People seem to choose this vote with no remorse.
Interesting.
People seem to choose this vote with no remorse.
With all these votes there’s bound to be a scum somewhere In here.In post 27, Almost50 wrote:In post 5, Doctor Drew wrote:Also, obligatory......'Swear I am not 3p this time guys' post.
Are you 4P then??
Also
VOTE: Pooky
Because Drew told me to (in the scum PT, of course)
Fun fact: I am disappointed I didn't roll scum in this game in particular. Drew said he wanted to be scum with me in the sign-up thread and I though "I wish that happens and our third would be Jay!". Looks like I didn't cross my fingers or press my thumb hard enough (or whatever you guys do to get your wishes to come true".
At least your not voting like a maniac.In post 33, TemporalLich wrote:I'm starting to get frightened at how fast the Pooky wagon is getting inRVS
Any reason besides Doctor Drew naked SRing Pooky... oh wait 26 is a scumclaim.
Somehow I feel this makes Pooky feel towny.
Alchemist's claim don't make no no sense.
I think from how fast your wagon went makes you more likely Town.
He said Pre-Game he was only going to post in images.In post 51, DrippingGoofball wrote:Pooky faking a post restriction; vote stays.
So is this how we start Day 1?In post 59, TemporalLich wrote:So I can form actual townreads and scumreads
DGB pings me scum a little for the insistence on staying on Pooky acting werid
VOTE: DGB
Pedit: yeah but considering the wincon it would make him more likely to be targeted by those wanting eliminate actual scum with the lynch
I’ve finished catching up.In post 75, Almost50 wrote:Town/Scum/SK/Survivor/Moderator/Spectator crumb detected. Now tell me HOW am I going to be wrong this time.In post 68, Elsa Jay wrote:I got a 1-shot vig, so I'll use it on you and you become a survivor with a gun. How's that sound?
Third Party Role.In post 86, Iecerint wrote:VOTE: Lavender
DD is town.
I'd appreciate it if someone could define "3p" for me.
Not attacking.In post 109, Vecna wrote:Another person attacking lichboy over this vote.....kid mustve struck gold.In post 84, Logicalicaltist wrote:So is this how we start Day 1?In post 59, TemporalLich wrote:So I can form actual townreads and scumreads
DGB pings me scum a little for the insistence on staying on Pooky acting werid
VOTE: DGB
Pedit: yeah but considering the wincon it would make him more likely to be targeted by those wanting eliminate actual scum with the lynch
Only a main wagon and a CW?
Shame.
VOTE: dripper-Goofball
What’s wrong with my conclusion here?In post 110, Vecna wrote:real big yikes. guess I got my scumteam. ez solveIn post 85, Logicalicaltist wrote:I’ve finished catching up.In post 75, Almost50 wrote:Town/Scum/SK/Survivor/Moderator/Spectator crumb detected. Now tell me HOW am I going to be wrong this time.In post 68, Elsa Jay wrote:I got a 1-shot vig, so I'll use it on you and you become a survivor with a gun. How's that sound?
Going to place a vote down on one of the Pooky voters.
VOTE: Votato
So I take it you don’t play like this as 3P?In post 114, Vecna wrote:seems like a pretty good way to get people to not use their abilities on you, no?
Why do you think town are now inclined to help you win as 3p, instead of using their abilities to catch scum?
Your play makes no sense as 3p trying to win like this. It does make sense as scum.
You seem like a Meme player.In post 129, pisskop wrote:oof you never no-lynchIn post 119, gobbledygook wrote:Auro did you get people to no lynch day 1?
I Chose the one I felt was getting the least attention.In post 136, username wrote:In post 85, Logicalicaltist wrote:I’ve finished catching up.In post 75, Almost50 wrote:Town/Scum/SK/Survivor/Moderator/Spectator crumb detected. Now tell me HOW am I going to be wrong this time.In post 68, Elsa Jay wrote:I got a 1-shot vig, so I'll use it on you and you become a survivor with a gun. How's that sound?
Going to place a vote down on one of the Pooky voters.
VOTE: Votato
how did you decide which one or was it more or less at random or
You said your sheeping DGB But your not town reading them but instead you Town read Vecna the one who I believe is voting them.In post 137, username wrote:mine is boring af but the mod is cool so it balances outIn post 102, Vecna wrote: my role pm has all yours beat regardless. Still cant believe this was an actual thing that got approved by someone
vecna's town
ill wait until im townreading dgb before i decide if im sheeping her
didn't like doc drew's shade about taking the game too seriously
ok thats enough internet for today my e-friends i'm gonna go back to doing whatever it is i do
Ok then give your top 3 Town Reads before day ends.In post 144, pisskop wrote:i shall notIn post 142, Logicalicaltist wrote:You seem like a Meme player.In post 129, pisskop wrote:oof you never no-lynchIn post 119, gobbledygook wrote:Auro did you get people to no lynch day 1?
Make sure to make a readslist before the day ends.
So you Town read 2 participants and a spectator.In post 147, pisskop wrote:Auro 50 elsa
In post 151, pisskop wrote:why pooki
theyve done nothing but gif meme.
their push is reactive and NAI
In post 152, pisskop wrote:ftm why tl and alch?
Never said it was “weird”In post 156, username wrote:On page six, it's gutIn post 145, Logicalicaltist wrote:You said your sheeping DGB But your not town reading them but instead you Town read Vecna the one who I believe is voting them.In post 137, username wrote:mine is boring af but the mod is cool so it balances outIn post 102, Vecna wrote: my role pm has all yours beat regardless. Still cant believe this was an actual thing that got approved by someone
vecna's town
ill wait until im townreading dgb before i decide if im sheeping her
didn't like doc drew's shade about taking the game too seriously
ok thats enough internet for today my e-friends i'm gonna go back to doing whatever it is i do
Why do you TR’ed Vecna?
Maybe it’s a specific post? Maybe a Gut Read?
Tell us why!
On page three hundred it will still be like 75% gut
correctly getting DGB's alignment on Day 1 seems like an effort in futility, I mean that's not nearly enough time to consult spirits, read tea leaves or have fever dreams
I don't think townreading two peoplewhere one is voting the other is weirdor even worth mentioning, and that's a strange place for you to go
And I'm not townreading DGB yet anyway because it's page six of day one
Yeah well we will see what they have to say about their A50 and Elsa Read.In post 158, TemporalLich wrote:pisskop doesn't seem that impressive to me though they are showing promise with the question
I’ll save this post in case I need to bring this up in the future.In post 179, username wrote:In post 98, Vecna wrote:pretending like it wasnt announced hed only post in gifs in signupIn post 51, DrippingGoofball wrote:Pooky faking a post restriction; vote stays.
jumping straight away that it has to be faked
gucci or bueno this is not
I couldn't remember who asked this but I found it
What makes you think she even read the signup thread and would have seen Pooky post that
She was one of the first to sign up; I just checked. Pooky stated the thing about the gifs at the very end of the thread
I dunno bout you but I don't hang out in the sign up thread after I /in
And in fact, I didn't even use the signup thread for this game; the mod invited me
So what makes you think she was pretending not to have seen it, when it's quite possible she hadn't? Hell, I myself hadn't seen it until just now.
I thought that was my role?In post 186, Vecna wrote:No, you signed up to be my sidekick.In post 183, votato wrote:i havent. im gonna lurk until day 3-4In post 182, Elsa Jay wrote:Who hasn't posted yet? I feel like we're missing people.
No lurking allowed.
Heck, if you don’t have any for Vecna, I’ll pull up so good rap burns for you to use on them.In post 187, Vecna wrote:Also im the only bully here, if u wanna fight you better do it rap-battle style and actually bring something to the table.
In post 188, votato wrote:wait but how did i sign up to be your sidekick without posting?In post 186, Vecna wrote:No, you signed up to be my sidekick.In post 183, votato wrote:i havent. im gonna lurk until day 3-4In post 182, Elsa Jay wrote:Who hasn't posted yet? I feel like we're missing people.
No lurking allowed.
How dare you Elsa!In post 238, votato wrote:whoa there! Calling me a donkey is pretty racist thoughIn post 237, Elsa Jay wrote:I already ride a magical steed. The donkey with a glued on horn is a downgrade. So no, it's not offensive.
Honestly I agree with you to an extent.In post 261, Iecerint wrote:In that particular moment, you framed a post about alignment-finding as if it were a joke at no one's expense. This is a clever and fun way to direct the attention of the thread away from the content in the post. So, my inference is that you did that intentionally, because you read the post enough to make that post, but you still madethatpost. I think this behavior helps scum, so it makes me think that scum performed the behavior.
I have never played with you before, so it is possible that there is another explanation for your behavior other than that you are scum. So, I asked you why you posted that in order to learn other explanations for your behavior.
Me reading you isn’t the best move?In post 265, Elsa Jay wrote:I made a joke because I was bored, and left the alignment stuff in your post for someone smarter to use later.In post 261, Iecerint wrote:In that particular moment, you framed a post about alignment-finding as if it were a joke at no one's expense. This is a clever and fun way to direct the attention of the thread away from the content in the post. So, my inference is that you did that intentionally, because you read the post enough to make that post, but you still madethatpost. I think this behavior helps scum, so it makes me think that scum performed the behavior.
I have never played with you before, so it is possible that there is another explanation for your behavior other than that you are scum. So, I asked you why you posted that in order to learn other explanations for your behavior.
In short, if I make a nonsense joke post, I am bored or think it's funny and will post it. If I only address one thing from a post its because that's the only thing I wanna talk about, though enough pushing will make me answer the rest of it if I seem it relevant.
Logic reading me isn't the best move. It's more of a feel thing.A few people genuinely can read my emotions and mood. Almost isn't one of them.
False.In post 280, pisskop wrote:pine hasnt posted? i would just consider it an empty slot fn.
No reason to lynch a Survivor like role if they are benefiting us.In post 325, Vecna wrote:VOTE: Alchemist
I just really cannot shake the feeling that something is iffy about this slot. Having a free day1 lynch on a non-town faction with some scum equity?
Dissuade me if u can
Good to know you are a logical one.In post 373, pisskop wrote:I also disagree with insta-lynching a 3p on day1
More like “let him live for Day 1”In post 397, username wrote:Dude
This IS progressing the game. His claim is part of the game.
And you must be drunk if you think "kill the claimed third party" is a safer "soapbox" than "let him live"
I’ll be honest.In post 400, username wrote:And I'm not even saying oh let's quicklynch him or oh he absolutely has to fuckin die right now
Day one is some boring ass shit, and at least the claim gives me a jumping off point
And it's not like I'm dead fuckin set on lynching him today, my preference is I don't let third parties live. If a better or scummier option comes up then we rope that instead
But if you're gonna scum read someone just because they don't trust a third party claim, then pal have I got some real bad news for you
Fair.In post 403, username wrote:I'd be perfectly happy to lynch scum on day one instead of a third party.In post 399, Logicalicaltist wrote:More like “let him live for Day 1”In post 397, username wrote:Dude
This IS progressing the game. His claim is part of the game.
And you must be drunk if you think "kill the claimed third party" is a safer "soapbox" than "let him live"
That’s the smarter move.
We would be wasting a lynch.
Yes he could end up siding with scum but if you actually did a hard read and focused. You can lynch scum Day 1 instead of a 3P Claim.
The thing is, it's only day one and no one has claimed scum, probably because that would be stupid.
So right now, this is where the discussion is. And it's disingenuous as hell for pisskop to pretend that it's a distraction from the game. It's not etched in Fucking stone. It's day one discussion of a claim in the game.
What did you mean?In post 455, Vecna wrote:You know this is not what I meantIn post 453, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:In post 448, Vecna wrote:Care to find a way through the gif-love-stream to demonstrate where I went wrong?
I second this.In post 457, TemporalLich wrote:gobble's ISO is a bunch of nothing
If they are scum they will become more obvious later on.In post 460, DrippingGoofball wrote:When has town not gotten rolled by third party BS players? How often do third party claims turn out scum?
C'mon people
Let me guess.In post 465, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:In post 463, DrippingGoofball wrote:Imagine iso'ing that garbage. It's such anti-town behavior. I hate it passionately.
It’s great that you like it and all.In post 466, DrippingGoofball wrote:MmmmmIn post 423, Iecerint wrote:@A50, here's your iso and my sense of each post:Fluffy first post referring to friends. Includes a reference to Pooky in the deleted part. No scumhunting.In post 27, Almost50 wrote:Fun fact: I am disappointed I didn't roll scum in this game in particular. Drew said he wanted to be scum with me in the sign-up thread and I though "I wish that happens and our third would be Jay!". Looks like I didn't cross my fingers or press my thumb hard enough (or whatever you guys do to get your wishes to come true".Shooting the shit. Not scumhunting.In post 40, Almost50 wrote:Wasn't that the case in the baker's wrestling game we just finished?Game state "helpfulness." Not scumhunting.In post 41, Almost50 wrote:It's only @3 votes I believe???Shooting the shit. Not scumhutning.In post 43, Almost50 wrote:You obviously haven't played with Firebringer or Not_Mafia before.This kind of comment is PR-hunting.In post 50, Almost50 wrote:Do as you wish. You'd probably get a kick out of my flip anyway (but not what you're implying for certain).ATE. Comes from a mindset that did not at all mirror mine at this point in my readthrough. Could reflect your history with players in the game (i.e., my thought expressed before that your relationship with Pooky or Drew could be a variable I'm not accounting for -- but Pooky said no at least for his vote).In post 52, Almost50 wrote:@Drew: Wouldn't you like yo wait to see a confirmation that the scum team is indeed of 3 persons? I mean, how would you feel if did lynch me, and I flipped Town, and some Vig shot a Redneck, and they flipped with a Role PM that said "You are Scum with [redacted], [redacted] & [redacted]" or "Hello [redacted], [redacted], [redacted] & [redacted]. You are the Rednecks team.." or anything similar?I guess this contextualizes your behavior that bothered me above. But it is flawed in that it errs if other players are not rational actors and it is noisy.In post 60, Almost50 wrote:You nailed it. Some of us (myself included) would try to claim or hint a role on RVS for the lolz. It also serves to hide any potential serious crumbs made by other TPRs. (I wish I could explain more, but I can't without revealing a couple of things I don't wish to reveal at this time, so maybe sometime later)Noisy. Not scumhunting.In post 75, Almost50 wrote:Town/Scum/SK/Survivor/Moderator/Spectator crumb detected. Now tell me HOW am I going to be wrong this time.
Noisy. Not scumhunting.In post 90, Almost50 wrote:
Noisy. Not scumhunting.In post 239, Almost50 wrote:How the hell did you end up receiving one to begin with? UNBELIEVABLE!Being "helpful" while avoiding the more important point, which is whether Alchemist is scum and what to do if he is 3p.In post 240, Almost50 wrote:Man. he's not saying he can confirm "1-shots". He is saying he gains a 1-shot of whatever ability he's targeted with, so can confirm the ability exists. (Ex: A Cop is on Alch. The Cop fails to get a result, but Alch gains a 1-shot Cop ability and that proves a Cop is in the game)Noisy, not scumhunting.In post 241, Almost50 wrote:It really isn't though. For instance; Janie's not a member of NRA, yet..Noisy, not scumhuntingIn post 273, Almost50 wrote:This is a new one. He fake claims backup mod. Not even EJ could've thought of that.Noisy, not scumhunting. You matched EJ/my behavior, apparently inferring that it was merely playful. But, it was actually tied into what EJ had indicated was the best mechanism for reading him (i.e., to do it in a schizoid way). But you did not observe our interaction as a way to collect information about alignments, despite this, fitting the pattern of engaging with the game in superficial ways that do not indicate a desire to find scum.In post 349, Almost50 wrote:A50: Mine comes from post-school era
JJD: Thanks for sharing
A50: Don't mention it. I'm always glad to give back to the community
So, overall, you have posts that distract from the important town tasks, which is parsimoniously explained by a scum identity. There may be a way to explain it away that I do not know (e.g., some stuff I allude to above at times, maybe other things that I will not know unless you tell me).
I really like this post.
This was DGB’s first post.
Wagonomics.In post 485, DrippingGoofball wrote:How can you even read an alignment from a bunch of pictures?In post 483, Logicalicaltist wrote:But the game state leans them to be more likely Town Aligned then scum Aligned.
Logically speaking you didn’t waste your time.In post 488, Doctor Drew wrote:Hmm, I thought I remember you fake claiming that game. After a quick refresher, you didn't really.In post 484, Alchemist21 wrote:Yeah.In post 482, Doctor Drew wrote:Alch, you were scum in Big 4 mafia, right?In post 480, Alchemist21 wrote:At least you’re right about this.In post 474, DrippingGoofball wrote:I have a simple explanation for the unsolicited claim: he really, REALLY wants to be targeted at night because it benefits him.
Also, couldn't really discern any similarities from D1 in that game and D1 in this game from you.
So basically I just wasted my time.
What do you mean by “Farmers”?In post 489, DrippingGoofball wrote:TOWNIES
DrippingGoofball
username
vecna
Elsa Jay
Doctor Drew
aLMOST50
SUBURBANITES
pisskop
Lavender
TemporalLich
FARMERS
Logicalicaltist
gobbledygook
???PASTURE???
Pooky
Pine
Alchemist21
So are you OMGUSing me? Or are you gonna give an actual reason towards why I’m your scum read.In post 497, DrippingGoofball wrote:"Farmers" is scumIn post 491, Logicalicaltist wrote:What do you mean by “Farmers”?In post 489, DrippingGoofball wrote:TOWNIES
DrippingGoofball
username
vecna
Elsa Jay
Doctor Drew
aLMOST50
SUBURBANITES
pisskop
Lavender
TemporalLich
FARMERS
Logicalicaltist
gobbledygook
???PASTURE???
Pooky
Pine
Alchemist21
And why is Pine below Gobble when both have barley posted a thing.
"Pasture" is gifposters, massive lurkers and third party bullshitters.
And what’s that reason?In post 499, DrippingGoofball wrote:I have him as null, for some reason I forgot to type his name.In post 493, Logicalicaltist wrote:Also, did you forget Iecerint exists?
Wanna come back to this as I noticed you made something so allow me to take a look at it.In post 514, Logicalicaltist wrote:So are you OMGUSing me? Or are you gonna give an actual reason towards why I’m your scum read.In post 497, DrippingGoofball wrote:"Farmers" is scumIn post 491, Logicalicaltist wrote:What do you mean by “Farmers”?In post 489, DrippingGoofball wrote:TOWNIES
DrippingGoofball
username
vecna
Elsa Jay
Doctor Drew
aLMOST50
SUBURBANITES
pisskop
Lavender
TemporalLich
FARMERS
Logicalicaltist
gobbledygook
???PASTURE???
Pooky
Pine
Alchemist21
And why is Pine below Gobble when both have barley posted a thing.
"Pasture" is gifposters, massive lurkers and third party bullshitters.
In post 513, DrippingGoofball wrote:gobble can be summarized by one word. "Derp"
Logicalaltist is harder to explain. His first posts are vivid alarm at the Pooky wagon. I found that very odd.
In post 80, Logicalicaltist wrote:In post 27, Almost50 wrote:In post 5, Doctor Drew wrote:Also, obligatory......'Swear I am not 3p this time guys' post.
Are you 4P then??
Also
VOTE: Pooky
Because Drew told me to (in the scum PT, of course)
Fun fact: I am disappointed I didn't roll scum in this game in particular. Drew said he wanted to be scum with me in the sign-up thread and I though "I wish that happens and our third would be Jay!". Looks like I didn't cross my fingers or press my thumb hard enough (or whatever you guys do to get your wishes to come true".With all these votes there’s bound to be a scum somewhere In here.In post 81, Logicalicaltist wrote:In post 33, TemporalLich wrote:I'm starting to get frightened at how fast the Pooky wagon is getting inRVS
Any reason besides Doctor Drew naked SRing Pooky... oh wait 26 is a scumclaim.
Somehow I feel this makes Pooky feel towny.
Alchemist's claim don't make no no sense.At least your not voting like a maniac.In post 82, Logicalicaltist wrote:I think from how fast your wagon went makes you more likely Town.
So I slightly TR you as well.In post 83, Logicalicaltist wrote:He said Pre-Game he was only going to post in images.In post 51, DrippingGoofball wrote:Pooky faking a post restriction; vote stays.In post 84, Logicalicaltist wrote:In post 59, TemporalLich wrote:So I can form actual townreads and scumreads
acting weridDGB pings me scum a little for the insistence on staying on Pooky
VOTE: DGB
Pedit: yeah but considering the wincon it would make him more likely to be targeted by those wanting eliminate actual scum with the lynchSo is this how we start Day 1?
Only a main wagon and a CW?
Shame.In post 85, Logicalicaltist wrote:I’ve finished catching up.In post 75, Almost50 wrote:Town/Scum/SK/Survivor/Moderator/Spectator crumb detected. Now tell me HOW am I going to be wrong this time.In post 68, Elsa Jay wrote:I got a 1-shot vig, so I'll use it on you and you become a survivor with a gun. How's that sound?
Going to place a vote down on one of the Pooky voters.
VOTE: VotatoThen Logicalaltist goes on to very strongly defend a claimed third party player.In post 157, Logicalicaltist wrote:In post 151, pisskop wrote:why pooki
theyve done nothing but gif meme.
their push is reactive and NAIIn post 152, pisskop wrote:ftm why tl and alch?
Well all they said they are doing this game is GIF’s.
Someone even pushed them because they thought Pooky was faking a post restriction and didn’t bother to read the Pre-Game post Pooky made.
The wagon on them was fast and desperate with little to no hesitation.
Although I think it’s most likely a Town driven wagon as I don’t believe multiple scum was on that, I still think it shows Pooky is more likely Town Aligned then scum Aligned here.
I have TL there because we shared a similar thought process which makes me more inclined to trust him.
I feel like despite Alchemist Claiming 3P, his overall attitude and tone he has given was genuine Townie.
Yes he’s trying to fulfill his wincon. But he’s not being anti-Town about it. He’s trying to solve and generating content like a Townie would. As such like TL, I also trust Alchemist here as well.
Now it’s your turn.
Why 50 and Elsa?
It could be a play style issue. I'll revise if needed.