Dance of the Title Thread: Resurgence in wild?

[Churros]

Hmm, I imagine it's against the rules to self-nom or discuss too much your own noms Nancy

not that I mind, but I guess mastina would be against.

[Nancy Drew 39]

Hmm, I imagine it's against the rules to self-nom or discuss too much your own noms Nancy

not that I mind, but I guess mastina would be against.

I’m not the one who made the original nom, you did, so I don’t see the problem?

[Cheetory6]

people have gotten warned/banned from the title thread for similar stuff.
the general view is that you shouldn't be trying to influence your own title nominations.

[Alisae]

If you want to give nancy drew a title so badly, you can vote for it when voting for the title fairy event ends.

[Alisae]

I don’t think you can outdo meta case here
It best describes what is trying to be achieved here.

[Churros]

I kinda don't like meta case to be fair

It feels a bit vague to me

I'm not really necessarily wanting to give Nancy a title as much as I'm throwing suggestions to people that have been nommed recently. I find it fun to come up with titles. I might begin to do it more often.

[Alisae]

She likes meta case and thats what matters.

[Nancy Drew 39]

people have gotten warned/banned from the title thread for similar stuff.
the general view is that you shouldn't be trying to influence your own title nominations.

Oh really? So, you can weigh in on other noms but never your own? I thought you just couldn’t nominate your own title but was allowed to express an opinion on others’noms for you? So, this is the first I’m hearing about this. Sorry, I didn’t know you weren’t allowed to do that.

[Nancy Drew 39]

She likes meta case and thats what matters.

I’m open to other suggestions though.

[Cheetory6]

yeah it's just to prevent a dimension of someone supporting a title even if they don't think it's good because the nominee likes it and they don't want them to feel bad

[Nancy Drew 39]

yeah it's just to prevent a dimension of someone supporting a title even if they don't think it's good because the nominee likes it and they don't want them to feel bad

I’m not really dead set on anything but of course, it would be obviously nice to have a fun title like all the cool kids.

[Cheetory6]

idk maybe there's something in like
heavy meta as a play on heavy metal
or some kind of way of leveraging metal idioms into a meta idiom

but then maybe that doesn't aesthetically fit Nancy either!!!
shoot!

but then is Nancy the undisputed meta master either?
boy this is just a set of conundrums I don't have the answers for

[Churros]

Meta Preacher

?

I may give up if you guys find this one no good as well

[Alisae]

No because she doesn’t advocate meta she uses meta

[Zaphkael]

What about

Meta Maniac

?

[Maruchan]

Which titles should I not nominate?

You probably weren't asking this and most of this section should be common sense, but it seems important anyway. You should not nominate:

• a title for yourself. You will not receive the title and other users may find it annoying that you tried this. If there are title nominations for you in consideration in the thread, be careful about giving too much feedback or input - while declining a specific title or set of titles that's currently in discussion for you is perfectly fine, going too far beyond that may cause users to become uncomfortable with the current proceedings.

[Awoo]

META KNIGHT

[Cheetory6]

oh nice premise
n1

[Keychain]

people have gotten warned/banned from the title thread for similar stuff.
the general view is that you shouldn't be trying to influence your own title nominations.

Oh really? So, you can weigh in on other noms but never your own? I thought you just couldn’t nominate your own title but was allowed to express an opinion on others’noms for you? So, this is the first I’m hearing about this. Sorry, I didn’t know you weren’t allowed to do that.

Katyusha's title under discussion was suspended for a month for commenting on it

Katy, I'd stop trying to sell you own title.

I'm divided--on the one hand, I think it's actually a good title.

On the other hand, even if it was not Katyusha's intention, her posting

was

pretty much self-advocating for said title.

Let's revisit it in a month: (expired on 2019-08-08 04:11:25).

If it's still a good title then

without

the self-advocating, then we can look into titling her from it.

[vonflare]

accept when he does

[Ariel]

so for the April event Zaphkael had the title "Ghost Writer." Zaphkael won Paperback Writer in 2017 and has done very in-depth written flavor for other mafia games. Also runs Fiction Rumble in GD and has been the "champion" for it multiple times. So I do think Zaph has a notable association with writing on mafiascum.net.

I'm a sucker for roles that don't have an obvious use or don't have an obviously optimal way of using them, but that can be used creatively. The neighborizers, your role, the Aeon factional abilities and even a masonry all fit this philosophy of mine, and if someone actually uses them creatively, it makes me a very happy mod. Your play was one of those things!

Based on this modding philosophy, I am going to throw out

Little Did I Know

as a title nom (trope reference)

[Cheetory6]

2nd

[animorpherv1]

3rd

[Alisae]

i'll support it but I'll be voting for his title during entitlement and prefer it over this tbh

[Ariel]

i think ghost writer sounds cool but i'm not knowledgeable about his relation to the ghost part of it if that makes sense