VOTE: Nay 304
Why???
pedit:
VOTE: Abstain 305
I'm against it personally because I believe it's better to let people vote against it again, but given we have proposal limits, I can see the case for it, so I'll abstain for now in case someone provides a more compelling case for it.
---
Edit: As of this post:
Active Proposals:
1.
Proposal 301
(
10) by Ircher: Proposals pass or fail immediately upon achieving the required number of yes votes to pass or required number of no votes to fail.
Yea -
Ircher,
Jormengand,
logan5123,
Allomancer,
Ausuka
Nay -
Not Voting - bugspray
2.
Proposal 302
(
12) by logan5123: Rules now have names. Rules cannot not have names, and any rules without them can be ignored by the moderator. Initial rules have an initial name of "Initial Rule x", where x is the number of the rule. All names are public. The number of the rule shall be put in parenthesis beside the rule. Rules missing numbers via this shall be counted as missing a number through rule 210, and be ignored. Rules, and votes on rules, may also use a name instead of a number. Any rules passed before this rule may have a name decided on by the submitter of the rule, except for this rule, which will be called the Name Rule.
Yea -
logan5123,
Ausuka
Nay -
Allomancer,
Ircher,
Jormengand
Not Voting - bugspray
3.
Proposal 303
(
17) by Allomancer: Someone is automatically assumed to be voting for their own proposal unless they vote otherwise.
Yea -
Allomancer,
Ircher,
logan5123,
Jormengand
Nay -
Not Voting - bugspray, Ausuka
4.
Proposal 304
(
22) by Jormengand: Rule 211 to be struck from the records; players may not abstain.
Yea -
Jormengand
Nay -
logan5123,
Ircher
Not Voting - Allomancer, bugspray, Ausuka
5.
Proposal 305
(
24) by logan5123: Players may not suggest rules that are functionally the exact same as previously denied rules, unless another rule allows them to.
Yea -
logan5123
Nay -
Abstain -
Ircher
Not Voting - Allomancer, Jormengand, bugspray, Ausuka