[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 11349837 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 898 | Forest Fire | Over - Mafiascum.net
In post 20, Blatant Scum wrote:I think we should lynch RC, if he flips town, we should hard sheep him.
I just finished a game with RC where scum wanted him dead. Policy lynching good scum players will just result in scum gamethrowing, so a really terrible idea, always.
In post 20, Blatant Scum wrote:I think we should lynch RC, if he flips town, we should hard sheep him.
I just finished a game with RC where scum wanted him dead. Policy lynching good scum players will just result in scum gamethrowing, so a really terrible idea, always.
But I wanted to policy lynch him because he is a good
town
player.
That makes absolutely no sense. Why would you ever want to pl someone for being a “good town player”?
In post 20, Blatant Scum wrote:I think we should lynch RC, if he flips town, we should hard sheep him.
I just finished a game with RC where scum wanted him dead. Policy lynching good scum players will just result in scum gamethrowing, so a really terrible idea, always.
Spoiler: Hid animated Gif --P
I mean in
general
obviously. People should always play to the best of their ability and pls based on past scum performance, just punish players for playing well in past games. It’s never a good reason to lynch someone solely based on that.
Last edited by Plotinus on Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
I don’t like BS pushing that but because of the mechanic, I don’t know if it’s necessarily scum indicative but if he persists, I will definitely be suspicious.
Realize that out of anyone on this site RC is the absolute worst person to direct your ploy towards. RC doesn’t respond well to disingenuous pressure of any sort.
In post 77, Gamma Emerald wrote:Hello, I actually just finished reading the game. Commentary in my next post.
No RVS but-RWBY V3 spoiler ahead [spoiler} I will say that best girl Pyrrha should probably be kept safe so she doesn’t get incinerated a second time{/spoiler]
Can you use spoiler = instead? And ??? What second time?
Is this some RWBY reference? *confused*
{spoiler=Omg]Bruh Pyrrha was turned to ash at the end of RWBY Volume 3. Would figure at the very least that had osmosis to you already even if you hadn’t seen the show for yourself.[/spoiler}
VOTE: Blatant Scum
I think this is okay rn
Btw this my first time playing this setup despite loosely speccing a few games before, I never saw any fancy strategy installed, so I’m gonna assume there is none for this one
Spoiler:
I’m not super familiar with RWBY. I created the account because both Krazy and Ank made RWBY accounts for the same game.
In post 85, Dannflor wrote:@Gamma, I agree that post #26 is scummy. However, why does #20 impress you?
@Pyrrha, two separate times in post #25 and post #62 you directly express suspicion on Blatant Scum's slot. Yet, you choose to sit on your RVS vote on me instead of voting Blatant Scum. If you were FOSing Blatant Scum—which I imagine has to be one of the strongest reads you have on anyone so far—why wouldn't you switch your RVS vote over there? Unless you genuinely found me more suspicious off my first three posts of the game, in which case I'm going to need you to elaborate on that as well.
No, my vote on you is still RVS. I was planning on switching it.
In post 90, Gamma Emerald wrote:Post 20 impressed me because it looks like a pretty bold statement. If he was earnest about it, that would actually look pretty good. But what he’s doing does not look like it’s in earnest.
Also I’ll just give the long answer. Pyrrha (iirc) is a pseudonym used by Achilles at one point in The Iliad. Pyrrha’s character is actually based on Achilles.
I didn’t know that. The fascinating things you learn on MS.
In post 85, Dannflor wrote:@Gamma, I agree that post #26 is scummy. However, why does #20 impress you?
@Pyrrha, two separate times in post #25 and post #62 you directly express suspicion on Blatant Scum's slot. Yet, you choose to sit on your RVS vote on me instead of voting Blatant Scum. If you were FOSing Blatant Scum—which I imagine has to be one of the strongest reads you have on anyone so far—why wouldn't you switch your RVS vote over there? Unless you genuinely found me more suspicious off my first three posts of the game, in which case I'm going to need you to elaborate on that as well.
No, my vote on you is still RVS. I was planning on switching it.
Like you seriously thought I would stay on you for the reasons I gave? Really?
In post 98, eth0s wrote:On a more serious note I get what BS was saying. I thought the logic was sound although I was uninterested in joining him. Dannflor does make me realize that the logic wasnt great. But I'm not sure if that's something BS was considering. I kinda think he truly believed his own logic regardless of his alignment
Gamma was right, the logic of lynching RC on D1 without even a single cause for suspicion, really made very little sense. I don’t know if he’s scum though. His reaction to it isn’t pinging me but the thing is he self-voted and put himself at L-1, so if he’s scum and that lynch would have gone through, it would look great for RC, so I’m thinking bad town over scum rn. I wish RC hadn’t have replaced out, because then we would know if BS continues to hardpush for this. If he did, it would be more than reasonable to assume he was probable scum. So now, we’ll never get to find that out.
In post 94, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:Like you seriously thought I would stay on you for the reasons I gave? Really?
My issue is not that you were voting me, it's that you didn't switch it on expressing suspicion for another slot. I would have had the same question if your RVS vote was on someone else.
What is your current read on Blatant Scum, Pyrrha?
In post 90, Gamma Emerald wrote:Post 20 impressed me because it looks like a pretty bold statement. If he was earnest about it, that would actually look pretty good. But what he’s doing does not look like it’s in earnest.
Do you think that particular bold statement would be town indicative if it was earnest? Earnest bold statements can come from scum and I'm not sure that particular one is any more likely to come from town than not.
In post 98, eth0s wrote:I thought the logic was sound although I was uninterested in joining him. Dannflor does make me realize that the logic wasnt great. But I'm not sure if that's something BS was considering. I kinda think he truly believed his own logic regardless of his alignment
Very very faint town ping from this. The immediate contradiction in "I found the logic sound," to, "I realize the logic wasn't great," is something I think most scum is too self-conscious to make.
@eth0s, do you have a read on BS based off these first few pages? Or are you not finding anything AI based on these first few pages. If not, reads or vague gut feelings on anyone else?
I don’t immediately switch my vote unless I feel strongly it’s scum and that is pretty consistent for me in practically every game I’ve played. I would never stay on an RVS vote. I either unvote or switch it when I have a decent read, which doesn’t always happen for me on D 1.
In post 117, sheepsaysmeep wrote:i admittedly understand where bs is coming from and i'd be too scared or self conscious to come in and announce that
i want to lynch rc d1 as wolf
, given the backlash it caused immediately was pretty predictable; also how much he pursues that so confidently for 2 pages shows he genuinely believes it's a good decision?
In post 20, Blatant Scum wrote:I think we should lynch RC, if he flips town, we should hard sheep him.
In post 20, Blatant Scum wrote:I think we should lynch RC, if he flips town, we should hard sheep him.
I just finished a game with RC where scum wanted him dead. Policy lynching good scum players will just result in scum gamethrowing, so a really terrible idea, always.
But I wanted to policy lynch him because he is a good
@sheep, there is literally no reason to think RC was a wolf. Based on an ISO of RC posts, did they read scummy to you, because I’m totally not following your train of thought at all here?
In post 119, sheepsaysmeep wrote:what i meant was that if i was a wolf theres no way i'd make a rash decision in calling to lynch rc for no game-specific reason off the bat
Can I link you to Newsroom where scum!SS did precisely that?
In post 119, sheepsaysmeep wrote:what i meant was that if i was a wolf theres no way i'd make a rash decision in calling to lynch rc for no game-specific reason off the bat
Can I link you to Newsroom where scum!SS did precisely that?
In post 126, sheepsaysmeep wrote:if someone's done it in the exact way matching the specific things im finding villagery then it would prolly make me think and not push this strongly later but i think with regards to a player newer to the site his entrance exemplified one of the towntells i search the hardest for on this site
In post 98, eth0s wrote:On a more serious note I get what BS was saying. I thought the logic was sound although I was uninterested in joining him. Dannflor does make me realize that the logic wasnt great. But I'm not sure if that's something BS was considering. I kinda think he truly believed his own logic regardless of his alignment
Gamma was right, the logic of lynching RC on D1 without even a single cause for suspicion, really made very little sense. I don’t know if he’s scum though. His reaction to it isn’t pinging me but the thing is he self-voted and put himself at L-1, so if he’s scum and that lynch would have gone through, it would look great for RC, so I’m thinking bad town over scum rn. I wish RC hadn’t have replaced out, because then we would know if BS continues to hardpush for this. If he did, it would be more than reasonable to assume he was probable scum. So now, we’ll never get to find that out.
I can hardpush Gamma if you want.
Why tf would I want you to do that? I never wanted you to push RC.
In post 131, Blatant Scum wrote:I didn't vote, because I wanted to discuss whether lynching RC is good idea day 1, rather than directly pushing his lynch.
PL lynching him tomorrow might end up into him being doused. Wastling 1 night to ignite RC stump might be worth for scum. Wastling 2 night probably not.
I didn't know that pushing a player outside of game is so easy. Hence, it was not my intention.
Yet, you didn't seem to be trying to discuss it. People had an abjectly negative reaction to the idea and you made wholly unproductive posts such as #53 and #59.
You're also either purposefully dumb-telling here or still haven't read the setup. Scum can only choose to prime
or
ignite once per night. They would have had to prime RC tonight, and then ignite the next night in order to kill him. It is impossible for anyone to die tonight.
What was your intention in self-voting, Blatant Scum?
In post 133, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:Hey Dann, considering you made such a big deal wrt my RVS vote on you, why haven’t you unvoted me yet?
I might have switched to Blatant Scum, but considering he already self-voted once, it's not impossible he would self-hammer. I'm not exactly comfortable with him going beyond L-2 at this stage of the game.
@sheepsaysmeep, I can see the argument for Blatant Scum's, uh... blatant-ness being townie. However,
antics like linking this very game as his scum game
, self-voting to L-1, and his general tone read rather forced to me. It's hard for me to see townie motivation for those things.
Yeah, that is exactly what happened when I clicked that link. I thought it was just broken but it leads right back to this game. Weird huh?
In post 143, Dannflor wrote:linking this very game as his scum game, self-voting to L-1, and his general tone read rather forced to me. It's hard for me to see townie motivation for those things.
meh agree to disagree
i find that this type of erratic behavior is generally too rash to be w shrug
@sheep, I couldn’t understand why the only link that didn’t seem to be working was the one to his scumgame but Dann is right, that link led straight back to this one. So, please explain to me why town!BS does that?
@Blatant Scum, why did you link THIS game as your scumgame?
In post 143, Dannflor wrote:@sheepsaysmeep, I can see the argument for Blatant Scum's, uh... blatant-ness being townie. However, antics like linking this very game as his scum game, self-voting to L-1, and his general tone read rather forced to me. It's hard for me to see townie motivation for those things
In post 172, Banakai wrote:pyyre strikes me as tryhard but tough to decide alignment
sheep strikes me as a town but bad at it
Blatant scum would be my biggest vote RN but I won't vote and leave him 1 away from death. -- also he's potentially just one of those trolly players, which I would normally like to lynch anyway (but in this game if we lynch him and hes town he sticks around)
my reads so far in conclusion:
pyrr: neutral, hard to read
RC's slot: medium to heavy town lean
sheep: medium town lean
blatantscum: heavy-ish scum lean
everybody else: I haven't decided
Why is sheep “town but bad at it”, because you disagree with his reads?
In post 198, sheepsaysmeep wrote:pyrrha was legitimately trying to sort me; this read is maybe a bit weaker pending them posting more
Can you expand on this? I read their interaction with you a few times and I don't see anything especially towny. Not saying it's scummy but talking about PL meta and asking for reads is like... Level 0 genuine sorting.
Ouch! Dann you wound me.
You’re also being a bit dense. If PP’s noise comment was in reference to me, than that goes double and triple for him. I’m kind of getting tired of having my sorting methods get shit on every damn game. :/
Although, I’m really happy Gamma is in this game, I’m really missing RC.
In post 214, Dannflor wrote:I believe his noise comment was about Blatant Scum's posting, which I agree with.
I'm not trying to shit on your sorting methods. I think you have some good methods. I just didn't see anything specifically in your interactions with sheep that made me go, "wow Pyrrha is town here!"
You obviously don’t know who I am but that’s good because I can’t become a better player by coasting on meta anyway.
Banaki referred to me as a “tryhard”, which definitely amused me because I just don’t care enough to bother doing that as scum. Activity isn’t AI for me but content definitely is.
In post 234, Dannflor wrote:Oh, Pyrrha, can you expand on your sheep town read for me?
I have never seen sheep play like this as scum and I’ve played with him numerous times as both alignments. He also gets mislynched a lot.
As scum, he’s been super scummy (really off and fake) - re: MBOS (Mystery Box of Silver 1)
Death tunnelly - ND (No Deadlines)
Coasting - UtS - Under the Sea
But here, he’s really efforting in a very clearly townie way.