This plz
The short deadline kinda makes forming a decent coalition hard. Even if we just get an extended D1 deadline I'll be happy
The bitching about the deadline is annoying. The coalition is not isn’t the be all end all. I’d be pissed as scum right now if Sky granted this.
@Espresso: Outside of the coalition, I would lynch LUV>Great
torn about LUV though, like the quote above, how likely is Sky to extend the day if scum are so openly against it in the thread like this?
but then i don't like LUV's pop ins this game and i dislike his buddying of RCMA so i'm not sure
In post 830, Hectic wrote:oh and his LAMIST posts earlier in the game
In post 831, Hectic wrote:Gamma's responses are really lazy but they feel genuine to me, like he's not overreacting or being really defensive, just taking the criticism as criticism of his town game
@GREAT
How do you feel about Alchemist kicking the bucket today? Also, is there any reason you’re doing those semi-catchup posts and then disappearing? It makes it really difficult to remember to engage with you, and hear your thoughts or feelings on specific things in real-time.
In post 904, EspressoPatronum wrote:
Hectic was likely waiting for an opportunity to go on Alchemist + RC's vote was a good chance to do so.
This sounds like you’re accusing Hectic of opportunism... but the rest of the post seems not to indicate that...
Remind me, what’s your read on Hectic?
Also, GREAT, could you flesh out your read on EP a bit? I could maybe see it; he’s definitely been losing out in both tone and content lately, but I’d like a more solid case than that, because right now it’s not something I can see going anywhere, ‘cause his tone and content at the start
In post 904, EspressoPatronum wrote:
Hectic was likely waiting for an opportunity to go on Alchemist + RC's vote was a good chance to do so.
This sounds like you’re accusing Hectic of opportunism... but the rest of the post seems not to indicate that...
Remind me, what’s your read on Hectic?
Town.
I don't see why town can't be opportunistic. It seems to me as though Alch was Hectic's top scum read + he probably wouldn't have voted outside of the coalition without support.
In post 831, Hectic wrote:Gamma's responses are really lazy but they feel genuine to me, like he's not overreacting or being really defensive, just taking the criticism as criticism of his town game
I just feel like in his cop game he was actually more active and proactive and less sheepy, which seems like the opposite to what you’d expect...
I’m very conflicted on how to read his general nonchalance, actually.
I don't think I've ever had a quiet cop game actually lol
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
In post 844, NC 39 wrote:So, if we vote inside coalition today and if we don’t get a scumflip, why is this different after that?
My opinion on this is we should have a nightkill to work worth and possibly interpret so at that point maybe it will be clear scum are split between in and out
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
In post 774, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I think limiting the lynch pool solely to those who were in the failed coalition is more likely to lead to a town loss.
We're not doing it the whole game, just starting there day 1.
LUV was the first one to suggest, that limiting lynches to just inside coalition was antitown but no one so far, has explained why.
Espresso agreed but just not on D1. So, if we vote inside coalition today and if we don’t get a scumflip, why is this different after that? @Espresso, your take on that confuses me.
In post 774, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I think limiting the lynch pool solely to those who were in the failed coalition is more likely to lead to a town loss.
I think you're right in the long term, but I see no reason why voting outside of it now is a good idea.
Looking at it Espresso does have a point, you kinda assigned my terms to Espresso's idea
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
In post 867, EspressoPatronum wrote:I did a quick skim of Alchemist's town SC game, town Overkill game, and the scum SC game and I honestly can't tell the difference between them.
If I had to pick something, he seemed a bit more proactive in the scum SC game compared to the others, but not by much.
Eh I'd try to meta Alchemist but I kinda recall blowing it last time I did it
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
In post 904, EspressoPatronum wrote:
Hectic was likely waiting for an opportunity to go on Alchemist + RC's vote was a good chance to do so.
This sounds like you’re accusing Hectic of opportunism... but the rest of the post seems not to indicate that...
Remind me, what’s your read on Hectic?
Town.
I don't see why town can't be opportunistic. It seems to me as though Alch was Hectic's top scum read +
he probably wouldn't have voted outside of the coalition without support.
In post 844, NC 39 wrote:So, if we vote inside coalition today and if we don’t get a scumflip, why is this different after that?
My opinion on this is we should have a nightkill to work worth and possibly interpret so at that point maybe it will be clear scum are split between in and out
I didn’t think about that but I can see how it may possibly shed light on possible pairings, like if LUV were to flip scum, GREAT is extremely unlikely to be his partner, probably based on activity levels.
In post 774, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I think limiting the lynch pool solely to those who were in the failed coalition is more likely to lead to a town loss.
We're not doing it the whole game, just starting there day 1.
LUV was the first one to suggest, that limiting lynches to just inside coalition was antitown but no one so far, has explained why.
Espresso agreed but just not on D1. So, if we vote inside coalition today and if we don’t get a scumflip, why is this different after that? @Espresso, your take on that confuses me.
In post 774, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I think limiting the lynch pool solely to those who were in the failed coalition is more likely to lead to a town loss.
I think you're right in the long term, but I see no reason why voting outside of it now is a good idea.
Looking at it Espresso does have a point, you kinda assigned my terms to Espresso's idea
You both essentially said the same thing, though he made the point first.
In post 867, EspressoPatronum wrote:I did a quick skim of Alchemist's town SC game, town Overkill game, and the scum SC game and I honestly can't tell the difference between them.
If I had to pick something, he seemed a bit more proactive in the scum SC game compared to the others, but not by much.
Eh I'd try to meta Alchemist but I kinda recall blowing it last time I did it
I still think he’s town but RC’s confidence is making me kind of paranoid, because I was so wrong on him in SC 2.
In post 844, NC 39 wrote:So, if we vote inside coalition today and if we don’t get a scumflip, why is this different after that?
My opinion on this is we should have a nightkill to work worth and possibly interpret so at that point maybe it will be clear scum are split between in and out
I didn’t think about that but I can see how it may possibly shed light on possible pairings, like if LUV were to flip scum, GREAT is extremely unlikely to be his partner, probably based on activity levels.
In post 904, EspressoPatronum wrote:
Hectic was likely waiting for an opportunity to go on Alchemist + RC's vote was a good chance to do so.
This sounds like you’re accusing Hectic of opportunism... but the rest of the post seems not to indicate that...
Remind me, what’s your read on Hectic?
Town.
I don't see why town can't be opportunistic. It seems to me as though Alch was Hectic's top scum read +
he probably wouldn't have voted outside of the coalition without support.
How is that anything other than NAI?
Agreed. My town read of Hectic is not because of said opportunism. I was addressing it bcz Spangled said I was accusing (ie. Insinuating Hectic was scum) with my opportunism comment.
My reasons for my Hectic tr are fleshed out earlier in my posts + they haven't changed since.
