In post 636, Alchemist21 wrote:The currently proposed names are RC, NC 39, LUV, Espresso, and Gamma.
I think I'm okay with that? Dunno bout LUV but we are mega-short on time
How many people have that as theirs rn? I'll put it down unless it'll decide it then and there, because I want a little more time to discuss.
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
3 people outside of the Coalition voting for it is a red flag.
HURT: Gamma
HEAL: Alchemist21
huh now this feels like an overreaction considering i said i'm just voting this temporarily in case people think i wouldn't come online in time to vote one through
better to try a coalition than none at all
Alchemist using this as reasoning for trying to slip himself in?
anyway got some time so catchup begins now
I was already in it before people started putting in Gamma.
I took myself out to add Gamma because of deadline.
And it’s simple logic that if 3 people outside the Coalition are ok with it then scum is in the Coalition.
In post 627, EspressoPatronum wrote:@nsg I trust Hectic to help make the coalition happen, so I'm counting him as a 4th vote to back this coalition.
Nobody should ever be putting Hectic in their Coalition.
scummy scum scumming
your initial SR on me was literally only based on me forgetting to pressure with my vote. the tone thing was irrelevant as you said yourself, it was the same as my newbie game
then i make a case where i'm trying to see if i can find anything scummy from your posts since my read on you is a gut read, and you overreact again
1) if we win by coalition no lynching needed
2) lynching before making a coalition nulls that part of the setup
I don’t understand this unless you think we don’t have enough info to determine that? However, whatever happens with the coalition, if we lynch today, it should definitely be outside the coalition.
So no, it only defeats the purpose if we lynch inside the coalition today, which is why I don’t understand where Espresso is coming from here.
So, that would be Spangled/Hectic/GREAT/Alchemist. Of those, GREAT makes the most sense, since she has been my weakest read this entire game.
3 people outside of the Coalition voting for it is a red flag.
HURT: Gamma
HEAL: Alchemist21
huh now this feels like an overreaction considering i said i'm just voting this temporarily in case people think i wouldn't come online in time to vote one through
better to try a coalition than none at all
Alchemist using this as reasoning for trying to slip himself in?
anyway got some time so catchup begins now
I was already in it before people started putting in Gamma.
I took myself out to add Gamma because of deadline.
And it’s simple logic that if 3 people outside the Coalition are ok with it then scum is in the Coalition.
You’re right but are you considering the possibility that this is scum WIFOM to make us question the coalition at this late date?
How can you be certain that scum can’t pull a last minute bait and switch?
Iow, how do you know that scum is really onboard with this and wants to derail it?
You could definitely be right but I’ve seen clever scum pull this kind of stunt when it’s too late to do anything about it.
Maybe that’s tin foil but I don’t think we should totally write that off either.
1) if we win by coalition no lynching needed
2) lynching before making a coalition nulls that part of the setup
I’m tl this post, so I think we should either leave the coalition the way it is or remove someone else, maybe LUV?
Because is it really best to risk one out of our 3 possible mislynches when coalition either succeeds or we have more info the next day? I don’t know.
I think if we do lynch today, it should be outside coalition but rn I don’t know if GREAT or Hectic is the best option but if I vote, it’s probably between them.
I don’t like how Hectic subbed himself in for Gamma right after voting the coalition.
If we lynch, I am opposed to lynching outside of GREAT/HECTIC today.
In post 666, EspressoPatronum wrote:Assuming we pass a coalition and it fails, nobody should be voting to lynch outside of the 5 coalition members.
Why not? IF coalition fails - unless you think there’s two scum in it - unlikely. So, for today and today only, IF we lynch, it makes the most sense to lynch amongst the two scummiest players NOT in coalition. It was definitely GREAT for me, until Hectic decided to sub himself for Gamma pretty much immediately after voting the coalition.
We CAN'T lynch until we pass a coalition or the deadline hits. I'm assuming we'll pull ourselves together enough to beat the deadline, so that leave us with this order of operations:
SCENARIO 1
A. We pass a coalition
B. We succeed
C. Game over
SCENARIO 2
A. We pass a coalition
B. It fails
C. We lynch
D. Game continues
Lynching outside of the coalition in the event of Scenario B makes no sense, as we have confirmed
at least
one scum in that group. We shouldn't risk voting outside of the coalition in the unlikely but possible event of both scum being in the coalition.