Hmm, do you prefer town or scum, Vorkuta?
VOTE: Vorkuta
Hmm, do you prefer town or scum, Vorkuta?
Looks like it to me, although there are a few other cases where the zombie can't resurrect (after being lynched in LYLO or if they're the last scum). Also, this means that town have 6 points worth of roles, which could be relevant later in the game, when we get to claims.In post 32, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Just so everyone is in the clear, i've read the setup and while i really don't understand a single thing about the "points mechanic" i did gather from the setup that we are informed about who the mafia roles are already.
So Baezu has already told us in the second post which mafia roles are in the game:This means (If i'm understanding this right) that the mafia has looked at the townie power roles and decided they want the 2 specific roles. (Putting aside the generic goon which is called "ghoul" in this setup)
- Zombie
Will always resurrect the next day if lynched. Can only be permanently killed by other means.
- Witch
Basically the mafia rolecop.
(Please explain to me if i misunderstood something.)
I kind of like Fire Emblem, but yeah, it's because it seemed to match the name. I've only played Awakening, but I'll probably pick up 3 houses in a few months.In post 605, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also NaCl, do you like Fire Emblem or did you just find that the best avatar for your username?
I think they'd try to deflect elsewhere? Even if he's Zombie, it's far better for scum to have it revealed later rather than earlier. Which now makes me more suspicious of Ben.In post 845, Vorkuta wrote:What would the core!scum team be doing if Fake-PP was one of them?
Not really, no. I can look back at you later, but I don't think I can convince anyone when I haven't been focusing enough to convince myself very much.In post 924, tris wrote:do you not want to try me anymore?
Hoptic is on the wagon with no reasoning at all, or none that seems clear to me. Also, I was townreading him due to a misunderstanding earlier, so now I actually need to read his posts, ugh.In post 926, PenguinPower wrote:What exactly do you think is weak reasoning, and are you tr'ing fakePP?
In post 313, Hoptic wrote: I'm 100% sure Hectic isn't blind even if it would explain all the times we keep getting lost.
-Hop
In post 870, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Hoptic:
Hopkirk
Both of the heads have been defending me a lot. I want to trust them based on this, but I know that’s a silly and non-logical position to take. Hopkirk’s early posts actually give me slightly scummy vibes, but his later posts are more analytical and less meme-y. So i’m hoping his early play was just flair and joking around before getting more serious. Feeling neutral for now.
Hectic
I really like the humor of this guy, in fact this duo might be my favourite hydra simply based on entertainment value. The mixture of jokes and seriousness makes it easier for me to follow what they are both saying. Some of the jokes fall flat though, I can't see what’s funny about pretending to be blind (post 178). I thought hectic was being serious for a second, making it annoying to realize he was lying. Some things just shouldn’t be joked about imho. Anyway, he makes many good points, better than Hopkirk’s at times. All in all I’m getting a mostly towny vibe from him.
Null Hopkirk + Townlean Hectic = Slight townlean Hoptic
Because of his inability to understand the Zombie role. His reason behind that was that he was blind, and I figured that if he was scum, his partners would have explained it to him seeing as they picked Zombie.In post 933, tris wrote:why would him being blind lead you to townread him?
You mean haven't been focusing, right? This is just a larger and more active game than I'd anticipated.In post 938, tris wrote:@Salt why would you say you been focusing?
Instead, I'll ask you a question. Do you think Fake-PP is scum? And apart from that, who are your other scumreads?In post 947, NorwegianboyEE wrote:So why does that reasoning make me more vote-worthy than the other people that changed their vote from Ben? I also don't see why changing your vote is scummy. Especially since i think Fake-PP seems legitimately more scummy than Ben. (Though i don't exactly feel strong townie vibes from him either.)In post 923, NaCl wrote:VOTE: Norwegian it kind of feels like he hopped on the wagon but is content to sit there.
Why do you think I'm town?
I'm not really engaging with you because I think you're town and I don't think talking to you will help me sort stuff out. Although if you're scum, please feel free to keep talking . Really, though, if you've got questions for me, ask away.In post 1034, Vorkuta wrote:Anyway-it's kind of a pain to engage with people who don't engage back.
NaCl drops the occasional one liner in my direction but that's about it.
Plus... you know... there's the rest of the roster out there to aid me in my inquisition, so I rely on them to pick up the slack as well
As someone who doesn't know most of the people here, who are you talking about?In post 1095, Something_Smart wrote:This just occurred to me. It's likely thatIn post 693, Platinum Phoenix wrote:im inclined to agree
mafia is really stupid for choosing such a shitty PRa specific scum playerwanted to be a zombie because they heavily expected to be lynched early.
Apart from just putting your vote there, you're not really trying to pressure him, though. And it's entirely possible he gets lynched soon from this wagon. Are you fine with that?In post 1113, NorwegianboyEE wrote:My view on it= Bandwagon on Ben accumulates due to him sounding kinda scummy in the start of the game before disappearing for a while. He then comes back and people switch their attention to Phoenix hydra due to them also sounding a bit suspicious.In post 1112, Something_Smart wrote:There haven't been enough votecounts for me to really get a good idea of how wagons have been moving. Why does the wagon exist?
So both of the wagons are in my view, not very warranted, my main reason for participating is to pressure whoever sounds the most suspicious at any given time. Just your average Day 1 groupthink...
1. I didn't really see PlatinumPhoeniix as doing anything that made him seem town to me, but at the same time, not really anything scummy. I was more suspicious about how the wagon suddenly grew on him, where a few people suddenly jumped from the Ben wagon to him, and it didn't feel real to me.In post 1114, Hoptic wrote:How do you not have a read on the slot.In post 927, NaCl wrote:Hoptic is on the wagon with no reasoning at all, or none that seems clear to me. Also, I was townreading him due to a misunderstanding earlier, so now I actually need to read his posts, ugh.In post 926, PenguinPower wrote:What exactly do you think is weak reasoning, and are you tr'ing fakePP?
Norwegian gives a reason and parks his vote, then doesn't really follow up in any way.
Gamma is okay.
I'm not really townreading PlatinumPhoenix, because I don't really see anything from the slot. If anything, I'm feeling like Chennisden's slightly different from the only game I've played with him. I just find the wagon itself to be strange.
You dislike the wagon and think it's scum motivated you say?
In post 929, NaCl wrote:I have a stance on Asgard's vote, which is that I don't think he's putting enough effort behind it. And I didn't mention you because you voted way earlier, aren't quite in the same shift from Ben->fake-PP, and I haven't checked over your reasoning.
Also, I'm not townreading Hoptic anymore. I initially believed the blind thing, and thought that if he was scum he would understand how Zombie works. But I missed the part where he said it was a joke until just earlier. Now I actually need to read his posts rather than putting him in a pile in my mind and not worrying about him.In post 935, NaCl wrote:Because of his inability to understand the Zombie role. His reason behind that was that he was blind, and I figured that if he was scum, his partners would have explained it to him seeing as they picked Zombie.In post 933, tris wrote:why would him being blind lead you to townread him?
Look, do you want something from me, Vorkuta?In post 1116, Vorkuta wrote:*inhales*In post 1072, NaCl wrote:Because I'm not really the teamwork kind of guy.
This and the above 3 posts are horrible, but I don't think scum is usually this brazen.
Points for honesty I suppose but damn
In post 974, RCEnigma wrote:My townblock is me, Gamma, Norwegian, Unstuck.
What made you change your mind on UiT?In post 1160, RCEnigma wrote: I'm still against pretty much all the hydras +Vork. Vork is probably the only one that can take off but if he's scum I'm pretty sure I live the night. Killing me off is a blatant scumclaim. The rest I'll have more ammo on tomorrow, if I get invested in the game I guess.
Plan on answering this?In post 1140, NaCl wrote:Apart from just putting your vote there, you're not really trying to pressure him, though. And it's entirely possible he gets lynched soon from this wagon. Are you fine with that?In post 1113, NorwegianboyEE wrote:My view on it= Bandwagon on Ben accumulates due to him sounding kinda scummy in the start of the game before disappearing for a while. He then comes back and people switch their attention to Phoenix hydra due to them also sounding a bit suspicious.In post 1112, Something_Smart wrote:There haven't been enough votecounts for me to really get a good idea of how wagons have been moving. Why does the wagon exist?
So both of the wagons are in my view, not very warranted, my main reason for participating is to pressure whoever sounds the most suspicious at any given time. Just your average Day 1 groupthink...
It sounds like you're not really scumreading him or doing anything to try and determine if he's actually scum.In post 1199, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Yeah, i have someone i'd be willing to vote and lynch. So suspicious lel.
Let's just do nothing and let scum take control of the game, cus that's how you win mafia.
You're not doing the same as everyone else (well, or the same as some people, anyways). You didn't care about furthering your read on PlatinumPhoenix at all.In post 1213, NorwegianboyEE wrote:All scumreads are pretty much based upon gut feelings at this point, it’s even harder for me since i can’t base it upon the meta. I don’t know anyone’s scumgame here. So the better question is: Are you really going to lambast me for what everyone else is doing on day 1?In post 1211, NaCl wrote:Or well, not really convinced on your scumread, but you're not trying to get evidence.
I was mostly asking you since (IIRC) you weren't on the wagon or against it, so I wanted to know what you think.In post 1313, Something_Smart wrote:I wasn't even around for the majority of it. How should I know?
I mean, statistically it's likely that scum was on it at some point, but that's not the same thing.
In post 1379, tris wrote:well, i'm off. I won't be around for deadline.
I can't tell if you're just joking or something, but I'm curious as to what would have changed between me hammering then or me or PP doing it 8 hours later? It wasn't like Tris was going to return, and I didn't see another wagon forming.
This is a bad list. Not really over Fake-PP, but more on Tris. It was pretty clear that UiT was getting on the wagon in order to get a lynch through, since deadline was approaching. Even the jump off was because of a misunderstanding with the deadline. You literally did the same thing with the Tris wagon.In post 1582, Vorkuta wrote:So- height of fake-PP's wagon:
Platinum Phoenix (6) ~ PenguinPower, norwegianboyEE, Gamma Emerald, RCEnigma, UiT, Ben (#1265)
At this point, tris has no votes whatsoever.
Then it goes like
Spoiler:
UiT's voting pattern (late on both wagons, jumped off when worried that something wasn't going to go through, jumped straight back on when the wagon "revived" again is that of scum wanting to mislynch either of the 2 townies available) is.... erm.... yeah
VOTE: UiT
Do tell me what discussion I stopped? Because first of all, it wasn't like people were discussing things much in the first place, Tris wasn't coming back, and there was like less than 12 hours when I hammered. And I'm not scumreading you just for your tone, it's because your voting patterns are scummy. You're trying to discredit my points with bad reasoning, given that your vote was on Tris as well.In post 1609, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don't think Tris gave much indication about having a PR, so that part isn't too relevant in incriminating any voters. But quick-hammering when there was still time left for discussion is. And i don't feel good about the slot in general since NaCL has mostly been scum reading townies for bad reasons. He strongly advocated lynching Benhalkum (a townie). And he also scum reads me because "my tone is off" like he puts it. He also targets Vorkuta, though i'm not too sure about that slot so i'll leave this alone for the benefit of the doubt, but point is that from my perspective NaCL is looking very anti-town.In post 1602, Unstuck in Time wrote:Is your vote based on the fact that he quickhammered town, or was it based on the fact that he quickhammered a PR?
Okay, Vorkuta, I'll talk with you now. My opinion on S_S isn't that he's super town, but more kinda null. Mostly because he seems to be parking his vote in weird places without putting actual pressure, although he doesn't seem to be actively pursuing an agenda. Though his push on me is bad, though I can't tell if it's serious or not.In post 1637, Vorkuta wrote:I'm graciously allowing other people to chip in in order to help me read them
In post 1691, NorwegianboyEE wrote:The fact that nobody but me and S_S has been mainly advocating for NaCL so far makes me wonder if NaCL is scum. Currently there is a lower percentage of townies compared to scum since Night 1 passed, so i'm thinking scum would be feeling more confident in pushing for mislynches. Like maybe what we're seeing with RCE and UiT? I feel like they might both just be a distraction, the former even more so than the latter. Therefore the fact that not so many people has jumped on NaCL's scummy behaviour in favour of trashing RCE and UiT makes me feel like NaCL is the safest bet to vote right now.
I don't think i'm going to switch my vote.
Thank you for doing this. I was starting to doubt you were scum overnight but you really proved me wrong. VOTE: NorwegianboyEEIn post 1693, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Well some of it i've said already in posts here and there, but i guess i should put all of my thoughts into one post so it will become more coherent.In post 1692, RCEnigma wrote:I think I've glazed over most of the time when nacl posts. Run me through your scumread Norwegian.
First of all, he's been wanting to lynch me for a long time based upon the "tone of my posts" but he hasn't elaborated further, so i don't know why he keeps trying to raise attention to me. In day 1 he really wanted to lynch me, but "compromised" on lynching Tris instead. I know this is not too interesting since there's no way for me to prove i'm a townie, but i can't leave behind the possibility that he is scum who found himself what he believes to be a "easy" target, and keeps trying to test the waters to see if the town is willing to mislynch me.
Then in post 1521 he strongly advocates lynching Benhalkum, but hammers Tris, so he found himself two suspects, both of which turned out to be town. I believe this might have been him attempting to set up a day 2 mislynch in the form of benhalkum once the Tris lynch went through, but his plan was thwarted when the vig killed Ben. (Which is what i assumed happened) NaCLmightbe the vigilante as well, but if he was i don't think he would be acting so hostile against his future vig kill and bringing unwanted attention upon himself by the mafia and their ability to nightkill. So if my theory is correct, then NaCL is one of the most anti-town people i've currently nailed down of the whole rooster. If he's scum then his lynch would give a lot of information as well, he's claimed he was "heavily against" the Fake-PP wagon of D1, so if he's scum= Fake-PP most likely scum as well. NaCL's votes have always seemed opportunistic to me, he will seem content with anyone's lynch except for Fake-PP's wagon for some reason. Preferring to spend his time being combative about why anyone "votes for that guy" like he wants to bring it up later if he knows their mislynch will give him ammo for setting up future mislynches and he can later go "aha! He voted for X, clearly scummy!"
This gives me bad vibes.In post 1625, NaCl wrote:To be honest, though, it feels like I'm a 'safe' place for people to park their votes on, given how it happened yesterday as well.
As for RCE and UiT i feel like the attacks on RCE are kinda artificial, it's just a crappy WIFOM argument as well as some (You're not like THAT in the games i've played with you?! WHERE'S THE REAL RCE???!) which seemed to me like bad arguments even back in D1, so i don't find them too engaging here in in D2 either. UiT's wagon seems more natural, but i have this feeling that UiT is genuine. It seems like they want to help town, but the whole "hydra" thing is making them difficult for each other to communicate which makes it easy for anyone to point out inconsistencies between the two.
You know that reasoning only works if you're town, right?In post 1696, Unstuck in Time wrote:I agree that the logic is convoluted and ridiculous. So how exactly is that scummy?In post 1694, NaCl wrote:In post 1691, NorwegianboyEE wrote:The fact that nobody but me and S_S has been mainly advocating for NaCL so far makes me wonder if NaCL is scum. Currently there is a lower percentage of townies compared to scum since Night 1 passed, so i'm thinking scum would be feeling more confident in pushing for mislynches. Like maybe what we're seeing with RCE and UiT? I feel like they might both just be a distraction, the former even more so than the latter. Therefore the fact that not so many people has jumped on NaCL's scummy behaviour in favour of trashing RCE and UiT makes me feel like NaCL is the safest bet to vote right now.
I don't think i'm going to switch my vote.Thank you for doing this. I was starting to doubt you were scum overnight but you really proved me wrong. VOTE: NorwegianboyEEIn post 1693, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Well some of it i've said already in posts here and there, but i guess i should put all of my thoughts into one post so it will become more coherent.In post 1692, RCEnigma wrote:I think I've glazed over most of the time when nacl posts. Run me through your scumread Norwegian.
First of all, he's been wanting to lynch me for a long time based upon the "tone of my posts" but he hasn't elaborated further, so i don't know why he keeps trying to raise attention to me. In day 1 he really wanted to lynch me, but "compromised" on lynching Tris instead. I know this is not too interesting since there's no way for me to prove i'm a townie, but i can't leave behind the possibility that he is scum who found himself what he believes to be a "easy" target, and keeps trying to test the waters to see if the town is willing to mislynch me.
Then in post 1521 he strongly advocates lynching Benhalkum, but hammers Tris, so he found himself two suspects, both of which turned out to be town. I believe this might have been him attempting to set up a day 2 mislynch in the form of benhalkum once the Tris lynch went through, but his plan was thwarted when the vig killed Ben. (Which is what i assumed happened) NaCLmightbe the vigilante as well, but if he was i don't think he would be acting so hostile against his future vig kill and bringing unwanted attention upon himself by the mafia and their ability to nightkill. So if my theory is correct, then NaCL is one of the most anti-town people i've currently nailed down of the whole rooster. If he's scum then his lynch would give a lot of information as well, he's claimed he was "heavily against" the Fake-PP wagon of D1, so if he's scum= Fake-PP most likely scum as well. NaCL's votes have always seemed opportunistic to me, he will seem content with anyone's lynch except for Fake-PP's wagon for some reason. Preferring to spend his time being combative about why anyone "votes for that guy" like he wants to bring it up later if he knows their mislynch will give him ammo for setting up future mislynches and he can later go "aha! He voted for X, clearly scummy!"
This gives me bad vibes.In post 1625, NaCl wrote:To be honest, though, it feels like I'm a 'safe' place for people to park their votes on, given how it happened yesterday as well.
As for RCE and UiT i feel like the attacks on RCE are kinda artificial, it's just a crappy WIFOM argument as well as some (You're not like THAT in the games i've played with you?! WHERE'S THE REAL RCE???!) which seemed to me like bad arguments even back in D1, so i don't find them too engaging here in in D2 either. UiT's wagon seems more natural, but i have this feeling that UiT is genuine. It seems like they want to help town, but the whole "hydra" thing is making them difficult for each other to communicate which makes it easy for anyone to point out inconsistencies between the two.
I don't believe you would have changed your mind or your vote on me regardless of how many people were voting me. If more people were voting me, would you say that makes me town? It's ridiculous logic.
Next, I wasn't scumreading you for your tone, I said you were a null read in that post at that point. I didn't like you because of your voting patterns. The wagon on Fake-PP grew too quickly for a town wagon compared to what I was seeing, and I think someone who got on early is scum, which is why I'm also suspicious of Hoptic.
Yes, I hammered Tris because that lynch was going through regardless. Do you think that I would have been doing that if it was between you and Tris, or Benhalkum and Tris, or anyone? Because Tris wasn't going to come back, and short of anyone claiming scum openly, that lynch wasn't changing. It's really easy to say that Benhalkum was me setting up a mislynch after he flipped, but did you ever consider how scummy he was?
You keep calling me anti-town rather than scum as an out for when I flip town.
My defense of Fake-PP is because I thought the wagon was bad.
Your attack on me is bad and it's clearly not taking an actual look at what I'm saying. If you're town, look over it again and stop lying about what my actual reasons are.
Check the join date. You think scum makes a bizarre case out on you when he's one of two on the wagon and needs 4 more to hop on or tries to make a passable case on the other developing wagon and hops on which makes 3 and only needs 3 more with Hoptic already saying I'm probably scum? If anything, S_S's vote on you is worse, because he voted you to kick off the day shading you for hammering before a claim when Tris was V/LA and we were probably too late for a different wagon anyway.
I really don't understand your SR of Norwegian here. The only way it makes sense is if you think he's trying to pull people off of me since I'm the counter-wagon at the moment. Do you think I'm scum with Norwegian? I think I'm having trouble with how him pushing you with bad logic means he's scum?
BP
Your logic doesn't have flaws. It's misrepresenting what I'm doing. And you're still not actually acknowledging that and continuing to push on me regardless of what actual argument I'm making.In post 1704, NorwegianboyEE wrote:NaCL’s response to my case is quite telling. A townie NaCL might have reacted like BP has done, pointing out flaws in my logic and perhaps being forgiving and assuming It is just as likely that i could be a townie on a bad track, instead he has become hyper aggressive and claims there is no way i am anything but scum. NaCL’s behaviour just doesn’t feel natural.
I don't see why you have this idea that scum Norwegian would have to push you when he could be pushing me. Do you think that scum is pushing you already, or are the people who were after you town? Because it's entirely possible for different people on the scumteam to be pushing different townies.In post 1738, Unstuck in Time wrote:In post 1717, NaCl wrote:@UiT
I looked over you again, and I think you're probably town. I had a solid townread D1, it weakened a bit after your D2 posts. But I agree, you're probably not scum. Still, I don't really see that it would clear Norwegian if you're town. Do you not think that he could push me if he's scum even if you're town?
Also, just to be clear, what do you think of his case on me? I think you believe that he's wrong, but not lying, and I want to know why you think he's able to make such a mistake and isn't going out of his way to misrepresent what I've said and done.
I re-read. You're right that his case on you is bad, and yeah probably a mis-rep. I can see why you would want to push there, and I don't have a good reason to say don't do it. But I'm not going to, because I think that both at that time and now, I'm an easier target and I think he'd have probably pushed me instead.
BP
Well, that's something we can both agree on.In post 1740, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Town seems quite dysfunctional right now. Does someone have a really good case on anybody so far?
Cool, this is the part I was most interested in. I know you put out that list of everyone's scumreads earlier, but only had me and UiT there for you.In post 1744, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I still feel like Phoenix is town.In post 1743, NaCl wrote:Do you think Hoptic's town, Norwegian? For that matter, do you think PlatinumPhoenix is town?
I mean, I agree that it could be suspicious. But I'm interested in knowing what you think is suspicious. Do you not have a stance on this?In post 1746, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Assuming town!phoneix= true, it doesn't seem likely that all votes on him would be town.In post 1745, NaCl wrote:If you think Phoenix is town, who do you think were the scum on the wagon? Or do you think they were all town?Hoptic got on as the second vote, then eventually unvoted before Vorkuta's next vote count. Assuming Fake-PP is town, then that would be a bit suspicious. RCE could be suspicious as well.In post 1167, Vorkuta wrote:Platinum Phoenix (5) L-2~ PenguinPower, Hoptic, norwegianboyEE, Gamma Emerald, RCEnigma
Then again, this is all just speculation. Barring any flips we can't know for sure.
I'm not really doing that. I just figured that since Norwegian thought Fake-PP was town, I could get his opinion on the wagon based on that assumption.In post 1757, PenguinPower wrote:Why are we analyzing an unflipped wagon as a town flip?
That is a good point. I kind of felt like it wasn't getting any traction after a while and they could have switched to Tris to get something through (this would probably point to RCE scum).In post 1763, PenguinPower wrote:I mean - that's what I'm asking. Why was scum on it early for it to fall apart at EOD onto a town wagon?
Well, you might not be wrong, though. Because it's possible for Norwegian to be town, I'm just not really sure why he'd make a case like that on me if he is. Of course, I can't just go and ask him if he's lying about me. And I don't know why he doesn't feel like he's trying to push his scumreads either.In post 1787, Unstuck in Time wrote:In response to your first point, I'm an idiot and didn't even consider that possibility.In post 1743, NaCl wrote:I don't see why you have this idea that scum Norwegian would have to push you when he could be pushing me. Do you think that scum is pushing you already, or are the people who were after you town? Because it's entirely possible for different people on the scumteam to be pushing different townies.In post 1738, Unstuck in Time wrote:In post 1717, NaCl wrote:@UiT
I looked over you again, and I think you're probably town. I had a solid townread D1, it weakened a bit after your D2 posts. But I agree, you're probably not scum. Still, I don't really see that it would clear Norwegian if you're town. Do you not think that he could push me if he's scum even if you're town?
Also, just to be clear, what do you think of his case on me? I think you believe that he's wrong, but not lying, and I want to know why you think he's able to make such a mistake and isn't going out of his way to misrepresent what I've said and done.
I re-read. You're right that his case on you is bad, and yeah probably a mis-rep. I can see why you would want to push there, and I don't have a good reason to say don't do it. But I'm not going to, because I think that both at that time and now, I'm an easier target and I think he'd have probably pushed me instead.
BP
BP
My alarm was that it suddenly got 3 votes on it very quickly one after the other (Well 4, but Vorkuta got on and back off partway through). As for getting near the end, it felt like it wasn't really moving past a point after RCE got on the wagon and others started to get off.In post 1767, PenguinPower wrote:It grew to quick for it to be natural? When did it get to the danger zone? What happened when it approached EOD?In post 1764, NaCl wrote:That is a good point. I kind of felt like it wasn't getting any traction after a while and they could have switched to Tris to get something through (this would probably point to RCE scum).In post 1763, PenguinPower wrote:I mean - that's what I'm asking. Why was scum on it early for it to fall apart at EOD onto a town wagon?
Do you think scum was on it early? Seems like you disagree with me. To me, it felt like it grew a bit too quickly for it to be natural.
Yes, I disagree with you. No, I won't feed you answers.
I think you're probably town, but that there's scum between you and Hoptic. I would like to be more sure of that.
I think that was more relevant for determining who scum were rather than how things were on D2.In post 1909, Hoptic wrote:Why are you avoiding talking about the actual PP lynch instead of the d1 part?
-Hop
In post 1114, Hoptic wrote:In post 929, NaCl wrote:I have a stance on Asgard's vote, which is that I don't think he's putting enough effort behind it. And I didn't mention you because you voted way earlier, aren't quite in the same shift from Ben->fake-PP, and I haven't checked over your reasoning.
Also, I'm not townreading Hoptic anymore. I initially believed the blind thing, and thought that if he was scum he would understand how Zombie works. But I missed the part where he said it was a joke until just earlier. Now I actually need to read his posts rather than putting him in a pile in my mind and not worrying about him.This sounds like an excuse to change your read more than anything.In post 935, NaCl wrote:Because of his inability to understand the Zombie role. His reason behind that was that he was blind, and I figured that if he was scum, his partners would have explained it to him seeing as they picked Zombie.In post 933, tris wrote:why would him being blind lead you to townread him?
-Hop
Hoptic, why did you change your mind on that post?In post 1913, Hoptic wrote:I'm not sure scum would use logic as ridiculous as the second paragraph here. This is genuine.In post 929, NaCl wrote:I have a stance on Asgard's vote, which is that I don't think he's putting enough effort behind it. And I didn't mention you because you voted way earlier, aren't quite in the same shift from Ben->fake-PP, and I haven't checked over your reasoning.
Also, I'm not townreading Hoptic anymore. I initially believed the blind thing, and thought that if he was scum he would understand how Zombie works. But I missed the part where he said it was a joke until just earlier. Now I actually need to read his posts rather than putting him in a pile in my mind and not worrying about him.