Open 86 - Lovers Multiball (Game Over)

Firestarter · Post Post #6 (isolation #0) » Sun Aug 03, 2008 4:10 pm

Wahey!!!

First post in...

Ok...

Original Roll String: 1d23

1 23-Sided Dice: (10) = 10

Firestarter · Post Post #7 (isolation #1) » Sun Aug 03, 2008 4:12 pm

1. sekinj,

replacing Lowell

2. Raging Rabbit
3. OpposedForce,

replacing Spacecase

4. somestrangeflea
5. Harvey Pew
6. ThAdmiral
7. Alabaska J
8. pwnz
9. DarlaBlueEyes
10. charter
11. Cephrir
12. neko2086
13. cerebus3
14. farside22
15. pacman281292
16. icemanE
17. WaltWishbone
18. Crazy
19. Raffles

20. Erratus Apathos

21. SleepyPanda,

replacing Septia

22. Adel,

replacing Ennui2778

23. dybeck

VOTE: Erratus Apathos

Firestarter · Post Post #17 (isolation #2) » Sun Aug 03, 2008 6:14 pm

Adel wrote: If the random voting stage is truely random then it will not yield information. Why don't you want to risk making a pseudo-random vote that could yield information?

Dice=Novelty+never tried before

..apart from the testing thread prior to my using of said dice, of course!

Firestarter · Post Post #81 (isolation #3) » Mon Aug 04, 2008 12:48 pm

I think the main thing is the size of this particular game... in relation to massclaiming.
Im in favour of a latter day to do this.

Firestarter · Post Post #90 (isolation #4) » Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:21 pm

Adel wrote:your rather obvious mistake, and my superior scum-detection ability.

If you were chocolate, you'd lick yourself to death!!

Firestarter · Post Post #295 (isolation #5) » Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:20 am

Apologies for not being present lately, Ive had alot of work in RL to contend with, will hope to get back on track in 48 hours..

Firestarter · Post Post #364 (isolation #6) » Sat Aug 09, 2008 11:59 am

Unvote: Vote: Raging Rabbit

With Crazy & Farside claimed lovers. you seem to be defending them more than anything else... You give plenty of reasons to vote Crazy in your posts, yet at the end of several you say your happy with where your vote is... please explain?

Firestarter · Post Post #371 (isolation #7) » Sat Aug 09, 2008 12:57 pm

@Neko26, Adel..

Crazy could be scum with an elaborate plan... Im not convinced however.

In 3 succesive RR posts, and before the post Adel quoted, he gives enough reasons to vote Crazy, imo, during and after Crazy got his scumtell wrong....

I found this odd.

Could be a scum partner, could also be buddying up, I'd like to hear from RR.

Firestarter · Post Post #373 (isolation #8) » Sat Aug 09, 2008 1:09 pm

Adel wrote:
unvote

reality check: why is Crazy -2 to lynch?

Are there no other wagons worth exploring?

Firestarter · Post Post #374 (isolation #9) » Sat Aug 09, 2008 1:10 pm

EBWOP... Worth exploring imo.

Firestarter · Post Post #377 (isolation #10) » Sat Aug 09, 2008 1:23 pm

If I were to make a case, I think you'd find I would have put alot more effort into my post, rather than just a reactionary vote post, similar to yours...

Thanks for fucking that up however....

Adel wrote:
unvote

reality check: why is Crazy -2 to lynch?

Are there no other wagons worth exploring?

Firestarter · Post Post #381 (isolation #11) » Sat Aug 09, 2008 1:28 pm

No... skimming through, this caught my eye.
As I stated, reactionary vote. Just like yours.. without a case.

Firestarter · Post Post #384 (isolation #12) » Sat Aug 09, 2008 1:52 pm

Firestarter wrote:
If I were to make a case, I think you'd find I would have put alot more effort into my post
, rather than just a reactionary vote post, similar to yours...

Firestarter · Post Post #386 (isolation #13) » Sat Aug 09, 2008 2:24 pm

Firestarter wrote:No...
skimming through, this caught my eye.

As I stated, reactionary vote. Just like yours.. without a case.

Heres an idea.... why dont I get the feedback Ive called for from RR... thank you!