In post 322, dsjstr wrote:We have less then a day and no chance of a NL so if you want me lynched then vote me
Well, I already did...
And it’s still cool, I think. There isn’t a lot of time left but it also doesn’t take a lot of people to change wagons.
So again, just chill and answer the questions if you have a bit of time
In post 322, dsjstr wrote:We have less then a day and no chance of a NL so if you want me lynched then vote me
Well, I already did...
And it’s still cool, I think. There isn’t a lot of time left but it also doesn’t take a lot of people to change wagons.
So again, just chill and answer the questions if you have a bit of time
I think I have answered my Hectic read to the best of my ability and the reason why I am suggesting a chem lynch is because I am starting to question my early egix read, but looker would be just as good.
Chem iss doing nothing but prodging which honestly, I’ve seen him do more as town than scum...
But that’s NOT a good reason to town-read him. He could go either way tbh
In post 300, dsjstr wrote:
I originally saw this vote as trying to get more info to solve, but now I am starting to realize that he could have just been placing a vote on Looker to say that he had started a wagon on him. To me it looks like he doesn't want to be able to be read, he has been jumping from wagon to wagon. Egix will be lynched if the VC stays the way it is. Ejj do you think that chem is trying to solve the game. It looks like the wagons are pointed in a direction that is favorable to them so they didn't have to solve. Then when a wagon gets formed on Looker he makes a comment to try and weaken the attack on Looker. I would much rather lynch Looker/Chem and I am curious if anyone else is okay with lynching chem.
...I don’t want to be an ass and I realize that I might be sort of tunneling you but I genuinely don’t understand your thought process.
The wagon on chem makes him be able to chill? Yes but the same goes for everyone except for you and egix
Since when has this been scum-indicative???
And since when has chemist genuinely cared about his town-games? It does happen from time to time in games with short phases but I wouldn’t be surprised if that was his town meta on forums like MS.
No, I won’t switch wagons just because he’s inactive.
In post 300, dsjstr wrote:It looks like the wagons are pointed in a direction that is favorable to them so they didn't have to solve. Then when a wagon gets formed on Looker he makes a comment to try and weaken the attack on Looker. I would much rather lynch Looker/Chem and I am curious if anyone else is okay with lynching chem.
You’re trying to say that looker and chemist are teammates because looker said sth good about him, right? Firstly, when did that happen?
And secondly, considering how passive looker is in general I find it funny how you managed to notice and then confidently scum-read 2 inactive players just based on that.
Lemme phrase it that way. I disagree with your reads. The way you talk about them makes me feel as if you had a certain result set in mind before reading the thread and are just describing it now while looking only for interactions that fit your theory. You phrase the posts in a way that makes sense on the surface but has no like, real analysis behind it in reality.
It feels as if you’re trying to lead instead of trying to solve, if that makes sense.
And I do not appreciate ONLY pushing people I town-read or at least don’t scum-read.
Mafia does not have to do anything if the wagons are at a place that is beneficial to them, trying to get the wagons switched would only hurt them. They can wait until D2 and try and cover up their D1 play which shouldn't be hard.
Chem iss doing nothing but prodging which honestly, I’ve seen him do more as town than scum...
But that’s NOT a good reason to town-read him. He could go either way tbh
In post 334, Hectic wrote:Can't catch up, but online for the next hour. Want me to move my vote, Nami? I still like the look of Egix from that recent VC.
