i mean it's really really easy to fake reads as wolf and when im wolfing pretending not to have reads is generally not a way of going out that i think ofIn post 295, Farkran wrote:@sheeps i disagree with your read of ben. Being lost in this game is NAI, posts feel like constant prodging
At a glance tchill looks town.In post 246, benhalkum wrote:VOTE: Tchill
His post today stick out to me. Like throwing a lot of things at the wall, seeing what sticks while sprinkling in his "town reads."
Doesn't feel right.
This says so littleIn post 275, benhalkum wrote:UNVOTE: Tchill
The majority who've played with him before (it seems) feel he is town. Instead of going on a crusade to search down why I feel his post were odd, I'm going to go with the group for now. I really need to re-read this game and see if anything's sticking out.
I honestly amIn post 302, bob3141 wrote:
So are you still happy with your vote being on egix as you never gave a reason for your revote of teh player you rvs voted. Cant see you mention egix at all after. Do you still scum read him, if so what are your reasons. What do you believe you ahve seen that shows you he is likely scum.
What is stopping you from being the change you want to see in the gameIn post 265, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:That’s fair. I believe I did answer the question though but I can expand a bit.In post 235, Tchill13 wrote:well im not a fan of uzi's play. game theory discussion then calls a question directed at him condescending instead of answering it.
Good engagement isn’t barking orders or talking at a target, but rather, talking to a person and asking them to think critically. Do you honestly think Flubber’s question did the latter?
I could see how you perceived it the way you did but compared to what i've seen on site i thank its got a decent tone to it.In post 265, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:That’s fair. I believe I did answer the question though but I can expand a bit.In post 235, Tchill13 wrote:well im not a fan of uzi's play. game theory discussion then calls a question directed at him condescending instead of answering it.
Good engagement isn’t barking orders or talking at a target, but rather, talking to a person and asking them to think critically. Do you honestly think Flubber’s question did the latter?
what was i throwing against the wall?In post 275, benhalkum wrote:UNVOTE: Tchill
The majority who've played with him before (it seems) feel he is town. Instead of going on a crusade to search down why I feel his post were odd, I'm going to go with the group for now. I really need to re-read this game and see if anything's sticking out.
sweet. cant remember playing w/you but glad you feel this way haha.In post 274, Detective Penguin wrote:I'm glad Tchill rolled town. I like playing with town Tchill.
Tchill, you are hereby deputized.
In post 282, Farkran wrote:I'm not saying he is playing particularly scummy, just very far from towny either. Shrugging off questions is NAI at best, it's definitely not hard to do as scum and does not help town imo.
This is turning into yet another theorycrafting debate on how to play mafia, i don't want to go there. If you have any reason to townread the penguin please let me know, because i don't have any.
DP has no reasons to be TR'd or SR'd to be fair from my pov.In post 283, Detective Penguin wrote:Farkran: Why is penguin town?
People: *reasons*
Farkran: Right, but why is penguin town?
sheep is just falling into my scums along w/ Ben.In post 294, sheepsaysmeep wrote:ben's crawling into my villas btw
In post 275, benhalkum wrote:UNVOTE: Tchill
The majority who've played with him before (it seems) feel he is town. Instead of going on a crusade to search down why I feel his post were odd, I'm going to go with the group for now. I really need to re-read this game and see if anything's sticking out.second post is very relateable/genuine for this gameIn post 210, benhalkum wrote:This is the first day 1 I've had where I really have no reads on anyone. Like, I keep going over everything and I get nothing more than confused.
In post 295, Farkran wrote:VOTE: benhalkum
@sheeps i disagree with your read of ben. Being lost in this game is NAI, posts feel like constant prodging
@SS what do you think of benhalkum so far?
good content.In post 297, Garmr wrote:disagree with that being a reason to make him town.In post 296, Something_Smart wrote:I think he's town. He doesn't feel agenda motivated at all (as evidenced by him finally making a vote after being lost for a while and then immediately taking it off when people disagreed).
this is breakneck speed of "giving up".In post 303, benhalkum wrote:I'm VT. So, unfortunately I really don't have anything to contribute if I'm not sensing anything from the conversation going.
My big contribution will be if you do lynch me. Look at who voted me, when, and their reason. Can guarantee there will be a scum on it.
im pretty sure in our most recent game you pointed out that one wagon was going too easy to be scum.In post 307, Flubbernugget wrote:This says so littleIn post 275, benhalkum wrote:UNVOTE: Tchill
The majority who've played with him before (it seems) feel he is town. Instead of going on a crusade to search down why I feel his post were odd, I'm going to go with the group for now. I really need to re-read this game and see if anything's sticking out.
Yet is so transparent
I'm not sure what to make of it
dude, flub, you should totally be more active I like your posts so far.In post 309, Flubbernugget wrote:What is stopping you from being the change you want to see in the gameIn post 265, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:That’s fair. I believe I did answer the question though but I can expand a bit.In post 235, Tchill13 wrote:well im not a fan of uzi's play. game theory discussion then calls a question directed at him condescending instead of answering it.
Good engagement isn’t barking orders or talking at a target, but rather, talking to a person and asking them to think critically. Do you honestly think Flubber’s question did the latter?
do you think your reasoning for disagreeing that people who were high posting in dead gamestate were villagery because wolves can do it easily applies here?In post 323, Tchill13 wrote:he's holding ppl accountable for generic statements.
that said, the content he's providing is solely content that is reactionary but he's doing more for town atm than anyone else.