Open 81 - The New C9 - Game Over

[armlx]

SC, stop listening to what other people are saying about who you should vig, unless we can all come around and do a second full vote on it. Taking 3-4 opinions is not going to help.

[strife220]

SC, stop listening to what other people are saying about who you should vig, unless we can all come around and do a second full vote on it. Taking 3-4 opinions is not going to help.

Worth repeating

[iamausername]

Also, SC killing someone only proves he's either an SK OR a Vig, not a Vig.

SC not being killed by the real vig tonight would prove that he's a vig, however.

[strife220]

Also, SC killing someone only proves he's either an SK OR a Vig, not a Vig.

SC not being killed by the real vig tonight would prove that he's a vig, however.

0-1 Vigilante

You are a vigilante. Each night you may send me a PM to attempt to kill one other player.

You win when all factions opposing the town have been eliminated.

SC surviving the night proves that either he's the vig, or we don't have a vig.

[armlx]

SC surviving the night proves that either he's the vig, or we don't have a vig.

3 kills last night proves we have a vig.

[strife220]

i fail

[Lowell]

I'm getting a renewed town read on muerrto. I'd vote someone else to be vigged tonight.

[The Fonz]

I don't see any particular scumtells in muerrto.

That said: I wish you'd not declare your targets, since if they're town it means the scum know they don't have to bother targetting said player. If you keep your intentions under wraps, then the scum might hit the same target as you, wasting a kill.

[Lowell]

I don't see any particular scumtells in muerrto.

That said: I wish you'd not declare your targets, since if they're town it means the scum know they don't have to bother targetting said player. If you keep your intentions under wraps, then the scum might hit the same target as you, wasting a kill.

Agreed.

[StrangerCoug]

SC, stop listening to what other people are saying about who you should vig, unless we can all come around and do a second full vote on it. Taking 3-4 opinions is not going to help.

So be it.

[JordanA24]

sc you should vig muerrto

I was asking ting =), but unless there are any objections I'll lynch Muerrto.

Don't you mean Vigkill?

Slip Up?

Though I agree Muerrto is a good vig kill, anyone else got any suggestions before we hammer BlakAdder?

[armlx]

Fonz also makes a good point beyond the 2-3 opinions is easier to influence as scum one I was talking about.

[forbiddanlight]

Don't you mean Vigkill?

Slip Up?

Be pretty hard to lynch on your lonesome. I doubt it's a slip, lol.

[The Fonz]

A lot of people keep trying to portray mildly incorrect linguistic choices as scum slips.

Can't say I'm a fan.

[armlx]

A lot of people keep trying to portray mildly incorrect linguistic choices as scum slips.

Can't say I'm a fan.

QFT

[forbiddanlight]

A lot of people keep trying to portray mildly incorrect linguistic choices as scum slips.

Can't say I'm a fan.

Second the quoting for truthery .

[ting =)]

@sc.
I object, because of stuff I already said.

You obviously don't have to listen to me, but since you asked, I'd vig either of sun tzu/tin.

@armlx.
Sorry, it was Fonz and Korts who were going for GS, not you and Fonz.

There is more than semantics to the GS case. He implied there was a case on one but not the other, and yet said that there was nothing to choose between them. Fairly substantial contradiction imho.

I think it's pretty clear that early on he meant that there wasn't anything yet that made him suspicious of either of Armlx/Strife, something which a bunch of other people also said. From his 10th post,

When the question was asked in post 17 there was hardly any content so I didn't have an opinion at the time.

On the: 'implied there was a case on one but not the other, yet said that there was nothing to choose between them'

At the time there were some attacks towards armix and none towards strife and that is why I said there was no case against strife, not because the case building against armix was good. How could I decide which case to go with when one of them didn't even have a case.

The question didn't ask if I had a case against either one of them. It asked me which one I thought was scummier which translates into, "Based on the cases already shown in this game, which of these two players do you find scummier?".

Where I think he clearly meant, 'I wasn't going to choose, because there was still nothing to compare.' - something which is a rather direct follow up of his earlier post.

[Korts]

I think all this conversation is fine and dandy, but a hammer would be nice.

If my opinion's important to you in any way, SC, I'd suggest you vig

tin

orangepenguin in the event of BlakAdder turning scum, otherwise there are quite a lot of contestants.

[armlx]

If my opinion's important to you in any way, SC, I'd suggest you vig tin orangepenguin in the event of BlakAdder turning scum, otherwise there are quite a lot of contestants.

See the top of the page.

And I forgot to vote post claim. Time to end this.

Vote BlackAdder

[Korts]

Armlx, your point being?

[forbiddanlight]

yay! But, you misspelled BlakAdder...

[armlx]

Armlx, your point being?

Welcome to the wonderful world of vig direction?

[BlakAdder]

Whatever. Obviously, the only result is me getting lynched, so I better just speed up the process.

unvote, Vote BlakAdder

Just gives me the chance to say I told you so sooner.

[armlx]

Deadlines make things lame

Fixed.

[Rogueben]

Vote Count 11

BlakAdder

- (9) {iamusername, Muerrto, forbiddanlight, strife220, orangepenguin, Korts, Lowell, roflcopter, armix}

Lowell - (2) {StrangerCoug, BlakAdder}

Muerrto - (1) {silence}

ting =) - (1) {The Fonz}

silence - (1) {Sun Tzu}

orangepenguin - (1) {JordanA24}

Not Voting: {Iron Man, ting =)}.

With 9 votes that's a lynch.