Alduskkel, Luca Blight, HeavenIn post 34, Quagsire wrote:
VOTE: Alduskkel
Are you trying to insult me?
Multiple games, wanna make sure no one slips through the cracks. They hadn't posted or voted.
Vote LucaIn post 116, Menalque wrote:Oh no, people voting me whatever shall I do
How original
In post 259, nomnomnom wrote:I replaced out of that game because you insulted me personally and I am not dealing with personal insults in mafia games
my tone is NAI and anyone that has played with me for a significant amount of time knows this
you townread me in our last micro so clearly you do not have a correct grasp of my town and scumgame
In post 260, nomnomnom wrote:I feel insulted that you'd imply that I would replace out as scum just because I am scumread because I have plenty of examples of the contrary
you are not hot shit, every single game you've played with me you've placed your vote on me early on d1 because of stuff that isn't even game related and you have the nerve to say you know how I am and what kind of game I play
educate yourself and read some of my past games, thank you
Again, exaggerative. Also, ego?In post 261, nomnomnom wrote:like the worst in all this is that you're probably town considering this is what you do every single game and you seem to have a massive ego that seems attached to your towngame
I assume these spam posts are because you stewed over this? I have to conclude that this is theater because this is a game. You weaving this inauthentic narrative is a strategy. We both know you're nowhere near important enough to be mad over. Especially "ultra" mad, whatever that is.In post 262, nomnomnom wrote:I have a little theory you're ultra mad from that micro still and this is why you're voting me here lmao
Hilarious. Especially considering you're literally mad.In post 264, nomnomnom wrote:spilling mad truth sorry
BoP incomingIn post 309, skitter30 wrote:i'm sorry i'll try really hard to catch up before i go to sleep but i'm not sure i'll be able to
No one is scum alone. Besides, with D1's track record, it'd probably stay a vanity wagon.In post 339, Quagsire wrote:you have me as your strongest scum read yet you vote for noms? explain that for meIn post 252, Looker wrote:Payback's a VOTE: nomnomnom
S {Quag | Heaven/Nom | Aldus/Skitter/Menal | Captain/Luca}T
Are you purposely feeding into her narrative? It's expected for Nom to insult me, but not really you.In post 342, Quagsire wrote:looker's vote on noms feels more like it's driven by personal shit instead of actual reasons why they think noms is scum.
I like this. Would prefer Quag first, but they're my two best bets.In post 361, Luca Blight wrote:Lynch Nom -> Quags.
There's a hood?In post 380, nomnomnom wrote:Furret explain to me how I am pocketing you in our hood when you were the one that initiated the conversation there
In post 402, skitter30 wrote:hi i think i will have some time this afternoon
Def QuagIn post 407, nomnomnom wrote:Recently I've started to realize that a lot of my null reads in mafia games ended up being scum and that I should start scumhunting the same way I play cop or vig
if I was cop or vig I would either check Quag or Ald here, so maybe I should vote there
In post 49, Heaven wrote:Oh, am I in this game?
Your suggestions are suggestions. I'm not going to fake some fabricated conviction to get others to vote you. This is a gambling game and I'm gambling.In post 488, Quagsire wrote:okay but you're not even trying to push me or question my stances. like it's not really a vanity when we still have time for other wagons to form. so if you think i'm scum, then you should be pushing me or trying to start a wagon on me, especially when others have expressed concerns about me.
i wasn't insulting you but okay. my point on your noms vote still stands.
I felt like people were ignoring him but the wagons he jumped on always made it to L-1/L-2 (Heaven, Luca). I don't remember Heaven; you've been gone for a while. I probably thought he was lurking on purpose.In post 521, skitter30 wrote:wait where did the quag scumread come from?
why are you scumreading heaven, i think the slot is townie for him
and new post now
Just because you bold something doesn't mean it's important, and I could care less how you feel when it comes to my playstyle. I play with my flip in mind, so make sure this little pseudo-OMGUS is worth it. This is either unfounded confidence (like most of D1), or scum strategy.In post 529, Quagsire wrote:what? why would you have to fabricate convictions when i'm supposedly yourIn post 515, Looker wrote:Your suggestions are suggestions. I'm not going to fake some fabricated conviction to get others to vote you. This is a gambling game and I'm gambling.In post 488, Quagsire wrote:okay but you're not even trying to push me or question my stances. like it's not really a vanity when we still have time for other wagons to form. so if you think i'm scum, then you should be pushing me or trying to start a wagon on me, especially when others have expressed concerns about me.
i wasn't insulting you but okay. my point on your noms vote still stands.
VOTE: Luca Blighttop scumread? like surely you must have reasons for that. i feel like you'd be trying a little harder to lynch me if you actually believed that i was scum.
VOTE: looker
In post 594, Quagsire wrote:hey chemistIn post 585, Chemist1422 wrote:My townlean on Luca that I forgot to mention is goneIn post 231, Luca Blight wrote:Obviously I’m gonna focus more on explaining my scumread than my townreads.
Why would not voting you give you pings when some players have barely posted? I mean yeah, I could have voted you, but Is it not also reasonable to wait until I have a read on everyone?
i know you're still getting caught up but.luca claimed macho neapolitan. also noms and furret are in a hood
My pronoun is "Pfffttttttt"In post 601, Alduskkel wrote:What’s the scum meta you have on her?In post 591, Luca Blight wrote:I’m definitely leaning town on Looker based on forthright nature of her posting.
It could be ballsy scum, but it’s completely at odds with the scum meta I have on her.
This is NAI, but it's posts like these that make it hard for me to get into D1. It's all subjective. What's that supposed to mean, "there's a world where..."? Has he avoided answering pointed questions you've asked him or do you just not like the way he plays/his posting style?In post 691, nomnomnom wrote:Because there's a world where what quag is posting comes from town
I can't say the same for Ald, it's all vague minimal posting, way more chances this comes from scum than town
Would you find it ironic or suspicious that the Quagsire wagon dissolved so rapidly in favor of your own?In post 756, nomnomnom wrote:this is why i feel distrustful of the quags wagon in the first place
this whole thing makes me feel there's scum involvement in there and if there's one person in this whole thing that does that, it's skitt
do you get what I'm saying here? I feel like I'm getting played
Me, too, but I had to remove the profanity and racial slurs, so it just ended up blank.In post 766, Captain the Furret wrote:I remember the time when I used to have quotes of what people said about me in their sigs
I beg your pardon? Can you explain why objectively and without bias?In post 792, Quagsire wrote:looker's play still sucks
In post 839, Quagsire wrote:i have explained this, you're not pushing your scumreads, you're making a bunch of random votes that don't actually reflect how you feel (or claim to feel)In post 836, Looker wrote:I beg your pardon? Can you explain why objectively and without bias?In post 792, Quagsire wrote:looker's play still sucks
like it's not even about the fact that you scumread me, it's about how you play around your scumreads that's concerning.
Numbers, but I thought I townread Nom more than I didIn post 842, Alduskkel wrote:How did this happen lol
Having scumreads is concerning, not having scumreads is concerning - I just keep getting called concerning. So many opinions about how other people should be playing this game.In post 843, nomnomnom wrote:the fact that the majority of players have said that they think quag/me are partners on d1 without any kind of flip is extremely concerning
Do you take it as an affront to your competence as a player? Because you shouldn't. I probably think you're more manipulative than you are, but we'll see.In post 868, nomnomnom wrote:Looker this wagon on me is literally because I refuse to vote quags
Literally 3 people on my wagon have stated they would rather get Quags yet I am at L-1 what the fuck is this shit!!!!!!!!!!
I am literally mindfucked by this gamestate what the hell guys
Is this Alisae/Furret?In post 879, nomnomnom wrote:Mister Mechtalk
That's adorable.
After her rant in our first mini, nom is the reason my signature currently is what it is. She's like if AtE had a profile.In post 884, Chemist1422 wrote:nom's posting since being put at L-1 is super towny and it's basically locked in my prior townread
Wow, so heartless
No CC from me
In post 1028, Chemist1422 wrote:Gonna park that there overnight and reevaluate in the morning
VOTE: AlduskkelIn post 1038, Chemist1422 wrote:Maybe tomorrow morning I’m gonna sleepIn post 1034, Captain the Furret wrote:Chemist vote noms then
I don't.In post 1071, Alduskkel wrote:Am I being hypocritical? Maybe. But I give myself a pass because I know I'm town.
It depends on who was on it. If someone I suspect hops on a wagon I'm on, I leave it. My lynches are typically a compromise of townreads.In post 1169, GeorgeBailey wrote:So he unvoted when the wagon got too hot? Sounds good to me.
VOTE: Looker
Don't get ahead of yourself, Furret - there's nothing top tier about you (in that regard). Consider my readlists more POE lists. At that point in the game, flipping you or Luca wasn't worth the likelihood of either of you being town.In post 1172, Captain the Furret wrote:I find it hard to believe you can come to the conclusion that I am a top tier townread that early
Hello
Playing. Having fun. Finding scum. Pick one.In post 1195, Alduskkel wrote:can someone please explain what looker is doing this game
I wasn't voting nom, though; I was voting you.In post 1196, Alduskkel wrote:the scumread lessened after nom flipped scumIn post 1191, GeorgeBailey wrote:Weren't you already scum reading Looker?In post 1181, Alduskkel wrote:Ugh, why did Looker and George both have to go and start acting scummy to make things complicated?
right now I'm just super confused by looker's alien thought processes
Huh.
What are you saying?In post 1217, Quagsire wrote:you know that tmi implies that the person who's tmi'ing is scum right? because only scum knows everyone's alignments? uninformed majority vs. informed minority etc. etc.In post 1177, Looker wrote:Interesting tactic, though, if you're scum - say my townread of you is TMI when you're actually scum. That would be impressive.
Because town minds think alike?In post 1218, Quagsire wrote:why is this a reason to townread someone?In post 1186, Looker wrote:@Quag: Because she was boring and only wanted to lynch the people I wanted to lynch
That sounds like a bad precedent to set.In post 1219, Quagsire wrote:i agree, but i'm kind of wondering if that vote is ~too~ blatantly opportunistic to come from scum.
The Captain sure is importantIn post 1235, Chemist1422 wrote:I trust captain's read on the two more than my own
It's because it's suspicious.In post 1237, Chemist1422 wrote:why do you care more about what I think than I do
I'm seeing a trend here.In post 1247, Quagsire wrote:i think at this point i trust furret's and skitter's reads more than i trust my own.
Too late.In post 1249, Chemist1422 wrote:is this where I self-hammer to deny you the satisfaction
WIFOMIn post 1259, GeorgeBailey wrote:Either Looker or Quag made that kill, since Furret said this EOD:
In post 1242, Captain the Furret wrote:skitter30
Alduskkel
GeorgeBailey
Quagsire
Looker
VOTE: Chemist1422
In post 1265, Quagsire wrote:probably need to reread at some point
We were really just waiting for you.
In post 1272, Quagsire wrote:sighhh
i know skitter is vla but still she's the only one i can confidently say is town right now so i need to know where her head is at
doing this in the meantime
VOTE: alduskkel
Why is Skitter town?
I vote with the intention to lynch, so that's not really a scumtell for me. I don't really stall.In post 1280, Alduskkel wrote:which is the second time that quag has casually put someone at L-1
the first time being luca
By saying "guaranteed", are you confirming that skitter is town?In post 1281, Alduskkel wrote:and putting me at L-1 when you also want to hear from skitter is absurd because if someone hammers me then skitter is basically guaranteed to get nightkilled
Do you think that both you and skitter make it to lylo?In post 1282, GeorgeBailey wrote:I'm sharing sentiments on Ald, where it's literally just sorting between the two. I'm leaning on Quag right now. But yeah, I want Skitters opinion on the game plan before moving forward.
It's because skitter's alignment wins regardless. If she's scum, she wins lylo; if she's town, she wins lylo or gets NK'd and whoever's left will be easily sorted (courtesy of yours truly).In post 1286, Alduskkel wrote:I feel worse about Quag's, but Looker's is also kinda scummy because I don't see why they'd swap from a vote on me to a vote on Quag so quickly.
I got it from the "sighhh" and usage of "meantime". It lacks conviction and expresses resignation in a way that relinquishes accountability.In post 1287, Alduskkel wrote:Also, Looker assumes Quag thinks I'm town, but I have no idea where Looker got that impression.
In post 1289, Alduskkel wrote:I'm saying I'll eat my hat if skitter is scum.In post 1288, Looker wrote:By saying "guaranteed", are you confirming that skitter is town?
Why do you keep changing your vote?
You are. These are my confidence levels:
The only way I'll vote GeorgeBailey is if skitter votes him.In post 1292, GeorgeBailey wrote:Yeah, I a lot of people have been saying they noticed it, but others say it's been around of ages. So idk.
And you know what, I think you're right about Quag
VOTE: Quagsire
I'm not accustomed to universal townreads, so I assumed someone was just going with the flow to avoid opening a can of worms and were just going to NK her afterward.In post 1294, GeorgeBailey wrote:Or are you looking for a scumslip
Why does it have to be brief? We clearly have all the time in the world. Alduskkel voteparked on Heaven while nom's wagon rode the wave, and I feel he was expecting to capitalize on my tunneling of Quagsire. The second part could be said of any of you, though. I also feel nom could've been distancing because she voted him the most.In post 1296, GeorgeBailey wrote:Can you tell me briefly why you scumread Ald over Quag?
Even if she did, though...I mean...come on....In post 1297, Alduskkel wrote:unless skitter wants to come in here and drop the take of the century.
Over me? But I'm the most townie.In post 1302, GeorgeBailey wrote:Fair, i'm pretty sure we both know she'd be the NK.
Hey, that's not my fault, man; I'm not the one trying to inspect skitter's colon with my skull.In post 1317, Quagsire wrote:the 'sighh' was because no one was posting and this game is boring and no one wants to lynch aldus despite the bad associations with noms
Because she's scumIn post 1327, Alduskkel wrote:why today?In post 1309, skitter30 wrote:also today is probably massclaim day i think
1-shot Ascetic PGO Treestump GoonIn post 1329, GeorgeBailey wrote:And what do you mean by today is massclaim day? I think everyone than can claim, has.
The hilarious part was that, if you had've voted skitter, I would've hammered her. The fact that you made 4 posts with no vote made me more suspicious of you. Skitter and Amrun are consistently inherently townread.In post 1370, Alduskkel wrote:oof gg
I was actually planning on double-checking skitter if skitter were still alive Day 4 but obviously I never got the chance
Of course to win I would have not only had to convince myself that skitter was scummier than looker but also convince looker that skitter was scummier than me so eh that probably would have never happened
chemist lynch was bad and both PRs claiming D1 was bad
skitter and nom are scary as scum