In post 40, beeboy wrote:
I am waiting for someone to say hey hey back before I play >:(
In post 40, beeboy wrote:
The Radja ones or something else o:In post 81, lilith2013 wrote:Hi!!!! you remind me of some pokemon games!In post 73, beeboy wrote:In post 40, beeboy wrote:
I am waiting for someone to say hey hey back before I play >:(
What game? my point of reference is MariaR's latest mini theme.In post 90, lilith2013 wrote:I didn’t get that vibe from scum!him at all, iirc he picked a lot of fights in the one game I saw him in
In post 65, lilith2013 wrote:But why are you still voting him then?In post 62, votato wrote:i dunno. anti-town play most often comes from town. but i suppose dunns play wasnt really anti-town. i just see that sort of bad push coming more often from overzealous town trying to get day 1 moving than from scum pushing a mislynch. if dunn is scum then im tempted to say skitter is also scum and this was a distancing play.
I see your logic and even if I don’t agree with it, I can understand it - but keeping your vote on him after you’ve put forth this logic makes 0 sense
I don't see Lilith as doing this. I don't think Dunnstral being scum makes you town given it was initially Skitter doing the push. So I dont view it as prepping the follow up scum read on you. Rather it's just 2 independent readsIn post 101, votato wrote:how do you weigh that against lilith kinda playing both sides in the 1v1. like i agree with your reasoning, but im still getting pings from lilith stirring stuff up on both sides of the fight.In post 100, beeboy wrote:I'll be honest I don't like reading into 1v1s themselves I've always found that to be kind of garbage but things surrounding 1v1s like the post above tend to be very alignment indicative. Scum tend to not be concerned about players outside said 1v1.
My thought on Lilith goes together with her push on Dunnstral being relatively acceptable as well
On a road trip right now! Very fun times!In post 123, Morning Tweet wrote:hia beeboy ヽ(^ω^)/
i'm a little sick today and i may be in too many games, but im doing alright! how's it going for u?
@Votato @MT I spoke about why I disagreed with you on this and I am wondering why you think she is playing both sides.In post 112, lilith2013 wrote:Like how does what I’ve said constitute “stirring up both sides”?
Ok I agree, was getting a tad mixed vibes on what you thought but I won't press further. What so you think of MT and Votato thinking she is "playing both sides"?In post 140, Clover Ebi wrote:I think she's town!In post 139, beeboy wrote:Clover leaf parsing your posts I can't tell what you think of Lilith. I see your points about her but I can't really tell if you think she is tunneling like town or scum in particular.
In post 101, votato wrote:how do you weigh that against lilith kinda playing both sides in the 1v1. like i agree with your reasoning, but im still getting pings from lilith stirring stuff up on both sides of the fight.In post 100, beeboy wrote:I'll be honest I don't like reading into 1v1s themselves I've always found that to be kind of garbage but things surrounding 1v1s like the post above tend to be very alignment indicative. Scum tend to not be concerned about players outside said 1v1.
My thought on Lilith goes together with her push on Dunnstral being relatively acceptable as well
In post 108, Morning Tweet wrote:I observed lilith sort of playing both sides -- She chimed in against both Dunn (34) and skitts (47) but I can easily see town lilith acknowledging different parts of the 1v1, it's not like you have to solely agree w/ one person. On the surface level maybe it's scummy but i didnt interpret it that wayIn post 101, votato wrote:how do you weigh that against lilith kinda playing both sides in the 1v1. like i agree with your reasoning, but im still getting pings from lilith stirring stuff up on both sides of the fight.In post 100, beeboy wrote:I'll be honest I don't like reading into 1v1s themselves I've always found that to be kind of garbage but things surrounding 1v1s like the post above tend to be very alignment indicative. Scum tend to not be concerned about players outside said 1v1.
My thought on Lilith goes together with her push on Dunnstral being relatively acceptable as well
Also did she even really do it past that point anyway? seems like you're making a big deal out of it but i mightve missed what you were referring to
In post 151, Hectic wrote:beeboy looks around at the surrounding trees. Despite the lack of breeze, the leaves sway gently side to side...
I think it's just an incredible leap of logic to say my fluff posting was an attempt at derailing the thread. All while not holding a scum read on the player you think I am defending? Do you think I have a large steak in defending a town Dunnstral as well?In post 174, Tuxedo Mask wrote:Then I do feel better about the reason for your defense. I got the impression it was based on one recent game though.In post 165, beeboy wrote:Why are you assuming I am supporting my case on one game anyway? Basically what I am getting at is your retroactively justifying a read based on my thread opening. And I am trying to identify if this is cond bias or scum play.
This feels like a stretch to me. I made my point, and then explained with my evidence when Votato didn't see what I saw. What would be scum!me's play here?In post 164, beeboy wrote:Why is there a 25 minute gap between your initial read and the elaboration to it without new information? I don't mean to nit pick time stamps but it's just odd to me.
Could be a team, could be white knighting. Just what I feel is the game was moving fast and revolving around Dunnstral wagon. Beeboy comes in and really try to pull the conversation off game stuff, and then hops in with a defense of Dunn. Neither of these things on their own would have pinged me, but together it feels like a good place to start. Like if Beeboy posted fluff and then hopped on the Dunn wagon I wouldn't feel they were trying to derail, or if they just hopped on with a defense of Dunn it probably wouldn't have stuck out, but the two together feels calculated(?).In post 169, Kanna wrote:@Tuxedo; wrt to your points on beeboy, why is that *scummy*? what is your theory, that beeboy/dunnstral are a team?
@Dunnstral how do you feel about Beeboy?
This would be the play, find a hole then build a read around the hole you saw. That hole was me fluff posting post RVS but I think as town you wouldnt make multiple assumptions to scum read me.In post 174, Tuxedo Mask wrote:This feels like a stretch to me. I made my point, and then explained with my evidence when Votato didn't see what I saw. What would be scum!me's play here?
No your right it isn't, I am getting upset and tunneling him because I see things clearly other people arent. Sorry I'll give him space.In post 187, Nahdia wrote:beeboy this feels like a huuuuuuge stretch. i actually agree with your initial assessment of tuxedo mask's case but you engaged Tux; why is it scummy for him to focus on responding to you?
I mean I am just getting heated in debates and expect some level of support, I am at a cottage right now and drinking constantly is prolly negatively effecting my post clarity and perception of how severe this actually is. (Idk how to post this without going hehe I am drunk XD cringe posts, although I guess I just made one woops.)In post 189, Nahdia wrote:...who isn't seeing it?
In post 204, Nahdia wrote:was there gonna be any followup to thisIn post 186, votato wrote:im getting weird vibes
@dunn asked you a question earlier. do you still stand by the reasoning you gave for the early skitter push? is there any more context?
Why?In post 201, Nahdia wrote:uhhh actually i misread it. i thought it said you were getting no pings on anyone, not that you were townreading them. my impression was that you were excusing yourself from forming readsClover Ebi wrote:Nahdia why do you think that post by me was scum?
VOTE: beeboy
Why do you scum read the person pushing me and town read the people pushing you. Excluding Votato obviouslyIn post 241, Tuxedo Mask wrote:Besides all that.
I have town pings from MT, Lilith, and Kanna.
Votato and Nahdia aren't sitting right with me.
Kanna stalls as scum and revs her engine real fast as town.In post 297, votato wrote:thats interesting. someone else called me out for scumreading all the wagons. i feel like ive been pretty active.In post 292, beeboy wrote:@Votato my thing is for someone that enjoys this style of game I feel like you aren't engaging in any of the "battles" that are going on. I don't think there is anything wrong with being a more passive player or taking a passive approach to the game it just seems odd earlier you hyped yourself up for it.
pedit: a townread on kanna? i feel like kanna hasnt done anything yet. explain that?
You know how sometimes you state a thought and read an ISO to check your memory and try and justify it?In post 167, drusilla wrote:In post 164, beeboy wrote:Why is there a 25 minute gap between your initial read and the elaboration to it without new information?do you think the elaboration was due to your/votato's reaction to the original post?In post 165, beeboy wrote:Basically what I am getting at is your retroactively justifying a read based on my thread opening.
I agree with this, why would Tux continue to fight me especially when we are both expressing doubt after going in kind of hard. The progression is natural and if they disagree they are not commenting on the aspect they thing is too easy / bizarreIn post 347, Morning Tweet wrote:Was there more to talk about with regards to beeboy? I recall Tux wrapping that up since it seemed most people disagreed. It didn't seem like it was going anywhere to meIn post 343, drusilla wrote:how do you feel about tuxedo mask disengaging from both votato and beeboy?In post 341, Morning Tweet wrote:This is better posting by Tux. I specifically like how he calls Nahdia's elaboration since better (rather than just give a blanket statement that nahdia is scum, especially when many have expressed suspicions on Nahdia recently). I also see what he means with votato
With votato hmm. Do you mean 286? votato had just said "well i townread you now lets townblock" and tux replied "We'll see" and asked a question. I don't think i see what you're getting at
Drusilla why did you ask that question in particular I find it relatively odd?
Ok so start off with a classic beeboy town read.
That is such a dumb scum opening to me.In post 362, midwaybear wrote:why is Dunnstral town? Just because he isn't as passive as last game?
In post 99, beeboy wrote:In post 65, lilith2013 wrote:But why are you still voting him then?In post 62, votato wrote:i dunno. anti-town play most often comes from town. but i suppose dunns play wasnt really anti-town. i just see that sort of bad push coming more often from overzealous town trying to get day 1 moving than from scum pushing a mislynch. if dunn is scum then im tempted to say skitter is also scum and this was a distancing play.
I see your logic and even if I don’t agree with it, I can understand it - but keeping your vote on him after you’ve put forth this logic makes 0 sense
This post from Lilith makes her my first town read. Having awareness while pushing on someone to follow the alignments of people working along side you is a very good look.
B)
I am thinking your apathy would be caused by treatment due to winning Lovers. So I think it might just be external and not alignment indicstive. My pings are related to nature.of how you decide to push people although I could be open to giving you space.In post 386, votato wrote:actually im generally more apathetic as town. i get excited by being scumread. but i have some apathy bleeding in from outside this particular game. did you think i was apathetic in lovers?
External things were riling me up and I was expecting a faster reaction for ?????In post 468, Kanna wrote:a slight problem i have is i don't know how beeboy can otherwise react? he was replying to tux's push on him which is just...as you would do in a game of mafia. how do you think town!beeboy would react?In post 464, Nahdia wrote:maybe i should reframe. it's not so much that beeboy is faking it as i have a feeling it's not how town!beeboy would react there. the aggression can be both real and also scummy. i maintain the "I see things clearly other people arent" is out of place tho.
although on readback, i'm not sure what he meant by "see things other people aren't seeing" either.
@beeboy; can you elaborate on that?
It's not that simple. I feel like the self doubt he expressed was making me think he could just be having a rough time with bad reads. It's not the first time I've been tunneled by town for bad reasons.In post 437, lilith2013 wrote:Why is it bothering you? Are you no longer scumreading Tux because his reads line up with yours?In post 296, beeboy wrote:I'm mind melding with tux on his other reads and that is bothering me a lot. Outside Nahdia I think their push on me is realistic but wrong, their opening matches a 1 note DM where we agreed our old playstyle were overwelming. Neither of which make Nahdia town but they both justify what they have done.
But we both agree Kanna and MT are playing like town and we both are getting pings from Votato without overly getting a scum read. And we have similar meta pools on all 3 players. Albeit I could be giving Kanna needless space due to noughts and crosses and I may just get slapped one day because of that.
His town bloc pushes with both MT and Tux were very bizzare to me. Had a slimy mix of being both tactical and presented as for fun.In post 561, lilith2013 wrote:What pinged you about votato? was it just the incongruency between him saying he was excited for the game and then not really taking much of a lead on pushing people?
Stop voting towns :'(In post 563, Nahdia wrote:which is it. do you need more content from our slots, or do you think we're scum?In post 488, lilith2013 wrote:Idk if it’s really as easy as raven/nahdia but that’s kind of where I’m at
VOTE: lilith