i think this is appropriateIn post 348, rb wrote:i'm gonna call it NAI because that seems most accurate but yeah that's my feeling as well
Oh right not sure why I thought it was in response to that. Point still stands.In post 328, Billy Pilgrim wrote:@Aaron, the above was in response to your 187.
Two games previous, one where I was scum and he was town, and one where I was town and he was scum.In post 352, rb wrote:@Luca: what previous experience do you have with Aaron that justifies him both having reasonable expectations of your typical towngame, and also, do you think that his confidence you're town is justified by your performance in this game based on that previous experience?
The natural follow up for you would be to either admit that you lurk or disagree arnd claim that you lack of time or really forgot about this game. If you throw away all of your reads just to counter attack, then I am satisfied with my RT.In post 345, rb wrote:you know, i think kerset is pretty likely to be scum here
because it's like a soft accusation that i'm scum, but never actually says it. it's like, "haha oh yeah sure, you "forgot" - the natural follow-up would be to then say why they think i'm lying? or think i'm scum?
also: their only focus on all the content i've provided so far is not any of the opinions i've had about the game, but literally just the post in which i said, "i'm backreading"
this doesn't scan to me as town, whether new player or not.
VOTE: kerset
If I was scum trying to buddy you then why would I be townreading the person you're 1v1ing?In post 341, Sirfetchd wrote:Vote: Aaron
They followed my mini 1v1 with a townread on me, potential soft buddy to avoid stirring me as an unknown quantity which is enough to jump on a wagon.
i don't feel any need to defend myself. the fact that you focus solely on the first part of my content where i simply say i'm backreading the game that took 4 days to finally open, which i forgot about in that time is much more relevant to me than any concern for your accusation.In post 357, Kerset wrote:The natural follow up for you would be to either admit that you lurk or disagree arnd claim that you lack of time or really forgot about this game. If you throw away all of your reads just to counter attack, then I am satisfied with my RT.In post 345, rb wrote:you know, i think kerset is pretty likely to be scum here
because it's like a soft accusation that i'm scum, but never actually says it. it's like, "haha oh yeah sure, you "forgot" - the natural follow-up would be to then say why they think i'm lying? or think i'm scum?
also: their only focus on all the content i've provided so far is not any of the opinions i've had about the game, but literally just the post in which i said, "i'm backreading"
this doesn't scan to me as town, whether new player or not.
VOTE: kerset
are you really that confident in a townread on someone based on a sample size of one town game?In post 356, AaronFrost wrote:Two games previous, one where I was scum and he was town, and one where I was town and he was scum.In post 352, rb wrote:@Luca: what previous experience do you have with Aaron that justifies him both having reasonable expectations of your typical towngame, and also, do you think that his confidence you're town is justified by your performance in this game based on that previous experience?
Kerset could be scum. They parked their vote on me pretty early for weak reasoning and posts have been mostly fluff other than early game setup spec.
forgot to say: vote kerset with me then? =]In post 356, AaronFrost wrote:Two games previous, one where I was scum and he was town, and one where I was town and he was scum.In post 352, rb wrote:@Luca: what previous experience do you have with Aaron that justifies him both having reasonable expectations of your typical towngame, and also, do you think that his confidence you're town is justified by your performance in this game based on that previous experience?
Kerset could be scum. They parked their vote on me pretty early for weak reasoning and posts have been mostly fluff other than early game setup spec.
I mean I'm obviously not 100% confident in it and it's mostly an early game gut read.In post 360, rb wrote:are you really that confident in a townread on someone based on a sample size of one town game?
Yeah of course that possibility has crossed my mind.rb wrote:moreover, wouldn't you expect that Luca would probably go out of their way to appear reminiscent of their towngame to someone with a limited sample size to go off?
rb wrote:forgot to say: vote kerset with me then? =]
Obviously we disagree about Frost, but could you elaborate on the others?
Why did you assume that i disagree with anything else? You state that i provide no content. Were would you read that there was anything else that was bothering me?In post 359, rb wrote:
i don't feel any need to defend myself. the fact that you focus solely on the first part of my content where i simply say i'm backreading the game that took 4 days to finally open, which i forgot about in that time is much more relevant to me than any concern for your accusation.
you know why? because you didn't even attach a vote or even apply a scumread. you just said, "sure, you forgot" and left it at that
and now the only content you're providing is to _defend yourself_ where previously all you did was talk mechanics, and complain about the state of the town's game - with no effort to improve the state of the town.
You beg Aaron and wooper to backup you with votes - you are the one concerned about your appearance. For what other reason would you need votes on me right now? Especially the one, which came out of sympathy. I am not on L-2, so all you can get here is good look.In post 359, rb wrote: you're more concerned about how you appear than in solving the game, it's obvious.
2 thingsIn post 369, Kerset wrote:Why did you assume that i disagree with anything else? You state that i provide no content. Were would you read that there was anything else that was bothering me?In post 359, rb wrote:
i don't feel any need to defend myself. the fact that you focus solely on the first part of my content where i simply say i'm backreading the game that took 4 days to finally open, which i forgot about in that time is much more relevant to me than any concern for your accusation.
you know why? because you didn't even attach a vote or even apply a scumread. you just said, "sure, you forgot" and left it at that
and now the only content you're providing is to _defend yourself_ where previously all you did was talk mechanics, and complain about the state of the town's game - with no effort to improve the state of the town.
Even if you somehow guessed that i disliked one of your opinions, why would i comment a statement, which is one sentence long? It was obvious that you only glanced on topic so far, because you gave no arguments to discuss about.
I won't vote people every single time i ask them a question.You beg Aaron and wooper to backup you with votes - you are the one concerned about your appearance. For what other reason would you need votes on me right now? Especially the one, which came out of sympathy. I am not on L-2, so all you can get here is good look.In post 359, rb wrote:
you're more concerned about how you appear than in solving the game, it's obvious.
VOTE: rb
