This post is really, really badIn post 423, Vex Vience wrote:chemists vote on me is bad.
im fine with lynching dong, however, site issues might just slow down stuff even further.
VOTE: dong
L-1
VOTE: Vex
This post is really, really badIn post 423, Vex Vience wrote:chemists vote on me is bad.
im fine with lynching dong, however, site issues might just slow down stuff even further.
VOTE: dong
L-1
In post 414, Iconeum wrote: Full disclosure: I'm in a PT with Dong, NOT confirmed town
I'm not seeing that in particular tbh? It feels to me like Chemist saw the deadline, went 'oh shit', and voted for a slot he felt was both scummy and lynchable. And I don't necessarily disagree with a Vex lynch today.In post 419, Bellaphant wrote:Sorry, were you trying to get yourself lynched in your chats with menalq?
I hate chemists latest post, it feels incredibly fake. And bothers BN me for -reasons-. I want to leave the dong/icon nonsense for tomorrow and just lynch probable scum, instead of messy.
See this is why i cant respect you, you project your stupidity onto me.In post 291, Menalque wrote: Regarding chem’s readslist, I think the way you asked implied that you were asking him for a readslist. Now who’s ignoring context? You’d literally just called someone out for posting their readslist that’s unexplained and then you’re like “hey, got a readslist?” to a player who hasn’t done a lot. Are you actually so socially unaware that it sounds like you want an affirmative answer there?
Also i've said many a times that you can have a readslist by page 8, however bellas reasoning for her reads werent cohesive back then. How many times do i have to say this for you to remember it?In post 164, Donempire wrote:Im fine with labelling all of chemists posts as NAI. Given that there are 9 anyways.
Chemist, what do you think about bellas readlist?
Do you have a readlist yourself?
Well, i dont think he intended to butt heads with me straight on when he first started posting. Thinking back i dont think he even intended to take on me at all and got a bit of a drunk encouragement. It all makes more sense if you view it from a scum POV, if he was town i believe he wouldnt have bothered posting drunk or even if he did, he would revise it to portray his point better. As town he either has to make his point clearer or he has to say that he was maybe reaching with this. In fact, thats what i was aiming to determine with me asking him to revise it, because i knew that if he was town and believed in this case he couldnt possibly mind revising it both to make me understand it clearer and to, you know, not get into a pointless argument.In post 435, Klick wrote:Menalque's frustration with you was genuine and I'm pretty strongly convinced it was town-motivated.
Tell me what the SCUM motivation is in him butting heads like this with you today. I know you're saying he's putting words in your mouth and trying to spin his own narrative to get you lynched. But he really doesn't have to double down like that and bring attention to himself if he's scum here, and in fact it's much more likely that he'd sit around in the sidelines letting the easy lynch happen. Because he wasn't in any danger of getting lynched today until he got into this fight with you.
This level of stubbornness on both sides comes from town so much more often than scum. And I'd wager both of the actual scum are sitting on the sidelines letting this trainwreck happen.
(4) stop lying. I literally explained my town!lean on chemist. I went from town leaning him to town reading him because you were acting so incredibly scummily that I thought he couldn't be scum by association as you wouldn't push your buddy D1 as an alternative to me.In post 292, Menalque wrote:Also this is real fucking scummyIn post 244, Donempire wrote:Chemist you're getting high on my shitlist and im gonna policy lynch you soon, we shouldnt have to TELL you to playIn post 220, Chemist1422 wrote:I wouldn’t say I’m engaged no
You bury a nice little comment backing a lynch on chem
Then you make a ‘case’ on me and vote me
Like if chem!town then this is just obvious distancing from the mislynch while still showing you’re okay with it (tbf I take it back if chem is the lynch for today and he flips scum) — also, before you say I’m misrepping: I know you said “policy lynch”. But guess what, that doesn’t matter because it’s still supporting the same outcome.
Also the timing of the post. It’s immediately before you make a case for me and start trying to put attention there to distract from your soft pushing of chem
In post 431, Klick wrote:Take a step back for a second and tell me how many times out of 100 you expect Dong to flip scum if we lynch him today.
Because I'd say 1, maaaaybe 2.
this is a good reason for why the number is probably closer to 75 thereIn post 429, Vex Vience wrote:plus dong selfvoted and left a cryptic message saying once they flip, well see why they claimed masons
Thanks man! I did 20 today, will probably do 30 tomorrow. Hows your workout going so far?In post 442, Menalque wrote: nice reps
In post 442, Menalque wrote:also, just quickly as I'm about to eat but:
(1) I drunk post as either alignment, and I don't do revisions when they're not needed. everyone else seemed to understand that post perfectly well/what I was getting at, you're the only one insisting that the thought process doesn't make sense. plus I made another post afterwards which was pretty much just supporting the drunk post and laid out perfectly logically, so any reasonable person would just take that as "revision" but you're looking for things to make me scum which is why you're trying to make such a minor point into a key point of your meta!scum argument
Mhm. Why havent you responded to my post that addressed your drunk post yet then?
(2) "barely decipherable" is clearly bullshit, if other people had a problem understanding it they would have made that clear, you're making this up as a justification for why you found me scummy for something that is perfectly explainable as town behaviour but doesn't fit your narrative
Why did you write the same point twice?
(3) here's the entirety of 292. nice misreps
Alright. Dont see what that proves.
You should know that policy lynch doesnt mean the same outcome, in a policy lynch you end up with minimal information. Keep telling yourself its the same thing i guess.(4) stop lying. I literally explained my town!lean on chemist. I went from town leaning him to town reading him because you were acting so incredibly scummily that I thought he couldn't be scum by association as you wouldn't push your buddy D1 as an alternative to me.In post 292, Menalque wrote:Also this is real fucking scummyIn post 244, Donempire wrote:Chemist you're getting high on my shitlist and im gonna policy lynch you soon, we shouldnt have to TELL you to playIn post 220, Chemist1422 wrote:I wouldn’t say I’m engaged no
You bury a nice little comment backing a lynch on chem
Then you make a ‘case’ on me and vote me
Like if chem!town then this is just obvious distancing from the mislynch while still showing you’re okay with it (tbf I take it back if chem is the lynch for today and he flips scum) — also, before you say I’m misrepping: I know you said “policy lynch”. But guess what, that doesn’t matter because it’s still supporting the same outcome.
Also the timing of the post. It’s immediately before you make a case for me and start trying to put attention there to distract from your soft pushing of chem
???? alright