Micro 898 | Forest Fire | Over

Pyrrha Nikos · Post Post #100 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2019 4:28 am

In post 95, eth0s wrote:Wait a second.

Forest fires create CO₂

CO₂ destroys the ozone layer

The ozone layer preserves the arctic regions

The arctic regions are where penguins live

UNVOTE:

His power is for the good of tree-kind this game. Or he's one sick and twisted penguin.

Time will tell.

You aren’t by any chance a Jingle alt, right?

PenguinPower · Post Post #101 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2019 4:31 am

In post 97, Gamma Emerald wrote:Some penguins live in non arctic regions, but they do still live in very southern longitudes
#facts

Yeah...jackass penguins.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #102 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2019 4:33 am

In post 100, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:
In post 95, eth0s wrote:Wait a second.

Forest fires create CO₂

CO₂ destroys the ozone layer

The ozone layer preserves the arctic regions

The arctic regions are where penguins live

UNVOTE:

His power is for the good of tree-kind this game. Or he's one sick and twisted penguin.

Time will tell.
You aren’t by any chance a Jingle alt, right?

I don’t think that’s the case.

Dannflor · Post Post #103 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2019 4:34 am

In post 94, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:Like you seriously thought I would stay on you for the reasons I gave? Really?

My issue is not that you were voting me, it's that you didn't switch it on expressing suspicion for another slot. I would have had the same question if your RVS vote was on someone else.

What is your current read on Blatant Scum, Pyrrha?

In post 90, Gamma Emerald wrote:Post 20 impressed me because it looks like a pretty bold statement. If he was earnest about it, that would actually look pretty good. But what he’s doing does not look like it’s in earnest.

Do you think that particular bold statement would be town indicative if it was earnest? Earnest bold statements can come from scum and I'm not sure that particular one is any more likely to come from town than not.

In post 98, eth0s wrote:I thought the logic was sound although I was uninterested in joining him. Dannflor does make me realize that the logic wasnt great. But I'm not sure if that's something BS was considering. I kinda think he truly believed his own logic regardless of his alignment

Very very faint town ping from this. The immediate contradiction in "I found the logic sound," to, "I realize the logic wasn't great," is something I think most scum is too self-conscious to make.

@eth0s, do you have a read on BS based off these first few pages? Or are you not finding anything AI based on these first few pages. If not, reads or vague gut feelings on anyone else?

Pyrrha Nikos · Post Post #104 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2019 4:39 am

In post 98, eth0s wrote:On a more serious note I get what BS was saying. I thought the logic was sound although I was uninterested in joining him. Dannflor does make me realize that the logic wasnt great. But I'm not sure if that's something BS was considering. I kinda think he truly believed his own logic regardless of his alignment

Gamma was right, the logic of lynching RC on D1 without even a single cause for suspicion, really made very little sense. I don’t know if he’s scum though. His reaction to it isn’t pinging me but the thing is he self-voted and put himself at L-1, so if he’s scum and that lynch would have gone through, it would look great for RC, so I’m thinking bad town over scum rn. I wish RC hadn’t have replaced out, because then we would know if BS continues to hardpush for this. If he did, it would be more than reasonable to assume he was probable scum. So now, we’ll never get to find that out.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #105 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2019 4:41 am

In post 103, Dannflor wrote:
In post 90, Gamma Emerald wrote:Post 20 impressed me because it looks like a pretty bold statement. If he was earnest about it, that would actually look pretty good. But what he’s doing does not look like it’s in earnest.
Do you think that particular bold statement would be town indicative if it was earnest? Earnest bold statements can come from scum and I'm not sure that particular one is any more likely to come from town than not.

Yes, if he followed through properly and didn’t post stuff like 26 then it would actually seem like he had a genuine idea of something that could be helpful. The base idea itself can come from both alignments but the execution is where the divergence lies as I see it.

Pyrrha Nikos · Post Post #106 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2019 4:43 am

In post 103, Dannflor wrote:
In post 94, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:Like you seriously thought I would stay on you for the reasons I gave? Really?
My issue is not that you were voting me, it's that you didn't switch it on expressing suspicion for another slot. I would have had the same question if your RVS vote was on someone else.

What is your current read on Blatant Scum, Pyrrha?

In post 90, Gamma Emerald wrote:Post 20 impressed me because it looks like a pretty bold statement. If he was earnest about it, that would actually look pretty good. But what he’s doing does not look like it’s in earnest.
Do you think that particular bold statement would be town indicative if it was earnest? Earnest bold statements can come from scum and I'm not sure that particular one is any more likely to come from town than not.

In post 98, eth0s wrote:I thought the logic was sound although I was uninterested in joining him. Dannflor does make me realize that the logic wasnt great. But I'm not sure if that's something BS was considering. I kinda think he truly believed his own logic regardless of his alignment
Very very faint town ping from this. The immediate contradiction in "I found the logic sound," to, "I realize the logic wasn't great," is something I think most scum is too self-conscious to make.

@eth0s, do you have a read on BS based off these first few pages? Or are you not finding anything AI based on these first few pages. If not, reads or vague gut feelings on anyone else?

I don’t immediately switch my vote unless I feel strongly it’s scum and that is pretty consistent for me in practically every game I’ve played. I would never stay on an RVS vote. I either unvote or switch it when I have a decent read, which doesn’t always happen for me on D 1.

Pyrrha Nikos · Post Post #107 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2019 4:46 am

In post 43, Blatant Scum wrote:((Does arsonist count as scum?))

Was this a serious question?

Pyrrha Nikos · Post Post #108 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2019 4:48 am

In post 26, Blatant Scum wrote:
In post 25, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:
In post 23, Pine wrote:
In post 20, Blatant Scum wrote:I think we should lynch RC, if he flips town, we should hard sheep him.
The fuck is this

VOTE: Blatant Scum
+1

FOS on BS for that post.
But I had towny intro - I reacted on a post in this thread!

Which?

Pyrrha Nikos · Post Post #109 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2019 4:50 am

In post 19, Blatant Scum wrote:
In post 15, RadiantCowbells wrote:also i'm considering switching to prince of renais and making this a meme rather than tryhard game for me
Elaborate.

THIS post is your idea of a “townie” as opposed to NAI “reaction”?

sheepsaysmeep · Post Post #110 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2019 4:50 am

wtf happened

Pyrrha Nikos · Post Post #111 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2019 4:52 am

If there was only 7 slots in this game, I’d probably be voting BS for 26.

@BS, can you link me a town and scumgame of yours? Thanks.

sheepsaysmeep · Post Post #112 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2019 4:53 am

i kinda like blatant scum asking to lynch rc actually

in terms of villageriness not agreeableness

Pyrrha Nikos · Post Post #113 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2019 4:55 am

In post 112, sheepsaysmeep wrote:i kinda like blatant scum asking to lynch rc actually

in terms of villageriness not agreeableness

Why?

Dannflor · Post Post #114 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2019 4:55 am

In post 111, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:If there was only 7 slots in this game, I’d probably be voting BS for 26.

I'm not sure I understand the correlation here.

Pyrrha Nikos · Post Post #115 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2019 4:56 am

In post 113, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:
In post 112, sheepsaysmeep wrote:i kinda like blatant scum asking to lynch rc actually

in terms of villageriness not agreeableness
Why?

How are you reading that as “villagery”?

Pyrrha Nikos · Post Post #116 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2019 4:57 am

In post 114, Dannflor wrote:
In post 111, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:If there was only 7 slots in this game, I’d probably be voting BS for 26.
I'm not sure I understand the correlation here.

He was the scummiest out of the 7 slots who had already posted.

sheepsaysmeep · Post Post #117 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2019 4:59 am

i admittedly understand where bs is coming from and i'd be too scared or self conscious to come in and announce that i want to lynch rc d1 as wolf, given the backlash it caused immediately was pretty predictable; also how much he pursues that so confidently for 2 pages shows he genuinely believes it's a good decision?

Pyrrha Nikos · Post Post #118 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:03 am

In post 117, sheepsaysmeep wrote:i admittedly understand where bs is coming from and i'd be too scared or self conscious to come in and announce that
i want to lynch rc d1 as wolf
, given the backlash it caused immediately was pretty predictable; also how much he pursues that so confidently for 2 pages shows he genuinely believes it's a good decision?

In post 20, Blatant Scum wrote:I think we should lynch RC, if he flips town, we should hard sheep him.

In post 27, Blatant Scum wrote:
In post 24, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:
In post 20, Blatant Scum wrote:I think we should lynch RC, if he flips town, we should hard sheep him.
I just finished a game with RC where scum wanted him dead. Policy lynching good scum players will just result in scum gamethrowing, so a really terrible idea, always.
But I wanted to policy lynch him because he is a good
town
player.

But he never called him a “wolf” sheep.

sheepsaysmeep · Post Post #119 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:05 am

what i meant was that if i was a wolf theres no way i'd make a rash decision in calling to lynch rc for no game-specific reason off the bat

Pyrrha Nikos · Post Post #120 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:07 am

@sheep, there is literally no reason to think RC was a wolf. Based on an ISO of RC posts, did they read scummy to you, because I’m totally not following your train of thought at all here?

sheepsaysmeep · Post Post #121 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:09 am

i literally read like 2 of rc's posts

he was not wolfy to me

he was not wolfy to bs either who is the only one ive been talking about

Pyrrha Nikos · Post Post #122 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:09 am

In post 119, sheepsaysmeep wrote:what i meant was that if i was a wolf theres no way i'd make a rash decision in calling to lynch rc for no game-specific reason off the bat

Can I link you to Newsroom where scum!SS did precisely that?

sheepsaysmeep · Post Post #123 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:10 am

In post 122, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:
In post 119, sheepsaysmeep wrote:what i meant was that if i was a wolf theres no way i'd make a rash decision in calling to lynch rc for no game-specific reason off the bat
Can I link you to Newsroom where scum!SS did precisely that?

yes please

Pyrrha Nikos · Post Post #124 (ISO) » Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:10 am

In post 121, sheepsaysmeep wrote:i literally read like 2 of rc's posts

he was not wolfy to me

he was not wolfy to bs either who is the only one ive been talking about

But that’s why it made no sense for him to advocate a pl on him, based exactly on what you’ve posted here.