Nomic

For completed/abandoned Mish Mash Games.
User avatar
Formerfish
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
User avatar
User avatar
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
Busboy Revolutionary
Posts: 12855
Joined: July 1, 2013
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post Post #150 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 8:37 pm

Post by Formerfish »

Hey infer, talk to me about P006
Show
"Getting lost in the details of nothing..."

"FF, you're a dick, but you don't hit below the belt. So you're a dick about finding scum, not hurting the people who are playing the game. That's acceptable dickary." MaryJoLisa

Need advice? Ask a Fish.
User avatar
Aronis
Aronis
Just here for the Pagetop!
User avatar
User avatar
Aronis
Just here for the Pagetop!
Just here for the Pagetop!
Posts: 6580
Joined: January 18, 2014
Location: Somewhere
Contact:

Post Post #151 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 9:04 pm

Post by Aronis »

P031: A Bill to Eliminate Legislative Backlog

1a. All Proposals will have a time limit of 96 hours. If the 96 hours elapse and a decision has not been reached on the proposal, it will fail.
1b. If more time to decide on a bill is deemed necessary, any player may motion to extend the time limit.
2. Each player is limited to one current proposal. They must either retract it or wait until is passes or fails to create a new one.


Obviously all old bills are grandfathered in and lack the time limit. Players with more than one current proposal are also grandfathered in.
This proposal is designed to make the game easier to follow and prevent us from compiling dozens of bills that nobody particularly cares about. I think 4 days is plenty of time for most people to see a bill and vote- but I could be persuaded to slightly increase it if necessary.
User avatar
Formerfish
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
User avatar
User avatar
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
Busboy Revolutionary
Posts: 12855
Joined: July 1, 2013
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post Post #152 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 9:09 pm

Post by Formerfish »

006- why nays?

007- is the office of executive explained anywhere?

008- There is some vague wording I would like to shore up, who would a player capable of making a motion be?

009- NMSA why nay?

VOTE: Aye P010

VOTE: Nay P011 I dont like the unlimited motion clause tacked on at the end

012- someone eli5 me?

015- do we not like this because someone could propose something and then have the group change it and they could pull it anytime they wanted?

016- whyd this fall flat?

017- is this a basic proxy vote allowance?

018- why is this one gaining traction when 015 is trending no?

019- is outside communication allowed in this game? I wondered reading this one how a coalition could start when it would have to be out in the open as it was starting.

020- is there going to be any oversight into these coalitions and their rules?

VOTE: Aye P021

VOTE: Aye P022

VOTE: Aye P023

VOTE: Aye P024

025- why not just limit the words allowed to 3 to account for agreement, disagreement, and abstain. Are we worried about people just not doing anything?

026- not sure what this one is about
Show
"Getting lost in the details of nothing..."

"FF, you're a dick, but you don't hit below the belt. So you're a dick about finding scum, not hurting the people who are playing the game. That's acceptable dickary." MaryJoLisa

Need advice? Ask a Fish.
User avatar
Formerfish
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
User avatar
User avatar
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
Busboy Revolutionary
Posts: 12855
Joined: July 1, 2013
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post Post #153 (ISO) » Wed Sep 11, 2019 9:10 pm

Post by Formerfish »

In post 151, Aronis wrote:
P031: A Bill to Eliminate Legislative Backlog

1a. All Proposals will have a time limit of 96 hours. If the 96 hours elapse and a decision has not been reached on the proposal, it will fail.
1b. If more time to decide on a bill is deemed necessary, any player may motion to extend the time limit.
2. Each player is limited to one current proposal. They must either retract it or wait until is passes or fails to create a new one.


Obviously all old bills are grandfathered in and lack the time limit. Players with more than one current proposal are also grandfathered in.
This proposal is designed to make the game easier to follow and prevent us from compiling dozens of bills that nobody particularly cares about. I think 4 days is plenty of time for most people to see a bill and vote- but I could be persuaded to slightly increase it if necessary.
do you require a second?
Show
"Getting lost in the details of nothing..."

"FF, you're a dick, but you don't hit below the belt. So you're a dick about finding scum, not hurting the people who are playing the game. That's acceptable dickary." MaryJoLisa

Need advice? Ask a Fish.
User avatar
NotMySpamAccount
NotMySpamAccount
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
NotMySpamAccount
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1181
Joined: January 29, 2019

Post Post #154 (ISO) » Thu Sep 12, 2019 1:48 am

Post by NotMySpamAccount »

In post 123, skitter30 wrote:
In post 106, Aronis wrote:Other positions may be added to aid the Chair at their discretion.
@aronis i'm not sure i like this part of your currency proposition
+1

This is abig improvement, but it's still not quite what I'm looking for.
Show
Town: 6-5
Scum: 2-1
3p: 0-1

"NMSA called out all three of us as scum or null in his reads list. Good thing no one's actually reading that." -Enter
"NMSA was at least a pretty easy mislynch that I didn't have to get my hands dirty to attain" -RC

Indefinite/permanent v/la
User avatar
NotMySpamAccount
NotMySpamAccount
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
NotMySpamAccount
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1181
Joined: January 29, 2019

Post Post #155 (ISO) » Thu Sep 12, 2019 1:52 am

Post by NotMySpamAccount »

VOTE: P027: No
VOTE: P028: No
VOTE: P029: Yea
VOTE: P030: No
VOTE: P031: Yea
Show
Town: 6-5
Scum: 2-1
3p: 0-1

"NMSA called out all three of us as scum or null in his reads list. Good thing no one's actually reading that." -Enter
"NMSA was at least a pretty easy mislynch that I didn't have to get my hands dirty to attain" -RC

Indefinite/permanent v/la
User avatar
NotMySpamAccount
NotMySpamAccount
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
NotMySpamAccount
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1181
Joined: January 29, 2019

Post Post #156 (ISO) » Thu Sep 12, 2019 1:56 am

Post by NotMySpamAccount »

P032
: Any action not prohibited is permitted, unless it relates to official matters in the rules, in which case it is prohibited if not permitted.
Show
Town: 6-5
Scum: 2-1
3p: 0-1

"NMSA called out all three of us as scum or null in his reads list. Good thing no one's actually reading that." -Enter
"NMSA was at least a pretty easy mislynch that I didn't have to get my hands dirty to attain" -RC

Indefinite/permanent v/la
User avatar
skitter30
skitter30
she/her
Last Laugh
User avatar
User avatar
skitter30
she/her
Last Laugh
Last Laugh
Posts: 36539
Joined: March 26, 2017
Pronoun: she/her
Location: Est
Happy Scumday!

Post Post #157 (ISO) » Thu Sep 12, 2019 2:44 am

Post by skitter30 »

In post 144, Inferno390 wrote:P029:
Amend R206:
Votes for proposals should be done using the vote tags and include "Yea" or "Nay" and include the proposal number. A player can also abstain from voting; their vote will not be counted among the number of active votes. To abstain from voting on a given proposal, a player must type Vote: Abstain (proposal number) in the thread.
I want to be able to use heal and hurt tags
Show
Hiatus once more.

'skitter is fucking terrifying' ~ town-bork about scum-me

'Skitter [was] terrifying to play against ngl' ~ scum-bork about town-me

'Going into lylo against scum!skit unprepared is like having someone force feed you dull razor blades. It's painful, and once it starts, you're pretty much dead' ~ NMSA

'Skitter you're a spirit animal's spirit animal' ~ slaxx
User avatar
skitter30
skitter30
she/her
Last Laugh
User avatar
User avatar
skitter30
she/her
Last Laugh
Last Laugh
Posts: 36539
Joined: March 26, 2017
Pronoun: she/her
Location: Est
Happy Scumday!

Post Post #158 (ISO) » Thu Sep 12, 2019 2:46 am

Post by skitter30 »

HEAL: p031
HURT: p032
Show
Hiatus once more.

'skitter is fucking terrifying' ~ town-bork about scum-me

'Skitter [was] terrifying to play against ngl' ~ scum-bork about town-me

'Going into lylo against scum!skit unprepared is like having someone force feed you dull razor blades. It's painful, and once it starts, you're pretty much dead' ~ NMSA

'Skitter you're a spirit animal's spirit animal' ~ slaxx
User avatar
Inferno390
Inferno390
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Inferno390
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2190
Joined: October 3, 2017
Location: With the Flying Pumpkin That Shoots Laser Beams Out Of It's Ass

Post Post #159 (ISO) » Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:16 am

Post by Inferno390 »

In post 157, skitter30 wrote:
In post 144, Inferno390 wrote:P029:
Amend R206:
Votes for proposals should be done using the vote tags and include "Yea" or "Nay" and include the proposal number. A player can also abstain from voting; their vote will not be counted among the number of active votes. To abstain from voting on a given proposal, a player must type Vote: Abstain (proposal number) in the thread.
I want to be able to use heal and hurt tags
This is what P025 is for.

I might vote yea on P031 if the number of proposals was upped. I think two would be slightly better with a group of 7 people. If more people come later and we want to amend it, we can. Not sure I'm comfortable with a time limit though.
"Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL

“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion

Inferno390 GTKAS

Mafiascum Moderator Society
User avatar
Inferno390
Inferno390
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Inferno390
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2190
Joined: October 3, 2017
Location: With the Flying Pumpkin That Shoots Laser Beams Out Of It's Ass

Post Post #160 (ISO) » Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:43 am

Post by Inferno390 »

@Former:

P006: I'm like 99% sure this is redundant given the rules.
P007: No it is not.
P008: A player can only make a motion should a rule say they can. So right now, there are no motions you can make, but in the future, we can add rules that allow player to make motions.
P012: This one goes hand in hand with P011. Basically, you can motion to do as much as you want on your turn, but if the motion does not pass, you have to cut down the actions in your turn so it follows the given rules.
P015: Not really sure.
P016: There are some issure in the rules with value and inflation, and like I said, I'm not for any new mechanics right now.
P017: Kind of? Basically you can let someone else vote for you.
P018: I think because people don't like the idea of specifically retracting proposals. This one just defines how a proposal can be changed by it's creator and gives a helpful definition.
P019: It is not explicitly against the rules as of yet.
P020: Probably not?
P025: I want to make sure words other than Yea or Nay are legal for processing votes. Right now we're counting them as such, but since it's not explicitly specified in the rules, it could raise some hairline issues later on.
P026 is supposed to read "amend R301." An error due to a wiki update.
"Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL

“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion

Inferno390 GTKAS

Mafiascum Moderator Society
User avatar
Charles510
Charles510
he
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Charles510
he
Goon
Goon
Posts: 219
Joined: March 11, 2017
Pronoun: he
Location: San Francisco Bay Area

Post Post #161 (ISO) » Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:53 am

Post by Charles510 »

VOTE: P011 Nay
User avatar
Charles510
Charles510
he
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Charles510
he
Goon
Goon
Posts: 219
Joined: March 11, 2017
Pronoun: he
Location: San Francisco Bay Area

Post Post #162 (ISO) » Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:53 am

Post by Charles510 »

VOTE: P012 Yea
User avatar
Charles510
Charles510
he
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Charles510
he
Goon
Goon
Posts: 219
Joined: March 11, 2017
Pronoun: he
Location: San Francisco Bay Area

Post Post #163 (ISO) » Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:54 am

Post by Charles510 »

VOTE: P014 Yea
User avatar
Aronis
Aronis
Just here for the Pagetop!
User avatar
User avatar
Aronis
Just here for the Pagetop!
Just here for the Pagetop!
Posts: 6580
Joined: January 18, 2014
Location: Somewhere
Contact:

Post Post #164 (ISO) » Thu Sep 12, 2019 5:06 am

Post by Aronis »

In post 153, Formerfish wrote:
In post 151, Aronis wrote:
P031: A Bill to Eliminate Legislative Backlog

1a. All Proposals will have a time limit of 96 hours. If the 96 hours elapse and a decision has not been reached on the proposal, it will fail.
1b. If more time to decide on a bill is deemed necessary, any player may motion to extend the time limit.
2. Each player is limited to one current proposal. They must either retract it or wait until is passes or fails to create a new one.


Obviously all old bills are grandfathered in and lack the time limit. Players with more than one current proposal are also grandfathered in.
This proposal is designed to make the game easier to follow and prevent us from compiling dozens of bills that nobody particularly cares about. I think 4 days is plenty of time for most people to see a bill and vote- but I could be persuaded to slightly increase it if necessary.
do you require a second?
If you'd vote yes it'd pass and that'd be really exciting
User avatar
Charles510
Charles510
he
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Charles510
he
Goon
Goon
Posts: 219
Joined: March 11, 2017
Pronoun: he
Location: San Francisco Bay Area

Post Post #165 (ISO) » Thu Sep 12, 2019 5:17 am

Post by Charles510 »

VOTE: P031 Yea
User avatar
Formerfish
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
User avatar
User avatar
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
Busboy Revolutionary
Posts: 12855
Joined: July 1, 2013
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post Post #166 (ISO) » Thu Sep 12, 2019 5:19 am

Post by Formerfish »

VOTE: Aye P031
Show
"Getting lost in the details of nothing..."

"FF, you're a dick, but you don't hit below the belt. So you're a dick about finding scum, not hurting the people who are playing the game. That's acceptable dickary." MaryJoLisa

Need advice? Ask a Fish.
User avatar
Formerfish
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
User avatar
User avatar
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
Busboy Revolutionary
Posts: 12855
Joined: July 1, 2013
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post Post #167 (ISO) » Thu Sep 12, 2019 5:40 am

Post by Formerfish »

In post 152, Formerfish wrote:006- why nays?

007- is the office of executive explained anywhere?

008- There is some vague wording I would like to shore up, who would a player capable of making a motion be?

009- NMSA why nay?

VOTE: Aye P010

VOTE: Nay P011 I dont like the unlimited motion clause tacked on at the end

012- someone eli5 me?

015- do we not like this because someone could propose something and then have the group change it and they could pull it anytime they wanted?

016- whyd this fall flat?

017- is this a basic proxy vote allowance?

018- why is this one gaining traction when 015 is trending no?

019- is outside communication allowed in this game? I wondered reading this one how a coalition could start when it would have to be out in the open as it was starting.

020- is there going to be any oversight into these coalitions and their rules?

VOTE: Aye P021

VOTE: Aye P022

VOTE: Aye P023

VOTE: Aye P024

025- why not just limit the words allowed to 3 to account for agreement, disagreement, and abstain. Are we worried about people just not doing anything?

026- not sure what this one is about

VOTE: 06- Nay redundant
VOTE: 07- Nay I would want at least a rough sketch of what this entails
VOTE: 08- Aye
VOTE: 12- Aye
VOTE: 17- Aye
VOTE: 18- Aye
VOTE: 19- Nay I think we need to figure out what we are before we let people start to make factions
VOTE: 20- Nay
25- why do we want to broaden the words we use and not limit them for sake of ease?
Show
"Getting lost in the details of nothing..."

"FF, you're a dick, but you don't hit below the belt. So you're a dick about finding scum, not hurting the people who are playing the game. That's acceptable dickary." MaryJoLisa

Need advice? Ask a Fish.
User avatar
NotMySpamAccount
NotMySpamAccount
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
NotMySpamAccount
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1181
Joined: January 29, 2019

Post Post #168 (ISO) » Thu Sep 12, 2019 6:40 am

Post by NotMySpamAccount »

P006 is not redundant, a supermajority is not the same as an absolute majority. One is 2/3, one is 1/2.
Show
Town: 6-5
Scum: 2-1
3p: 0-1

"NMSA called out all three of us as scum or null in his reads list. Good thing no one's actually reading that." -Enter
"NMSA was at least a pretty easy mislynch that I didn't have to get my hands dirty to attain" -RC

Indefinite/permanent v/la
User avatar
Aronis
Aronis
Just here for the Pagetop!
User avatar
User avatar
Aronis
Just here for the Pagetop!
Just here for the Pagetop!
Posts: 6580
Joined: January 18, 2014
Location: Somewhere
Contact:

Post Post #169 (ISO) » Thu Sep 12, 2019 8:27 am

Post by Aronis »

VOTE: N P006 - no significance
VOTE: N P007 - too vague
VOTE: N P009 - i feel like my bill addresses the backlog issues better and it already got passed
VOTE: N P011 - see above
VOTE: N P015 - pretty sure i didn't propose this, but either way it can die
VOTE: N P019 - too vague, lacks safeguards that I mentioned earlier, I really just want this old stuff to die so the wiki is cleaner
VOTE: N P020 - see above
User avatar
Aronis
Aronis
Just here for the Pagetop!
User avatar
User avatar
Aronis
Just here for the Pagetop!
Just here for the Pagetop!
Posts: 6580
Joined: January 18, 2014
Location: Somewhere
Contact:

Post Post #170 (ISO) » Thu Sep 12, 2019 8:29 am

Post by Aronis »

I'm going to try to update the wiki- I'll put a log of everything I do here in spoilers so if needed, it can be changed back pretty easily
updated through P020- I'll try to finish the 20s/30s soon

Spoiler: Defeated
===P006===

Proposed by: NMSA

Yea (1) - NMSA

Nay (4) - Inferno, Charles510, Formerfish, Aronis

Any rule which has an effect retroactively requires a supermajority to pass.
===P007===

Proposed by: NMSA

Yea (3) - NMSA, skitter, okapoka

Nay (4) - Inferno, Charles510, Formerfish, Aronis

The office of Executive is established.
===P011===

Proposed by: Inferno

Yea (1) - Inferno

Nay (4) - NotMySpamAccount, Formerfish, Charles510, Aronis

Players may only make 1 proposal to add or remove a single rule OR 2 separate proposals to amend or transmute a single rule on their turn. In addition, on their turn they may perform any number of motions on their turn.
===P015===

Proposed by: ???

Yea (0) -

Nay (4) - OkaPoka, Inferno, NotMySpamAccount, Aronis

A player may retract their proposal at any time. When this occurs it does not go into effect and cannot be voted on any longer.
===P019===

Proposed by: NotMySpamAccount

Yea (1) - NotMySpamAccount

Nay (4) - Inferno, Skitter, Formerfish, Aronis

Any group of players may, at any time, declare themselves a COALITION. The CHAIR of said coalition must post the name of the coalition in the thread, as well as all players who are part of it. All listed players must confirm that they are part of this coalition. Once they do, the coalition is official, and can determine its own rules and regulations to be followed by its members. The chair of a coalition may exercise any ex officio right granted to him by a proposal.
===P020===

Proposed by: NotMySpamAccount

Yea (1) - NotMySpamAccount

Nay (4) - Inferno, Skitter, Formerfish, Aronis

If permitted, either conditionally or otherwise, by the rules of his coalition, the chair of a coalition may exercise some or all of the votes delegated by members of his coalition. If the chair does so, the players whose votes are delegated are treated as if they themselves had voted in the standard way. Any vote delegated to a chair may be changed by the delegating player at will.

Spoiler: Passed
===P008===

A Motion is a action that can only be made by a specific player who possesses the capability to do so. The ability to perform a Motion is only given by a rule that states as such. Motions shall begin numbering at M001 and count up by each ordinal number. A Motion may be passed by absolute majority. A Motion's clause always consists of a thing that will happen when it is passed, i.e., "X will occur." Motions cannot change the rules in any way. When a motion passes, the effect stated immediately occurs.
made into r307
===P012===

Proposed by: Inferno

Yea (4) - Inferno, NotMySpamAccount, Charles510, Formerfish

Nay (0) -

All players have the ability to perform a Motions so as they may ignore any turn restrictions placed on them by other rules. They may do this in conjunction with making proposals, and in conjunction may submit more proposals that the stated limits by any rules. However, should the motion fail, a number of those proposals, chosen by the player who submitted them, must become void and cannot come into effect, so that the player's turn falls under the restriction placed on them by any other rules.
made into rule 308
===P014===

Proposed by: Inferno

Yea (4) - Inferno, NotMySpamAccount, Formerfish, Charles510

Nay (0) -

Amend R104 to state: "No-one may edit or delete any post on the the game thread, with the exception of the initial post, which may be edited to display important information at the discretion of the moderator, or in the sole case to adjust proposal numbers so they are in accordance with the numbers of other proposals in this thread, so as to avoid confusion."
made into r309
===P018===

Proposed by: Inferno

Yea (4) - Inferno, NotMySpamAccount, Aronis, Formerfish

Nay (0) -

A player who creates a proposal controls that proposal. The controlling player may alter their proposal at any time before it is passed. Players may not alter the proposals they do not control, but they met suggest changes that can be adopted by the controlling player. Whenever an alteration is made to a proposal, the new form of that proposal must be posted in the thread and all votes on it are reset, except for the controlling player's vote.
made into r310
User avatar
Aronis
Aronis
Just here for the Pagetop!
User avatar
User avatar
Aronis
Just here for the Pagetop!
Just here for the Pagetop!
Posts: 6580
Joined: January 18, 2014
Location: Somewhere
Contact:

Post Post #171 (ISO) » Thu Sep 12, 2019 8:37 am

Post by Aronis »

P031 also passed with five votes in favor (Aronis, Formerfish, Charles510, skitter30, NotMySpamAccount) - I made it rule 311 and I'm pretty sure the wiki is up to date now
User avatar
skitter30
skitter30
she/her
Last Laugh
User avatar
User avatar
skitter30
she/her
Last Laugh
Last Laugh
Posts: 36539
Joined: March 26, 2017
Pronoun: she/her
Location: Est
Happy Scumday!

Post Post #172 (ISO) » Thu Sep 12, 2019 8:41 am

Post by skitter30 »

Thanks

Also aronis, your currency propsal needs a better definition for what a game moderator is
Show
Hiatus once more.

'skitter is fucking terrifying' ~ town-bork about scum-me

'Skitter [was] terrifying to play against ngl' ~ scum-bork about town-me

'Going into lylo against scum!skit unprepared is like having someone force feed you dull razor blades. It's painful, and once it starts, you're pretty much dead' ~ NMSA

'Skitter you're a spirit animal's spirit animal' ~ slaxx
User avatar
Inferno390
Inferno390
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Inferno390
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2190
Joined: October 3, 2017
Location: With the Flying Pumpkin That Shoots Laser Beams Out Of It's Ass

Post Post #173 (ISO) » Thu Sep 12, 2019 8:43 am

Post by Inferno390 »

Time out
How did P012 pass without P010?
Will someone double check that work?
"Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL

“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion

Inferno390 GTKAS

Mafiascum Moderator Society
User avatar
Inferno390
Inferno390
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Inferno390
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2190
Joined: October 3, 2017
Location: With the Flying Pumpkin That Shoots Laser Beams Out Of It's Ass

Post Post #174 (ISO) » Thu Sep 12, 2019 8:44 am

Post by Inferno390 »

I’m sorry, P011, not P010

Also I made P015, and a I was voting yea on it
"Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL

“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion

Inferno390 GTKAS

Mafiascum Moderator Society
Locked

Return to “Sens-O-Tape Archive”