Nomic: The Constitution Game - Game Over

[Jake The Wolfie]

/in

[Jake The Wolfie]

As for my Refferer, I shall say whomever currently has the least amount of Reputation points at this time.

[Jake The Wolfie]

You can't transmute individual parts of the rule though. Heck, if you vote yes, I'll even give you 2 rep. How does that sound? (I'll do it for anyone who votes yes to these proposals.)

Active Proposals

Up to date as of post 124.

1.

Proposal 322

(104) by logan5123: Transmute 301 to immutable.
Yea - logan5123, Ircher, Allomancer
Nay -
Not Voting - Jormengand, StrangerCoug

This requires unaminous consent.

2.

Proposal 327

(123) by Ircher: Motions may supersede any and all mutable rules, but they may not override immutable rules.
Yea - Ircher
Nay - Allomancer
Not Voting - logan5123, Jormengand, StrangerCoug

3.

Proposal 328

(123) by Ircher: There may be a max of three proposed motions at a time.
Yea - Ircher
Nay - Allomancer
Not Voting - logan5123, Jormengand, StrangerCoug

VOTE: Yea 322
VOTE: Nay 327
VOTE: Nay 328

[Jake The Wolfie]

We have 5 again.

I'm not sure I can count that as a valid referral. Can I have opinions from other players on the matter?
---
I'll edit this post with the current proposals. Most of them need your vote to progress.

Edit: Here we go:

Active Proposals

Up to date as of post 152.

1.

Proposal 322

(104) by logan5123: Transmute 301 to immutable.
Yea - logan5123, Ircher, Allomancer, StrangerCoug
Nay -
Not Voting - Jake the Wolfie

This requires unaminous consent.

2.

Proposal 329

(127) by Allomancer: A player may duel another player by announcing their intention do so in in bold in the thread. Only one duel may take place at a time. All players not in the duel have one vote to vote for a winner of duel, which they do by posting a vote tag with the dueler's name. The dueler with the majority of votes wins the duel. If there is a tie when all active players have voted, the defender wins the duel. The loser of the duel loses 10 Reputation and the winner gains 10 Reputation.
Yea - Allomancer, logan5123
Nay - Ircher
Not Voting - StrangerCoug, Jake the Wolfie

3.

Proposal 330

(131) by Ircher: Transmute 327 to immutable.
Yea - Ircher, Allomancer, logan5123, StrangerCoug
Nay -
Not Voting - Jake the Wolfie

This requires unaminous consent.

4.

Proposal 333

(147) by StrangerCoug: Players may withdraw any of their own proposals made after the passage of this rule. A withdrawn proposal is treated as if it failed immediately upon withdrawal for the purposes of rules affecting failed proposals.
Yea - StrangerCoug, Ircher
Nay -
Not Voting - logan5123, Allomancer, Jake the Wolfie

VOTE: ABSTAIN 329
VOTE: NAY 330 (Not like it Fuken matters)
VOTE: YEA 333

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 334:

Every character "e" must be colored red after the passing of this rule.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Motion M001:

Repeal rule M001 for as long as it can take effect.

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Nay 329
Thought I did that already.

Well I guess we have a tie.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Motion M001:

Repeal rule M001 for as long as it can take effect. This has a maximum timeframe of 1 week.

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Nay M001
VOTE: Nay 334
334 is just a nuisance. M001 makes no sense.

334 is the first real rule that we would have to follow.
It can also lead to players generation rep/some other currency

[Jake The Wolfie]

We will never have any rules that players must follow because all players would immediately Nay it.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Motion M001:

If players vote against the majority on anything, they lose 1 reputation point. This lasts for 7 days.

[Jake The Wolfie]

We don't need to vote Nay on Jake's thing this time because he numbered it wrong LUL

But there is no Motion M001 yet

[Jake The Wolfie]

Motion M002:

If players vote against the majority on anything, they lose 1 reputation point. This lasts for 7 days.

[Jake The Wolfie]

If I reintroduce 329 with the option to decline a duel you're challenged to, would those of you who opposed it before vote for it? Could I do so now or would it count as "functionally equivalent" and I would have to wait 3 days?

I will always be opposed to those whom decline my propositions.

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Yea 322
VOTE: Nay 335
VOTE: Yea 336
VOTE: Yea 337
VOTE: Nay 338

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 340:

Players may exhange 2 reputation points in exchange for 1 extra vote in a proposal. This will change the majority.


I would like to remind everyone about rule 319 as well.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Also what is a supermajority?

[Jake The Wolfie]

Why do people not like my ideas

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Nay M003

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 342:

Transmute 337 from Mutable to Immutable

[Jake The Wolfie]

I can't vote on 343, as there isn't enough room for 343

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Yea 343

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Yea 343

[Jake The Wolfie]

Motion M006:

For the next week, an infinite amount of new players may join. During this week, gaining reputation points via refferal will be doubled.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Motion M005:

For the next week, an infinite amount of new players may join. During this week, gaining reputation points via refferal will be doubled.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Also, sure Ircher.

[Jake The Wolfie]

I don't think repealing it, rather an amendment.

[Jake The Wolfie]

I would like players who aren't the original proposer to have free reign. The original proposer would still have the wait time.

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Yea 346
VOTE: Yea 347
VOTE: Yea 348

[Jake The Wolfie]

From now on, I will be accepting bribes of 1-5 Reputation points. 5 rep guarentees that I vote like you. 1 rep will make me consider it I will allow bribe wars.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 350:

Coins are a point system. Each 24 hour period after this is passed, each player gains 5 coins.

[Jake The Wolfie]

It doesn't make much sense to spend 100 reputation points on eliminating a player.

[Jake The Wolfie]

@Stranger Give me 5 Rep points and I'll vote Yea.

[Jake The Wolfie]

You get 5 coins a day.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 358:

Players can bribe other players by giving them coins equal to half or more of the recipient's total coins. Doing so will make the Briber lose 5 reputation. A bribe can force a player to vote in a particular way.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Hey guys let's abstain on 357 to get the epic maymays

[Jake The Wolfie]

The President's power cannot be unilaterally used because of rule 319.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Isn't there a Judiciary branch, or is this Vladimir President?

[Jake The Wolfie]

I dunno if I should bribe 2 people to vote me or not

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 363:

The President may type VOTE: PASS ## to immediately pass a proposal.

Proposal 364:

It takes a unified majority of all players except the President to overturn the President's ruling.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 365:

The President, when elected, must appoint at least 3 other players to become his Advisory Board. The Advisory Board can overturn any ruling the President makes with a 2/3ds vote. In the event that the President passes anything, the Advisory board must, with a 2/3rds majority, agree with the passing before the approval goes through.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Since 365 just passed,

Proposal 366:

Amend Rule 365 to say "The President, when elected, must appoint at least 3 other players to become his Advisory Board. The Advisory Board can overturn any ruling the President makes with a 2/3ds vote within 48 hours. In the event that the President passes anything, the Advisory board must, with a 2/3rds majority and within 48 hours, agree with the passing before the approval goes through."

Edit 1: Spelling
Edit 2: Added Quotation at the end.

[Jake The Wolfie]

"Unnecessary change" Says the person who wanted said change.

[Jake The Wolfie]

while I'm on my daily triple post routine

Duel jake the wolfie

and while I'm in a rule making mood

370: Whenever a player wins a duel, they draw a card from the playing card deck.

Trust me, the "playing card deck" was necessary.

U wanna go m8?

[Jake The Wolfie]

If you vote for me I'll give you 5 rep.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Ircher isn't in the Duel?

[Jake The Wolfie]

Allo, don't you want Reputation points though?

[Jake The Wolfie]

Bribe Ircher 15 coins to vote me in Duel

Bribe StrangerCoug 15 coins to vote me in Duel

[Jake The Wolfie]

Oh would you look at that, everyone has voted and I gailed a Supermajority.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Bribe Ircher 15 coins to vote me in Duel

Bribe StrangerCoug 15 coins to vote me in Duel

Starting a duel costs 5 coins. You can't bribe both of us.

I think the proper ruling here is that you bribe me, but not StrangerCoug.
(I won't resolve the duel quite yet so we can resolve this conflict.)

Preventing the start of a duel costs 5 coins.

[Jake The Wolfie]

"A player may duel another player by announcing their intention do so in in bold in the thread. Starting a duel costs 5 coins. Only one duel may take place at a time. The player challenged may decline the duel within 24 hours, which costs 5 coins. All players not in the duel have one vote to vote for a winner of duel, which they do by posting a vote tag with the dueler's name. The dueler with the majority of votes wins the duel. If there is a tie when all active players have voted, the defender wins the duel. The loser of the duel loses 10 Reputation and the winner gains 10 Reputation."

So I wasn't completely right, but it wouldn't cost me 5 coins, it would cost Logan 5 coins.

[Jake The Wolfie]

If it did cost me 5 coins because Logan declared it, then any player could abuse the system by declaringf Duel after duel on a player until they go bankrupt.

[Jake The Wolfie]

How much are you bribing me? Literally nothing? Sham

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 372: Repeal rule 358.

Its scope is too large (I thought it was meant for proposals/motions only) and is prone to being abused.

I think people would only agree with you because of the minuscule amount of people currently playing right now. It would be easy for someone with lots of coins to force a Majority now, however if we get more than 5 players, the required amount for a majority jumps from 3 to 4.

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: YEA 372
Spending coins to force people to do stuff is dumb. One can technically force a president to veto a proposal, using up their proposal AND requiring their council to do what they actually want to do.
If you have enough, you can even circumvent the council system altogether. Could allow someone to win the game very easily.
...oh my god you can get enough coins for it in 2 irl days.
TWO!

How so?

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 374:

The President may type VOTE: PASS ## to pass a proposal. The President cannot win for 24 hours after the passing of the Proposal.

[Jake The Wolfie]

"I don't like win conditions"
Well then how the fuck are we every going to win?

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 375:

No player may win the game.

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: NAY 357

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 277:

Weak rules are a new rule category. They are unofficial rules that have no weighing over anyone. It requires a 1/3rd vote to pass. A weak rule may be transmuted into and out of the mutable rules by a Supermajority.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 377:

Weak rules are a new rule category. They are unofficial rules that have no weighing over anyone. It requires a 1/3rd vote to pass. A weak rule may be transmuted into and out of the mutable rules by a Supermajority.

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Nay 377 Useless, and I'm opposed to anything that requires less than a majority to pass.

Didn't you originally Yea the President?

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Nay 376

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 386:

A player who duels someone who cannot afford to decline loses 5 reputation for beating up the poor.

This is also to prevent people from abusing the duels to drain someone of their reputation.

I am not declining the duel as of yet, but I am also not taking them on just yet.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 386:

A player who duels someone who cannot afford to decline loses 5 reputation for beating up the poor.

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Nay 387

[Jake The Wolfie]

Decline Duel

I am by far the most hated person. You could probably run me dry of my reputation and coins by duels alone.

[Jake The Wolfie]

I don't know which of you I most least unhate the most

[Jake The Wolfie]

I'll allow 389 if you allow this one:

Proposal 390:

Any player may only have 1 proposal out at a time for free. Any additional proposals will cost them 10 coins.

[Jake The Wolfie]

1+1=2 in a general sense.

[Jake The Wolfie]

It doesn't in binary. 1 + 1 = 10.

(Or possibly 1 + 1 = 1 if you define + as logical AND.)

In a general sense

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 391:

Any player may only have 1 proposal out at a time for free. Any additional proposals will cost them 10 coins.
This is to punish one player from hogging all of the proposal space

Proposal 392:

A player gains twice the amount of the gains or losses for each prime number in their proposal number. This is not applied retroactively, 0 and 1 are not considered prime, and this does not apply to costs for making a proposal. (Example: 392 would have x2 for containing the prime 3. 395 would have x4 for having the primes 3 and 5.)
This incentivizes making better proposals on numbers with lots of primes, which increases overall proposal quality.

[Jake The Wolfie]

If there are lots of primes in most proposal numbers, then everyone benefits from it, no?

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 393:

Unless stated otherwise, all points of any type may be freely given to other players.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Contract 001:

This contract, the Mutual Support Contract, guarantees that all signatories shall vote in a beneficial way to any other signatory, such as voting for a proposal made by a signatory or voting for a signatory during a duel. If a player is able to vote in a beneficial way but chooses not to, they must pay the offended signatory a minimum of 3 coins within 24 hours. A signatory may choose to pay another signatory in advance to cover for a future offense. In the event that voting beneficially for one signatory is harmful to another, no penalty payment is needed. In the event that a signatory's vote does not explicitly benefits another signatory, they may choose to vote however they please.
To become a signatory of this contract, you must either pay all existing members 1 coin in fees, or 3 coins to 1 member. You must also announce intent in the thread by typing the following:

I hereby join the Mutual Support Contract.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Jake The Wolfie pays all Mutual Support Contract members 1 coin.

I hereby join the Mutual Support Contract

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 394:

The creator of a contract may amend a contract or burn a contract. All signatories of the previous contract, if amended, are no longer signatories of the amended contract and must become new signatories of the amended contract. If a contract is burned, he contract is repealed and all previous signatories of the contract are removed from being signatories.

If anyone would like to re-word this to make this simpler, please let me know.

[Jake The Wolfie]

My next theoretical proposal will be the following:

The Moderator is allowed to edit the header post of each page, but only to display an updated view of the gamestate. The player who originally posted must not have their message altered in any way, and their words must come before the update.

[Jake The Wolfie]

"You may amend anything that has been stated can be amended"

Great job.

[Jake The Wolfie]

If we have no way to get rid of contracts, then how do we get rid of them when we find them no longer useful?

[Jake The Wolfie]

So currently I have total control over my Contract :^)

[Jake The Wolfie]

A supermajority of the contract could literaly make it impossible for the other third to both unsign the contract and instantly lose no backsies

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Nay 396

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Nay 397

[Jake The Wolfie]

Nominate: Logan

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 400:

If the current President is influenced by any other player via points, the offending parties both lose 5 reputation if it is caught within 24 hours.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 405:

Repeal 402, and amend 401 to the following: "A player may vote "[Yea/Nay] with reservations" on any proposal made after this rule, which shall henceforth be known as a vote with reservations. A player who does so should, but is not required to, explain the reservations the player holds that prevent an unqualified vote. A vote with reservations is indistinct from a normal vote for the purposes of calculating the number of votes needed to pass a proposal."

Credit 405 to StrangerCoug

If this fails, I won't be angry. Just disappointed.

[Jake The Wolfie]

If I give someone negative points, do I gain points?

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: No President

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Nay with reservations 408

There is really no reason for this.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Every time I'm not in the Advisory board, it makes me less and leass lilely to like the proposals that the President makes.

[Jake The Wolfie]

I mean, can you really give away negative Rep points?

[Jake The Wolfie]

I'm really tempted to create a poiint called "negative quantities of things"

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 413:

If any player has shown reservations within their vote on a proposal, their vote cannot lead to the passing or failing of that proposal until either the reservation is cleared up, or the last vote isn't a reserved vote.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Contract 002:

Jake will host a minigame of 1000 Blank White Cards. Each signatory may submit up to 10 different cards via PM to Jake. Any cards not submitted up to 10 when Jake calls time will be counted as Blank Cards. For a full list of rules on how to play, go here. The winner of the minigame will receive their choice of 10 coins from all Signatories, or 5 Reputation from all Signatories. Cards played during the round do not affect the main game, and the minigame may not end prematurely or before the deck would have run out. This contract will be destroyed after the minigame is completed. To become a Signatory, PM Jake with at least 5 cards and wait for Jake to confirm in-thread. Alternatively, you may have the username "Jake the Wolfie" to be a signatory.

[Jake The Wolfie]

I confirm Logan as a signatory.

[Jake The Wolfie]

I'll sweeten the deal if you join my game.

[Jake The Wolfie]

I confirm Ircher as playing

[Jake The Wolfie]

Jake is playing.

A suckbox does exist, but no cards can be sent there as of yet. (Since the gane hasn't ended yet with a clear winner)

[Jake The Wolfie]

Wait, shit did I say is? I meant Jake *Isn't* playing.

[Jake The Wolfie]

nice

[Jake The Wolfie]

Whom'st has summoned my name

[Jake The Wolfie]

I'll yea it after you explain what it's for.

[Jake The Wolfie]

ircher.
Also, pls vote on 414. (preferrably YEA)
It's expiring in like 6 hours, and I don't want to have to redo the entire process.

pretty sure 414 passed.

But there were only 2 Yeas and 2 abstains

[Jake The Wolfie]

We should just remove rule 105

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Yea 421
VOTE: Nay 422

I don't appreciate having to actually *follow* rules.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Why do so many people want Logan for president? It makes no sense

[Jake The Wolfie]

@mod If a Contract doesn't have any players, but players have the ability to join, then the contract should still stay.

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Nay 426

[Jake The Wolfie]

I like this Mod Ruling

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Nay 427

It's his fault that he created this rule.

[Jake The Wolfie]

It's not my fault you defined week as ending tommorow.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 428:

A player may not be a President if they had used any Presidential power during their last term.

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Nay 428

There are other ways we can use/propose to limit his power. That's a considerable nerf.

It also stops people from electing
the
same
god
bloody
damn
person
every
election
cycle
like
jesus
christ

[Jake The Wolfie]

You don't even have to elect me. Just elect someone other than Logan so that they don't get flooded with the rewards that come with being elected.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 429:

During a general election, no candidate may vote for themselves. They may abstain from the vote.

[Jake The Wolfie]

I'm temted to give myself Infinite Reputation/coins rn

[Jake The Wolfie]

Hey Ircher, if I were to have Infinite Reputation, could I convert some portion of the infinity (like half) into infinite coins?

[Jake The Wolfie]

Fine, what about Aleph Null Rep?

[Jake The Wolfie]

If I found a way to get Aleph Null Reputation, could I then convert half of it to Coins, and have Aleph Null Coins?

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 431:

Amend 421 to be the following:

421: Players may not make any kind of proposal that target specifically named players. Attempting to do so will cause the player to lose 5 reputation. [This includes actual proposals, motions, and contracts as of now.]

[Jake The Wolfie]

To quote:
"421: Players may not make proposals that target specifically named players. Attempting to do so will cause the player to lose 5 reputation."

I could make a Motion right now that targets Logan to be instantly eliminated, as it's not a Proposal.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Ircher, are you saying that Motion Proposals can't target players?

[Jake The Wolfie]

No, I'm saying adding stuff in brackets [like this] doesn't hold legal weight.

I know that.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 434:

If a play can get away with anything for up to 7 days, they can escape punishment. The following is a list of exceptions where punishment can still be given: Alternate Accounting.

I mean, if you can get by for 7 entire days without anyone noticing, then you've really escaped the law.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Allo, explain why wou wouldn't want this. If you get away with something after 7 days, when people have had plenty of time to catch up and catch you, you should be able to get away with it.

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Nay 419

[Jake The Wolfie]

It also creates a culture of people trying harder to enforce the rules. It encourages finding who is manipulation and finding what crimes they did.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 440:

Weapons may be used to subtract life from other players. Armor may be used to block the subtraction of life from yourself or others. Weapons and armor may also have descriptions, detailing information about them.

[The description would contain things such as how much life can be subtracted, how many uses you have, when you can use the weapon, or even if these items can be traded between people]

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Yea 441

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal M010:

All players may choose to create and send either 1 weapon or 1 armor to anyone of their choosing, except themselves, via PM directly to that player. If any player receives a weapon or armor that they created by most intentional means, they lose half of their health. This Motion lasts until either everyone has sent their one item, or until 7 days pass. [Intentional means is text such as "Give this Weapon to its creator within 24 hours or lose 50k life.", where the receiver has little choice but to give it back. This would NOT be applied if the receiver sent it back to it's creator.]

[Jake The Wolfie]

It's a motion proposal.

It's M010

aka Motion 010

[Jake The Wolfie]

Motion M011:

Whoever wins the lottery this time gets their choice of either a card from the deck or the following weapon. This lasts until either the winner picks or 7 days pass.

Weapon

Description:
Title: Lucky Knife
Attack: -1,000 Life
Uses: 1
Other: 50% chance to gain another use after usage. Can only be used once per 24 hours.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Hot damn, it only failed because 1/2 of the majority didn't like it.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 444:

Logan gets 1 cheap plastic trophy. Just 1.

[Jake The Wolfie]

And because like hell I'm gonna allow logan to gain anything, VOTE: NAY 444

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Nay 432
VOTE: Nay 438
VOTE: Nay 439

[Jake The Wolfie]

It just says that Logan gets 1 Cheap Plasic Trophy. It doesn't specify which Logan.

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Nay M012

[Jake The Wolfie]

Since motions are no longer proposals, I can totally target people with my shenanigans.

[Jake The Wolfie]

My actual legal name is logan5124, gimmie gimmie

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Yea 446

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Yea M014

[Jake The Wolfie]

Why did Allo lose life?

[Jake The Wolfie]

Is there a limit to my nominations?

[Jake The Wolfie]

Nominate Allomancer

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Nay 448
VOTE: Nay 449

[Jake The Wolfie]

Motion M018:

Add the following weapon into the shop.

Weapon

Description:
Title: Assassination shot
Price: 50 Coins
Uses: One
Other: Can only be used on the current president. Will immediately drain that presidents life down to 0. You will lose 2/3rds of your reputation by doing this.

[Jake The Wolfie]

We have precisely 0 proposed motions, because they are not Proposals, they are motions.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Well then, Proposed motions become proposals, because anything that hasn't been apporved or rejected is a fuckin proposal.

[Jake The Wolfie]

But you also lose a fuck ton of rep as a result

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Abstain from Election

[Jake The Wolfie]

445 seems to have expired.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Actually, speaking of which:

Challenge Jake the Wolfie to a duel.

Come at me bruh.

You are actively coming at me.

But fine.

[Jake The Wolfie]

If I die, I will die in battle.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 456:

Plays may not attack themselves if doing so would cause them to gain life.

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Nay 453
VOTE: Nay 454
VOTE: Yea 457

Hey @Mod, if I have reservations on something, does it permanently stop it from passing until I clear up the reservation, or until someone else votes ontop of me?

[Jake The Wolfie]

Also I just realized how many coins I have holy shit.

I guess the pen is mightier than the sword.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 458:

Players may queue up Proposals of any kind (Currently Proposals and Motions). Queued Proposals can be voted on, but cannot be passed as law until they are a Pending Proposal. They become a Pending Proposal if they are both at the front of the Queue, and a slot is open for them. They can, however, be failed like a Pdnding Proposal. The only exception to this is if all players decide to pass it.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Logan, whwre the hell did you get so many Gavels?

[Jake The Wolfie]

Why don't you like it?

Also I edited it because I fucked up spelling.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Because the proposal limit exists for a reason and this circumvents it completely. Adding proposals is the longest part of the job.

So basically you don't like it because it makes your life harder?

[Jake The Wolfie]

P to the A to the G to the E to the T to the O to the P

What does that spell?

PAGETOP!

[Jake The Wolfie]

Hey, do status conditions stack? Like, for instance, if I hit Jake with a Judge's Gavel twice, will he get 2 stacks of Unpopularity?

If you hit me, I'll smack you back.

[Jake The Wolfie]

I mean, 1 indefinite time + 1 indefinite time =/= 2 indefinite times

[Jake The Wolfie]

Infinity + Infinity = 2 * Infinity = Infinity

Only Infinity - Infinity and Infinity / Infinity are undefined.

Infinity is not a number. Aleph Null is. You may abreviate it as AN.

[Jake The Wolfie]

That means there's an open slot on The President's Advisory board.

[Jake The Wolfie]

I'm still waiting on 2 more players.

[Jake The Wolfie]

A few other things:
- Lottery expired
- All players have inputted on the duel (now)

But it's also a tie.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Boop

[Jake The Wolfie]

Who wants to join my Mish mash game?

[Jake The Wolfie]

Take one down, murder a clown, ninety-eight bottle of beer on the wall!

[Jake The Wolfie]

I am tempted to nay it's transmusion, but I'm easily scared by tiny wooden hammers.

[Jake The Wolfie]

aaa

[Jake The Wolfie]

Invis, if you join I'll personally nominate and vote you for president.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Nominate: Invisibility

[Jake The Wolfie]

And so it begins, Logan.

[Jake The Wolfie]

@mod I'm gonna be inactive, but not out.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Because honestly, I'm the last one standing, so I will eventually win.