia and Mafia variants.
User avatar
geometry
geometry
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
geometry
Goon
Goon
Posts: 506
Joined: July 9, 2019
Location: outted chennisden alt

Post Post #75 (ISO) » Fri Jul 26, 2019 7:42 am

Post by geometry »

here's a geometry question (quite easy):

Consider circle W and points A,B outside circle W. Let the tangents from A to W intersect W at P,Q and let the midpoint of PQ be A'. Define B' similarly. Prove that AA'B'B is cyclic.
I signed up to play
MAFIA
, not so you could roll me town again.
Tazaro
Tazaro
Selfie
Tazaro
Selfie
Selfie
Posts: 3997
Joined: July 4, 2010
Location: I can go now without writing more

Post Post #76 (ISO) » Fri Jul 26, 2019 8:08 am

Post by Tazaro »

there is a sense in which we can recognize the superior utility of ending up choosing the one box, but I have an explanation for why this doesn't actually come from the "math" value of your DECISION. The nature of this problem suggests a different origin of this supposed utility, and this addition to the context negates the validity of appealing to "expected utility" as a basis for determining your best option. Please read what I have written.
If the predicting entity ends up having made the right prediction, then given the awesome predicting power of the genie that suggests you had no real chance to oppose his prediction... we can conclude that you had virtually no real choice--nor egress via decision-making--to cause Mr. Right / Mr. G'Nie(Nius) to be in error; that is to say, for all the talk about wielding the versatile instrument of human will, you could not escape the fate that corresponds to the inner truth contained in the erstwhile unopened mystery box. That would mean the whole situation was simply an (approximately) inevitable gift to you and not a game of efficacious decision-making (fleshing this out with more description, we can say that a weird conceptual object is in the thick of things with the salient trait that it "impersonates" expected utility; it appears to be the case that, whatever its formal name could be, it is NOT maximized by your opting to exclusively choose the one box--so it is not the the so-called expected utility--but is established by the predictor's judgment w.r.t. whether to fill the mystery box or not, in essence signifying your fate in advance :P)... THUS all of us should disregard the expected utility argument and avail ourselves of the remaining, second perspective in service to our reasoning out how both our guesswork in this decision puzzle and our genie's magically powered guesswork can coexist/interrelate in a meaningful framing of this puzzle. An interesting thing to ask here is this question: is it possible to upgrade FROM sleepwalking through this conundrum, our guessing game conundrum, and being merely satisfied with whatever happens at the end TO the weal of realizing an unambiguously optimal single solution (either the option to one-box or to two-box) in the event that one presents itself as potentially of efficacious use to us in the course of this two boxes game?
Insofar as there is a bona fide chance to actually "play the game" in terms of the puzzle's context, which would be the chance that the magical entity will be wrong, there consequently is a rather simple but crucial detail to notice. The auspicious element of fallibility in this equation of guesses and magic makes possible a situation in which acting according to the dominance perspective wins out over the former perspective as the "right" strategy. Just in case there is an actual game in which you can genuinely make and carry out a decision, the right one is to take both boxes. A successful framing of this puzzle seems finally to be at hand when all the preceding text (which I forged) is understood as holding key insight into the mysterious paradox and is trusted as a proper source of its exact means of resolution. This is thanks to the perfect fit of our forged key into this infamous treasure chest of paradox, our money-offering thought experiment that has entertained us.
Last edited by Tazaro on Wed Jul 21, 2021 2:57 pm, edited 11 times in total.
Show
Maybe Subservience to Protocol isn't tantamount to Solution to Problem ...
"A little bit of yourself goes a long way"
Blue paint strokes of sadness that leave a trace of meaningfulness
Tell me, O Karen,
Do you feel better
After getting your pound of flesh?
User avatar
Kagami
Kagami
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Kagami
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7065
Joined: November 5, 2013

Post Post #77 (ISO) » Fri Jul 26, 2019 8:16 am

Post by Kagami »

Regardless of whether you have prepared a strategy, the super-being can divine the strategy you will arrive at once presented with the box, and she will arrange the contents knowing that strategy. It presupposes that she is not a super predicting super-being to say that she can't do so.
User avatar
Kagami
Kagami
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Kagami
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7065
Joined: November 5, 2013

Post Post #78 (ISO) » Fri Jul 26, 2019 8:33 am

Post by Kagami »

I'm treating the evidence of her being a super being in the article as designed for entertainment purposes, and that this should be approached philosophically, accepting her superness as a given.

If this were a practical exercise, I assume her to be a fraud and any prior predictive prowess she's shown is likely driven by survivorship bias (we wouldn't be in this situation if she had been documented being wrong in the past). The correct choice would be to take both if I had to and assume I'm getting 1k pounds, or, if allowed, to sell the chance to choose to a more gullible individual.
User avatar
Felissan
Felissan
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Felissan
Goon
Goon
Posts: 216
Joined: April 3, 2015
Location: France

Post Post #79 (ISO) » Fri Jul 26, 2019 8:36 am

Post by Felissan »

The concept of something being able to predict anything in the future with perfect accuracy has so many paradoxes inherent to it that it feels impossible to give a correct answer to this question.
"Dammit Felissan, making someone lose the game is NOT NICE"
- DeathRowKitty 2016
"Also, the me in your signature just made the me in this thread lose the game and I'm not sure how to feel about this."
- DeathRowKitty 2018
"You've made me make myself lose the game so many times that I feel like it's an entirely new game I'm losing"
- DeathRowKitty 2022
User avatar
Who
Who
Yes?
User avatar
User avatar
Who
Yes?
Yes?
Posts: 4745
Joined: March 22, 2013
Location: Third Base

Post Post #80 (ISO) » Fri Jul 26, 2019 9:21 am

Post by Who »

In this specific case it doesn't have paradoxes because anything the super being could accomplish by predicting they could also accomplish by cheating (Have the box set up so that it automatically burns the money if you take both or some other similar thing). If we accept the super being's superness as fact, then the problem is the same as facing a cheating being, so obviously don't take the second box.

Other than the fact that it may be possible to use her to break quantum mechanics.
Who said that?
Chamber. It's all a conspiracy.
Or is it?
6
User avatar
StrangerCoug
StrangerCoug
He/Him
Does not Compute
User avatar
User avatar
StrangerCoug
He/Him
Does not Compute
Does not Compute
Posts: 12457
Joined: May 6, 2008
Pronoun: He/Him
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Contact:

Post Post #81 (ISO) » Sun Jul 28, 2019 5:46 am

Post by StrangerCoug »

Here's an interesting one in addition to #76 above for those who like proofs: Prove that there are only finitely many triangular numbers that are also tetrahedral numbers. How many are there, and what are they?
STRANGERCOUG: Stranger Than You!

Current avatar by PurryFurry of FurAffinity.
User avatar
chennisden
chennisden
Macho Pichu
User avatar
User avatar
chennisden
Macho Pichu
Macho Pichu
Posts: 8907
Joined: February 11, 2019
Location: sheltered in place

Post Post #82 (ISO) » Sun Jul 28, 2019 8:28 am

Post by chennisden »

Doh

Tetrahedral: (n * (n + 1) * (n + 2)) / 6

Triangular: (n * (n + 1)) / 2

If these are equal n+2=3
User avatar
chennisden
chennisden
Macho Pichu
User avatar
User avatar
chennisden
Macho Pichu
Macho Pichu
Posts: 8907
Joined: February 11, 2019
Location: sheltered in place

Post Post #83 (ISO) » Sun Jul 28, 2019 8:29 am

Post by chennisden »

Ugh people these days just think about alg and NT

and geo gets ignored :(
User avatar
Kagami
Kagami
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Kagami
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7065
Joined: November 5, 2013

Post Post #84 (ISO) » Sun Jul 28, 2019 8:31 am

Post by Kagami »

The index of the tetrahedral and triangular number don't have to be the same.
User avatar
chennisden
chennisden
Macho Pichu
User avatar
User avatar
chennisden
Macho Pichu
Macho Pichu
Posts: 8907
Joined: February 11, 2019
Location: sheltered in place

Post Post #85 (ISO) » Sun Jul 28, 2019 9:10 am

Post by chennisden »

Hmm.
User avatar
chennisden
chennisden
Macho Pichu
User avatar
User avatar
chennisden
Macho Pichu
Macho Pichu
Posts: 8907
Joined: February 11, 2019
Location: sheltered in place

Post Post #86 (ISO) » Sun Jul 28, 2019 9:17 am

Post by chennisden »

(n * (n + 1) * (n + 2)) / 6=(m * (m + 1)) / 2

n(n+1)(n+2)=3m(m+1)

Hmm.

There are only so many ways to get 3m(m+1) to be three consecutive numbers. Uh
User avatar
Mitillos
Mitillos
He
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Mitillos
He
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2300
Joined: August 23, 2012
Pronoun: He
Contact:

Post Post #87 (ISO) » Sun Jul 28, 2019 9:54 am

Post by Mitillos »

Do the factors on the two sides have to be the same, or can you have different factors giving you the same product?
You don't have ambiguity; you have
options
.
User avatar
StrangerCoug
StrangerCoug
He/Him
Does not Compute
User avatar
User avatar
StrangerCoug
He/Him
Does not Compute
Does not Compute
Posts: 12457
Joined: May 6, 2008
Pronoun: He/Him
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Contact:

Post Post #88 (ISO) » Sun Jul 28, 2019 12:21 pm

Post by StrangerCoug »

It only matters that both sides of the equation come out to the same number. You can use one variable on one side and another on the other.
STRANGERCOUG: Stranger Than You!

Current avatar by PurryFurry of FurAffinity.
User avatar
Mitillos
Mitillos
He
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Mitillos
He
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2300
Joined: August 23, 2012
Pronoun: He
Contact:

Post Post #89 (ISO) » Sun Jul 28, 2019 1:15 pm

Post by Mitillos »

Yeah, that was my point, in that 3, m, and m+1 potentially need not be consecutive. :Þ
You don't have ambiguity; you have
options
.
User avatar
BTD6_maker
BTD6_maker
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
BTD6_maker
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2244
Joined: April 7, 2016

Post Post #90 (ISO) » Sun Jul 28, 2019 7:53 pm

Post by BTD6_maker »

Part of the difficulty in this problem is that there is no easy way to make tetrahedral numbers into nth powers. I have a proof that, for any n >= 3, there are only finitely many triangular numbers that are nth powers, but I haven't yet got it to work for tetrahedral numbers. This is an interesting problem in itself, so you can try this problem (as well as my two previous combinatorics problems).

For geometry's geometry problem, let O be the centre of W and let it have radius R. Let one of the tangents from A touch W at C, and let theta be the angle AOC. Then OA' = OC cos theta and OC = OA cos theta so OA' OA = OC^2 = R^2. Likewise, OB' OB = R^2. Also, O, A, A' are collinear, and so are O, B, B'. Since OA' OA = OB' OB, we have AA'B'B is cyclic.
"one of these days i'll read you correctly" - Transcend, Micro 714
User avatar
Kagami
Kagami
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Kagami
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7065
Joined: November 5, 2013

Post Post #91 (ISO) » Mon Jul 29, 2019 5:54 am

Post by Kagami »

The triangular number = tetrahedral number proof is not something anyone should be banging their head over.

I don't think (please correct me if I'm wrong) anyone's presented an elegant proof of it, and the inelegant proof is arduous with steps that are far from straightforward.
User avatar
chennisden
chennisden
Macho Pichu
User avatar
User avatar
chennisden
Macho Pichu
Macho Pichu
Posts: 8907
Joined: February 11, 2019
Location: sheltered in place

Post Post #92 (ISO) » Sat Aug 03, 2019 5:20 pm

Post by chennisden »

In post 91, Kagami wrote:The triangular number = tetrahedral number proof is not something anyone should be banging their head over.

I don't think (please correct me if I'm wrong) anyone's presented an elegant proof of it, and the inelegant proof is arduous with steps that are far from straightforward.
i agree and now i feel worser about not finding it
User avatar
chennisden
chennisden
Macho Pichu
User avatar
User avatar
chennisden
Macho Pichu
Macho Pichu
Posts: 8907
Joined: February 11, 2019
Location: sheltered in place

Post Post #93 (ISO) » Sat Aug 03, 2019 5:20 pm

Post by chennisden »

here's a nice problem:

A secret spy organization needs to spread some secret knowledge to all of its members. In the beginning, only 1 member is informed. Every informed spy will call an uninformed spy such that every informed spy is calling a different uninformed spy. After being called, an uninformed spy becomes informed. The call takes 1 minute, but since the spies are running low on time, they call the next spy directly afterward. However, to avoid being caught, after the third call an informed spy makes, the spy stops calling. How many minutes will it take for every spy to be informed, provided that the organization has 600 spies?
User avatar
chennisden
chennisden
Macho Pichu
User avatar
User avatar
chennisden
Macho Pichu
Macho Pichu
Posts: 8907
Joined: February 11, 2019
Location: sheltered in place

Post Post #94 (ISO) » Sat Aug 03, 2019 5:22 pm

Post by chennisden »

In post 90, BTD6_maker wrote:Part of the difficulty in this problem is that there is no easy way to make tetrahedral numbers into nth powers. I have a proof that, for any n >= 3, there are only finitely many triangular numbers that are nth powers, but I haven't yet got it to work for tetrahedral numbers. This is an interesting problem in itself, so you can try this problem (as well as my two previous combinatorics problems).

For geometry's geometry problem, let O be the centre of W and let it have radius R. Let one of the tangents from A touch W at C, and let theta be the angle AOC. Then OA' = OC cos theta and OC = OA cos theta so OA' OA = OC^2 = R^2. Likewise, OB' OB = R^2. Also, O, A, A' are collinear, and so are O, B, B'. Since OA' OA = OB' OB, we have AA'B'B is cyclic.
yup! A' is called the "inversion" of A about W. defined such that OA' * OA = r^2
User avatar
Kagami
Kagami
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Kagami
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7065
Joined: November 5, 2013

Post Post #95 (ISO) » Sun Aug 04, 2019 11:13 am

Post by Kagami »

In post 93, chennisden wrote:here's a nice problem:

A secret spy organization needs to spread some secret knowledge to all of its members. In the beginning, only 1 member is informed. Every informed spy will call an uninformed spy such that every informed spy is calling a different uninformed spy. After being called, an uninformed spy becomes informed. The call takes 1 minute, but since the spies are running low on time, they call the next spy directly afterward. However, to avoid being caught, after the third call an informed spy makes, the spy stops calling. How many minutes will it take for every spy to be informed, provided that the organization has 600 spies?

S0 = 1
S1 = 2
S2 = 4
S3 = 8
and
Si = 2*Si-1 - Si-4 for i > 3

So you get a goofy fibonacci-esque recursive sequence. For something as low as 600, you can just do it manually or programatically to get the sequence:

1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 28, 52, 96, 177, 326, 600, 1104, 2031, 3736, 6872, 12640, 23249, 42762, 78652, 144664, 266079, 489396, 900140, 1655616

And you see that you've informed exactly 600 spies in 10 minutes. To solve it for an arbitrary N, there should be a closed form solution of the form sum(c_i a_i ^ N) with at most four terms, which wouldn't be terribly difficult to sort out.
User avatar
vizIIsto
vizIIsto
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
vizIIsto
Townie
Townie
Posts: 21
Joined: January 23, 2019

Post Post #96 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 12:29 am

Post by vizIIsto »

I've got a fun little maths problem you might want to get your head around... and chances are you probably already know about the puzzle. Welp!

A long time ago lived a very rich trader in the desert who had three sons. The rich trader had a whopping seventeen camels. The trader decided that after his death, his oldest son should inherit half of his camels, the middle one would get a third and the youngest son received a ninth of the seventeen camels.

Your task is to calculate how you're going to divide the camels among the three sons, and tell me how you got there. It'd be very helpful if you didn't have to cut up some of the camels.. :good:
User avatar
Mitillos
Mitillos
He
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Mitillos
He
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2300
Joined: August 23, 2012
Pronoun: He
Contact:

Post Post #97 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 12:39 am

Post by Mitillos »

1/2 + 1/3 + 1/9 = 17/18
You don't have ambiguity; you have
options
.
User avatar
vizIIsto
vizIIsto
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
vizIIsto
Townie
Townie
Posts: 21
Joined: January 23, 2019

Post Post #98 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 12:53 am

Post by vizIIsto »

In post 97, Mitillos wrote:1/2 + 1/3 + 1/9 = 17/18
Yes.
But it's not the answer I want to hear. How will you divide the camels among the sons?
User avatar
Mitillos
Mitillos
He
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Mitillos
He
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2300
Joined: August 23, 2012
Pronoun: He
Contact:

Post Post #99 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 1:33 am

Post by Mitillos »

Lend the dead man a camel.
You don't have ambiguity; you have
options
.
Post Reply

Return to “The Whole Sort of General Mish Mash”