[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 11929268 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 953: Treestump Express [Game Over] - Mafiascum.net
In post 16, Hoptic wrote:I have a survey for everyone to fill out - this is very important and vital for safe travel.
1) What is your favourite type of boat?
2) Should Shrek continue his RP? Please answer yes to this question.
3) Who would you throw overboard? Please pick the person you feel has the most to live for.
-Hectic
1. The gravy boat.
2. Yes.
3. Holmes. If he's gonna provide a verbose running commentary of everything that happens then frankly I'm not interested.
In post 53, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:When someone is certain they have a scum player figured out they use FINGER OF DEATH on that scum - we all vote him.
if that person is scum - we win.
if that person is town,
we lynch whoever used the FINGER OF DEATH in the end-game
In post 89, Chemist1422 wrote:
Game feels like a crawl rn which is not great for my engagement level
^^^
In post 90, Chemist1422 wrote:If I were to force something out, Hectic seems sort of unmotivated to solve and I don’t really like Hopkirk being more banter-y than not
please only remember this read if it’s correct
Tbf, Hect does feel a bit less "serious mode" compared to the game where I was scum with him.
This spoiler contains four posts from four players. Rank these posts from Towniest to Scumiest and give a reason.
Spoiler:
In post 53, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:When someone is certain they have a scum player figured out they use FINGER OF DEATH on that scum - we all vote him.
if that person is scum - we win.
if that person is town, we lynch whoever used the FINGER OF DEATH in the end-game.
In post 53, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:When someone is certain they have a scum player figured out they use FINGER OF DEATH on that scum - we all vote him.
if that person is scum - we win.
if that person is town, we lynch whoever used the FINGER OF DEATH in the end-game.
I think this is objectively a bad plan, especially because it’s been called
Playing under the assumption that scum are willing to WIFOM this out and will never push a partner:
Town on town - (7/9) * (3/4) = 7/12 = 58.3%
Town on scum - (7/9) * (1/4) = 7/36 = 19.4%
Scum on town - (2/9) = 2/9 = 22.2%
So mathematically that works out to a 58.3% scum winrate, while voting randomly (1-(7/9 * 2/3)) is only a 51.8% chance
In post 58, Hoptic wrote:It's somehow even more magnificent than before.
Reads:
• Shrek and Donkey are probably unaligned.
• Sherlock Holmes is very kind for repeating out loud everything he writes.
FINGER OF DEATH: Misty
Your first mistake was assuming the finger of death was bound to your mortal rules of EV calculation. What would you like your final meal to be?
In post 89, Chemist1422 wrote:
Game feels like a crawl rn which is not great for my engagement level
^^^
In post 90, Chemist1422 wrote:If I were to force something out, Hectic seems sort of unmotivated to solve and I don’t really like Hopkirk being more banter-y than not
please only remember this read if it’s correct
Tbf, Hect does feel a bit less "serious mode" compared to the game where I was scum with him.
This spoiler contains four posts from four players. Rank these posts from Towniest to Scumiest and give a reason.
Spoiler:
In post 53, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:When someone is certain they have a scum player figured out they use FINGER OF DEATH on that scum - we all vote him.
if that person is scum - we win.
if that person is town, we lynch whoever used the FINGER OF DEATH in the end-game.
In post 53, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:When someone is certain they have a scum player figured out they use FINGER OF DEATH on that scum - we all vote him.
if that person is scum - we win.
if that person is town, we lynch whoever used the FINGER OF DEATH in the end-game.
I think this is objectively a bad plan, especially because it’s been called
Playing under the assumption that scum are willing to WIFOM this out and will never push a partner:
Town on town - (7/9) * (3/4) = 7/12 = 58.3%
Town on scum - (7/9) * (1/4) = 7/36 = 19.4%
Scum on town - (2/9) = 2/9 = 22.2%
So mathematically that works out to a 58.3% scum winrate, while voting randomly (1-(7/9 * 2/3)) is only a 51.8% chance
In post 58, Hoptic wrote:It's somehow even more magnificent than before.
Reads:
• Shrek and Donkey are probably unaligned.
• Sherlock Holmes is very kind for repeating out loud everything he writes.
FINGER OF DEATH: Misty
Your first mistake was assuming the finger of death was bound to your mortal rules of EV calculation. What would you like your final meal to be?
I feel like I would have to do a lot of incessant nitpicking in order to derive anything from this.
There are essentially four different actions about the same thing:
Player A proposes FOD gameplan that would essentially be a coinflip
Player B says "let's do it!" but doesn't do it
Player C opposes the plan and present a reason why the plan would be sub-optimal
Player D acts on the plan
Now obviously not all of those players are scum, and it's unlikely they are all town (although possible)
So which of these three actions is the scummiest in a vaccuum?
In post 184, pighawk wrote:Egix96 is 4 for 4 scumposting. Each one is reactive to inquired in the game - no original content. They all do that thing scum do if “comment on the game but not make any waves whatsoever” and stick to the facts. Like look at 96 where they ^^^^^ at the comment “this game is slow”. Yeah it is...AND?
I bet a dollar on this being one of the scum.
Not that this is much different from how I usually am on Day 1 of games
I'm gonna try having a look through some ISOs and see where that leads me.
Afair we haven't played a game together before, so I can only presume you determined that by cold-reading a past game (or games) of mine.
==
There wasn't much that I found to be noteworthy, but I can say that Pooky/pighawk are prob not w/w, and there are two other slots I'm leaning town on. No one seems particularly like scum to me yet though.
Afair we haven't played a game together before, so I can only presume you determined that by cold-reading a past game (or games) of mine.
==
There wasn't much that I found to be noteworthy, but I can say that Pooky/pighawk are prob not w/w, and there are two other slots I'm leaning town on. No one seems particularly like scum to me yet though.
I haven’t read any of you old games. Do you want to share a couple?
You said “it’s not THAT different”, which means it IS somewhat different. Why are you playing somewhat different?
Because every game is different.
I feel like you know what I really meant and are being needlessly pedantic.
In post 213, pighawk wrote:On what grounds? Encouraging conversation? Reading the game and giving my reads? Or are you with the haphop that I’m just not as enthusiastic as you think I should be? Now I’m being pedantic and nitpicking apparently we’ll that’s how you get things out of people. Egos could have used that post to give a read or some thought but it’s just still reaction to his own situation. It looks like scum to me.
The angel and devil on my shoulders are fighting over whether I should omgus you for it.
In post 244, chkflip wrote:Can someone explain L-2 = L-1 in this setup? Wouldn't a quickhammer today ensure a town victory? I genuinely don't understand.
If a town member gets to 4 votes, and at least one of the scum isn't already on the wagon, they can just hammer and let their buddy stump them.
Yeah, I know, it was partly because I couldn’t be bothered to try and sell people on it in Sherlock!speak but I low-key don’t disagree that him being lurky could be scum
I don’t know what I think of pooky but it seems a bit weird that scum would want to hammer particularly? But he’s kinda being lazy with the push on you imo
In post 447, pighawk wrote:If I’m such obvious scum I guess I’ll stump myself tonight won’t I? If you think I’m scum, vaporize me.
In post 448, pighawk wrote:Think about it this way: if you end up in 3p lylo with me, Would you trust me? If you’d vote me instead of the whoever else, lynch me now and save us all.
Egix96 96 pinged me really hard for scum just hanging out and taking potshots that won’t go anywhere.
In post 162, pighawk wrote:Egix96 seems like a strong candidate for scum to me.
In post 184, pighawk wrote:Egix96 is 4 for 4 scumposting. Each one is reactive to inquired in the game - no original content. They all do that thing scum do if “comment on the game but not make any waves whatsoever” and stick to the facts. Like look at 96 where they ^^^^^ at the comment “this game is slow”. Yeah it is...AND?
I bet a dollar on this being one of the scum.
I don't understand how when you had 3 votes on you and Egix had 2 on them you went into fatalistic death spiral mode instead of voting someone you said many times you scumread - and make them an equal leading wagon. You haven't mentioned them with any kind of opinion on alignment recently.
-Hopki
Now that you mention it... yeah, I think this is pretty damning actually.
